Search

• An almost complete review of current methods for feature extraction from underwater acoustic signals. • Developing a reliable and accurate model for distinguishing Underwater vessel-radiated acoustical noise (UVRAN), which is robustness to noise. • Converting complex marine signals to images using the Gramian angular field (GAF) technique and extracting second-order image statistics by image texture analysis for the first time. • extracting more discriminative information from the UVRAN by signal-to-image transformation. • Designing a parameter called spectral amplitude mean difference function (SAMDF) that is more suitable for encoding to an image than the original signal. Underwater vessel-radiated acoustical noise (UVRAN) is a major factor for classification in the sea by the SONAR. Due to unsteady and complex maritime ambient, analyzing underwater sound signals is a challenging issue that has lately received attention in the marine field. In the conventional feature extraction methods, to reduce the effect of ocean noise, the de-noising procedure is performed before complexity measurement by mode decomposition techniques. Based on this, we propose a novel insight for the first time to distinguish the objects which made the underwater noises as the hydro-acoustic signature, using a signals-to-image conversion without noise removal. After pre-processing, the spectral amplitude mean difference function is encoded into an image using Gramian angular field (GAF) technique. Subsequently, image texture analysis is performed in which GAF images are subjected to the gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM). Finally, the second-order image statistic (i.e., 2-D permutation entropy) is calculated. Compared with other methods, results demonstrate that the proposed method has a high degree of separation and stability between the various kinds of underwater targets, suggesting that the methodology is superior to the existing methods. Moreover, our model is robust to noise. The approach perhaps opens an alternative path for UVRAN discrimination. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Image processing tehnique for water surface velocity prediction. • Temporal feature extraction for dynamic image sequence using XOR operator. • Machine learning method for image texture analysis. Water surface velocity (WSV) is one of the critical parameters in hydrology. The development of non-intrusive measurement of this parameter using cameras is increasing. Traditionally, measuring WSV using a camera utilizes tracking of moving objects on the water surfaces. Recently, another method has emerged that utilizes the movement of water ripples to estimate the WSV. This paper proposes a novel method for estimating WSV based on camera measurements. The authors call this method Temporal Gray-scale Pattern Image (TGPI) since it extracts Gray-scale patterns of pixels of water flow video in the temporal domain using the XOR operator and create new image. The new image pattern formed is then used to predict WSV using predictor. There are four predictors being compared, namely Multiple Input Linear Regression (MILR), Multiple Input Logistic Regression (MILgR), Convolutional Neural Network Regression (CNN-R), and Convolutional Neural Network Classification (CNN-K). CNN-R and CNN-K predict WSV directly from the results of TGPI. Meanwhile, MILR and MILgR predict WSV from five TGPI features. The five features are the Mean and Median of the Histogram, Mean and Median of the Histogram of Oriented Gradient (HOG), and the Maximum Mid-Value of the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT). MILR and CNN-R are predictors for regression problems, so the testing metrics for them are Trend-Line equation and R2 from the predicted WSV and actual values graph. Meanwhile, for MILgR and CNN-K, which are predictors for classification problems, the testing metrics are Confusion Matrix (CM), Accuracy, Precision, Recall, and F1-Score. To test the four methods without distinguishing their predictor types, a 2-dimensional histogram graph is used. The data-set used for training and testing is video footage of water flow with known WSV. The WSV measurement points used in this study are 1.7 m/s, 3.1 m/s, and 4.2 m/s. The video dataset and these three points are generated by the Mini Open Channel Water Flow Simulator (MOCWFS) developed by the author in this study. From the comparison results, it can be seen that the classification type predictor is superior to the regression type. For the regression type predictor, MILR is better than CNN-R. Meanwhile, for the classification type, CNN-K is superior to MILgR. The best accuracy produced by CNN-K is 98.4%. Although there are shortcomings, the TGPI method is quite feasible for predict Water Surface Velocity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]