Search

Racism is a key modifiable determinant of health that contributes to health inequities in Aotearoa and elsewhere. Experiences of racism occur within the health sector for workers, patients and their whānau (extended family) every day. This paper uses stories of racism from nurses – reworked into vignettes – to examine the dynamics of racism to generate possible micro, meso and macro anti‐racism interventions. A critical qualitative design was utilised, informed by kaupapa Māori approaches. The five vignettes in this paper were sourced from a pair of caucused focus groups with nine senior Māori (Indigenous peoples of Aotearoa) and Tauiwi (non‐Māori) nurses held in Auckland Aotearoa in 2019. The vignettes were lightly edited and then critically analysed by both authors to identify sites of racism and generate ideas for anti‐racism interventions. The vignettes illustrate five key themes in relation to racism. These include (i) mono‐cultural practice, (ii) everyday micro‐aggressions; (iii) complexity and the costs of racism, (iv) Pākehā (white settler) privilege and (v) employment discrimination. From analysing these themes, a range of evidence‐based micro, meso and macro‐level anti‐racism interventions were derived. These ranged from engaging in reflective practice, education initiatives, monitoring, through to collective advocacy. Vignettes are a novel way to reveal sites of racism to create teachable moments and spark reflective practice and more active engagement in anti‐racism interventions. When systematically analysed vignettes can be utilised to inform and refine anti‐racist interventions. Being able to identify racism is essential to being able to effectively counter racism. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Primary health is at the forefront of efforts to address health inequities. Effective primary health care keeps people well and improves longevity and quality of life. The persistence of health inequities, particularly between Indigenous peoples and non‐Indigenous peoples globally, suggests that there is a need to strengthen policy and practise. Unique to Aotearoa (New Zealand) is te Tiritio Waitangi, a treaty negotiated in 1840 between the British Crown and hapū (Māori [Indigenous] subtribes). This treaty is foundational to public policy in Aotearoa and requires the Crown (New Zealand government) to uphold a set of responsibilities around protecting and promoting Māori health. This paper examines to what extent Primary Health Organisations are upholding te Tiritio Waitangi. The study utilises data from a nationwide telephone survey of public health providers conducted in 2019–2020 recruited from a list on the Ministry of Health website. This paper focuses on data about te Tiriti application from 21 Primary Health Organisations from a sample size of thirty. Critical te Tiriti analysis, an emerging methodology, was used to assess to what extent the participating primary health organisations were te Tiriti compliant. The critical te Tiriti analysis found poor to fair compliance with most elements of te Tiriti but good engagement with equity. Suggestions for strengthening practise included examining relationships with Māori, utilising a planned approach, structural mechanisms, normalising Māori world views and consistency in application. The onus needs to be on non‐Māori to contribute to the cultural change and power‐sharing required to uphold te Tiriti. Critical te Tiriti analysis is a useful methodology to review te Tiriti compliance and could be used in other contexts to review alignment with Indigenous rights and aspirations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chronic pain is common in older people. However, little is known about how pain is experienced in residents of retirement villages ('villages'), and how pain intensity and associations are experienced in relation to characteristics of residents and village living. We thus aimed to examine pain levels, prevalence and associated factors in village residents. The current paper is a cross‐sectional analysis of baseline data from the 'Older People in Retirement Villages' study in Auckland, New Zealand. Between July 2016 and August 2018, 578 village residents were interviewed face‐to‐face by gerontology nurse specialists, using interRAI Community Health Assessment (CHA) and customised survey. We used a validated pain scale and multivariable logistic regression analyses adjusted for pre‐specified confounders. Residents' median age was 82 years; 420 (73%) were female; 270 (47%) exhibited/reported daily pain, and in 11% this was severe. After controlling for confounders, daily pain was positively associated with self‐reported arthritis (OR = 3.88, 95% CI = 2.57–5.87), poor/fair self‐reported health (OR = 3.19, 95% CI = 1.29–7.93), having no health clinic on‐site (OR = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.10–2.83), and minimal fatigue (diminished energy but completes normal day‐to‐day activities) (OR = 1.77, 95% CI = 1.11–2.81). Similar associations were observed for levels of pain. We conclude that levels of pain and prevalence of daily pain are high in village residents. Self‐reported arthritis, self‐reported poor/fair health, no health clinic on‐site and minimal fatigue are all independently associated with a higher risk of daily pain and with levels of pain. This study suggests potential opportunities for villages to better provide on‐site support to decrease prevalence and severity of pain for their residents, and thus potentially increase wellbeing and quality‐of‐life, though as we cannot prove causality, more research is needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Māori health providers emerged in Aotearoa/New Zealand in the 1980s as a mechanism to achieve self‐determination for Māori communities. However, the contracts funding Māori health providers limit expressions of self‐determination and fail to reflect Te Tiriti O Waitangi, the founding treaty of Aotearoa/New Zealand. Significant health reforms are proposed in Aotearoa/New Zealand, including the creation of a Māori Health Authority that will commission services from Māori health providers. This paper aims to critique the government contracts provided to Māori health providers in the light of the health reforms. A discourse analysis was undertaken on contracts held by a Māori health provider. The study was informed by a Kaupapa Māori congruent methodology that centralised Māori knowledge. The contractural language utilised a variety of discursive techniques that ultimately limit the power of Māori health providers. These discursive techniques included the redefinition of Māori concepts of self‐determination, the use of rhetoric that was not matched by action, reshaping Māori health priorities to reflect the funders' priorities and the application of a deficit lens to Māori health issues. The discursive techniques present in these contracts is consistent with previous work demonstrating a failure of funders to centralise Māori knowledge and ways of being. Success of the proposed health reforms and the Māori Health Authority should require dismantling of non‐Māori ways of commissioning and contracting, otherwise there is the continued risk of discriminatory contracting practices limiting the expression of self‐determination for Māori health providers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]