Search

Established treatment options for rare cancers are limited by the small number of patients. The current comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) testing might not fully exploit opportunities for precision oncology in patients with rare cancers. Therefore, we aimed to explore the factors associated with CGP testing utility in rare cancers and identify barriers to implementing precision oncology. Patients who underwent CGP testing at our institution between September 2019 and June 2021 were enrolled in this retrospective study. Based on their results, the patients received molecularly targeted drugs or immune checkpoint inhibitors. Univariate and multivariate analyses evaluated the association between patient characteristics and the proportion of patients receiving molecularly targeted drugs. Overall, 790 patients underwent CGP testing. Among them, 333 patients with rare cancers were identified, of whom 278 (83.5%) had actionable genomic alterations, 127 (38.1%) had druggable genomic alterations, and 25 (7.5%) received genomically matched therapy. The proportion of patients receiving molecularly targeted drugs was significantly higher among those with treatment options with evidence levels A–D (8.7%) than those without treatment options with evidence levels A–D (2.9%). A potential barrier to CGP testing utility in rare cancers is the limited number of molecularly targeted drugs with clinical evidence. We propose that CGP testing be performed in patients with rare cancers who have treatment options with evidence levels A–D to maximize CGP testing utility in real‐world practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Bone and soft tissue sarcomas are rare tumors and extremely rarely metastasize to the brain. Previous studies have examined the characteristics and poor prognostic factors in cases of sarcoma brain metastasis (BM). Due to the rarity of cases of BM from sarcoma, limited data exist concerning the prognostic factors and treatment strategies. Methods: A retrospective single‐center study was performed on sarcoma patients with BM. The clinicopathological characteristics and treatment options for BM of sarcoma were investigated to identify predictive prognostic factors. Results: Between 2006 and 2021, 32 patients treated for newly diagnosed BM at our hospital were retrieved among 3133 bone and soft tissue sarcoma patients via our database. The most common symptom was headache (34%), and the most common histological subtypes were alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (25%). Non‐ASPS (p = 0.022), presence of lung metastasis (p = 0.046), a short duration between initial metastasis, and the diagnosis of brain metastasis (p = 0.020), and the absence of stereotactic radiosurgery for BM (p = 0.0094) were significantly correlated with a poor prognosis. Conclusions: In conclusion, the prognosis of patients with brain metastases of sarcomas is still dismal, but it is necessary to be aware of the factors associated with a relatively favorable prognosis and to select treatment options appropriately. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Previous clinical trials indicate that 10%–25% of patients received genomically matched therapy after comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) tests. However, the clinical utility of CGP tests has not been assessed in clinical practice. We assessed the clinical utility of CGP tests for advanced or metastatic solid tumor and determined the proportion of patients receiving genomically matched therapy among those with common and non‐common cancers. From August 2019 to July 2020, a total of 418 patients had undergone CGP tests, and the results were discussed through the molecular tumor board at our site. The median age of patients was 57 (range: 3–86) years. Colorectal cancer was the most common, with 47 (11%) patients. Actionable genomic alterations (median 3, range: 1–17) were identified in 368 (88.0%) of 418 patients. Druggable genomic alterations were determined in 196 (46.9%) of 418 patients through the molecular tumor board. Genomically matched therapy was administered as the subsequent line of therapy in 51 (12.2%) patients, which is comparable to the proportion we previously reported in a clinical trial (13.4%) (p = 0.6919). The proportion of patients receiving genomically matched therapy was significantly higher among those with common cancers (16.2%) than non‐common cancers (9.4%) (p = 0.0365). Genomically matched therapy after the CGP tests was administered to 12.2% of patients, which is similar to the proportion reported in the previous clinical trials. The clinical utility of CGP tests in patients with common cancers greatly exceeded that in patients with non‐common cancers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Meningioma is the most common intracranial tumor, with generally favorable patient prognosis. However, patients with malignant meningioma typically experience recurrence, undergo multiple surgical resections, and ultimately have a poor prognosis. Thus far, effective chemotherapy for malignant meningiomas has not been established. We recently reported the efficacy of eribulin (Halaven) for glioblastoma with a telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter mutation. This study investigated the anti–tumor effect of eribulin against TERT promoter mutation‐harboring human malignant meningioma cell lines in vitro and in vivo. Two meningioma cell lines, IOMM‐Lee and HKBMM, were used in this study. The strong inhibition of cell proliferation by eribulin via cell cycle arrest was demonstrated through viability assay and flow cytometry. Apoptotic cell death in malignant meningioma cell lines was determined through vital dye assay and immunoblotting. Moreover, a wound healing assay revealed the suppression of tumor cell migration after eribulin exposure. Intraperitoneal administration of eribulin significantly prolonged the survival of orthotopic xenograft mouse models of both malignant meningioma cell lines implanted in the subdural space (P <.0001). Immunohistochemistry confirmed apoptosis in brain tumor tissue treated with eribulin. Overall, these results suggest that eribulin is a potential therapeutic agent for malignant meningiomas. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

INTELLANCE‐J was a phase 1/2 study of a potent antibody‐drug conjugate targeting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), depatuxizumab mafodotin (Depatux‐M), as a second‐ or first‐line therapy, alone or combined with chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy in 53 Japanese patients with World Health Organization (WHO) grade III/IV glioma. In second‐line arms, patients with EGFR‐amplified recurrent WHO grade III/IV glioma received Depatux‐M plus chemotherapy (temozolomide) or Depatux‐M alone regardless of EGFR status. In first‐line arms, patients with newly diagnosed WHO grade III/IV glioma received Depatux‐M plus chemoradiotherapy. The study was halted following lack of survival benefit with first‐line Depatux‐M in the global trial INTELLANCE‐1. The primary endpoint was 6‐month progression‐free survival (PFS) in patients with EGFR‐amplified tumors receiving second‐line Depatux‐M plus chemotherapy. Common nonocular treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs) with both second‐line and first‐line Depatux‐M included lymphopenia (42%, 33%, respectively), thrombocytopenia (39%, 47%), alanine aminotransferase increase (29%, 47%), and aspartate aminotransferase increase (24%, 60%); incidence of grade ≥3 TEAEs was 66% and 53%, respectively. Ocular side effects (OSEs) occurred in 93% of patients receiving second‐line Depatux‐M plus chemotherapy and all patients receiving second‐line Depatux‐M alone or first‐line Depatux‐M plus chemoradiotherapy. Most OSEs were manageable with dose modifications and concomitant medications. The 6‐month PFS estimate was 25.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.4‒42.6), and median PFS was 2.1 months (95% CI 1.9‒3.9) with second‐line Depatux‐M plus chemotherapy in the EGFR‐amplified subgroup. This study showed acceptable safety profile of Depatux‐M alone or plus chemotherapy/chemoradiotherapy in Japanese patients with WHO grade III/IV glioma. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02590263). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]