Search

This document provides a list of committee members and award recipients for the 40th World Congress of Endourology (WCE 2023). The committees include the Executive Committee of the Endourological Society, the Board of Directors, and various other committees focused on topics such as education, research, and diversity and inclusion. The award recipients include Dr. Thomas Chi, who received the "Arthur" Award, Dr. Jaime Landman, who received the Ralph Clayman "Mentor" Award, Dr. Dean George Assimos, who received the Karl Storz "Lifetime Achievement" Award, and Thomas Wosnitza, who received the "Industry" Award. These individuals have made significant contributions to the field of urology and have been recognized for their achievements. [Extracted from the article]

Purpose: Patients with recurring kidney stone events can expect significant morbidity and functional impairment. Few studies have evaluated the effect of bilateral kidney stones on disease progression and quality of life. We wanted to determine the association of bilateral stone disease on age of onset, and the impact on number of stone events and individual kidney stone disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQOL) by analyzing the validated and prospectively collected Wisconsin Stone Quality of Life (WISQOL) database. Materials and Methods: We studied 2906 stone patients from 16 centers in North America after having completed the WISQOL questionnaire from 2014 to 2019. Kidney stone formers were assessed if kidney stones were bilateral or unilateral on imaging. Analysis with a chi-square test compared categorical variables. Bilateral kidney stone disease and its impact on HRQOL were evaluated through a multivariable linear regression model. Results: Of 2906 kidney stone formers, 1340 had unilateral kidney stones and 1566 had bilateral kidney stones. We observed more frequently that patients with bilateral stones had an increased number of depression/anxiety symptoms, renal tubular acidosis, and rheumatoid arthritis (all p < 0.05). Patients with bilateral stones had a younger mean (standard deviation [SD]) age of kidney stone disease onset (37.2 ± 15.8 vs 46.4 ± 15.9 years of age, p < 0.001). Bilateral kidney stone formers had a higher mean (SD) number of stone events (11.3 ± 21.8) than unilateral kidney stone formers (3.0 ± 5.1) (p < 0.001). Within our multivariable analysis, we found that HRQOL was negatively affected by the presence of bilateral stones for kidney stone patients (β = −11.2 [confidence interval: −19.5 to −3.0] points, p < 0.05). Conclusions: Bilateral kidney stone formers had a younger age of kidney stone disease onset and a higher number of stone events compared with unilateral kidney stone disease formers. The presence of bilateral kidney stone disease negatively impacted HRQOL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction and Objective: Prior literature had demonstrated increased stone burden and higher rates of staged surgery in individuals of lower socioeconomic status (SES). Low SES individuals are more likely to experience delays in definitive stone surgery after initial presentation to the emergency department (ED) for kidney stones. This study aims to investigate the relationship between delays in definitive kidney stone surgery and the subsequent need for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) and/or staged surgical procedures using a statewide data set. Methods: This retrospective cohort study gathered longitudinal data from 2009 to 2018 using the California Department of Health Care Access and Information data set. Patient demographic characteristics, comorbidities, diagnosis/procedure codes, and distance were analyzed. Complex stone surgery was defined as initial PNL and/or undergoing more than one procedure within 365 days of initial intervention. Results: A total of 1,816,093 billing encounters from 947,798 patients were screened, resulting in 44,835 patients with ED visits for kidney stones followed by a urologic stone procedure. Multivariable analysis revealed that relative to patients who underwent surgery within 1 month of initial ED visit for stone disease, patients were at increased odds of undergoing complex surgery if waiting ≥6 months (odds ratio [OR] 1.18, p = 0.022), ≥1 year (OR 1.29, p < 0.001), and ≥3 years (OR 1.43, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Delays in definitive stone surgery after initial ED encounter for stone disease were associated with increased likelihood of undergoing a complex stone treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Outcomes after ultrasound-only percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), in which no fluoroscopy is used, are not well known. The goal of this study was to compare outcomes of ultrasound-only and fluoroscopy-directed PCNL. Materials and Methods: Prospectively collected data from the Registry for Stones of the Kidney and Ureter database were reviewed for all patients who underwent PCNL at one academic center from 2015 to 2021. Primary outcomes were complications and stone-free rates (no residual fragments ≥3 mm). Results: Of the 141 patients who underwent ultrasound-only PCNL and 147 who underwent fluoroscopy-directed PCNL, there was no difference in complication rates (15% vs 16%, p = 0.87) or stone-free status (71% vs 65%, p = 0.72), respectively. After adjusting for body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), stone size, and stone complexity by Guy score, ultrasound-only PCNL was not associated with any increased odds of complications (odds ratio [OR] 0.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.3–1.6, p = 0.41) or residual stone fragments ≥3 mm (OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.5–1.9, p = 0.972) compared with fluoroscopy-directed PCNL. Ultrasound-only PCNL was associated with shorter operative time (median 99.5 vs 126 minutes, p < 0.001), and the use of ultrasound remained a significant predictor of short operative time (<100 minutes) after controlling for supine positioning, stone size, and stone complexity by Guy score (OR 2.31, 95% CI 1.01–5.29, p = 0.048). Patients in the ultrasound-only group were spared a mean radiation exposure dose of 10 mGy per procedure. Conclusions: Ultrasound-only PCNL is safe and achieves similar stone-free rates compared with fluoroscopy-directed PCNL with the added benefit of avoidance of radiation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is a common complication after ureteroscopy. Despite sterilization, there is evidence that reusable ureteroscopes can still harbor bacteria. Whether this property is associated with increased risk of UTI is unknown. The objective of this study was to compare rates of postoperative UTI after ureteroscopy for urolithiasis performed with single-use ureteroscopes vs reusable ureteroscopes. Materials and Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of all patients who underwent ureteroscopy for urolithiasis between June 2012 and March 2021. Outcomes were compared between those who underwent stone removal with single-use and reusable ureteroscopes. The primary endpoint was postoperative UTI. The secondary endpoints were intra-operative and postoperative outcomes, and health service utilization after surgery. Results: Of 991 patients identified, 500 (50.4%) underwent ureteroscopy with a single-use ureteroscope. Rates of postoperative UTI were lower in those undergoing ureteroscopic stone removal with a single-use ureteroscope compared to a reusable ureteroscope (6.5% vs 11.9%, p = 0.018). In multivariable analysis, use of a single-use ureteroscope was associated with lower odds of postoperative UTI compared to a reusable ureteroscope when adjusting for risk (odds ratio 0.37, p = 0.015). Use of a single-use ureteroscope was associated with a higher stone clearance rate compared to a reusable ureteroscope (90.0% vs 83.9%, p = 0.005). There was no difference in operative time, overall complication rate, readmission, or emergency department visits between two groups. Conclusion: Single-use ureteroscopes are associated with a twofold decreased risk of UTI and increased stone clearance rate after ureteroscopy for urolithiasis compared to reusable ureteroscopes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: With a 5-year stone recurrence rate of 30% to 50%, kidney stone formers are subject to significant morbidity that negatively impacts their health-related quality of life (HRQOL). We sought to determine the impact of age at kidney stone onset, duration of stone disease, and kidney stone event (surgery or stone passage) on HRQOL of individual patients by querying the validated and prospectively collected Wisconsin Stone Quality of Life (WISQOL) database. Patients and Methods: Cross-sectional data were obtained from a total of 2438 kidney stone formers from 14 institutions in North America who completed the WISQOL questionnaire during the period from 2014 to 2019. The 28-question survey has a 1- to 5-point scale for each item (total score range 0–140). Multivariable linear regression models assessed the impact of age at kidney stone onset, duration of stone disease, and time since most recent surgery or stone passage on HRQOL. Results: Of 2438 patients, older age at kidney stone onset and longer duration of disease were both independent predictors of better WISQOL scores (β = 0.33 points/year; confidence interval [CI] 0.17–0.49; p < 0.001; and β = 0.50 points/year; CI 0.32–0.68; p < 0.001, respectively). Of 1376 patients who underwent surgery between 2010 and 2019, longer time since most recent surgery was an independent predictor of better WISQOL scores (β = 2.28 points/year; CI: 1.47–3.10; p = <0.001). Of 1027 patients with spontaneous stone passage occurring between 2010 and 2019, longer time since most recent stone passage was an independent predictor of better WISQOL scores (β = 1.59 points/year; CI: 0.59–2.59; p = <0.05). Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that older age at onset, longer duration of disease, and longer time since most recent surgery or stone passage were independent predictors of better HRQOL in kidney stone formers. Results of future studies that focus on optimizing stone-related modifiable risk factors to decrease the number of recurrent stone episodes and thus the need for recurrent surgeries will be essential. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]