Search

Aims: To assess the effectiveness of an unsupervised home‐based pulmonary rehabilitation with self‐management program in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Background: A few recent studies have shown that unsupervised home‐based pulmonary rehabilitation can improve the clinical outcome of patients with COPD. More studies are needed to prove its benefits. Design: This study used a quasi‐experimental design. Methods: Seventy‐two admitted COPD patients were assigned to experimental group or control group through purposeful sampling. Data were collected from March 2016 to November 2017 in the Thoracic Intensive Care Unit of a Medical Center in Taiwan. The Medical Research Council dyspnea scale, the COPD Self‐Efficacy Scale and the Clinical COPD Questionnaire were measured before education and at the first, second and third months after discharge. Results: The Medical Research Council dyspnea scale and COPD Self‐Efficacy Scale results in the experimental group were significantly improved compared with the control group in the third month after discharge. The Clinical COPD Questionnaire score continued to improve in both groups in the third month after discharge, and there was no difference between the two groups. Conclusion: A short‐term unsupervised home‐based pulmonary rehabilitation with self‐ management program had significant benefits for patients with COPD. The long‐term effects need to be confirmed. Summary statement: What is already known about this topic? The literature emphasizes the importance of alternative supervision of home‐based pulmonary rehabilitation rather than center‐based pulmonary rehabilitation for patients who find this inconvenient to access.Few studies have shown that unsupervised home‐based pulmonary rehabilitation can improve the clinical outcome of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). What this paper adds? This study demonstrates that a short‐term unsupervised home‐based pulmonary rehabilitation with self‐management program can improve dyspnea during physical activity, self‐care efficacy in certain activities and quality of life after discharge in patients with COPD. The implications of this paper: The findings of this study can be used as the basis for providing a short‐term unsupervised home‐based pulmonary rehabilitation with self‐management program for patients with COPD after discharge.We recommend that patients with COPD undergo unsupervised home‐based pulmonary rehabilitation with self‐management for 3 months after discharge, especially if regular hospital visits for this are not convenient.The effect of longer‐term unsupervised home‐based pulmonary rehabilitation can be further studied in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Accessible summary: What is known on the subject?: Intellectual disability (ID) involves problems with general mental abilities and affects intellectual functioning and adaptive functioning.People diagnosed with ID present higher levels of functional disability, which means they usually have difficulty or the inability to independently perform basic activities of daily living.Little to no attention has been paid to the issues of the mental health of people diagnosed with ID. Specifically, healthcare workers' experiences of caring for patients with IDPD have been neglected. What does the paper add to existing knowledge?: The findings increase our understanding and partially address the knowledge gap regarding the situations and circumstances faced by healthcare workers in caring for patients diagnosed with intellectual disability co‐occurrent with psychiatric disorders (IDPD).In cases of insufficient staffing, healthcare workers may be forced to ignore the individualized needs of patients so as to facilitate management.Healthcare workers may also feel frustrated by not being able to anticipate or deal with patients' unexpected problem behaviours or accidents. They adapt by adjusting their expectations of their patients. What are the implications for practice?: Healthcare administrators need to understand the difficulties faced by staff in caring for patients diagnosed with IDPD, arrange appropriate in‐service education to increase the healthcare workers' knowledge and skills in caring for patients diagnosed with IDPD, and create warm and supportive environments for them.The government department responsible for the management of ID patient care institutions should be able to regularly monitor the overall staffing and quality of care in these institutions. Introduction: When intellectual disability co‐occurs diagnosed with psychiatric disorders (IDPD), the impact of the burden of illness on the affected individuals, their caregivers, their family and friends, and the services that provide for them is particularly high. The issues of the mental health of people diagnosed with ID have received little, if any, attention. One specific area of neglect is healthcare workers' experiences of caring for patients diagnosed with IDPD. Aim: The aim of this study was to understand healthcare workers' experiences of caring for patients diagnosed with IDPD. Methods: A qualitative descriptive research approach and semi‐structured interviews were used in this study. We interviewed 15 participants who had experience in caring for patients diagnosed with a dual diagnosis of IDPD. Findings: Four themes were found, as follows: (1) Negative impacts of insufficient staffing on the quality of care, (2) Constantly worrying about harmful incidents, (3) Discovering effective ways to provide individual patient care and (4) Adjusting expectations and attitudes towards patients. Participants' experiences revealed that they perceived the importance and effectiveness of providing individualized care for IDPD patients. However, when staffing is insufficient, they may be forced to ignore the individualized needs of patients so as to facilitate management. They may also feel frustrated by not being able to anticipate or deal with patients' unexpected problem behaviours or accidents. In addition, they adapt by adjusting their expectations of the patients. Discussion: The findings from this research help to fill the knowledge gap in our understanding of healthcare workers' experiences of and their perspectives on caring for patients diagnosed with IDPD. Implications for Practice: Healthcare administrators need to understand the difficulties faced by staff in caring for patients diagnosed with IDPD, arrange appropriate in‐service education to increase the healthcare workers' knowledge and skills in caring for patients diagnosed with IDPD, and create warm and supportive environments for them. The government department overseeing the management of institutions providing ID patient care should be empowered to conduct regular monitoring of the overall staffing and quality of care in such institutions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]