Search

Background: Recap of atopic eczema (RECAP) is a patient‐reported outcome measure assessing eczema control. This instrument has been developed and validated in the UK. There are self‐reported and proxy‐reported versions in English, Dutch and German. However, it is unclear whether the self‐reported version shows adequate content validity when completed by young people (8–16 years) in these languages. Objectives: To assess the content validity (comprehensibility, relevance and comprehensiveness) of the English, German and Dutch versions of the self‐reported RECAP in young people with atopic eczema and to identify the most appropriate age cutoff for self‐completion. Methods: We conducted 23 semistructured cognitive interviews with young people aged 8–16 years, using the 'think‐aloud' method. In Germany and the Netherlands, participants were recruited in dermatology clinics and in the UK through social media and existing mailing lists. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed in the three languages, using a problem‐focused coding manual. Transcripts were coded by two independent reviewers in each country. Themes were translated into English and compared across the three countries. Results: Significant age‐related comprehensibility issues with the last three items of the questionnaire occurred with young people aged 8–11 years, causing difficulties completing RECAP without help. However, older children had only minor problems and were able to complete the questionnaire by themselves. The self‐reported version of RECAP has sufficient content validity for self‐completion in young people aged 12 years and above. However, the German version with some translational adaptations may be appropriate for children from the age of 8 years. There may be some situations where the proxy version is needed for older children too. Conclusions: The self‐reported version of RECAP is appropriate for use from the age of 12 years. The proxy version can be used in children younger than 12 years. Other measurement properties should be further investigated. What is already known about this topic?Recap of atopic eczema (RECAP) is an instrument recommended by the Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema initiative for the core outcome domain of long‐term control of atopic eczema.Content validity of RECAP for self‐completion by adults and of the proxy version has been assessed. What does this study add?In this study, content validity (comprehensibility, relevance and comprehensiveness) of the self‐reported version of RECAP among young people (aged 8–16 years) with atopic eczema across the UK, Germany and the Netherlands is assessed.Based on these findings, key recommendations on how to measure eczema control in young people with atopic eczema are formulated. What are the clinical implications of this work?The Dutch, English and German self‐completion versions of RECAP are recommended for use in adolescents from the age of 12 years.The proxy version could be used in children younger than 12 years or where children are cognitively or physically incapable of reporting their experience of eczema control.Caregivers should be encouraged to complete RECAP together with their child where possible. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction/Background Tralokinumab is a high-affinity, fully human IgG4 monoclonal antibody that specifically targets interleukin-13, a key driver of atopic dermatitis (AD) disease progression. Clinical trials have shown that tralokinumab is efficacious in patients with moderate-to-severe AD and has a favorable safety profile, including a low frequency of adverse events such as conjunctivitis. Management of patients in routine clinical practice differs from those enrolled in clinical trials due to strict protocol criteria, and there is a lack of clinical data on tralokinumab use in the real-world setting. Objectives: TRACE is a real-world study in patients with AD, aiming to better understand the effectiveness, safety, and clinical use of tralokinumab in daily practice. Here, we describe baseline characteristics from the first patients enrolled into TRACE in Germany. Methods: TRACE is an observational, prospective, single-cohort study of adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD who are treated with tralokinumab, according to national approved labels. Eleven countries are participating in the study across Europe, North America and the Middle East. The primary objective is to assess changes in clinical signs and symptoms of AD in tralokinumab-treated patients. Secondary objectives are to investigate safety, quality of life, patient-reported outcomes and treatment adherence, among others. Results: Of the first 100 patients initiated on tralokinumab, the mean age (standard deviation [SD]) was 44.7 years (17.9) and 58% were male. Most patients had moderate-to-severe AD with a mean Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score of 3.5 (SD 0.7) and mean Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) of 22.5 (SD 12.9). Patients reported heavy symptomatic burden of disease; the mean eczema-related sleep numerical rating scale (NRS) was 5.6 (SD 2.9) and mean worst daily pruritus NRS was 6.2 (SD 2.7). Patients also reported a substantial impact on quality of life, demonstrated by a mean Dermatology Life Quality Index of 15.6 (SD 6.9). Overall, 79 patients were biologic-naïve and 19 were biologic-experienced (data missing; n=2). All biologic-experienced patients were previously treated with dupilumab, of whom most experienced one or more treatment failures. Reasons for switching from dupilumab included lack or loss of effectiveness, and adverse events, which most commonly included conjunctivitis. Conclusions: Initial findings showed that most adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD who were treated with tralokinumab were biologic-naïve, indicating tralokinumab is prescribed as firstline systemic treatment in real-world clinical practice, in line with European Dermatology Forum guidelines. The main reasons for switching from dupilumab were lack or loss of effectiveness, and adverse events, such as conjunctivitis, indicating the need for alternative biologic treatments such as tralokinumab. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Tralokinumab is a high-affinity, fully human IgG4 monoclonal antibody that specifically inhibits interleukin-13 (IL-13), a key driver of atopic dermatitis (AD) disease progression. Clinical trials have shown that tralokinumab is efficacious in patients with moderate-to-severe AD and has a favorable safety profile, including a low frequency of adverse events (AEs) such as conjunctivitis. However, management of patients in routine clinical practice differ from those enrolled in clinical trials due to strict inclusion/exclusion criteria, and there is currently a lack of clinical data on tralokinumab use in the real-world setting. TRACE is an observational cohort study of patients with AD, which aims to better understand the effectiveness, safety and clinical use of tralokinumab in the real-world setting. This study aims to describe baseline characteristics and initial insights from the first 100 patients enrolled into TRACE in Germany. TRACE is a longitudinal, prospective, new user, noncomparative, observational, single-cohort study, with primary data collection of adult patients with AD who are treated with tralokinumab, according to national approved labels. The study is taking place across countries in Europe, North America and the Middle East. The primary objective is to assess changes in clinical signs and symptoms of AD in tralokinumab-treated patients. Secondary objectives are to investigate safety, quality of life, patient-reported outcomes and adherence, among others. This analysis includes the first 100 patients enrolled from 39 sites across Germany. Of the first 100 patients in TRACE initiated on tralokinumab in Germany, the majority were males. Most patients had moderate-to-severe disease as indicated by their mean Investigator's Global Assessment score and mean Eczema Area and Severity Index. Patients reported heavy symptomatic burden of disease, as demonstrated by their mean eczema-related sleep numerical rating scale (NRS) and mean worst daily pruritus NRS. Patients also reported a substantial impact on quality of life, as demonstrated by mean Dermatology Life Quality Index. Overall, approximately 4/5 of the patients were biologic-naïve. All biologic-experienced patients were previously treated with dupilumab, of whom most experienced one or more treatment failures. Reasons for switching from dupilumab included lack or loss of efficacy, and AEs, which included mainly conjunctivitis. Initial findings from the first 100 patients from TRACE in Germany showed that the majority of adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD treated with tralokinumab were biologic-naïve, indicating that tralokinumab is prescribed as first-line systemic treatment in the real world, in line with European Dermatology Forum guidelines. Of patients who switched from dupilumab, the main reasons for switching were lack or loss of efficacy, and conjunctivitis, indicating the need for an alternative biologic treatment such as tralokinumab. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]