Search

Background: Pediatric intestinal pseudo‐obstruction (PIPO) encompasses a variety of rare, heterogeneous, and disabling disorders that severely affect gastrointestinal motility and are associated with high morbidity and mortality. PIPO management is complex and focuses on maintaining an optimal nutritional status, improving gut function, relieving symptoms, and treating complications. Nutritional issues prevail, and PIPO patients often experience severe undernutrition and faltering growth. Thus, nutritional management plays a pivotal role for achieving the most favorable clinical outcomes. The calorie and nutrient intake of each patient needs to be tailored to age, extent and severity of gut involvement and nutritional needs to support an optimal nutritional status. After defining the extent and severity of gut dysmotility, an experienced team should perform a careful nutritional assessment. An oral diet should always be encouraged and might include bite and dissolve solids, liquid diet or simple oral stimulation. If oral caloric intake is inadequate, liquid gastric feeds should provide the subsequent step. In the presence of severe gastric dysmotility, continuous post‐pyloric feeding represents a viable option. In the most severe cases, parenteral nutrition (PN) is required to meet appropriate nutritional requirements. Purpose: Pediatric data on this topic are scarce and mainly extrapolated from adult studies. In this review, we discuss current evidence and knowledge regarding nutritional options, implications of the use of different feed types, including a blended diet, and the use of PN. Moreover, based on our experience and the evidence from the literature, we propose a flow chart to guide the nutritional management of PIPO patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: IBS affects a large number of children throughout the world and is thought to be the result of disturbed neuroimmune function along with the brain–gut axis. Although the underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms are not clear, the role of low‐grade inflammation and mucosal immune activation in IBS symptom generation has become evident also in subsets of pediatric patients. Animal models provided meaningful insight in the causal relationship between abnormal mucosal immune activation and changes in gastrointestinal (GI) sensory‐motor function. Likewise, the development of long‐standing GI symptoms fulfilling the current criteria for functional GI disorders after infection gastroenteritis and in patients with IBD or celiac disease in remission further supports this hypothesis. Immune activation, its impact on gut sensory‐motor function, and potential implications for symptom generation emerged in both children and adults with IBS. Purpose: The aim of this review is to summarize the main evidence on the presence of low‐grade inflammation and immune activation in children with IBS, its possible role in symptom generation, and its potential implication for new therapeutic strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Objectives: Gastric emptying (GE) requires precise antropyloroduodenal coordination for effective transpyloric flow, the mechanisms of which are still unclear. We aimed to correlate gastric antral function assessed by antroduodenal manometry (ADM) with GE scintigraphy (GES) for liquid feeds in children with suspected gastrointestinal dysmotility. Methods: Children who underwent both ADM and GES over a five‐year period were reviewed. ADM tracings were re‐analyzed to assess antral frequency, amplitude, and motility index (MI) pre‐prandially and postprandially. Transpyloric propagation (TPP) was defined as antegrade propagated antral activity preceding duodenal phase III of the migrating motor complex (MMC). TPP was defined as "poor" if occurring in <50% of all presented duodenal phases III. For GES, regions of interest over the whole stomach, fundus, and antrum were drawn to calculate GE half‐time (GE‐T1/2) and retention rate (RR) in each region at 1 and 2 h. Results: Forty‐seven children (median age: 7.0 years) were included. Twenty‐two had PIPO, 14 functional GI disorders, and 11 gastroparesis. Children with poor TPP had longer GE‐T1/2 (113.0 vs 66.5 min, p = 0.028), higher RR of the whole stomach and fundus at 1 h (79.5% vs 63.5%, p = 0.038; 60.0% vs 41.0%, p = 0.022, respectively) and 2 h (51.0% vs 10.5%, p = 0.005; 36.0% vs 6.5%, p = 0.004, respectively). The pre‐prandial antral amplitude of contractions inversely correlated with GE‐T1/2, RR of the whole stomach, and fundus at 2 h. Conclusions: TPP during phase III of the MMC correlated with gastric emptying of liquid and its assessment on ADM might predict abnormalities in postprandial gastric function. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Antroduodenal manometry (ADM) and histopathology are currently employed to aid the diagnosis of pediatric intestinal pseudo‐obstruction (PIPO). Limited data are available on the reliability of ADM analysis and its correlation with histopathology. We aimed to develop a protocol for enhanced analysis of ADM contractile patterns, including a scoring system, and explore whether this provided better correlation with histopathology. Methods: Children referred with suspected PIPO between April 2012‐December 2019 who underwent both ADM and full‐thickness biopsies were included. ADM tracings were analyzed using both standard (conventional ADM) and novel (enhanced ADM) motility parameters. A novel ADM score (GLASS score) was generated based on the enhanced ADM analysis. Conventional and enhanced ADM analyses were then correlated with histopathology. Results: Forty patients were included. Using conventional clinical criteria, 29 of these were diagnosed with PIPO and the other 11 with non‐PIPO diagnoses. Twenty‐three of the PIPO patients had abnormal histopathology: 6 myopathy, 4 neuropathy, 3 neuro‐myopathy, and 10 non‐specific changes. No agreement in diagnosis was found between conventional ADM analysis and histopathology (ϰ = 0.068; p = 0.197), whereas the latter significantly correlated with enhanced ADM analysis (ϰ = 0.191; p = 0.003). The enhanced ADM score was significantly higher in PIPO versus non‐PIPO (16.0 vs. 8.0; p < 0.001). Conclusions: As opposed to conventional analysis protocols, the newly developed enhanced ADM analysis and associated score is not only able to discriminate between PIPO and non‐PIPO patients, but also between distinct histopathological pathologies. Further studies are required to assess the utility of enhanced ADM analysis in larger populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]