Search

Intraoperative blood transfer between twins during laser surgery for twin-twin transfusion syndrome can vary by surgical technique and has been proposed to explain differences in donor twin survival. This trial compared donor twin survival with 2 laser techniques: the sequential technique, in which the arteriovenous communications from the volume-depleted donor to the volume-overloaded recipient are laser-occluded before those from recipient to donor, and the selective technique, in which the occlusion of the vascular communications is performed in no particular order. A single-center, open-label, randomized controlled trial was conducted in which twin-twin transfusion syndrome patients were randomized to sequential vs selective laser surgery. Nested within the trial, a second trial randomized patients with superficial anastomoses (arterioarterial and venovenous) to ablation of these connections first (before ablating the arteriovenous anastomoses) vs last. The primary outcome measure was donor twin survival at birth. A total of 642 patients were randomized. Overall donor twin survival was similar between the 2 groups (274 of 320 [85.6%] vs 271 of 322 [84.2%]; odds ratio, 1.12 [95% confidence interval, 0.73–1.73]; P =.605). Superficial anastomoses occurred in 177 of 642 cases (27.6%). Donor survival was lower in the superficial anastomosis group vs those with only arteriovenous communications (125 of 177 [70.6%] vs 420 of 465 [90.3%]; adjusted odds ratio, 0.33 [95% confidence interval, 0.20–0.54]; P <.001). In cases with superficial anastomoses, donor survival was independent of the timing of ablation or surgical technique. The postoperative mean middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocity was lower in the sequential vs selective group (1.00±0.30 vs 1.06±0.30 multiples of the median; P =.003). Post hoc analyses showed 2 factors that were associated with poor overall donor twin survival: the presence or absence of donor twin preoperative critical abnormal Doppler parameters and the presence or absence of arterioarterial anastomoses. Depending on these factors, 4 categories of patients resulted: (1) Category 1 (347 of 642 [54%]), no donor twin critical abnormal Doppler + no arterioarterial anastomoses: donor twin survival was 91.2% in the sequential and 93.8% in the selective groups; (2) Category 2 (143 of 642 [22%]), critical abnormal Doppler present + no arterioarterial anastomoses: donor survival was 89.9% vs 75.7%; (3) Category 3 (73 of 642 [11%]), no critical abnormal Doppler + arterioarterial anastomoses present: donor survival was 94.7% vs 74.3%; and (4) Category 4 (79 of 642 [12%]), critical abnormal Doppler present + arterioarterial anastomoses present: donor survival was 47.6% vs 64.9%. Donor twin survival did not differ between the sequential vs selective laser techniques and did not differ if superficial anastomoses were ablated first vs last. The donor twin's postoperative middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocity was improved with the sequential vs the selective approach. Post hoc analyses suggest that donor twin survival may be associated with the choice of laser technique according to high-risk factors. Further study is needed to determine whether using these categories to guide the choice of surgical technique will improve outcomes. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Vasa previa is an obstetrical condition in which fetal vessels located near the cervix traverse the fetal membranes unprotected by underlying placenta. Type I vasa previa arises directly from a velamentous cord root, whereas types II and III arise from an accessory lobe or a distal lobe of the same placenta, respectively. Fetoscopic laser ablation for types II and III vasa previa is a novel therapeutic option with benefits that include surgical resolution of the vasa previa, avoidance of prolonged hospitalization, and opportunity for a term vaginal delivery. The potential risks of fetoscopy can be mitigated by delaying laser surgery until a gestational age of 31 to 33 weeks, immediately before anticipated hospitalized surveillance. This study aimed to assess feasibility and outcomes of types II and III vasa previa patients treated via fetoscopic laser ablation in the third trimester. This is a retrospective study of singleton pregnancies with types II and III vasa previa treated with fetoscopic laser ablation at a gestational age ≥31 weeks at a single center between 2006 and 2022. Pregnancy and newborn outcomes were assessed. Continuous variables are expressed as mean±standard deviation. Of 84 patients referred for vasa previa, 57 did not undergo laser ablation: 19 either had no or resolved vasa previa, 25 had type I vasa previa (laser-contraindicated), and 13 had type II or III vasa previa but declined laser treatment. Of the remaining 27 patients who underwent laser ablation, 7 were excluded (laser performed at <31 weeks and/or twins), leaving 20 study patients. The mean gestational age at fetoscopic laser ablation was 32.0±0.6 weeks, and total operative time was 62.1±19.6 minutes. There were no perioperative complications. All patients had successful occlusion of the vasa previa vessels (1 required a second procedure). All patients were subsequently managed as outpatients. The mean gestational age at delivery was 37.2±1.8 weeks, the mean birthweight was 2795±465 g, and 70% delivered vaginally. Neonatal intensive care unit admission occurred in 3 cases: 1 for respiratory distress syndrome and 2 for hyperbilirubinemia requiring phototherapy. There were no cases of neonatal transfusion, intraventricular hemorrhage, sepsis, patent ductus arteriosus, or death. Laser ablation for types II and III vasa previa at 31 to 33 gestational weeks was technically achievable and resulted in favorable outcomes. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Controversy exists regarding the threshold of recipient twin polyhydramnios required to diagnose twin-twin transfusion syndrome at a gestational age of ≥20 weeks. One criterion set (Quintero staging) requires the amniotic fluid maximum vertical pocket for the recipient twin to measure ≥8 cm, whereas another (European) system uses a maximum vertical pocket for the recipient twin of ≥10 cm.Objective: This study aimed to characterize the patients with twin-twin transfusion syndrome who were treated with laser surgery and would be excluded from laser surgery according to the European criteria.Study Design: A total of 366 monochorionic diamniotic twins diagnosed with twin-twin transfusion syndrome from 20 to 26 weeks' gestation who underwent laser surgery at our center were studied. A maximum vertical pocket for the recipient twin of ≥8 cm was used to diagnose twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Patients were retrospectively divided into the following 2 groups: group A with a maximum vertical pocket for the recipient twin of ≥8 cm and <10 cm and group B with a maximum vertical pocket for the recipient twin of ≥10 cm. The association of each of the groups with the survivorship outcomes was tested. Bivariate associations between the patient characteristics and the 30-day donor twin and dual survivorship outcomes were evaluated. Tests used in the analysis were chi-square or Fisher exact tests as appropriate for categorical variables and Kruskal-Wallis tests for continuous variables. Multiple logistic regression models for each of the survivorship outcomes were then assessed. The results are reported as mean±standard deviation.Results: Of the 366 studied patients, 53 (14.5%) had a maximum vertical pocket for the recipient twin of ≥8 and <10 cm (group A) and 313 (85.5%) had a maximum vertical pocket for the recipient twin of ≥10 cm (group B). Groups A and B did not differ in the Quintero stage. Notably, 60.4% (32 of 53) of group A patients were stage III or IV. When compared with group B, group A was diagnosed with twin-twin transfusion syndrome at an earlier gestational age (21.7±1.6 vs 22.3±1.6 weeks; P=.0037) and had a higher prevalence of donor growth restriction (81.1% [43 of 53] vs 65.5% [205 of 313]; P=.0260). Rates of at least 1 twin and dual twin survival between group A and B were similar (98.1% [52 of 53] vs 95.8% [300 of 313]; P=.7023, and 79.2% [42 of 53] vs 83.4% [261 of 313]; P=.4369, respectively). Logistic regression models adjusted for perioperative characteristics showed no difference in the outcomes between the groups (group B as reference) (donor twin survival odds ratio, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.29-1.42; P=.2753; and dual survivor odds ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.42-1.91; P=.7757).Conclusion: Restriction of the definition of twin-twin transfusion syndrome to a maximum vertical pocket for the recipient of ≥10 cm beyond 20 weeks gestational age would potentially exclude 14.5% of patients from laser surgery, the majority of whom had advanced stage twin-twin transfusion syndrome. A unifying criterion of a maximum vertical pocket for the recipient of ≥8 cm regardless of gestational age would allow inclusion of these patients and access to surgical management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]