Search

Introduction:Despite scale up of Option B+, long-term retention of women in HIV care during pregnancy and the postpartum period remains an important challenge. We compared adherence to clinic appointments and antiretroviral therapy (ART) at different follow-up time points between enrolment and 24 months postpartum among pregnant women living with HIV and initiating Option B+ randomized to a peer group support, community-based drug distribution and income-generating intervention called “Friends for Life Circles” (FLCs) versus the standard of care (SOC).Methods:Between 16 May 2016 and 12 September 2017, 540 ART-naïve pregnant women living with HIV at urban and rural health facilities in Uganda were enrolled in the study. Participants were randomized 1:1 to the FLC intervention or SOC and assessed for adherence to prevention of mother to child HIV transmission (PMTCT) clinic appointments at 6 weeks, 12 and 24 months postpartum, self-reported adherence to ART at 6 weeks, 6 and 24 months postpartum validated by plasma HIV-1 RNA viral load (VL) measured at the same time points, and HIV status and HIV-free survival of infants at 18 months postpartum. We used Log-rank and Chi-Square p-values to test the equality of Kaplan-Meier survival probabilities and hazard rates (HR) for failure to retain in care for any reason by study arm.Results:There was no significant difference in adherence to PMTCT clinic visits or to ART or in median viral loads between FLC and SOC arms at any follow-up time points. Retention in care through the end of study was high in both arms but significantly higher among participants randomized to FLC (86.7%) compared to SOC (79.3%), p=0.022. The adjusted HR of visit dropout was 2.5 times greater among participants randomized to SOC compared to FLC (aHR=2.498, 95% CI: 1.417 – 4.406, p=0.002). Median VL remained < 400 copies/ml in both arms at 6 weeks, 6 and 24 months postpartum.Conclusions:Our findings suggest that programmatic interventions that provide group support, community based ART distribution and income-generation activities may contribute to retention in PMTCT care, HIV-free survival of children born to women living with HIV, and to the elimination of mother to child HIV transmission (MTCT).

BackgroundUganda used Ebola vaccines as part of its preparedness and response during the 2018-2020 10thEbola virus disease (EVD) outbreak in neighboring Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). We evaluated the public’s perceptions of Ebola vaccines and compared their confidence in health services to treat Ebola versus malaria and tuberculosis as part of a survey on Ebola knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) conducted in March 2020.MethodsA cross-sectional household survey was implemented in six districts in Uganda using multi-stage cluster sampling to randomly select participants. The districts were purposively selected from districts classified by the government as at high- or low-risk for an EVD outbreak. We describe perceptions of Ebola vaccines and confidence in health services to treat Ebola, tuberculosis, and malaria. Modified Poisson regression modeling was used to identify the demographic correlates of these outcomes.ResultsAmong 3,485 respondents, 18% were aware of Ebola vaccines. Of those, 92% agreed that the vaccines were needed to prevent Ebola. Participants aged 15-24 years were 4% more likely to perceive such need compared to those 60 years and older (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0-1.08). The perceived need was 5% lower among participants with at least some secondary education compared to uneducated participants (aPR 0.95; 0.92-0.99). Overall, 81% of those aware of the vaccines believed that everyone or most people in their community would get vaccinated if offered, and 94% said they would likely get vaccinated if offered. Confidence in health services to treat Ebola was lower compared to treating malaria or tuberculosis (55% versus 93% and 77%, respectively). However, participants from the EVD high-risk districts were 22% more likely to be confident in health services to treat Ebola compared to those in low-risk districts (aPR: 1.22; 95% CI: 1.08, 1.38).ConclusionOur findings suggest that intent to take an Ebola vaccine during an outbreak was strong, but more work needs to be done to increase public awareness of these vaccines. The public’s high confidence in health services to treat other health threats, such as malaria and tuberculosis, offer building blocks for strengthening their confidence in health services to treat EVD in the event of an outbreak.

BackgroundPregnant young women who engage in high-risk sexual activity are at elevated biological and social risk for HIV acquisition. PrEP serves as an effective means of HIV prevention, including during pregnancy. This study aimed to explore attitudes, experiences and challenges with PrEP to understand what motivates or limits PrEP uptake and adherence during pregnancy among this population of young women.MethodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with 23 participants, recruited from the Prevention on PrEP (POPPi) study in the Good Health for Women Project clinic in Kampala, Uganda. POPPi’s inclusion criteria comprised of HIV-uninfected women, aged 15-24, who engaged in high-risk sexual activity. Interviews focused on experience with PrEP and pregnancy. Data were analyzed utilizing a framework analysis approach.FindingsKey themes were comprised of participant barriers to and facilitators of PrEP uptake and adherence. Reasons for PrEP initiation included desire for autonomy and agency, mistrust of partners, and social support. Participants expressed challenges with initiating or sustaining their use of PrEP, including PrEP access and perceived or felt stigma. During pregnancy, participants’ primary motivators for altering PrEP use were either understanding of PrEP safety for their baby or changes in perceptions of their HIV risk. Many of these factors were similar across participants who had experience with pregnancy and those who did not.InterpretationThis study highlights the importance of addressing barriers to and facilitators of PrEP adherence, especially during pregnancy where risk is elevated, with a multi-level approach. Community-oriented education, stigma reduction activities alongside access to PrEP, can serve as means for adherence. The development of robust PrEP adherence support guidelines regarding PrEP use during pregnancy among high-risk women, and strategies for their implementation, are of utmost importance for the control of HIV in key populations and the elimination of mother-to-child transmission of HIV.