Search

Plastic sanitary sheaths over artificial insemination (AI) guns have been used at the time of AI to improve hygiene at AI and fertility in cattle, but fertility responses have been variable in studies when AI was performed by professional inseminators. The aims of this study were to investigate whether the use of a sanitary sheath at the time of AI carried out by nonprofessional (do-it-yourself, or DIY) inseminators improves pregnancy rates to AI in pasture-based dairy cows and whether effects of sheaths are greater in cows with contaminated vulvas and in cows at increased risk of extended calving to conception intervals. Lactating dairy cows located in 10 pasture-based herds in a subtropical region of northern Australia were inseminated by herd-based DIY inseminators and assigned to be inseminated with (n = 3,655) or without (n = 3,969) a sanitary sheath, with potential effects assessed using multivariable logistic regression. Overall, use of a sheath at the time of AI did not significantly affect pregnancy rates to AI (36.3% for those inseminated without a sheath vs. 36.8% for those inseminated with a sheath; odds ratio: 1.02; 95% confidence interval: 0.92-1.11). Effects of using a sheath on pregnancy rates to AI varied by herd, with lower pregnancy rates with the use of sheaths in 1 herd and some evidence of increases in 3 herds. Unexpectedly, there was evidence that the effect of sheath on pregnancy rates was less positive (or more negative) when the vulva was classified as dirty before any cleaning of the vulva before insemination compared with when the vulva was classified as clean (interaction odds ratio: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.56-1.00). Interactions between sheath and other explanatory variables that could affect fertility were not significant; thus, there was no compelling evidence that the effect of using a sheath was modified by any of these variables. We conclude that the use of sheaths during AI of pasture-based dairy cows by DIY inseminators does not, on average, markedly improve pregnancy rates to AI. However, responses may vary between herds, and the response to sheaths may be inferior (i.e., less positive or more negative) when a cow's vulva is contaminated with feces or discharge at the time of AI compared with when the vulva is clean., (Copyright © 2019 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

This study evaluated the effect of equine chorionic gonadotropin (eCG) on reproductive performance, when incorporated into the first Ovsynch + P4 synchronization following planned start mating (PSM) in pasture-based lactating dairy cows. Two synchrony programs were compared in a randomized controlled trial in Queensland, Australia. Lactating cows from a single dairy herd (n = 782) were randomly allocated to Control and eCG groups. Control cows had their estrous cycles synchronized by treatment with 100 μg gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH; im) and insertion of a progesterone (P4) releasing intravaginal device that contained 1.0 g of P4 on Day 0; removal of P4 device and administration of 500 μg of an analogue of PGF2α on Day 7 (cloprostenol; im); 100 μg im of GnRH on Day 9, and fixed-time artificial insemination (FTAI) on Day 10. The eCG group were treated the same as the Control group except for the addition of 400 IU of eCG, im on Day 7 of the first synchronized estrous cycle. Following the first insemination, non-pregnant cows from both groups had their estrous cycles synchronized with the same treatment protocol without using eCG. The effects of eCG on 42d cumulative incidence of pregnancy and pregnancy per AI (P/AI) were determined using logistic regression models. The effect of eCG on time to pregnancy was determined using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards models. Adjusted 42 d cumulative incidence of pregnancy for eCG and control groups were 47.2 and 39.3% respectively (Odds ratio [OR] = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.01-1.88). Hazard of pregnancy tended to be higher in eCG cows overall (Hazard ratio [HR] = 1.18, 95% CI: 0.99-1.41) and was significantly higher when restricting to the first 42 days after PSM (HR = 1.31, 95% CI: 1.04-1.64). Hazards of pregnancy were not different between groups when restricting to > Day 42 post PSM (HR = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.77-1.31). P/AI tended to be higher in eCG treated cows at the first AI (44.0 vs 37.7%, OR = 1.30, 95% CI: 0.94-1.78). P/AI for second and third AIs were not significantly different between groups. In this herd, a single treatment of eCG at the first synchronized estrus after PSM improved reproductive performance in the short term, but not at subsequent inseminations., (Crown Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)