Search

The paper introduces a powerful method for developing lightweight designs and enhancing the load-bearing capacity of common structures. The method, referred to as the 'method of aggregation', has been derived from reverse engineering of sub-additive and super-additive algebraic inequalities. The essence of the proposed method is consolidating multiple elements loaded in bending into a reduced number of elements with larger cross sections but a smaller total volume of material. This procedure yields a huge reduction in material usage and is the first major contribution of the paper. For instance, when aggregating eight load-carrying beams into two beams supporting the same total load, the material reduction was more than 1.58 times. The second major contribution of the paper is in demonstrating that consolidating multiple elements loaded in bending into a reduced number of elements with larger cross sections but the same total volume of material leads to a big increase in the load-bearing capacity of the structure. For instance, when aggregating eight cantilevered or simply supported beams into two beams with the same volume of material, the load-bearing capacity until a specified tensile stress increased twice. At the same time, the load-bearing capacity until a specified deflection increased four times. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The paper explores the probabilistic interpretations of algebraic inequalities and presents several findings. First, the inequality of the additive ratios can be used to increase the probability of an event occurring within a set of mutually exclusive and exhaustive events. The interpretation of this inequality produced a counter‐intuitive result, that for suppliers delivering the same quantity of reliable products alongside unknown numbers of unreliable products, the probability of purchasing a reliable product from a randomly selected supplier is higher than the probability of purchasing a reliable product from the market formed by all suppliers. Next, the paper discusses how averaging the reliabilities of components from different varieties can lead to a significant overestimation of the calculated system reliability, as demonstrated by another algebraic inequality interpretation. Finally, the paper derives tight bounds for the reliability of demand in a load‐strength interference model by interpreting the Hayashi's inequality. Notably, these bounds do not depend on the shape of the load distribution and only require the strength distribution to be known in relatively small vicinities of the lower and upper bound of the load. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A special class of general inequalities has been identified that provides the opportunity for generating new knowledge that can be used for optimising systems and processes in diverse areas of science and technology. It is demonstrated that inequalities belonging to this class can always be interpreted meaningfully if the variables and separate terms of the inequalities represent additive quantities. The meaningful interpretation of a new algebraic inequality based on the proposed general class of inequalities led to developing a light-weight design for a supporting structure based on cantilever beams, reducing the maximum force upon impact, generating new knowledge about the deflection of elastic elements connected in parallel and series and optimising the allocation of resources to maximise expected benefit. The interpretation of the new inequality yielded that the deflection of elastic elements connected in parallel is at least n 2 times smaller than the deflection of the same elastic elements connected in series, irrespective of the individual stiffness values of the elastic elements. The interpretation of another algebraic inequality from the proposed general class led to a method for decreasing the stiffness of a mechanical assembly by cyclic permutation of the elastic elements building the assembly. The analysis showed that a decrease of stiffness exists only if asymmetry of the stiffness values in the connected elements is present. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The paper introduces two fundamental approaches for reliability improvement and risk reduction by using nontrivial algebraic inequalities: (a) by proving an inequality derived or conjectured from a real system or process and (b) by creating meaningful interpretation of an existing nontrivial abstract inequality relevant to a real system or process. A formidable advantage of the algebraic inequalities can be found in their capacity to produce tight bounds related to reliability‐critical design parameters in the absence of any knowledge about the variation of the controlling variables. The effectiveness of the first approach has been demonstrated by examples related to decision‐making under deep uncertainty and examples related to ranking systems built on components whose reliabilities are unknown. To demonstrate the second approach, meaningful interpretation has been created for an inequality that is a special case of the Cauchy‐Schwarz inequality. By varying the interpretation of the variables, the same inequality holds for elastic elements, resistors, and capacitors arranged in series and parallel. The paper also shows that meaningful interpretation of superadditive and subadditive inequalities can be used with success for optimizing various systems and processes. Meaningful interpretation of superadditive and subadditive inequalities has been used for maximizing the stored elastic strain energy at a specified total displacement and for optimizing the profit from an investment. Finally, meaningful interpretation of an algebraic inequality has been used for reducing uncertainty and the risk of incorrect prediction about the magnitude ranking of sequential random events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]