Search

Confirmation of patient information is required to ensure the safety of radiation therapy. The purpose of this study was to construct a system that facilitates radiation therapy operations by linking a radiation therapy information system to a smartphone. By linking a smartphone to a radiation therapy operation support system, without using a PC terminal, we were able to input information about the patient's position and fixation into images taken with a smartphone. In addition, patient information could be directly linked into the radiation therapy information system. In addition, patient information could be verified in the irradiation room by synchronizing the smartphone with the radiation therapy support system. The questionnaire was highly evaluated in terms of radio reception, usability, visibility and barcode reading. In this study, by linking a smartphone to a radiotherapy information system, it was possible to construct a system that facilitates radiotherapy operations by checking and registering patient information at hand.

Background/aim To evaluate the incidence and grade of radiation pneumonitis after volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) performed for the treatment of non-small cell cancer (NSCLC). Patients and methods Fifty consecutive non-surgical candidates with NSCLC underwent VMAT. Thirty-five patients had stage-III tumors and 15 had recurrent tumors. The prescribed radiation dose for the gross tumor and the elective nodal area was 69 Gy in 30 fractions and 51 Gy in 30 fractions, respectively. Results Radiation pneumonitis developed in 38 patients (76%, 38/50), and grade ≥2 radiation pneumonitis developed in 11 patients (22%, 11/50). The percentage of lung volume that received a dose in excess of 5 Gy (V5), V10, V20, V30, and the mean lung dose (MLD) in the bilateral and ipsilateral lung were significantly associated with the development of grade ≥2 radiation pneumonitis. Conclusion The incidence and degree of radiation pneumonitis are acceptable following treatment of NSCLC with VMAT.

Background Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is an essential component of care for patients with cardiovascular diseases (CVD). We aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes in outpatients with CVD who did and did not complete a 5-month CR program. Methods Three hundred thirty-two outpatients with CVD who participated in a 5-month CR program and were followed-up for maximum 5 years were registered. We divided the patients into two groups: those who completed the CR program (success group, n = 175) and those who could not (non-success group, n = 157). Both long-term (5 years) and short-term (5 months) clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results There were no significant differences in patient characteristics at baseline between the success and non-success groups. With regard to both long-term and short-term clinical outcomes, the rates of all-cause death and hospital admission in the success group were significantly lower than those in the non-success group by a Kaplan-Meier analysis. There was a significant difference in short-term CVD death and hospital admission between the groups, but not for long-term CVD death and hospital. In long-term period, all-cause death and hospital admission was independently associated with completion of the CR program in addition to the presence of peripheral artery disease and VE vs. VCO2 slope after adjusting for age, gender, body mass index, types of CVD and medications. Conclusions Completion of a 5-month CR program was associated with the prevention of all-cause death and hospital admission, but not CVD death and hospital admission in the long-term, which suggests that we need to reconsider this issue.

Aim This study aimed to assess the utility and stability of intraoral stent during intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Background The benefits of intraoral stents in radiotherapy are unclear. Materials and methods We analyzed 386 setup errors in 12 patients who received IMRT for head and neck cancers without intraoral stents (intraoral stent [−]) and 183 setup errors in 6 patients who received IMRT with intraoral stents (intraoral stent [+]). All patients were matched according to the immobilization method (masks and boards). Setup errors were measured as the distance from the initial setup based on the marking on the skin and mask to the corrected position based on bone matching on cone beam computed tomography. Results The mean interfractional setup errors in the right–left, craniocaudal, anterior–posterior (AP), and three-dimensional (3D) directions were −0.33, 0.08, −0.25, and 2.75 mm in the intraoral stent (−) group and −0.37, 0.24, −0.63, and 2.42 mm in the intraoral stent (+) group, respectively ( P = 0.50, 0.65, 0.01, and 0.02, respectively). The systematic errors for the same directions were 0.89, 1.46, 1.15, and 0.88 mm in the intraoral stent (−) group and 0.62, 1.69, 0.68, and 0.56 mm in the intraoral stents (+) group, respectively. The random errors were 1.43, 1.43, 1.44, and 1.22 mm in the intraoral stent (−) group and 1.06, 1.11, 1.05, and 0.92 mm in the intraoral stents (+) group, respectively. Conclusion Setup errors can be significantly reduced in the AP and 3D-directions by using intraoral stents.

Deformable image registration (DIR) has been an important component in adaptive radiotherapy (ART). Our goal was to examine the accuracy of ART using the dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and to determine the optimal timing of replanning. A total of 22 patients who underwent volume modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for head and neck (H&N) cancers were prospectively analyzed. The planning target volume (PTV) was to receive a total of 70 Gy in 33 fractions. A second planning CT scan (rescan) was performed at the 15th fraction. The DSC was calculated for each structure on both CT scans. The continuous variables to predict the need for replanning were assessed. The optimal cut-off value was determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. In the correlation between body weight loss and DSC of each structure, weight loss correlated negatively with DSC of the whole face (rs = -0.45) and the face surface (rs = -0.51). Patients who required replanning tended to have experienced rapid weight loss. The threshold DSC was 0.98 and 0.60 in the whole face and the face surface, respectively. Patients who showed low DSC in the whole face and the face surface required replanning at a significantly high rate (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01). Weight loss correlated with DSC in both the whole face and the face surface (P < 0.05 and P < 0.05). The DSC values in the face predicted the need for replanning. In addition, weight loss tended to correlate with DSC. DIR during ART was found to be a useful tool for replanning.

Background: Visit-to-visit variability (VVV) in blood pressure (BP) has been shown to be a strong predictor of cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, the long-term effect of comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation (CR) with exercise training on VVV in BP has not yet been established. Therefore, we evaluated the long-term effects of CR on VVV in BP in patients with CVD. Methods: Twenty-two CVD patients in a 12-month CR program who had at least six clinic visits per month to measure BP were enrolled. We determined VVV in BP expressed as the standard deviation of average BP every month for 12 months. Results: The mean age was 70 ± 8 years and the body mass index was 24.4 ± 4.9 kg/m 2 . In addition, the percentage (%) of males, % heart failure and % ischemic heart disease were 77%, 55% and 27%, respectively. Patients who had uncontrolled BP at baseline showed a significant reduction of both systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP). VVV in SBP in the first month was significantly less than that in the last month, although there was no difference in VVV in DBP. Patients were divided into larger (L-) and smaller (S-) VVV in SBP groups according to the average value of VVV in SBP as a cut-off. The L-VVV in SBP group, but not the S-VVV in SBP group, showed a significant reduction of VVV in SBP. Conclusion: Comprehensive CR may improve VVV in SBP in CVD patients who have larger VVV in SBP. J Clin Med Res. 2017;9(4):345-352 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jocmr2915w

Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) improves cardiac function and exercise capacity in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). Simpler techniques are needed for use by physicians in the examination room to assess the usefulness of CR. We enrolled 46 consecutive CVD patients in a CR program (CR group) and prospectively followed them for 3months. We compared them to 18 age-, gender- and body mass index-matched CVD patients without CR (non-CR group). Various parameters were measured at baseline and after 3months using 3 simple non-invasive tests: severity of atherosclerosis [arterial velocity pulse index and arterial pressure volume index (API)] were determined using PASESA®, an autonomic nerve total activity amount index and a coefficient of variation of the R–R interval (CVRR) were determined using eHEART®, and peripheral resistance index, pressure rate product, stroke volume and cardiac index were determined using nico®]. There were no significant differences in patient characteristics including percentages (%) of ischemic heart disease and heart failure between the non-CR and CR groups. Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic BP, heart rate and API at baseline significantly decreased and CVRR at baseline significantly increased after 3months in the CR group, but not in the non-CR group. In addition, ΔAPI (Δ=the value after 3months minus the value at baseline) was positively associated with ΔSBP in the CR group. In conclusion, CR significantly decreased BP and improved atherosclerosis and sympathetic nerve activity. These findings suggest that simple non-invasive tests may be useful for assessing the effects of CR.

Visit-to-visit variability (VVV) in blood pressure (BP) has been shown to be a predictor of cardiovascular events. It is unknown whether CR can improve VVV in BP as well as reducing BP. We enrolled 84 patients who had cardiovascular disease (CVD) and participated in a 3-month CR program. We measured systolic and diastolic BP (SBP and DBP), pulse pressure (PP), and heart rate (HR) before exercise training at each visit and determined VVV in BP or HR expressed as the standard deviation of the average BP or HR. Patients who had uncontrolled BP at baseline and who did not change their antihypertensive drugs throughout the study period showed a significant reduction of both SBP and DBP with a decrease in PP after 3 months. Patients who did not change their antihypertensive drugs were divided into larger (L-) and smaller (S-) VVV in the SBP groups and L- and S-VVV in the DBP groups according to the average value of VVV in SBP or DBP. In the L-VVV in the SBP and DBP groups, VVV in SBP and DBP in the 1st month was significantly decreased after the 3rd month in both groups. HR at baseline was significantly decreased after 3 months. In addition, CR induced a significant increase in the level of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) in blood. In conclusion, CR improved VVV in BP in patients with L-VVV in BP and evoked a significant reduction in HR and an increase in HDL-C. These effects due to the CR program may be cardioprotective.