1. Resilience and Well-Being Among Persons With Spinal Cord Injury/Disorders.
- Author
-
Wade, Laurel, Elliott, Timothy R., Schlegel, Rebecca J., Williamson, Meredith L. C., Yoon, Myeongsun, and Spooner, Mikaela
- Subjects
- *
WELL-being , *POSITIVE psychology , *STATISTICS , *SPINAL cord injuries , *ANALYSIS of variance , *CONFIDENCE intervals , *CROSS-sectional method , *SELF-evaluation , *SPINAL cord diseases , *CAUDA equina syndrome , *T-test (Statistics) , *LIFE , *PSYCHOLOGY of veterans , *COMPARATIVE studies , *QUALITY of life , *DESCRIPTIVE statistics , *SCALE analysis (Psychology) , *QUESTIONNAIRES , *CHI-squared test , *CLUSTER analysis (Statistics) , *DATA analysis software , *QUADRIPLEGIA , *PERSONALITY tests , *PATH analysis (Statistics) , *MAXIMUM likelihood statistics , *DATA analysis , *PSYCHOLOGICAL resilience , *PERSONALITY assessment , *PSYCHOTHERAPY , *PARAPLEGIA - Abstract
Purpose: We examined positive behavioral resources and characteristics that might distinguish resilient personality prototypes among persons with chronic spinal cord injury/disorder (SCID). Positive psychology variables with clear linkages to existing psychological interventions were examined as potential mediators of the resilience–well-being relationship. Research Method and Design: A cross-sectional, self-report study was conducted. Two hundred and ninety-eight consenting members of the Paralyzed Veterans of America (268 male; 236 self-identified as white) provided useable survey data for analysis (including 161 veterans with tetraplegia, 107 with paraplegia, 30 with cauda equina). Cluster analysis of Big Five personality traits identified resilient and nonresilient personality profiles. Tests of mean differences between resilient and nonresilient participants on behavioral resources and characteristics were performed. Path models predicting well-being and health-related quality of life (HRQL) were conducted. Results: One hundred and sixty-three respondents had resilient personality profiles and 135 had nonresilient profiles. Resilient individuals reported significantly more optimal scores on every positive psychology variable, and greater well-being and HRQL than nonresilient respondents. Path models found the relationship of resilience to well-being was explained through its beneficial associations with psychological flexibility, use of personal strengths, meaning in life (MIL), and gratitude. Psychological flexibility also mediated the resilience–HRQL relationship. Cauda equina was significantly associated with higher pain interference and lower HRQL. Conclusions: Higher gratitude, MIL, use of personal strengths, and psychological flexibility appear to characterize resilience and well-being among persons with chronic SCID. Further studies are needed to understand the impact of pain interference on HRQL among individuals with cauda equina. Impact and Implications: The present study documents several positive behavioral resources and characteristics that typify resilience among persons with chronic spinal cord injury/disorder. The results should prompt rehabilitation psychologists to consider further study of the positive psychology variables examined in this paper, and the potential use of the existing interventions associated with each one. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF