Search

While many organizations' hiring practices now incorporate artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML), research suggests that job applicants may react negatively toward AI/ML-based selection practices. In the current research, we thus examined how organizations might mitigate adverse reactions toward AI/ML-based selection processes. In two between-subjects experiments, we recruited online samples of participants (undergraduate students and Prolific panelists, respectively) and presented them with vignettes representing various selection systems and measured participants' reactions to them. In Study 1, we manipulated (a) whether the system was managed by a human decision-maker, by AI/ML, or a combination of both (an "augmented" approach), and (b) the selection stage (screening, final stage). Results indicated that participants generally reacted more favorably toward augmented and human-based approaches, relative to AI/ML-based approaches, and further depended on participants' pre-existing familiarity levels with AI. In Study 2, we sought to replicate our findings within a specific process (selecting hotel managers) and application method (handling interview recordings). We found again that reactions toward the augmented approach generally depended on participants' familiarity levels with AI. Our findings have implications for how (and for whom) organizations should implement AI/ML-based practices. • People react more favorably toward AI that augments (rather than replaces) humans. • Reactions to AI are relevant to both early and late stages of the hiring process. • Augmented approaches mitigate adverse reactions to AI-based hiring for people who have low familiarity with AI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Ten-fold cross validation was used to determine the average model prediction efficiency and three ranking methods were used to explore the influence of 33 variables for further determining the best combination of variables. The gini importance ranking method was found to be applicable for variables filtering. • The predictive performance of AKIMLpred which constructed by the XGBoost algorithm was the best among six machine learning models. When the AKIMLpred included the nine features with the highest influence ranking, its model had the best prediction performance. • The SHAP algorithm was used to interpret the prediction results of AKIMLpred. • The web-calculator of AKIMLpred was shown for predicting AKI with more convenient (https://www.xsmartanalysis.com/model/list/predict/model/html?mid=8065&symbol=11gk693982SU6AE1ms21). • AKIMLpred was better than the optimal model built with only routine tests for predicting AKI in critically ill patients within 7 days. Early recognition and timely intervention for AKI in critically ill patients were crucial to reduce morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to use biomarkers to construct a optimal machine learning model for early prediction of AKI in critically ill patients within seven days. The prospective cohort study enrolled 929 patients altogether who were admitted in ICU including 680 patients in training set (Jiefang Campus) and 249 patients in external testing set (Binjiang Campus). After performing strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, 421 patients were selected in training set for constructing predictive model and 167 patients were selected in external testing for evaluating the predictive performance of resulting model. Urine and blood samples were collected for kidney injury associated biomarkers detection. Baseline clinical information and laboratory data of the study participants were collected. We determined the average prediction efficiency of six machine learning models through 10-fold cross validation. In total, 78 variables were collected when admission in ICU and 43 variables were statistically significant between AKI and non-AKI cohort. Then, 35 variables were selected as independent features for AKI by univariate logistic regression. Spearman correlation analysis was used to remove two highly correlated variables. Three ranking methods were used to explore the influence of 33 variables for further determining the best combination of variables. The gini importance ranking method was found to be applicable for variables filtering. The predictive performance of AKIMLpred which constructed by the XGBoost algorithm was the best among six machine learning models. When the AKIMLpred included the nine features (NGAL, IGFBP7, sCysC, CAF22, KIM-1, NT-proBNP, IL-6, IL-18 and L-FABP) with the highest influence ranking, its model had the best prediction performance, with an AUC of 0.881 and an accuracy of 0.815 in training set, similarly, with an AUC of 0.889 and an accuracy of 0.846 in validation set. Moreover, the performace was slightly outperformed in testing set with an AUC of 0.902 and an accuracy of 0.846. The SHAP algorithm was used to interpret the prediction results of AKIMLpred. The web-calculator of AKIMLpred was shown for predicting AKI with more convenient(https://www.xsmartanalysis.com/model/list/predict/model/html?mid=8065&symbol=11gk693982SU6AE1ms21). AKIMLpred was better than the optimal model built with only routine tests for predicting AKI in critically ill patients within 7 days. The model AKIMLpred constructed by the XGBoost algorithm with selecting the nine most influential biomarkers in the gini importance ranking method had the best performance in predicting AKI in critically ill patients within 7 days. This data-driven predictive model will help clinicians to make quick and accurate diagnosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• DenseNet has better prediction performance than AlexNet, GoogLeNet, and ResNets. • DenseNet-39 gained 99.3% accuracy with low computational cost and high efficiency. • t-SNE and confusion matrix was used to visualize the performance of DenseNet-39. • CAM was used to explore the mechanism of false identification by DenseNet-39. Detecting and classifying the melt pool states in laser-based direct energy deposition (L-DED) is crucial for reducing defects and enhancing the mechanical properties of L-DED metal parts. Although physics-based modeling methods and traditional machine learning algorithms such as convolutional neural network have been introduced to monitor the melt pool states, improving the low accuracy of these methods remains to be challenging. To address this issue, we developed a DenseNet-39 model to classify the melt pool states. 80 single-track samples were fabricated using a linear scan strategy by L-DED and using a coaxial high-speed camera to capture the melt pool images in-process. Experimental results have demonstrated the superior performance of DenseNet-39 in classifying the melt pool states with 99.3% accuracy, achieved a lower computation burden, and less processing time. We used CAM to explain the mechanism of classification by DenseNet-39. DenseNet-39 provides the potential applications of online process monitoring in L-DED. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]