Search

The rapid expansion of exotic saltcedar along riparian corridors has dramatically altered the landscape structure and ecological function of riparian habitats in the western United States. The development of accurate and reproducible mapping methods with remote sensing plays an indispensable role in the timely monitoring of saltcedar, re-evaluating its ecological functions, and establishing effective control measures. The utmost challenge for achieving this goal is manifested as the lack of time series of remote sensing images to capture the saltcedar phenology adequately. To this end, the newly available Landsat 9 images, combined with its counterpart of Landsat 8, offer a precious opportunity to compensate for the temporal image shortage. To understand Landsat 9 in the saltcedar classification and to discover helpful information for its application, this study presents the first attempt to classify saltcedar using intra-annual Landsat 8 and Landsat 9 images. We adopted two machine learning algorithms, support vector machine (SVM) and random forest (RF), to compare the performance of Landsat 9 and Landsat 8 for intra-annual saltcedar classification. In addition, we investigated the respective contribution of each spectral band to the overall performance and identified the optimal time window for saltcedar classification. The results indicated that the difference in classification performance between Landsat 9 and Landsat 8 was insignificant. The shortwave infrared bands associated with both Landsat 8 & 9 have contributed most to the process of saltcedar identification. Image acquired in July, November, and December yielded better results than other months for saltcedar classification. It is concluded that Landsat 8 & 9 constellation has the potential to refine saltcedar classification accuracy on larger spatial and temporal scales. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aims to predict channel unit types (CUTs) by combining remotely sensed data with morphological variables using machine learning algorithms (random forest, support vector machines, multiple adaptive regression splines, extreme gradient boosting and adaptive boosting) within the Upper Ogun River Basin, Southwestern Nigeria. In achieving the aim of this study, we identified the most important variable(s) in CUT discrimination using the random forest – recursive feature elimination (RF-RFE). A total of 249 cross-sections across 83 reaches were sampled during the fieldwork. Landsat 8 and Sentinel-1 bands were retrieved for days the fieldwork was carried and mosaiced using the Google Earth Engine platform. The RF-RFE identified five top variables (accuracy: 0.79 ± 0.14; kappa: 0.39) discriminating the CUT as dimensionless stream power, slope, width, wetted perimeter and Band 4. In essence, there is much hope in the use of remote sensing in CUT mapping at the reach scale. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The study involves an object-based segmentation method to extract feature changes in tropical rainforest cover using Landsat image and airborne LiDAR (ALS). Disturbance event that are represents the changes are examined by the classification of multisensor data; that is a highly accurate ALS with different resolutions of multispectral Landsat image. Disturbance Index (DI) derived from Tasseled Cap Transformation, Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), and the ALS height are the variables for object-based segmentation process. The classification is categorized into two classes; disturbed and non-disturbed forest cover using Nearest Neighbor (NN), Random Forest (RF) and Support Vector Machine (SVM). The overall accuracy ranging from 88% to 96% and kappa ranging from 0.79 to 0.91. Mcnemar's test p-value (<0.05) is applied to check the classification for each method used which is RF 0.03 and SVM 0.01. The accuracy increases when the integration of ALS in Landsat image (SpectralLandsat; and SpectralLandsat + HeightALS). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Accurate spatial modelling of forest characteristics is one of the most important challenges in remote sensing applications. In this study, we compared the ability of Multiple Linear Regression (MLR), Geographically weighted regression (GWR), and Random Forest (RF) to estimate different forest attributes based on field sample data and Landsat 8 image. CA was modelled with the highest accuracy compared to other variables using GWR. GWR outperformed other methods. The highest and the lowest values of RMSE were for BA using RF (31.0%) and CA using GWR (12.0%), respectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]