Search

In this study, the effects of adding trapezoidal ribs to microchannel on functionalized multi-walled nano-tubes/water nanofluid heat transfer are examined. The dimensionless slip coefficient (0–0.1), Reynolds number (50–400) and Hartmann number (0–20) are considered as independent variables and the heat transfer along with the entropy generation are considered as the output parameters. The simulation outcomes confirm that the addition of trapezoidal ribs, on the one hand, increases the heat transfer area and, on the other hand, intensifies the possibility of vortex formation. The presence of a vortex decreases the heat transfer potential and thus reduces the performance of the trapezoidal-wall microchannel compared to the base one. With increasing Reynolds number (Re), the probability of vortex formation intensifies, which in turn diminishes the positive effects of using trapezoidal ribs. However, it is found that, with increasing Hartmann number (Ha) and dimensionless slip coefficient ( β ∗ ) , the vortex strength is weakened, and consequently heat transfer is improved. Based on numerical computations, it is found that at Re = 400, Ha = 0 and β ∗ = 0 and adding trapezoidal ribs to the base microchannel increases heat transfer by 11.12%. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The idea of using the compact device with higher heat transfer potential has encouraged researchers to use microchannels. Creating sinusoidal walls is a technique leading to better effectiveness and smaller size. In this study, the effects of discrete heat sources location on heat transfer and pressure drop are investigated, using graphene nanoplatelets/water inside a sinusoidal microchannel. For this, discrete heat sources are installed in a smooth microchannel (layout A) and compared with two sinusoidal-wall microchannels. In layouts B and C, the heating sources are installed above the convergent/diverging sections, respectively. Since the velocity and temperature gradients are higher in the converging region, the heat exchange and pressure drop for layout B are greater than other ones. In other words, installing heating sources in these regions with high-temperature gradient has a more obvious positive efficacy on heat exchange. For the best layout (B), although the heat exchange compared to the base layout (A) is 37.5% higher, the pressure drop and entropy generation are higher by 79% and 35.2%, respectively. By introducing a new figure of merit (FOM), it is found that layout B is in the desirable zone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]