Search

Background: Oocyte components are maternally provided, solely determine oocyte quality, and coordinately determine embryo quality with zygotic gene expression. During oocyte maturation, maternal organelles are drastically reorganized and specialized to support oocyte characteristics. A large number of maternal components are actively degraded after fertilization and gradually replaced by zygotic gene products. The molecular basis and the significance of these processes on oocyte/embryo quality are not fully understood. Methods: Firstly, recent findings in organelle characteristics of other cells or oocytes from model organisms are introduced for further understanding of oocyte organelle reorganization/specialization. Secondly, recent progress in studies on maternal components degradation and their molecular mechanisms are introduced. Finally, future applications of these advancements for predicting mammalian oocyte/embryo quality are discussed. Main findings: The significance of cellular surface protein degradation via endocytosis for embryonic development, and involvement of biogenesis of lipid droplets in embryonic quality, were recently reported using mammalian model organisms. Conclusion: Identifying key oocyte component characteristics and understanding their dynamics may lead to new applications in oocyte/embryo quality prediction and improvement. To implement these multidimensional concepts, development of new technical approaches that allow us to address the complexity and efficient studies using model organisms are required. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The human dental pulp stem cells (hDPSCs) are one of the readily available sources of multipotent mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and can be considered as a type of tool cells for cell‐based therapies. However, the main limitation in the clinical use of these cells is DPSC senescence, which can be induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) of oral pathogenic bacteria. Up to now, far little attention has been paid to exploring the molecular mechanisms of senescence in DPSCs. So, the current study aimed to investigate the underlying molecular mechanism of senescence in hDPSCs stimulated with Porphyromonas gingivalis (P. gingivalis) and Escherichia coli (E. coli)‐derived LPSs, by evaluating both mRNA and protein expression of four important senescence‐related genes, including TP53, CDKN1A, CDKN2A and SIRT1. To this purpose, hDPSCs were stimulated with different LPSs for 6, 24 and 48 h and then the gene expression was evaluated using quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and western blotting. Following stimulation with P. gingivalis and E. coli‐derived LPSs, the relative mRNA and protein expression of all genes were significantly up‐regulated in a time‐dependent manner, as compared with unstimulated hDPSCs. Moreover, the hDPSCs stimulated with P. gingivalis LPS for 6 and 24 h had the highest mRNA expression of CDKN1A and SIRT1, respectively (p < 0.0001), whereas the highest mRNA expression of CDKN2A and TP53 was seen in hDPSCs stimulated with E. coli LPS for 48 h (p < 0.0001). In summary, because DPSCs have been reported to have therapeutic potential for several cell‐based therapies, targeting molecular mechanisms aiming at preventing DPSC senescence could be considered a valuable strategy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]