Search

Aims: Wildtype transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy is an under‐recognized cause of heart failure in elderly patients. Transcatheter tricuspid valve repair is a newly emerging therapeutic option for severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR). We present first insights into safety and possible benefits of this procedure in patients with cardiac amyloidosis. Methods and results: Eight patients with cardiac non‐hereditary (wildtype) transthyretin (ATTRwt) amyloidosis and severe to torrential TR, undergoing successful transcatheter tricuspid valve repair, were included in the analysis and compared to a control group of 21 patients without cardiac amyloidosis. All patients presented with an advanced stage of amyloid cardiomyopathy. Primary endpoint was reduction in TR at 3 months follow‐up. Secondary endpoints were feasibility, safety, hospitalization or death, clinical improvement, cardiac biomarkers, and structural and functional right heart parameter obtained by echocardiography. Transcatheter tricuspid valve repair resulted in a significant reduction of TR (IV to II, P = 0.008) in all eight patients with cardiac amyloidosis (100%). Device success (amyloidosis 75% vs. control group 86%, P = 0.597) and overall probability of hospitalization or death (amyloidosis 13% vs. control group 25%, P = 0.646) were similar compared with those in the control group at 3 months follow‐up. Transcatheter tricuspid valve repair led to an improvement of New York Heart Association functional class (P = 0.031) and 6 min walking distance (from 313 ± 118 to 337 ± 106, P = 0.012). TR reduction in amyloidosis patients was less extensive compared with that in control group (TR‐reduction 1.6 ± 0.3, P = 0.008 vs. control group 2.3 ± 0.3, P < 0.0001). Furthermore, these patients showed no significant improvement of structural right heart parameters. Conclusions: Transcatheter tricuspid valve repair is a safe and feasible new treatment option in patients with amyloid cardiomyopathy and has the potential to improve TR‐grade and clinical status. However, the benefit appears to be less pronounced compared with patients without cardiac amyloidosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To study the impact of time to diagnosis on cardiac Mayo stages, treatment outcome, and overall survival. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 77 consecutive patients diagnosed between 2015 and 2020 with AL amyloidosis and cardiac involvement. Medical history was recorded in standardized form with the help of a questionnaire. Results: Time from onset of symptoms of cardiac failure to diagnosis was correlated with the severity of cardiac involvement in modified Mayo 2004 and revised Mayo 2012 staging systems (rs = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.07‐0.50, P =.007 and rs = 0.25, 95% CI: 0.01‐0.45, P =.03). Patients with advanced Mayo 2004 stages received reduced‐intensity regimens and had a lower probability to achieve adequate hematologic‐ and cardiac response after first‐line treatment than patients with early stages (rs = 0.28, 95% CI: 0.04‐0.48, P =.01 and rs = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.55‐0.82, P <.0001) and poorer overall survival (P =.0004). Compared with patients diagnosed within the first year, patients diagnosed after 13‐18 or ≥19 months from first symptoms had a 3‐ to 5 times higher risk of dying. Our data indicate that there is a 12‐month window within which the diagnosis of AL amyloidosis needs to be established to avoid early deterioration and death. Conclusions: Sensitizing physicians and raising awareness for the disease are crucial for timely diagnosis and may improve the outcome of the disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]