Search

Background/Objectives: The ulnar nerve's unique anatomy makes it vulnerable to complex elbow dislocations. Depending on the nature of the injury, the clinical treatment and outcomes related to the nerve may vary. Unfortunately, the current literature provides limited and fragmented information on managing the ulnar nerve and the incidence of neuropathy in complex elbow dislocations. This study aimed to determine the occurrence of ulnar nerve pain and its relationship with transposition. Methods: A retrospective evaluation was conducted on a consecutive series of 44 patients who underwent surgery for complex elbow dislocations. The average follow-up period was 29 months. Patients were categorized based on their condition (trans-olecranon fracture–dislocation, Terrible Triad, Monteggia-like lesions, and injuries not falling into the previous categories). The study assessed whether the ulnar nerve was released from the cubital tunnel and underwent transposition. Additionally, the study examined the number of patients experiencing ulnar pain in the postoperative period and its duration over time. All patients were also evaluated using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, and Oxford Elbow Score (OES). Results: Patients who underwent simultaneous ulnar nerve transposition surgery with complex elbow dislocation showed a higher incidence of neuropathy. In these patients, the symptoms were less severe but lasted longer. MEPS, DASH, and OES did not show statistically significant differences between the two groups; however, they were slightly better for the group without ulnar nerve transposition. Conclusions: Surgeons should refrain from routinely transposing the ulnar nerve in complex elbow dislocations. However, further studies involving larger populations are necessary. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of this study was to compare inter- and intraobserver agreement of a novel intraoperative subluxation classification for patients undergoing ulnar nerve surgery at the elbow. We hypothesize there will be strong inter- and intraobserver agreement of the 4-category classification system, and reviewers will have substantial confidence while reviewing the classification system. Four blinded fellowship-trained orthopedic hand surgeons reviewed 25 videos in total on 2 separate viewings, 21 days apart. Variables collected were ulnar subluxation classification (A, B, C, or D) and a confidence metric. Subsequent to primary data collection, classification grading was stratified into A/B or C/D subgroups for further analysis. Cohen κ scores were used to evaluate all variables collected in this study. The interpretation of κ scores included ≤0.0 as no agreement, 0.01-0.20 as none to slight, 0.21-0.40 as fair, 0.41-0.60 as moderate, 0.61-0.80 as substantial, and 0.81-1.0 as almost perfect agreement. Interobserver agreement of subluxation classification as a 4-category scale demonstrated a moderate agreement on first viewing, second viewing, and when both viewings were combined (κ = 0.51, 0.51, and 0.51 respectively). Seventy-five percent (3 of 4) of reviewers had moderate intraobserver agreement for ulnar nerve subluxation classification, whereas 1 reviewer had substantial intraobserver classification (κ = 0.72). Overall, there was high confidence in 65% of classification scores in the second round of viewing, which improved from 58% in the first viewing round. When ulnar subluxation classification selections were regrouped into classes A/B or C/D, 100% of reviewers had substantial interobserver (κ = 0.74-0.75) and substantial to almost perfect intraobserver (κ = 0.71-0.91) agreement. The 4-category classification was reproducible within and between reviewers. Agreement appeared to increase when simplifying the classification to 2 categories, which may provide guidance to surgical decision making. The validation of a reproducible classification scheme for intraoperative ulnar subluxation may aid with decision making and further postoperative outcomes research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Peripheral nerves consist of delicate structures, including a rich microvascular system, that protect and nourish axons and associated Schwann cells. Nerves are sensitive to internal and external trauma, such as compression and stretching. Ulnar nerve entrapment, the second most prevalent nerve entrapment disorder after carpal tunnel syndrome, appears frequently at the elbow. Although often idiopathic, known risk factors, including obesity, smoking, diabetes, and vibration exposure, occur. It exists in all adult ages (mean age 40–50 years), but seldom affects individuals in their adolescence or younger. The patient population is heterogeneous with great co-morbidity, including other nerve entrapment disorders. Typical early symptoms are paresthesia and numbness in the ulnar fingers, followed by decreased sensory function and muscle weakness. Pre- and postoperative neuropathic pain is relatively common, independent of other symptom severity, with a risk for serious consequences. A multimodal treatment strategy is necessary. Mild to moderate symptoms are usually treated conservatively, while surgery is an option when conservative treatment fails or in severe cases. The decision to perform surgery might be difficult, and the outcome is unpredictable with the risk of complications. There is no consensus on the choice of surgical method, but simple decompression is relatively effective with a lower complication rate than transposition. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Approaches to surgical treatment to cubital tunnel syndrome include simple decompression, decompression with medial epicondylectomy, and decompression with anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve. Transposition of the ulnar nerve involves decompression and transposition of the nerve anteriorly to a subcutaneous, intramuscular, or submuscular position. However, transposing the ulnar nerve to subcutaneous plane renders it more susceptible to external trauma. Hence, this technique article introduces the use of a modified fascial sling. Methodology: The modified fascial sling technique for anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve involves careful dissection to identify the ulnar nerve, decompression of the nerve, then transposition of the ulnar nerve anterior to the medial epicondyle. An AlloWrap (Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI, USA) is first wrapped around the ulnar nerve, followed by wrapping a fascial sling fashioned from the flexor carpi ulnaris fascia. A prospective case series for this surgical technique was conducted. Wilcoxon signed-rank test compared preoperative and postoperative qDASH-9 scores, an abbreviated questionnaire to assess functional limitations of the upper limb. Results: Five patients were included in this study, with a mean duration of follow-up of 530.4 days. The mean QuickDASH-9 functional disability score was 36.5 ± 25.1 preoperatively and 20.6 ± 12.8 postoperatively, demonstrating statistically significant improvement (P = .008). Conclusion: The modified fascial sling technique for anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve was developed to address the complications of perineural adhesions after transposition causing tethering of the ulnar nerve. At the same time, the fascial sling prevents posterior subluxation of the ulnar nerve back to its original location, thereby reducing the risk of recurrent symptoms.

The common neuropathy Cubital Tunnel Syndrome (CuTS) causes sensory impairment. Numerous patients also exhibit muscle atrophy as a symptom of severe and persistent nerve damage, which typically portends a poor prognosis. In the majority of individuals with minor nerve dysfunction, nonsurgical treatment aimed at reducing both compression and traction on the ulnar nerve at the elbow is successful. The optimum care for a patient with this pathology requires prompt and accurate evaluation, diagnosis, and testing, as well as evidence-based therapy choices. The goal of this review article was to offer an updated summary of the most recent research on the results of several surgical procedures for CuTS. A clinician must use the available information to develop a diagnosis and treatment plan that are unique to the patient. The most effective surgical methods for CuTS need to be discovered through more in-depth scientific investigation.

The common neuropathy Cubital Tunnel Syndrome (CuTS) causes sensory impairment. Numerous patients also exhibit muscle atrophy as a symptom of severe and persistent nerve damage, which typically portends a poor prognosis. In the majority of individuals with minor nerve dysfunction, nonsurgical treatment aimed at reducing both compression and traction on the ulnar nerve at the elbow is successful. The optimum care for a patient with this pathology requires prompt and accurate evaluation, diagnosis, and testing, as well as evidence-based therapy choices. The goal of this review article was to offer an updated summary of the most recent research on the results of several surgical procedures for CuTS. A clinician must use the available information to develop a diagnosis and treatment plan that are unique to the patient. The most effective surgical methods for CuTS need to be discovered through more in-depth scientific investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Peripheral nerves consist of delicate structures, including a rich microvascular system, that protect and nourish axons and associated Schwann cells. Nerves are sensitive to internal and external trauma, such as compression and stretching. Ulnar nerve entrapment, the second most prevalent nerve entrapment disorder after carpal tunnel syndrome, appears frequently at the elbow. Although often idiopathic, known risk factors, including obesity, smoking, diabetes, and vibration exposure, occur. It exists in all adult ages (mean age 40–50 years), but seldom affects individuals in their adolescence or younger. The patient population is heterogeneous with great co-morbidity, including other nerve entrapment disorders. Typical early symptoms are paresthesia and numbness in the ulnar fingers, followed by decreased sensory function and muscle weakness. Pre- and postoperative neuropathic pain is relatively common, independent of other symptom severity, with a risk for serious consequences. A multimodal treatment strategy is necessary. Mild to moderate symptoms are usually treated conservatively, while surgery is an option when conservative treatment fails or in severe cases. The decision to perform surgery might be difficult, and the outcome is unpredictable with the risk of complications. There is no consensus on the choice of surgical method, but simple decompression is relatively effective with a lower complication rate than transposition.

Background: Injury of the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) has become increasingly common, particularly in overhead athletes. There is no consensus on management of the ulnar nerve in UCL reconstruction (UCLR) in patients with preoperative ulnar nerve symptoms, as literature supports both not decompressing the nerve as well as ulnar nerve transposition (UNT). Hypothesis/Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare subjective clinical outcomes and return-to-sports (RTS) metrics between patients who received UNT during UCLR and a matched cohort who underwent UCLR alone. We hypothesized that there would be no significant difference in patient outcomes or RTS metrics between the cohorts. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Using an institutional database, patients who underwent UCLR with UNT between 2007 and 2017 were retrospectively identified. These patients were matched based on sex, age at surgery (±3 years), and body mass index (±2 kg/m2) to a comparison group that underwent UCLR alone. Patients completed the Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic Shoulder & Elbow (KJOC) score, the Timmerman and Andrews elbow score, the Conway-Jobe scale, and custom patient satisfaction and RTS questionnaires. Results: Thirty patients who underwent UCLR with concomitant UNT and 30 matched patients who underwent UCLR without UNT were available for follow-up at a mean of 6.9 (3.4-9.9) and 8.1 (3.4-13.9) years, respectively. The UNT group reported similar KJOC (78.4 in UNT vs 76.8; P =.780), Conway-Jobe (60% excellent in UNT vs 77% excellent; P =.504), Timmerman and Andrews (86.2 in UNT vs 88.8; P =.496), and satisfaction scores (85.3% in UNT vs 89.3%; P =.512) compared with UCLR group. In terms of RTS rate (84% in UNT vs 93% in UCLR; P =.289) and duration required to RTS (11.1 months in UNT vs 12.5 months in UCLR; P =.176), the 2 groups did not significantly differ. Finally, despite significant differences in preoperative ulnar nerve symptoms (100% in UNT vs 7% in UCLR; P <.001), the 2 groups did not statistically differ in the proportion of patients who experienced postoperative ulnar nerve symptoms (13% in UNT vs 0% in UCLR; P =.112). Conclusion: This matched cohort analysis showed no statistically significant differences in patient-reported outcomes and RTS between patients undergoing UCLR with and without UNT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Medial elbow pain is a common complaint in overhead throwing athletes. The throwing motion places repetitive tensile and compressive forces on the elbow resulting in significant stress across the ulnohumeral joint. This stress can result in soft-tissue, ligamentous, and ulnar nerve injury. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively investigate the clinical findings and outcomes, including return to play rates, of patients who underwent ulnar nerve transposition surgery for isolated ulnar neuritis. Methods: Throwing athletes who underwent isolated, primary ulnar nerve transposition surgery over an eight-year period, 2009 to 2017, were identified and included in our analysis. Nonthrowing athletes, those who underwent revision ulnar nerve transposition surgery, and those who underwent concomitant ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction or repair were excluded. Patients were contacted to complete the Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic Shoulder and Elbow Score as well as a return to play rate questionnaire. The minimum follow-up was 2 years. Results: Fifteen patients met the inclusion criteria: 13 (86.7%) men and 2 (13.3%) women. The average age at the time of surgery was 19.2 years old (range, 15.6-28.0). Preoperatively, 13 (86.7%) patients played baseball and 2 (13.3%) patients played softball. Two patients (13.3%) underwent a previous ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction. There were no complications. The average final follow-up was 65.26 (range, 24.44-113.29) months with an average Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic Score of 64.51 (range, 28.60-100.00). Thirteen (86.7%) patients were able to return to their preinjury sport, 2 to a higher level of competition, 8 to the same level, and 3 to a lower level. Seven of the 13 (53.8%) patients sustained a postoperative ipsilateral shoulder or elbow injury at an average of 19.57 (range, 7.00-36.00) months postoperatively. All patients reported sustaining the injury as a result of throwing. Conclusion: The results of our study indicate that ulnar nerve transposition surgery in throwing athletes allows athletes to return to throwing with low reoperation rates. However, more than half of the athletes in our analysis sustained a subsequent ipsilateral shoulder or elbow injury. Further investigation regarding outcomes in throwing athletes after ulnar nerve transposition surgery is warranted.

Background: No study has specifically evaluated how ulnar neuritis and ulnar nerve transposition affect outcomes in baseball players undergoing ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction (UCLR). Purpose: To evaluate the effects of ulnar neuritis and ulnar nerve transposition in baseball pitchers undergoing UCLR in regard to return to sport, time to return to sport, and need for revision or additional surgery. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: At a single institution, all consecutive baseball pitchers undergoing UCLR between 2002 and 2015 were identified. Ulnar neuritis was diagnosed preoperatively by the following criteria: ulnar nerve symptoms, Tinel sign at the elbow, symptomatic subluxation, and numbness/paresthesia in an ulnar nerve distribution of the hand. The primary outcome of the study was return to sport. The secondary outcomes of the study were time to return to sport, length of playing career, and revision or additional surgery. Results: A total of 578 UCLRs were performed in baseball players; of these, 500 UCLRs were performed in pitchers. Ulnar neuritis was diagnosed in 97 (19.4%) baseball pitchers presenting with UCL injury. There were no significant differences in patient characteristics or surgical techniques performed for reconstruction between baseball pitchers with and without ulnar neuritis. In review of injury characteristics, ulnar neuritis was significantly more likely to be diagnosed in pitchers with an acute onset of UCL injury (P =.03). Transposition of the ulnar nerve was more commonly performed in players with ulnar neuritis (47%) versus those without ulnar neuritis (10%; P =.0001). The players who had ulnar neuritis and underwent UCLR had a significantly lower odds of returning to sport (odds ratio, 0.45; P =.04); however, no significant difference was found for time to return to sport and length of playing career for those with and without ulnar neuritis (P =.38 and.51, respectively). Conclusion: The study suggests that ulnar neuritis, when present preoperatively in baseball pitchers undergoing UCLR, may adversely affect their ability to return to sport, whereas ulnar nerve transposition at the time of UCLR does not alter the ability to return to sport. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The paper aims to present the advantages and disadvantages related to using the anterior transposition technique for the treatment of the cubital tunnel syndrome. Materials and Methods: The study presents the surgical treatment of a 58 years old woman. The therapeutic protocol included the decompression of the ulnar nerve at the level of the elbow, followed by the anterior transposition, the new position being maintained by anchoring in a fascial sling. Results: The electromyographic evaluation performed 12 months after the surgical intervention indicated that the parameters of motor nerve conduction were within normal limits on all segments, normal sensory velocities from the V finger, orthodromic and from the dorsal branch, sign of a very good postoperative recovery. Conclusions: Anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve may be a firm solution for the treatment of the compressive ulnar neuropathies located at the level of the elbow.

The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of follow-up time on revision rates of in situ decompression and ulnar nerve transposition for the surgical treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome. A comprehensive literature search was performed to identify prospective and retrospective primary comparison studies assessing the revision rates of in situ decompression and ulnar nerve transposition for the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome. Meta-regression analyses were used to assess the effect of average study follow-up on the revision rates of both cubital tunnel syndrome treatments. Modeling results were then used to estimate revision rates between decompression and transposition at increasing follow-up times. Sixteen studies including 2,225 patients were included. Average study follow-up time was a statistically significant moderator of revision rates. Model predictions show that in situ decompression operations had an increased risk for revision as compared to ulnar transposition after 48 months of follow-up. In studies with follow-up time ≥48 months, revision rates for in situ decompression (11.9%) were significantly greater than in ulnar transposition (3.2%). In situ decompression for cubital tunnel syndrome is associated with an increased risk of revision surgery as compared to ulnar nerve transposition, particularly when assessed at longer follow-up intervals. The effect of follow-up duration on revision rates demonstrates the need for additional studies to compare outcomes of these operative approaches at follow-up times ≥48 months. This study provides evidence that ulnar nerve transposition may ultimately lead to lower revision rates and demonstrates the need for prospective, randomized trials to corroborate this effect., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024, Reichenbach et al.)

Background: Injury to the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) leading to medial elbow instability and possible ulnar neuritis is common in overhead-throwing athletes. Treatment may require UCL reconstruction (UCLR) and concomitant ulnar nerve transposition (UNT) for those with preoperative ulnar neuritis. Purpose: To evaluate the return-to-play (RTP) rates, clinical outcomes, and rates of persistent ulnar neuritis after concomitant UCLR and UNT in a cohort of baseball players with confirmed preoperative ulnar neuritis. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Eligible patients were those who underwent concomitant UCLR and UNT at a single institution between January 2008 and June 2018 and who had a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. Additional inclusion criteria were athletes who identified as baseball players and who had a confirmed history of ulnar neuritis. Patients were contacted at a minimum of 2 years from surgery and assessed with the Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic (KJOC) Shoulder and Elbow Score, Andrew-Timmerman (A-T) Elbow Score, Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score, and a custom RTP questionnaire. Results: Included were 22 male baseball players with a mean age of 18.9 ± 2.1 years (range, 16-25 years). The mean follow-up was 6.1 ± 2.4 years (range, 2.5-11.7 years). Preoperatively, all 22 patients reported ulnar nerve sensory symptoms, while 4 (18.2%) patients reported ulnar nerve motor symptoms. At the final follow-up, 7 (31.8%) patients reported persistent ulnar nerve sensory symptoms, while none of the patients reported persistent ulnar nerve motor symptoms. Overall, 16 (72.7%) players were able to return to competitive play at an average of 11.2 months. The mean postoperative patient-reported outcome scores for the KJOC Shoulder and Elbow Score, MEPS, A-T Elbow Score, and SANE score were 77.9 ± 20.9 (range, 14-100), 92.7 ± 12.7 (range, 45-100), 86.1 ± 17.1 (range, 30-100), and 85.5 ± 14.8 (range, 50-100), respectively. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that after concomitant UCLR and UNT for UCL insufficiency and associated ulnar neuritis, baseball players can expect reasonably high RTP rates and subjective outcomes; however, rates of persistent sensory ulnar neuritis can be as high as 30%. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose of Review: Compressive neuropathy of the ulnar nerve across the elbow is a common diagnosis encountered frequently within a hand and upper extremity clinical practice. Appropriate and timely evaluation, diagnosis, objective testing, and evidence-based decisions regarding treatment options are paramount in the optimal care of the patient with this pathology. An understanding of current literature is critical in determining and understanding best practices. Recent Findings: A thorough review of the recent literature regarding physical examination, diagnostic testing, and nonoperative versus operative results was performed. Regarding physical examination, the glenohumeral internal rotation test and scratch collapse test are more effective and sensitive than traditional maneuvers such as Tinel's testing and the elbow flexion test. Electrodiagnostic testing, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasound evaluation have all been shown to be effective in diagnosing cubital tunnel syndrome. However, no single test has proven itself to be superior. Nonoperative treatment can be successful for mild cases of cubital tunnel syndrome. Surgical release techniques comparing open with endoscopic release are equivocal, and in situ release versus transposition techniques show that transposition should not be performed routinely. Summary: The diagnosis and treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome do not have a well-defined algorithm based on current literature. The treating physician must therefore utilize the available information to determine a diagnostic and treatment plan individualized to the patient. More rigorous scientific studies are needed to determine the most effective surgical approaches for cubital tunnel syndrome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The paper aims to present the advantages and disadvantages related to using the anterior transposition technique for the treatment of the cubital tunnel syndrome. Materials and Methods: The study presents the surgical treatment of a 58 years old woman. The therapeutic protocol included the decompression of the ulnar nerve at the level of the elbow, followed by the anterior transposition, the new position being maintained by anchoring in a fascial sling. Results: The electromyographic evaluation performed 12 months after the surgical intervention indicated that the parameters of motor nerve conduction were within normal limits on all segments, normal sensory velocities from the V fi nger, orthodromic and from the dorsal branch, sign of a very good postoperative recovery. Conclusions: Anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve may be a fi rm solution for the treatment of the compressive ulnar neuropathies located at the level of the elbow. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction is now being performed more commonly and on younger patients than in prior decades. As a result, radiologists will increasingly be asked to evaluate elbow imaging of patients presenting with pain who have had UCL reconstruction. It is essential for radiologists to understand the normal and abnormal imaging appearances after UCL reconstruction and ulnar nerve transposition, which is also commonly performed in overhead-throwing athletes. Doing so will allow radiologists to provide accurate interpretations that appropriately guide patient management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Ulnar nerve transposition (UNT) surgery is performed for the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome. Improperly performed UNT can create iatrogenic pain and neuropathy. The aim of this study is to identify anatomical structures distal to the medial epicondyle that should be recognized by all surgeons performing UNT to prevent postoperative neuropathy. Methods : Ten cadaveric specimens were dissected with attention to the ulnar nerve. Intramuscular UNT surgery was simulated in each. Distal to the medial epicondyle, any anatomical structure prohibiting transposition of the ulnar nerve to a straight-line course across the flexor-pronator mass was noted and its distance from the medial epicondyle was measured. Results : Seven structures were found distal to the medial epicondyle whose recognition is critical to ensuring a successful anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve: (1) Branches of the medial antebrachial cutaneous (MABC) nerve; (2) Osborne's fascia; (3) branches from the ulnar nerve to the flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU); (4) crossing vascular branches from the ulnar artery to the FCU; (5) the distal medial intermuscular septum between the FCU and flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS); (6) the combined muscular origins of the flexor-pronator muscles; and (7) the investing fascia of the FDS. Measurements are given for each structure. Conclusions : Poor outcomes and unnecessary revision surgeries for cubital tunnel syndrome can be avoided with intraoperative attention to 7 structures distal to the medial epicondyle. Surgeons should expect to dissect up to 12 cm distal to the medial epicondyle to adequately address these and prevent kinking of the nerve in transposition. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Cubital tunnel syndrome is a common compressive neuropathy of the upper extremity. The anconeus epitrochlearis muscle is an unusual but occasional contributor. We review our experience with this anomalous muscle in elbows with cubital tunnel syndrome. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed charts of 13 patients noted to have an anconeus epitrochlearis muscle associated with cubital tunnel syndrome. Results: Ten patients had unilateral ulnar neuropathy supported by nerve conduction studies. Three had bilateral cubital tunnel syndrome symptoms with 1 of those having normal nerve conduction studies for both elbows. Eight elbows were treated with myotomy of the anconeus epitrochlearis muscle and submuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve. The other 8 elbows were treated with myotomy of the anconeus epitrochlearis muscle and in situ decompression of the ulnar nerve only. All but 1 patient had either clinical resolution or improvement of symptoms at follow-up ranging from 2 weeks to 1 year after surgery. The 1 patient who had persistent symptoms had received myotomy and in situ decompression of the ulnar nerve only. Conclusions: An anomalous anconeus epitrochlearis occasionally results in compression of the ulnar nerve but is usually an incidental finding. Its contribution to compression neuropathy can be tested intraoperatively by passively ranging the elbow while observing the change in vector and tension of its muscle fibers over the ulnar nerve. Regardless of findings, we recommend myotomy of the muscle and in situ decompression of the ulnar nerve. Submuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve may be necessary if there is subluxation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: While ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction (UCLR) of the elbow is an increasingly commonly performed procedure with excellent results reported in the published literature, less attention has been paid to specifically on the characterization of postoperative ulnar nerve complications, and it is unclear what operative strategies may influence the likelihood of these complications. Purpose: The purpose of this study is to examine the prevalence and type of ulnar nerve complications after UCLR of the elbow based on the entirety of previously published outcomes in the English literature. In addition, this study examined how the rate of ulnar nerve complications varied as a function of surgical exposures, graft fixation techniques, and ulnar nerve management strategies. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was completed using the MEDLINE, PubMed, and Ovid databases. UCLR case series that contained complications data were included. Ulnar neuropathy was defined as any symptoms or objective sensory and/or motor deficit(s) after surgery, including resolved transient symptoms. Meta-analysis of the pooled data was completed. Results: Seventeen articles (n = 1518 cases) met the inclusion criteria, all retrospective cohort studies. The mean prevalence of postoperative ulnar neuropathy was 12.0% overall after any UCLR procedure at a mean follow-up of 3.3 years, and 0.8% of cases required reoperation to address ulnar neuropathy. There were no cases of intraoperative ulnar nerve injury reported. The surgical approach associated with the highest rate of neuropathy was detachment of flexor pronator mass (FPM) (21.9%) versus muscle retraction (15.9%) and muscle splitting (3.9%). The fixation technique associated with the highest rate of neuropathy was the modified Jobe (16.9%) versus DANE TJ (9.1%), figure-of-8 (9.0%), interference screw (5.0%), docking technique (3.3%), hybrid suture anchor-bone tunnel (2.9%), and modified docking (2.5%). Concomitant ulnar nerve transposition was associated with a higher neuropathy rate (16.1%) compared with no handling of the ulnar nerve (3.9%). Among cases with concomitant transposition performed, submuscular transposition resulted in a higher rate of reoperation for ulnar neuropathy (12.7%) compared with subcutaneous transposition (0.0%). Conclusion: Despite a perception that UCLR has minimal morbidity, a review of all published literature revealed that 12.0% of UCLR surgeries result in postoperative ulnar nerve complications. UCLR techniques associated with the highest rates of neuropathy were detachment of the FPM, modified Jobe fixation, and concomitant ulnar nerve transposition, although it remains unclear whether there is a causal relationship between these factors and subsequent development of postoperative ulnar neuropathy due to limitations in the current body of published literature. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To identify the incidence and the factors associated with a postoperative ulnar nerve neuropathy in patients who had undergone open reduction and internal fixation for intraarticular distal humerus fractures. We retrospectively reviewed 116 patients who had undergone surgery between January 2011 and December 2020. Age, sex, BMI, mechanism of injury, open or closed fracture, operation time, tourniquet time, and nerve injury at the final examination were collected from medical charts. We essentially used the paratricipital approach. In cases in which the reduction of intraarticular bone fragments was difficult, olecranon osteotomy was used. Ulnar nerve function was graded according to a modified system of McGowan. We conducted logistic regression analysis to investigate factors of neuropathy using items identified as statistically significant in univariate analysis as explanatory variables. Thirty-four patients (29.3%) had persistent neuropathy at the final follow-up. In the modified McGowan classification, 28 patients had grade 1 and 6 patients had grade 2 neuropathy. Olecranon osteotomy emerged as a distinct explanatory variable for the prophylaxis of ulnar nerve neuropathy in the multivariate analysis (odds ratio, 0.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.12–0.73). Anterior transposition, however, was not a statistically significant factor (odds ratio, 1.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.81–4.56). Olecranon osteotomy was the only independent factor associated with preventing the occurrence of ulnar nerve neuropathy. Ulnar nerve transposition might not be associated with prevention of ulnar nerve neuropathy. Prognostic IV. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Long standing nonunion of the lateral humeral condyle (LHC) usually results in elbow pain and instability with progressive cubitus valgus and tardy ulnar neuritis. Surgical treatment of long standing nonunion is still a controversial issue due to the reported complications, such as stiffness, loss of elbow motion, and avascular necrosis of the LHC fragment. In this study, we reported the outcomes of treatment of cubitus valgus deformity in long standing nonunion of the LHC in children treated with combined triple management (fixation of the nonunion site, dome corrective osteotomy, and anterior transposition of ulnar nerve) through a modified para-triceptal approach.Methods: We evaluated ten patients with cubitus valgus deformity more than 20 degrees after neglected nonunion of the lateral humeral condyle more than 24 months. Only childern with post-operative follow up more than 24 months were included in this study. All patients were evaluated clinically, radio logically, and by pre- and post-operative functional evaluation using Mayo elbow performance score. For evaluation of ulnar nerve affection, the Akahori's system was used.Results: There were six females and four males with the average age of 7.7 years at operation. The left elbow was affected in six patients and the right elbow was affected in four patients. The average time between fracture of the LHC and operation was 40.3 months with average post-operative follow up of 44.3 months. The average carrying angle of the healthy side was 5.5 degrees and pre-operative carrying angle of the affected side was 33.5 degrees. The average post-operative carrying angle of the affected side was 6.1 degrees. The improvement of the carrying angle at the last follow up was found statistically significant (p < 0.05). All six patients that had pre-operative various degrees of ulnar nerve affection had completely improved at last follow up. The osteotomy site united in an average time of 43 days, whereas the LHC nonunion site united in an average time of 77.2 days. The osteotomy site united in significantly less time than the LHC non-union site (p < 0.05). The correlation between time since injury and time of union of LHC non-union site was significant (p < 0.05). Post-operative elbow range of motion was not changed in five patients, slightly decreased in four patients, and increased in one patient. Three patients had an average 6.7 degrees (range; 5-10) loss of the last degrees of flexion. One patient developed extension lag of 10 degrees. The mean elbow range of motion (ROM) pre-operatively was 139 ± 4.6 degrees while the mean post-operative ROM was 138 ± 5.3 degrees. The difference was found to be statistically insignificant (p > 0.05). The mean pre-operative Mayo elbow performance score was poor 55 ± 9.7, four patients had fair score, and six had poor score. The mean post-operative Mayo elbow performance score was excellent 92.5 ± 10, six patients had excellent score, and four had good score. The improvement of the Mayo score at the last follow up was found to be statistically significant (p < 0.05). No intra-operative complications were recorded during any of the procedures and no patient developed a wound or pin track infection post-operatively. At the last follow up, none of the patients had developed avascular necrosis of the LHC.Conclusion: Preservation of the blood supply of the nonunited fragment is the key to successful management. This combined technique successfully addresses different aspects of the problem simultaneously and provides a durable solution without deterioration of the results over time. The para-triceptal approach provided excellent exposure of both sides of the elbow with minimal disruption of the triceps muscle. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ten fresh frozen right cadaver arms were placed in a motorized jig and an in-situ ulnar nerve decompression was performed in 5 mm increments distally to the flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU) aponeurosis then proximally to the intermuscular septum. The elbows were ranged 0–135° after each incremental decompression and the ulnar nerve to medial epicodyle distance was measured to assess for nerve translation/subluxation compared with baseline (prerelease) values. None of the specimens had ulnar nerve subluxation (defined as anterior translation past the medial epicondyle) even after full decompression. Furthermore, there were no statistically significant ulnar nerve translations (defined as any difference in distance from ulnar nerve to medial epicondyle before and after each decompression) for any flexion angle or extent of decompression. This study provides biomechanical evidence that in situ ulnar nerve decompression from the FCU aponeurosis to the intermuscular septum does not result in significant ulnar nerve translation or subluxation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose The purpose of this study was to contrast the rate and types of complications and secondary surgeries for in situ cubital tunnel release and ulnar nerve transposition. Methods A retrospective cohort study was performed by query of hospital billing records for all patients who underwent cubital tunnel surgery from August 2008 to July 2013, yielding 421 patients. Exclusion criteria were acute trauma, revision surgery, neoplasm, age younger than 18 years, incomplete records, and postoperative follow-up less than 3 months. Of the remaining 234 patients, 147 patients underwent 157 in situ cubital tunnel releases and 87 patients underwent 90 ulnar nerve transpositions. Results In 157 in situ cubital tunnel releases, there were 6 complications (3.8%), including 3 cases (1.9%) of ulnar nerve instability, 2 cases (1.3%) of postoperative infection, and 1 case (0.6%) of a postoperative seroma. In 90 ulnar nerve transpositions, there were 2 complications (2.2%), including 1 case (1.1%) of postoperative infection and 1 case (1.1%) of medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve injury. The secondary surgery rate was 5.7% overall, 2.5% for in situ cubital tunnel release, and 11.1% for ulnar nerve transposition. Chronic kidney disease was associated with complication after cubital tunnel surgery. Prior trauma to the elbow and ulnar nerve transposition were associated with secondary surgery. Conclusions The short-term complication rates of cubital tunnel surgery are low (3.2%), but higher for patients with chronic kidney disease. The secondary surgery rate after cubital tunnel surgery was 5.7% overall, but higher for patients with prior elbow trauma and for patients undergoing ulnar nerve transposition. Type of study/level of evidence [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To evaluate surgical treatment of symptomatic non-union of lateral condylar elbow fractures in adults.Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 11 consecutive adult patients were surgically treated for symptomatic non-union of the lateral humeral condyle. Milch type I fracture non-unions (n = 3) were treated with medial closing wedge osteotomy and ulnar nerve transposition, while type II equivalents (n = 8) were treated with non-union fixation and bone grafting. Age at injury, age at referral, pre-operative symptoms, and pre-operative functional data (Modified An and Morrey functional rating index) were collected.Results: Eleven patients (average age 20 years old) with varying symptoms attributable to non-union were surgically treated at a mean of 15.8 years following the initial fracture. Post-operative complications included one superficial infection and 17one radial nerve temporary neuropraxia. Pain, ulnar neuritis, and functional outcomes (Modified An and Morrey, mean 7.1 point improvement) improved significantly. However, the combined range of motion decreased by a mean of 11.4°.Conclusion: Our treatment algorithm for adults with chronic neglected and symptomatic non-union of the lateral humeral condyle improved functional outcomes in this cohort. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cubital tunnel syndrome is the second most common upper-extremity compressive neuropathy, and persistent symptoms can necessitate operative treatment. Surgical options include simple decompression and ulnar nerve transposition. The cause of wound dehiscence after surgery is not well known, and the factors leading to the development of these complications have not been previously described. Patients undergoing ulnar nerve surgery from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2019, were retrospectively evaluated for the development of wound dehiscence within 3 months of surgery. There were 295 patients identified who underwent transposition and 1,106 patients who underwent simple decompression. Patient demographics and past medical history were collected to evaluate the risk factors for the development of wound dehiscence. The overall rate of wound dehiscence following surgery was 2.5%. In the simple decompression group, the rate of wound dehiscence was 2.7% (30/1,106), which occurred a mean of 21 days (range, 2–57 days) following surgery. In the transposition group, the rate of wound dehiscence was 1.7% (5/295), which occurred a mean of 20 days (range, 12–32 days) following surgery. The difference in rates of dehiscence between the decompression and transposition groups was not significant. Five patients in the simple decompression group and 1 patient in the transposition group required a secondary surgery for closure of the wound. Age, body mass index, smoking status, and medical comorbidities were not found to contribute to the development of wound dehiscence. Wound dehiscence can occur following both simple decompression and transposition, even after postoperative evaluation demonstrates a healed wound. Surgeons should be aware of this possibility and specifically counsel patients about remaining cautious with, and protective of, their wound for several weeks after surgery. Dehiscence may be related to suboptimal vascularity in the soft tissue envelope in the posteromedial elbow. When it occurs, dehiscence can generally be treated by allowing healing by secondary intention. Therapeutic IV. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Approaches to surgical treatment to cubital tunnel syndrome include simple decompression, decompression with medial epicondylectomy, and decompression with anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve. Transposition of the ulnar nerve involves decompression and transposition of the nerve anteriorly to a subcutaneous, intramuscular, or submuscular position. However, transposing the ulnar nerve to subcutaneous plane renders it more susceptible to external trauma. Hence, this technique article introduces the use of a modified fascial sling., Methodology: The modified fascial sling technique for anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve involves careful dissection to identify the ulnar nerve, decompression of the nerve, then transposition of the ulnar nerve anterior to the medial epicondyle. An AlloWrap (Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI, USA) is first wrapped around the ulnar nerve, followed by wrapping a fascial sling fashioned from the flexor carpi ulnaris fascia. A prospective case series for this surgical technique was conducted. Wilcoxon signed-rank test compared preoperative and postoperative qDASH-9 scores, an abbreviated questionnaire to assess functional limitations of the upper limb., Results: Five patients were included in this study, with a mean duration of follow-up of 530.4 days. The mean QuickDASH-9 functional disability score was 36.5 ± 25.1 preoperatively and 20.6 ± 12.8 postoperatively, demonstrating statistically significant improvement ( P  = .008)., Conclusion: The modified fascial sling technique for anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve was developed to address the complications of perineural adhesions after transposition causing tethering of the ulnar nerve. At the same time, the fascial sling prevents posterior subluxation of the ulnar nerve back to its original location, thereby reducing the risk of recurrent symptoms., (© 2023 The Authors.)

Ulnar neuropathy is commonly encountered, both acutely after elbow trauma and in the setting of chronic compression neuropathy. Careful clinical evaluation and discerning evaluation of electrodiagnostic studies are helpful in determining the prognosis of recovery with nonoperative and operative management. Appreciation of the subtleties in clinical presentation and thoughtful consideration of the timing and type of surgical intervention are critical to optimizing outcomes after treatment of ulnar neuropathy. The potential need for decompression at both the cubital tunnel and Guyon's canal must be appreciated. Supplementation of decompression with supercharged end-to-side nerve transfer can expedite motor recovery of the ulnar intrinsic muscles in the appropriately selected patient. The emergence of nerve transfer techniques has also changed the management of acute ulnar nerve injuries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose To assess the incidence of ulnar nerve instability in patients undergoing in situ decompression and to identify preoperative risk factors to predict the need for transposition. Methods Using our surgical database, we retrospectively identified 363 patients who were candidates for in situ ulnar nerve decompression for the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome over a 5-year period. During this time, the 3 participating surgeons considered ulnar nerve instability to be a contraindication for in situ ulnar nerve decompression. We collected demographic data including sex, age, weight, height, and body mass index. We recorded the number of patients who underwent ulnar nerve transposition owing to ulnar nerve instability and evaluated whether ulnar nerve instability was diagnosed before, during, or after surgery. Results Of the 363 patients who were considered for in situ ulnar nerve decompression, 76 patients (21%) underwent ulnar nerve transposition secondary to ulnar nerve instability. Twenty-nine patients (8%) were identified with instability before surgery, and 44 patients (12%) were identified with instability during surgery following in situ decompression. Three patients (1%) were not diagnosed with instability until after surgery and subsequently underwent secondary transposition. Patients who underwent transposition owing to instability were more likely to be male and to be younger. Conclusions A notable percentage of patients with a stable nerve before surgery will have ulnar nerve instability following decompression. Identification of factors correlating to instability and the potential need for transposition can aid surgeons and patients in preoperative planning. Type of study/level of evidence Prognostic II. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose To examine trends in and determinants of the use of different procedures for treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome. Methods We performed a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Florida State Ambulatory Surgery Database for 2005 to 2012. We selected all patients who underwent in situ decompression, transposition, or other surgical treatments for cubital tunnel syndrome. We tested trends in the use of these techniques and performed a multivariable analysis to examine associations among patient characteristics, surgeon case volume, and the use of different techniques. Results Of the 26,164 patients who underwent surgery for cubital tunnel syndrome, 80% underwent in situ decompression, 16% underwent transposition, and 4% underwent other surgical treatment. Over the study period, there was a statistically significant increase in the use of in situ release and a decrease in the use of transposition. Women and patients treated by surgeons with a higher cubital tunnel surgery case volume underwent in situ release with a statistically higher incidence than other techniques. Conclusions In Florida, surgeon practice reflected the widespread adoption of in situ release as the primary treatment for cubital tunnel syndrome, and its relative incidence increased during the study period. Patient demographics and surgeon-level factors influenced procedure selection. Type of study/level of evidence Therapeutic III. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Patients with nonunion of the lateral humeral condyle often present with pain, instability, progressive cubitus valgus and tardy ulnar nerve palsy. At present repairing of this nonunion is still controversial due to previous reported complications such as stiffness and avascular necrosis (AVN). This study reported the outcomes of treatment in nonunion of the lateral humeral condyle in children. Methods: We evaluated 17 patients with nonunion of the lateral humeral condyle after repair. Corrective osteotomy was done in patients with valgus deformity of more than 30 degrees and anterior ulnar nerve transposition in patients with ulnar nerve symptoms. Evaluations were performed with the use of radiographic examination, clinical assessment and also evaluated using Mayo Elbow Performance score by interview and physical examination interpreted as excellent (≥90 points), good (75-89 points), fair (60-74 points), and poor (<60 points). Results: Nine patients were male, and eight were female. The mean age at presentation was 6.5 years. The average interval from the injury to the presentation of the symptoms was 31.5 months. The average duration of follow-up was 48.6 months. The range of flexion was 130-145° (average 130°). The Mayo elbow performance score was excellent in 11 patients and good in six patients. Mean Mayo elbow performance score was 94. Osseous union was achieved after the initial operation in 16 patients. One patient had re-operation using local bone graft and healed nicely. Determination of correlation coefficients found good correlation between neglected time and Mayo performance score <89 (-0.741), age of patient was fairly well correlated with Mayo performance score <89 (-0.635) and ROC curve show that neglected lateral condyle fracture in children more than 28 months will reduce the Mayo score. Conclusion: (1) We support osteosynthesis for children, not only for those who have pain but also for those who are less symptomatic. Good and excellent results by Mayo elbow performance score were found in all patients, and all nonunions were united with good range of motion. (2) Neglecting lateral condyle fracture in children more than 28 months will reduce Mayo performance score to below 89 points. (3) Cases presenting with AVN pre-operatively can still have good results and remodeling potential with congruency of the joint. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]