Search

Introduction: It is well known that the femtosecond laser lamellar cut induces some degree of surface roughness. Nevertheless, as in femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK (FS-LASIK), an excimer LASIK ablation is performed, and the post-ablation stromal bed should show some degree of smoothening. We decided to compare, using atomic force microscopy (AFM), the roughness of the corneal stromal bed, after a femtosecond lasers device flap was created with or without an excimer myopic ablation. Methods: Using 6 freshly enucleated porcine eyes, we created in every eye a flap using a femtosecond laser. Additionally, in 3 eyes, an excimer laser ablation to correct-3 diopters (D) was made. AFM imaging of the remaining corneal stroma was performed. Ten different square areas of 20 μm x 20 μm at the central area of the stroma of each corneal sample were studied. The roughness parameters used were the root-mean-square deviation from a perfectly flat surface. Results: The RMS deviation was 360 ± 120 nm in femtosecond laser only, and 110 ± 20 nm in those cases where excimer is also involved (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Our results show that the roughness of the surface treated with excimer is clearly lower than in the group with no excimer ablation; thus, the application of laser excimer after a flap created by femtosecond laser seems to soften the nano-irregularities created by this technique. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Higher preoperative myopic astigmatism is associated with a higher probability of retreatment due to patient dissatisfaction as a result of residual cylindrical error. Nonetheless, retreatment is safe and the final clinical results are comparable to those of patients with lower preoperative astigmatism who were satisfied with the primary treatment. Our purpose is to compare the efficacy and safety of femtosecond LASIK (FS-LASIK) for the refractive correction of patients with low (< 1.5 Diopters (D) versus high (≥ 1.5 D) myopic astigmatism. Methods: Retrospective observational study of 841 eyes of 825 eligible patients treated with FSLASIK for the correction of simple or compound myopic astigmatism. Outcome measures included residual error, best corrected and uncorrected distance visual acuity (BCVA and UCVA), efficacy and safety 3 months after the primary procedure or the retreatment. Results: Of 841 eyes in total, 432 (51.37%) had < 1.5 D (Group 1) and 409 (48.63%) had ≥ 1.5 D (Group 2) preoperative myopic astigmatism. The efficacy index of primary treatment was 0.94 ± 0.18 in Group 1 and 0.89 ± 0.22 in Group 2 (P = 0.001). Of 138 eyes (16.41%) that were retreated due to dis-satisfaction related to residual refractive error, 28 belonged to Group 1 (6.5%) and 110 (26.9%) to Group 2 (P < 0.001). Following retreatment, small but statistically significant differences in the residual mean postoperative cylinder (−0.08 ± 0.24 vs −0.27 ± 0.46 D, P = 0.001) and UCVA (1.11 vs 0.96, P = 0.0001) were detected for Groups 1 and 2, respectively. However, there were no statistically significant differences in the safety and efficacy indices. Conclusion: Following FS-LASIK, eyes with myopic astigmatism ≥ 1.5 D have approximately four times more chances of undergoing retreatment due to dis-satisfaction caused by residual refractive error compared to eyes with myopic astigmatism < 1.5 D. However, the clinical results after retreatment are highly satisfactory and comparable in both groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]