Search

• Myotonic dystrophy (DM) is an autosomal dominant neuromuscular and multisystem disease. • DM patients may manifest with various speech and language abnormalities. • Speech impairments are related to both cognitive dysfunction and bulbar/vocal muscles weakness and myotonia. • Decrease in speech rate and performance due to myotonia and flaccid dysarthria are present in DM type 1. • Speech and language characteristics in DM could serve as potential markers in clinical trials. Myotonic dystrophy (DM) is an autosomal dominant neuromuscular and multisystem disease that is divided into two types, DM1 and DM2, according to mutations in DMPK and CNBP genes, respectively. DM patients may manifest with various speech and language abnormalities. In this review, we had an overview on speech and language abnormalities in both DM1 and DM2. Our literature search highlights that irrespective of age, all DM patients (i.e. congenital, juvenile, and adult onset DM1 as well as DM2 patients) exhibit various degrees of speech impairments. These problems are related to both cognitive dysfunction (e.g. difficulties in written and spoken language) and bulbar/vocal muscles weakness and myotonia. DM1 adult patients have also a significant decrease in speech rate and performance due to myotonia and flaccid dysarthria, which can improve with warming up. Weakness, tiredness, and hypotonia of oral and velopharyngeal muscles can cause flaccid dysarthria. Hearing impairment also plays a role in affecting speech recognition in DM2. A better understanding of different aspects of speech and language abnormalities in DM patients may provide better characterization of these abnormalities as markers that can be potentially used as outcome measures in natural history studies or clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Speckle-tracking echocardiography is a promising tool for evaluating cardiac diastolic dysfunction. A correlation between left atrial strain rate during atrial contraction and the severity of diastolic dysfunction previously has been demonstrated. Because visualization of the left atrial walls is difficult with transesophageal echocardiography, the authors evaluated the use of left ventricular strain rate during atrial contraction as a substitute for left atrial strain rate to intraoperatively measure the extent of cardiac diastolic dysfunction. Retrospective clinical study. Single institutional study. Sixty-six patients who underwent cardiac surgery between January 2018 and January 2021. None. Preoperative echocardiographic reports and intraoperative echocardiographic images of the participants were studied. The correlation of cardiac diastolic dysfunction stage with the peak longitudinal strain rate during late diastole and the time to peak value were evaluated. The late diastolic peak longitudinal strain rate was correlated significantly with the stage of diastolic dysfunction (r = –0.64, p < 0.0001). There was no significant correlation between the stage of diastolic dysfunction and the time to peak value (r = –0.17, p = 0.18). A late diastolic peak longitudinal strain rate <0.68 1/s had a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 81% for predicting grade 2 or 3 diastolic dysfunction. The late diastolic peak longitudinal strain rate correlates with the severity of diastolic dysfunction in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]