Search

Patients with a history of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism are at risk for a recurrent event. This is particularly true of patients with idiopathic events or events related to low risk triggers. In these patients extending anticoagulation beyond 3 to 6months may be warranted. Using clinical risk, biomarker analysis and risk stratification protocols we can make the best recommendations to patients with respect to the risks and benefits of ongoing therapy. Trials demonstrating benefit from low-dose aspirin for secondary prophylaxis may provide an option for patients in whom ongoing anticoagulation is deemed unsafe. In addition, recent introduction of the direct oral anticoagulants have expanded options for secondary prophylaxis for preventing venous thromboembolism recurrence.

Background In every field of medicine, comprehensive education should be delivered at the graduate level. Currently, no single specialty routinely provides a standardized comprehensive curriculum in venous and lymphatic disease. Method The American Board of Venous & Lymphatic Medicine formed a task force, made up of experts from the specialties of dermatology, family practice, interventional radiology, interventional cardiology, phlebology, vascular medicine, and vascular surgery, to develop a consensus document describing the program requirements for fellowship medical education in venous and lymphatic medicine. Result The Program Requirements for Fellowship Education in Venous and Lymphatic Medicine identify the knowledge and skills that physicians must master through the course of fellowship training in venous and lymphatic medicine. They also specify the requirements for venous and lymphatic training programs. The document is based on the Core Content for Training in Venous and Lymphatic Medicine and follows the ACGME format that all subspecialties in the United States use to specify the requirements for training program accreditation. The American Board of Venous & Lymphatic Medicine Board of Directors approved this document in May 2016. Conclusion The pathway to a vein practice is diverse, and there is no standardized format available for physician education and training. The Program Requirements for Fellowship Education in Venous and Lymphatic Medicine establishes educational standards for teaching programs in venous and lymphatic medicine and will facilitate graduation of physicians who have had comprehensive training in the field.

Objectives Venous leg ulcers (VLU) are the most severe clinical sequelae of venous reflux and post thrombotic syndrome. There is a consensus that ablation of refluxing vein segments and treatment of significant venous obstruction can heal VLUs. However, there is wide disparity in the use and choice of adjunctive therapies for VLUs. The purpose of this study was to assess these practice patterns among members of the American Venous Forum. Methods The AVF Research Committee conducted an online survey of its own members, which consisted of 16 questions designed to determine the specialty of physicians, location of treatment, treatment practices and reimbursement for treatment of VLUs Results The survey was distributed to 667 practitioners and a response rate of 18.6% was achieved. A majority of respondents (49.5%) were vascular specialists and the remaining were podiatrists, dermatologists, primary care doctors and others. It was found that 85.5% were from within the USA, while physicians from 14 other countries also responded. Most of the physicians (45%) provided adjunctive therapy at a private office setting and 58% treated less than 5 VLU patients per week. All respondents used some form of compression therapy as the primary mode of treatment for VLU. Multilayer compression therapy was the most common form of adjunctive therapy used (58.8%) and over 90% of physicians started additional modalities (biologics, negative pressure, hyperbaric oxygen and others) when VLUs failed compression therapy, with a majority (65%) waiting less than three months to start them. Medicare was the most common source of reimbursement (52.4%). Conclusions Physicians from multiple specialties treat VLU. While most physicians use compression therapy, there is wide variation in the selection and point of initiation for additional therapies once compression fails. There is a need for high-quality data to help establish guidelines for adjunctive treatment of VLUs and to disseminate them to physicians across multiple specialties to ensure standardized high-quality treatment of patients with VLUs.

Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) has proven morbidity and mortality benefits in cardiovascular disease, which directly correlates with exercise performance achieved. Many patients in CR exercise at sub-optimal levels, without obvious limitations. Occult lower-extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD) may be a determinant of diminished exercise capacity and reduced benefit obtained from traditional CR. In this prospective study of 150 consecutive patients enrolled in Phase II CR, we describe the prevalence of PAD, the utility of externally validated screening questionnaires, and the observed impact on CR outcomes. Abnormal ankle–brachial indices (ABI) (1.4) were observed in 19% of those studied. The Edinburgh Claudication Questionnaire was insensitive for detecting PAD by low ABI in this population, and the Walking Impairment Questionnaire and a modified Gardner protocol demonstrated a lack of typical symptoms with low levels of activity. Importantly, at completion of traditional CR, exercise improvement measured in metabolic equivalents (METs) was worse in those with a low ABI compared to those with a normal ABI (+1.39 vs +2.41 METs, p=0.002). In conclusion, PAD is common in patients in Phase II CR and often clinically occult. Screening based on standard questionnaires appears insensitive in this population, suggesting a need for a broad-based screening strategy with ABI measurements. In this study, undiagnosed PAD significantly attenuated improvements in exercise performance, which potentially has bearings on future clinical events.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus continues to grow in global prevalence and to consume an increasing amount of health care resources. One of the key areas of morbidity associated with diabetes is the diabetic foot. To improve the care of patients with diabetic foot and to provide an evidence-based multidisciplinary management approach, the Society for Vascular Surgery in collaboration with the American Podiatric Medical Association and the Society for Vascular Medicine developed this clinical practice guideline. METHODS: The committee made specific practice recommendations using the Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system. This was based on five systematic reviews of the literature. Specific areas of focus included (1) prevention of diabetic foot ulceration, (2) off-loading, (3) diagnosis of osteomyelitis, (4) wound care, and (5) peripheral arterial disease. RESULTS: Although we identified only limited high-quality evidence for many of the critical questions, we used the best available evidence and considered the patients' values and preferences and the clinical context to develop these guidelines. We include preventive recommendations such as those for adequate glycemic control, periodic foot inspection, and patient and family education. We recommend using custom therapeutic footwear in high-risk diabetic patients, including those with significant neuropathy, foot deformities, or previous amputation. In patients with plantar diabetic foot ulcer (DFU), we recommend off-loading with a total contact cast or irremovable fixed ankle walking boot. In patients with a new DFU, we recommend probe to bone test and plain films to be followed by magnetic resonance imaging if a soft tissue abscess or osteomyelitis is suspected. We provide recommendations on comprehensive wound care and various débridement methods. For DFUs that fail to improve (>50% wound area reduction) after a minimum of 4 weeks of standard wound therapy, we recommend adjunctive wound therapy options. In patients with DFU who have peripheral arterial disease, we recommend revascularization by either surgical bypass or endovascular therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Whereas these guidelines have addressed five key areas in the care of DFUs, they do not cover all the aspects of this complex condition. Going forward as future evidence accumulates, we plan to update our recommendations accordingly.

There are many clinical and laboratory biomarkers that play a role in venous thromboembolism management. In clinical care, biomarkers may be used along with clinical risk scores to exclude venous thromboembolism. In addition, they can be used to determine venous thromboembolic risk, determine the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism, as well as risk stratify patients for adverse clinical outcomes during therapy. Having a working knowledge of and the ability to use biomarkers is important in all aspects of venous thromboembolism management.

The noninvasive assessment of the critically ischemic limb has evolved from air plethysmography for pulse volume wave recordings and quantitative pressure evaluation to imaging of occlusive arterial lesions utilizing duplex color ultrasonography which produces highly reliable and reproducible data. This physiologic and anatomic data have practical implications for pre-interventional planning, operative guidance, and post-interventional surveillance in critical limb ischemia (CLI). Adjunctive diagnostic measures have become available with the advances in technology over the past decades to determine oxygen tension and microvascular pressures for poorly perfused distal extremities and feet which utilize transcutaneous oximetry, laser Doppler, and near-infrared spectroscopy. Fluorescence angiography is also now among the newest of the commercially available modalities that can be offered at the bedside for both qualitative and quantitative evaluation of skin perfusion in ischemic distal extremities.

Post-thrombotic syndrome frequently affects patients following deep vein thrombosis. The clinical signs and symptoms of post-thrombotic syndrome reflect the underlying pathophysiology of venous obstruction, venous reflux as well as acute and chronic inflammation. Patients with post-thrombotic syndrome are at risk for long-term consequences including decreased quality of life, lost work productivity, and increased health expenditures. Unfortunately, despite recognition of pathophysiology and the clinical, physical, and economic impact of PTS, there have been few advances in prevention. PTS continues to be a frustrating condition to both prevent and manage. Preventing post-thrombotic syndrome begins with preventing deep vein thrombosis. In the setting of acute deep vein thrombosis-using available medical therapies to prevent the development of post-thrombotic syndrome is imperative. Patients should be provided optimal medical therapy with anticoagulation, maintaining therapeutic anticoagulation as much of the time as possible. Use of compression stockings, while contentious, are a low risk intervention which may provide benefit and are unlikely to be associated with harm. In the appropriate patient, considering endovenous procedures to decrease the thrombus burden and provide optimal preservation of venous valve function may be warranted.