Search

BACKGROUND: Ozanimod, a high selective sphingosine 1 phosphate (S1P) receptor (S1PR) 1/5 modulator was approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of adult patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. Additional S1PR modulators are being tested in clinical development programs for both ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. AIM: To provide an overview of advances in understanding S1PRs biology and summarize preclinical and clinical investigations of S1P receptor modulators in chronic inflammatory disease with special emphasis on inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). METHODS: We performed a narrative review using PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov. RESULTS: Through S1PRs, S1P regulates multiple cellular processes, including proliferation, migration, survival, and vascular barrier integrity. The S1PRs function of regulating lymphocyte trafficking is well known, but new functions of S1PRs expand our knowledge of S1PRs biology. Several S1PR modulators are in clinical development for both ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease and have shown promise in phase II and III studies with Ozanimod now being approved for ulcerative colitis. CONCLUSIONS: S1P receptor modulators constitute a novel, promising, safe, and convenient strategy for the treatment of IBD.

Pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (POMS) is a rare neuroinflammatory and neurodegenerative disease that has a significant impact on long-term physical and cognitive patient outcomes. A small percentage of multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnoses occur before the age of 18 years. Before treatment initiation, a careful differential diagnosis and exclusion of other similar acquired demyelinating syndromes such as anti-aquaporin-4-associated neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (AQP4-NMOSD) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody spectrum disorder (MOGSD) is warranted. The recent 2017 changes to the McDonald criteria can successfully predict up to 71% of MS diagnoses and have good specificity of 95% and sensitivity of 71%. Additional measures such as the presence of T1-weighted hypointense lesions and/or contrast-enhancing lesions significantly increase the accuracy of diagnosis. In adults, early use of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) is instrumental to a better long-term prognosis, including lower rates of relapse and disability worsening, and numerous FDA-approved therapies for adult-onset MS are available. However, unlike their adult counterparts, the development, testing, and regulatory approval of POMS treatments have been significantly slower and hindered by logistic and/or ethical considerations. Currently, only two MS DMTs (fingolimod and teriflunomide) have been tested in large phase III trials and approved by regulatory agencies for use in POMS. First-line therapies not approved by the FDA for use in children (interferon-β and glatiramer acetate) are also commonly used and result in a significant reduction in inflammatory activity when compared with non-treated POMS patients. An increasing number of POMS patients are now treated with moderate efficacy therapies such as dimethyl fumarate and high-efficacy therapies such as natalizumab, anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, anti-CD52 monoclonal antibodies, and/or autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. These high-efficacy DMTs generally provide additional reduction in inflammatory activity when compared with the first-line medications (up to 62% of relapse-rate reduction). Therefore, a number of phase II and III trials are currently investigating their efficacy and safety in POMS patients. In this review, we discuss potential changes in the regulatory approval process for POMS patients that are recommended for DMTs already approved for the adult MS population, including smaller sample size for pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies, MRI-centered primary outcomes, and/or inclusion of teenagers in the adult trials.

OBJECTIVE Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is a serious viral infection associated with disease-modifying therapies (DMT) for multiple sclerosis (MS) including sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor (S1PR) modulators. The objective of this review was to investigate the characteristics of PML in MS patients associated with drugs of the S1PR modulator. METHODS We conducted a literature review and analysis of 24 patients from 12 publications in PubMed, SCOPUS and EMBASE. This is a descriptive analysis and study of characteristics of PML associated fingolimod and related S1PR modulator group of DMT. RESULTS A total of 24 cases of PML in MS patients treated with fingolimod were identified. Of these, 21 cases contained data regarding changes in the expanded disability status scale (EDSS). One case of PML in association with ozanimod treatment in a clinical trial was also identified. In PML cases associated with fingolimod, the mean age at the time of PML diagnosis was 50.91 ± 11.5 years. All patients were treated with fingolimod for more than 24 months. Compared to patients who improved or were stable, in terms of EDSS, after symptomatic management of PML, the non-improved groups were significantly older. There were no fatalities in either group during the reported follow-up period. CONCLUSION The incidence of PML appears to be extremely low in MS patients treated with S1PR modulators. Risk of PML increases with increase in duration of treatment with S1PR modulators like fingolimod, and increased age at the time of PML diagnosis is associated with worse prognosis.

Background: Ozanimod, a selective sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulator, is under investigation for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Methods: We conducted a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ozanimod as induction and maintenance therapy in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. In the 10-week induction period, patients in cohort 1 were assigned to receive oral ozanimod hydrochloride at a dose of 1 mg (equivalent to 0.92 mg of ozanimod) or placebo once daily in a double-blind manner, and patients in cohort 2 received open-label ozanimod at the same daily dose. At 10 weeks, patients with a clinical response to ozanimod in either cohort underwent randomization again to receive double-blind ozanimod or placebo for the maintenance period (through week 52). The primary end point for both periods was the percentage of patients with clinical remission, as assessed with the three-component Mayo score. Key secondary clinical, endoscopic, and histologic end points were evaluated with the use of ranked, hierarchical testing. Safety was also assessed. Results: In the induction period, 645 patients were included in cohort 1 and 367 in cohort 2; a total of 457 patients were included in the maintenance period. The incidence of clinical remission was significantly higher among patients who received ozanimod than among those who received placebo during both induction (18.4% vs. 6.0%, P

Ozanimod, a sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulator that binds with high affinity selectively to S1P receptor subtypes 1 (S1P1) and 5 (S1P5), is approved for the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS) in multiple countries. Ozanimod profiling revealed a species difference in its potency for S1P5 in mouse, rat, and canine compared with that for human and monkey. Site-directed mutagenesis identified amino acid alanine at position 120 to be responsible for loss of activity for mouse, rat, and canine S1P5, and mutation back to threonine as in human/monkey S1P5 restored activity. Radioligand binding analysis performed with mouse S1P5 confirmed the potency loss is a consequence of a loss of affinity of ozanimod for mouse S1P5 and was restored with mutation of alanine 120 to threonine. Study of ozanimod in preclinical mouse models of MS can now determine the S1P receptor(s) responsible for observed efficacies with receptor engagement as measured using pharmacokinetic exposures of free drug. Hence, in the experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis model, ozanimod exposures sufficient to engage S1P1, but not S1P5, resulted in reduced circulating lymphocytes, disease scores, and body weight loss; reduced inflammation, demyelination, and apoptotic cell counts in the spinal cord; and reduced circulating levels of the neuronal degeneration marker, neurofilament light. In the demyelinating cuprizone model, ozanimod prevented axonal degradation and myelin loss during toxin challenge but did not facilitate enhanced remyelination after intoxication. Since free drug levels in this model only engaged S1P1, we concluded that S1P1 activation is neuroprotective but does not appear to affect remyelination. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Ozanimod, a selective modulator of human sphingisone 1-phosphate receptor subtypes 1 and 5 (S1P1/5), displays reduced potency for rodent and dog S1P5 compared with human, which results from mutation of threonine to alanine at position 120. Ozanimod can thus be used as a selective S1P1 agonist in mouse models of multiple sclerosis to define efficacies driven by S1P1 but not S1P5. Based on readouts for experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis and cuprizone intoxication, S1P1 modulation is neuroprotective, but S1P5 activity may be required for remyelination.

The sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) signalling pathways have important and diverse functions. S1P receptors (S1PRs) have been proposed as a therapeutic target for various diseases due to their involvement in regulation of lymphocyte trafficking, brain and cardiac function, vascular permeability, and vascular and bronchial tone. S1PR modulators were first developed to prevent rejection by the immune system following renal transplantation, but the only currently approved indication is multiple sclerosis. The primary mechanism of action of S1PR modulators in multiple sclerosis is through binding S1PR subtype 1 on lymphocytes resulting in internalisation of the receptor and loss of responsiveness to the S1P gradient that drives lymphocyte egress from lymph nodes. The reduction in circulating lymphocytes presumably limits inflammatory cell migration into the CNS. Four S1PR modulators (fingolimod, siponimod, ozanimod, and ponesimod) have regulatory approval for multiple sclerosis. Preclinical evidence and ongoing and completed clinical trials support development of S1PR modulators for other therapeutic indications.

Objective To review the pharmacological and clinical profile of ozanimod in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). Data Sources A PubMed search was conducted from inception to July 2021 using the keywords ozanimod, ulcerative colitis, and sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulator. Information was also extracted from published abstracts and the package insert. Study Selection and Data Extraction Phase 2 and 3 studies and relevant literature on ozanimod pharmacological and clinical profiles were reviewed. Data Synthesis Ozanimod approval was based on True North, a phase 3 trial evaluating ozanimod’s efficacy and safety in the treatment of moderate to severe UC. Compared with placebo, ozanimod led to clinical remission in a significantly higher proportion of patients in both the induction and maintenance phase. Additionally, for secondary end points of clinical response, endoscopic improvement, corticosteroid-free remission, and mucosal healing, ozanimod performed significantly better than placebo. Common adverse events included infections, headaches, hypertension, bradycardia, and liver enzyme elevations. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice Ozanimod is the first sphingosine 1-phosphate modulator to be approved for UC and is administered orally. Its efficacy profile is comparable with other UC medications. However, its safety profile is unique, requiring extensive assessments prior to initiation of and during treatment. Thus, it is unclear how ozanimod will be positioned in UC treatment. Conclusion Ozanimod is another option in the growing arsenal of UC treatment. Although it offers a novel mechanism of action and is administered orally, there are important safety, dosing, and pharmacokinetic factors to consider prior to initiation and use.

Fingolimod (FTY), a second-line oral drug approved for relapsing remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) acts in preventing lymphocyte migration outside lymph nodes; moreover, several lines of evidence suggest that it also inhibits myeloid cell activation. In this study, we investigated the transcriptional changes induced by FTY in monocytes in order to better elucidate its mechanism of action. CD14+ monocytes were collected from 24 RRMS patients sampled at baseline and after 6 months of treatment and RNA profiles were obtained through next-generation sequencing. We conducted pathway and sub-paths analysis, followed by centrality analysis of cell-specific interactomes on differentially expressed genes (DEGs). We investigated also the predictive role of baseline monocyte transcription profile in influencing the response to FTY therapy. We observed a marked down-regulation effect (60 down-regulated vs. 0 up-regulated genes). Most of the down-regulated DEGs resulted related with monocyte activation and migration like IL7R, CCR7 and the Wnt signaling mediators LEF1 and TCF7. The involvement of Wnt signaling was also confirmed by subpaths analyses. Furthermore, pathway and network analyses showed an involvement of processes related to immune function and cell migration. Baseline transcriptional profile of the HLA class II gene HLA-DQA1 and HLA-DPA1 were associated with evidence of disease activity after 2 years of treatment. Our data support the evidence that FTY induces major transcriptional changes in monocytes, mainly regarding genes involved in cell trafficking and immune cell activation. The baseline transcriptional levels of genes associated with antigen presenting function were associated with disease activity after 2 years of FTY treatment.

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a complex disease of the central nervous system that can cause permanent disability in young adults. A large armamentarium is available for its management and is increasing over time. Ozanimod is an oral drug belonging to the sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor (S1PR) modulator family recently approved in different countries for MS with active disease. It selectively modulates S1PR1 and S1PR5 to prevent autoreactive lymphocytes from entering the central nervous system (CNS), where they can determine inflammation and neurodegeneration. Ozanimod was tested in one Phase II and two Phase III pivotal trials and was shown to be effective and well tolerated. Moreover, further investigations, including comparative trials with other S1P modulators and MS disease-modifying drugs, are needed to better define placement in MS treatment. Furthermore, ozanimod is currently under evaluation for inflammatory bowel diseases, such as ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease, in international phase III studies. This article retraces the itinerary leading to the approval of ozanimod for MS treatment and its peculiarities and potentiality inside the S1PR modulator family.

Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) is a bioactive lysophospholipid that can influence a broad range of biological processes through its binding to five distinct G-protein-coupled receptors. S1P receptor modulators are a new group of immunosuppressive agents currently used in the immunotherapy of multiple sclerosis. Inflammation following stroke can exacerbate neuronal injury. Given that S1P signaling is linked to multiple immune processes, therapies targeting the S1P axis may be suitable for treating stroke. In this review, we outline S1P metabolism and S1P receptors, discuss the mechanisms of action of S1P receptor modulators in lymphocyte migration and their direct action on cells of the central nervous system, and provide a concise summary of the efficacy of S1P receptor modulators in animal studies and clinical trials on treatments for stroke.

Background Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) experience relapses and sustained disability progression. Since 2004, the number of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for MS has grown substantially. As a result, patients, healthcare providers, and insurers are increasingly interested in comparative efficacy and safety evaluations to distinguish between treatment options, but head-to-head studies between DMTs are limited. Objective The aim of the current study was to compare efficacy and safety outcomes with the DMTs ozanimod and dimethyl fumarate (DMF) using a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) to adjust for cross-trial differences in study design and population. Methods A systematic literature review was performed to identify clinical studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of ozanimod compared with DMF. Individual patient-level data (IPD) for ozanimod were obtained from the SUNBEAM and RADIANCE Part B trials, and aggregate-level patient data (APD) for DMF were obtained from CONFIRM and DEFINE. A MAIC is used to weight IPD to APD based on important baseline patient characteristics considered to be effect modifiers or prognostic factors in order to balance the covariate distribution to establish more homogenous trial populations. Once trial populations are determined to be sufficiently homogenous, outcomes of interest are estimated and used to generate treatment effects between the weighted IPD and APD. We used MAIC methodology to compare efficacy and safety outcomes of interest between ozanimod 1.0 mg once daily (OD) and DMF 240 mg twice daily (BID), including confirmed disability progression (CDP) at 3 and 6 months, annualized relapse rate (ARR), proportion of patients relapsed, overall adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), and discontinuations due to AEs. Results After matching patient data, baseline patient characteristics were balanced between patients receiving ozanimod and those receiving DMF. Compared with DMF, ozanimod demonstrated significantly improved CDP at 3 months (hazard ratio 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53–0.86), ARR (rate ratio [RR] 0.80; 95% CI 0.67–0.97), proportion of patients relapsed (odds ratio [OR] 0.66; 95% CI 0.52–0.83), overall AEs (OR 0.11; 95% CI 0.08–0.16), SAEs (OR 0.27; 95% CI 0.19–0.39), and discontinuations (OR 0.11; 95% CI 0.07–0.17). CDP at 6 months did not differ significantly between the two agents (RR 0.89; 95% CI 0.62–1.26). Conclusions After adjustment of baseline patient characteristics, the MAIC demonstrated that the efficacy and safety of ozanimod 1.0 mg OD was superior to that of DMF 240 mg BID. Although a MAIC is less likely to produce biased estimates than a naïve or a standard indirect treatment comparison via a common comparator, limitations include potential confounding due to unobserved and thus unaccounted for baseline differences., Plain Language Summary Ozanimod and dimethyl fumarate (DMF) are disease-modifying therapies used to treat relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS). Comparative efficacy and safety evaluation is important to key patients, healthcare providers, and health insurers; however, head-to-head studies between MS therapies are limited. In this analysis, we used an indirect treatment comparison method, specifically a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC), to compare results of clinical trials of ozanimod and DMF. In this MAIC, findings suggested that ozanimod was associated with greater reductions of relapses, a lowered risk of disability progression at 3 months, and improved safety outcomes compared with DMF. Although MAICs were conducted while adjusting for important treatment-effect modifiers and/or prognostic factors, the possibility of confounding as a result of unobserved baseline differences remains. Such an issue can be resolved only by conducting a head-to-head treatment comparison in a randomized clinical trial.

Ozanimod is approved for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis. Absorption, metabolism, and excretion of ozanimod were investigated after a single oral dose of 1.0 mg [14C]ozanimod hydrochloride to six healthy subjects. In vitro experiments were conducted to understand the metabolic pathways and enzymes involved in the metabolism of ozanimod and its active metabolites. The total mean recovery of the administered radioactivity was ∼63%, with ∼26% and ∼37% recovered from urine and feces, respectively. Based on exposure, the major circulating components were active metabolite CC112273 and inactive metabolite RP101124, which together accounted for 50% of the circulating total radioactivity exposure, whereas ozanimod accounted for 6.7% of the total radioactive exposure. Ozanimod was extensively metabolized, with 14 metabolites identified, including two major active metabolites (CC112273 and CC1084037) and one major inactive metabolite (RP101124) in circulation. Ozanimod is metabolized by three primary pathways, including aldehyde dehydrogenase and alcohol dehydrogenase, cytochrome P450 isoforms 3A4 and 1A1, and reductive metabolism by gut microflora. The primary metabolite RP101075 is further metabolized to form major active metabolite CC112273 by monoamine oxidase B, which further undergoes reduction by carbonyl reductases to form CC1084037 or CYP2C8-mediated oxidation to form RP101509. CC1084037 is oxidized rapidly to form CC112273 by aldo-keto reductase 1C1/1C2 and/or 3β- and 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase, and this reversible oxidoreduction between two active metabolites favors CC112273. The ozanimod example illustrates the need for conducting timely radiolabeled human absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion studies for characterization of disproportionate metabolites and assessment of exposure coverage during drug development. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Absorption, metabolism, and excretion of ozanimod were characterized in humans, and the enzymes involved in complex metabolism were elucidated. Disproportionate metabolites were identified, and the activity of these metabolites was determined.

The high incidence of obesity has increased the need to discover new therapeutic targets to combat obesity and obesity-related metabolic diseases. Obesity is defined as an abnormal accumulation of adipose tissue, which is one of the major metabolic organs that regulate energy homeostasis. However, there are currently no approved anti-obesity therapeutics that directly target adipose tissue metabolism. With recent advances in the understanding of adipose tissue biology, molecular mechanisms involved in brown adipose tissue expansion and metabolic activation have been investigated as potential therapeutic targets to increase energy expenditure. This review focuses on G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) as they are the most successful class of druggable targets in human diseases and have an important role in regulating adipose tissue metabolism. We summarize recent findings on the major GPCR classes that regulate thermogenesis and mitochondrial metabolism in adipose tissue. Improved understanding of GPCR signaling pathways that regulate these processes could facilitate the development of novel pharmacological approaches to treat obesity and related metabolic disorders.

BackgroundAdequate response to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine represents an important treatment goal in caring for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Previous data so far have demonstrated lower spike-specific IgG responses following two SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations in MS patients treated with sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulators and anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (mAb) compared to other disease modifying therapies (DMTs). It is unknown whether subsequent vaccinations can augment antibody responses in these patients.ObjectivesThe goal of this observational study was to determine the effects of a third SARS-CoV-2 vaccination on antibody and T cell responses in MS patients treated with anti-CD20 mAb or S1P receptor modulators.MethodsVaccine responses in patients treated with anti-CD20 antibodies (ocrelizumab and ofatumumab) or S1P receptor modulators (fingolimod and siponimod) were evaluated before and after third SARS-CoV-2 vaccination as part of an ongoing longitudinal study. Total spike protein and spike receptor binding domain (RBD)-specific IgG responses were measured by Luminex bead-based assay. Spike-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses were measured by activation-induced marker expression.ResultsMS patients and healthy controls were enrolled before and following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. A total of 31 MS patients (n=10 ofatumumab, n=13 ocrelizumab, n=8 S1P) and 10 healthy controls were evaluated through three SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations. Compared to healthy controls, total spike IgG was significantly lower in anti-CD20 mAb-treated patients and spike RBD IgG was significantly lower in anti-CD20 mAb and S1P-treated patients following a third vaccination. While seropositivity was 100% in healthy controls after a third vaccination, total spike IgG and spike RBD IgG seropositivity were lower in ofatumumab (60% and 60%, respectively), ocrelizumab (85% and 46%, respectively), and S1P-treated patients (100% and 75%, respectively). Longer treatment duration, including prior treatment history, appeared to negatively impact antibody responses. Spike-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses were well maintained across all groups following a third vaccination. Finally, immune responses were also compared in patients who were vaccinated prior to or following ofatumumab treatment. Antibody responses were significantly higher in those patients who received their primary SARS-CoV-2 vaccination prior to initiating ofatumumab treatment.ConclusionsThis study adds to the evolving understanding of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine responses in people with MS treated with disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) known to suppress humoral immunity. Our findings provide important information for optimizing vaccine immunity in at-risk MS patient populations.

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a relapsing and remitting inflammatory disease of the colon with a variable course. Despite advances in treatment, only approximately 40% of patients achieve clinical remission at the end of a year, prompting the exploration of new treatment modalities. This review explores novel therapeutic approaches to UC, including promising drugs in various stages of development, efforts to maximize the efficacy of currently available treatment options, and non-medication-based modalities. Treatment approaches which show promise in impacting the future of UC management are highlighted.

Intracerebral haemorrhage is inadequately controlled by current treatments, requiring new solutions to improve the prognosis. Following the primary injury, a proinflammatory cascade in the perihaematomal region, composed of activated resident microglia and astrocytes and infiltrated leucocytes, propagates neural cell death. The protracted nature of neuroinflammation in intracerebral haemorrhage provides a window of opportunity for therapies to subdue the undesired consequences. In animal models and early clinical trials in intracerebral haemorrhage, several drugs have reduced detrimental neuroinflammation without substantial compromise of the beneficial reparative aspects of an inflammatory response. Potential strategies include controlling excessive harmful neuroinflammation with minocycline, sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators, and statins after a brain haemorrhage. The quick initiation of these drugs, particularly in high systemic doses, could be key to counteracting the evolving secondary injury in people with intracerebral haemorrhage and provides a promising way in which the poor prognosis of intracerebral haemorrhage might one day be counteracted.

ONO-4641 is a second-generation sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulator that exhibits selectivity for S1P receptors 1 and 5. Treatment with ONO-4641 leads to a reduction in magnetic resonance imaging disease measures in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. The objective of this study was to explore the potential impact of ONO-4641 treatment based on its immunomodulatory effects. Severe aplastic anemia is a bone marrow (BM) failure disease typically caused by aberrant immune destruction of blood progenitors. Although the T helper type 1–mediated pathology is well described for aplastic anemia, the molecular mechanisms driving disease progression remain undefined. We evaluated the efficacy of ONO-4641 in a mouse model of aplastic anemia. ONO-4641 reduced the severity of BM failure in a dose-dependent manner, resulting in higher blood and BM cell counts. By evaluating the mode of action, we found that ONO-4641 inhibited the infiltration of donor-derived T lymphocytes to the BM. ONO-4641 also induced the accumulation of hematopoietic stem cells in the BM of model mice. These observations indicate, for the first time, that S1P receptor modulators demonstrate efficacy in the mouse model of aplastic anemia and suggest that treatment with ONO-4641 might delay the progression of aplastic anemia. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT ONO-4641 is a second-generation sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulator selective for S1P receptors 1 and 5. In this study, we demonstrated that ONO-4641 regulates the trafficking of T lymphocytes along with hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells, leading to alleviation of pancytopenia and destruction of bone marrow in a bone marrow failure–induced mouse model mimicking human aplastic anemia.

Epilepsy is a devastating neurological condition characterized by long-term tendency to generate unprovoked seizures, affecting around 1-2 % of the population worldwide. Epilepsy is a serious health concern which often associates with other neurobehavioral comorbidities that further worsen disease conditions. Despite tremendous research, the mainstream anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) exert only symptomatic relief leading to 30% of untreatable patients. This reflects the complexity of the disease pathogenesis and urges the precise understanding of underlying mechanisms in order to explore novel therapeutic strategies that might alter the disease progression as well as minimize the epilepsy-associated comorbidities. Unfortunately, the development of novel AEDs might be a difficult process engaging huge funds, tremendous scientific efforts and stringent regulatory compliance with a possible chance of end-stage drug failure. Hence, an alternate strategy is drug repurposing, where anti-epileptic effects are elicited from drugs that are already used to treat non-epileptic disorders. Herein, we provide evidence of the anti-epileptic effects of Fingolimod (FTY720), a modulator of sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptor, USFDA approved already for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS). Emerging experimental findings suggest that Fingolimod treatment exerts disease-modifying anti-epileptic effects based on its anti-neuroinflammatory properties, potent neuroprotection, anti-gliotic effects, myelin protection, reduction of mTOR signaling pathway and activation of microglia and astrocytes. We further discuss the underlying molecular crosstalk associated with the anti-epileptic effects of Fingolimod and provide evidence for repurposing Fingolimod to overcome the limitations of current AEDs.

Aim: The bioactive lipid, sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P), has various roles in the physiology and pathophysiology of many diseases. There are five S1P receptors; however, the role of each S1P receptor in atherogenesis is still obscure. Here we investigated the contribution of S1P receptor 2 (S1P2) to atherogenesis by using a specific S1P2 antagonist, ONO-5430514, in apolipoprotein E-deficient ( Apoe −/− ) mice. Methods: Apoe −/− mice fed with a western-type diet (WTD) received ONO-5430514 (30 mg/kg/day) or vehicle. To examine the effect on atherogenesis, Sudan IV staining, histological analysis, qPCR, and vascular reactivity assay was performed. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) were used for in vitro experiments. Results: WTD-fed Apoe −/− mice had significantly higher S1P2 expression in the aorta compared with wild-type mice. S1P2 antagonist treatment for 20 weeks reduced atherosclerotic lesion development ( p ＜0.05). S1P2 antagonist treatment for 8 weeks ameliorated endothelial dysfunction ( p ＜0.05) accompanied with significant reduction of lipid deposition, macrophage accumulation, and inflammatory molecule expression in the aorta compared with vehicle. S1P2 antagonist attenuated the phosphorylation of JNK in the abdominal aorta compared with vehicle ( p ＜0.05). In HUVEC, S1P promoted inflammatory molecule expression such as MCP-1 and VCAM-1 ( p ＜0.001), which was attenuated by S1P2 antagonist or a JNK inhibitor ( p ＜0.01). S1P2 antagonist also inhibited S1P-induced JNK phosphorylation in HUVEC ( p ＜0.05). Conclusions: Our results suggested that an S1P2 antagonist attenuates endothelial dysfunction and prevents atherogenesis. S1P2, which promotes inflammatory activation of endothelial cells, might be a therapeutic target for atherosclerosis.

Introduction: Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is an immune-mediated, complex, chronic inflammatory, and neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system. Among the several therapeutic options developed over the last decade for relapsing MS (RMS), fingolimod, a sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor (S1PR) modulator, was the first oral treatment. The adverse events associated with fingolimod have limited its use in certain populations, thus further stimulating the search for other S1PR modulators. Areas covered: The authors reviewed the English-published literature on ponesimod using the PubMed database. The search terms used were ‘ponesimod’ or ‘ACT-128,800’ and ‘multiple sclerosis.’ Available data on the pharmacological profile of ponesimod and the information on clinical efficacy and safety drawn from clinical trials in comparison with other S1PR modulators are presented and discussed. Expert opinion: Published peer-reviewed data on long-term safety and efficacy are still lacking but have been collected and regulatory authorities expressed a favorable opinion to market access. At present, we believe that ponesimod has little chance of becoming a leading treatment for RMS due to the availability of many alternative options and the timing of market access. Given its favorable risk-benefit and convenience profile, however, ponesimod might become a leading option among S1P receptor modulators used for RMS.

Neuropathic pain severely impairs rehabilitation and quality of life after spinal cord injury (SCI). The sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor agonist, FTY720, plays an important protective role in neuronal injury. This study aims to examine the effects of FTY720 in a rat acute SCI model, focusing on neuropathic pain. Female rats with SCI induced by 1-min clip compression were administered vehicle or 1.5 mg/kg of FTY720 24 h after the injury. Using the mechanical nociceptive threshold test, we monitored neuropathic pain and performed histological analysis of the pain pathway, including the μ opioid receptor (MOR), hydroxytryptamine transporter (HTT), and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP). Motor score, SCI lesion volume, residual motor axons, inflammatory response, glial scar, and microvascular endothelial dysfunction were also compared between the two groups. FTY720 treatment resulted in significant attenuation of post-traumatic neuropathic pain. It also decreased systemic and local inflammation, thereby reducing the damaged areas and astrogliosis and resulting in motor functional recovery. Whereas there was no difference in the CGRP expression between the two groups, FTY720 significantly preserved the MOR in both the caudal and rostral areas of the spinal dorsal horn. Whereas HTT was preserved in the FTY720 group, it was significantly increased in the rostral side and decreased in the caudal side of the injury in the vehicle group. These results suggest that FTY720 ameliorates post-traumatic allodynia through regulation of neuroinflammation, maintenance of the blood-brain barrier, and inhibition of glial scar formation, thereby preserving the connectivity of the descending inhibitory pathway and reducing neuropathic pain.

To determine changes in retinal microcirculation, caused by fingolimod (FTY720) use, via swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography (SS-OCTA) in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RR-MS) patients.80 patients with RR-MS, who were using fingolimod, and 50 healthy control subjects were included in the study. Group 1 consisted of 40 eyes from 40 RR-MS patients, who had been using fingolimod for less than six months, and Group 2 consisted of 40 eyes from 40 RR-MS patients, who had been using fingolimod for longer than six months. All participants underwent SS-OCTA via DRI OCT Triton (Topcon, Tokyo, Japan), analysing their central macular thickness (CMT) (µm), subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) (µm), superficial (VDs) (%) and deep vascular plexuses (VDd) (%), choriocapillaris (VDcc) (%), and superficial and deep foveal avascular zones (FAZs, FAZd, respectively) (%) in mean values.The mean follow-up times for patients in Groups 1 and 2 were 2.9 ± 1.5 months and 22.5 ± 11.3 months, respectively. The FAZs value in Group 2 was found to be significantly higher than that in both Group 1 and the control group (Fingolimod use seems to remarkably increase VDs and VDd measurements in the early period of administration and decrease CMT over a longer period of administration in patients with RR-MS.

Fingolimod is an approved treatment for relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (MS), and its properties in different pathways have raised interest in therapy research for other neurodegenerative diseases. Fingolimod is an agonist of sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptors. Its main pharmacologic effect is immunomodulation by lymphocyte homing, thereby reducing the numbers of T and B cells in circulation. Because of the ubiquitous expression of S1P receptors, other effects have also been described. Here, we review preclinical experiments evaluating the effects of treatment with fingolimod in neurodegenerative diseases other than MS, such as Alzheimer’s disease or epilepsy. Fingolimod has shown neuroprotective effects in different animal models of neurodegenerative diseases, summarized here, correlating with increased brain-derived neurotrophic factor and improved disease phenotype (cognition and/or motor abilities). As expected, treatment also induced reductions in different neuroinflammatory markers because of not only inhibition of lymphocytes but also direct effects on astrocytes and microglia. Furthermore, fingolimod treatment exhibited additional effects for specific neurodegenerative disorders, such as reduction of amyloid-β production, and antiepileptogenic properties. The neuroprotective effects exerted by fingolimod in these preclinical studies are reviewed and support the translation of fingolimod into clinical trials as treatment in neurodegenerative diseases beyond neuroinflammatory conditions (MS).

In the 'treat-to-target' era of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) management, small molecule drugs (SMDs) represent a promising alternative to biomolecular drugs. Moreover, increasing failure rates of anti-tumor necrosis factor α agents have contributed to the development of new molecules with different mechanisms of action and bioavailability. This review focuses on the positioning of new, orally targeted therapies in the treatment algorithm of both Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), with special consideration to their efficacy and safety. We performed a comprehensive search of PubMed and clinical trial registries to identify randomized controlled trials assessing SMDs in adult patients with moderate-to-severe IBD, irrespective of previous exposure to other biologics. In this review, we included 15 double-blind, placebo-controlled trials that assessed the efficacy and safety of Janus kinase inhibitors, sphingosine-1-phosphate modulators (S1P), SMAD blockers, phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors and α-4 antagonists. The primary endpoints in UC were achieved for tofacitinib in the phase III OCTAVE study and AJM-300, with a favorable safety profile. S1P receptor agonists, such as etrasimod and ozanimod, demonstrated favorable results in induction studies. For CD, filgotinib and upadacitinib also met the primary outcome criteria. Available data have demonstrated so far that SMDs have an advantageous safety and efficacy profile. However, their use in a clinical setting will eventually require a personalized, mechanism-based therapeutic approach.

Fingolimod is indicated for the treatment of patients with the relapsing-remitting form of multiple sclerosis. The primary study objective was to evaluate the bioequivalence of a test formulation, 0.5 mg fingolimod HCl capsule (Lebrina, Asofarma Sociedad Anónima Industrial y Comercial, Argentina) relative to a reference formulation, 0.5 mg fingolimod capsule (Gilenya, Novartis Pharmaceutical, Australia). In a single-center, randomized, single-dose, single-blinded, 2-way crossover study, 33 New Zealand healthy subjects of both sexes were enrolled to receive a 0.5-mg dose of 3 capsules of each fingolimod formulation under fasting conditions, with a 42-day washout period between administrations. Additional pharmacokinetic information regarding its main active metabolite, fingolimod phosphate, was also provided. The point estimate and 90% confidence intervals of the ratios of maximum concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 72 hours were 99.07 (95.83-102.41) and 97.64 (95.33-100.00) for fingolimod, and 95.60 (90.95-100.49) and 98.54 (96.19-100.96), for fingolimod phosphate. Primary parameters, maximum concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 72 hours for fingolimod and fingolimod phosphate were found to have no significant difference when test and reference formulations were compared. Fingolimod and fingolimod phosphate of both formulations were within the accepted 90% confidence interval limits of 80.00% and 125.00%. No significant differences between the test and reference drug products were detected in any of the pharmacokinetic parameters estimated. Notwithstanding the primary conclusion of bioequivalence is focused on the measurement of the parent compound, compliance with the same criteria by the active metabolite reinforces the comparability between the pharmacokinetic profiles of both formulations (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03757338).

Ozanimod (ZEPOSIA®; Celgene Corporation) is a novel, orally administered sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulator. In March 2020, the US FDA approved ozanimod capsules for use in the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis, to include clinically isolated syndrome, relapsing-remitting disease, and active secondary progressive disease, in adults. In the same month, ozanimod received a positive CHMP opinion recommending approval in the EU for the treatment of adult patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis with active disease defined by clinical or imaging features. Ozanimod is currently being evaluated for use in ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease in multinational phase III trials. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of ozanimod leading to its first approval for relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis.

Objective: Neuroinflammation is a central part of cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury. The novel immune suppressant, fingolimod, is a promising candidate to ameliorate stroke-induced damage. Fingo...

Tumor vasculature is innately dysfunctional. Poorly functional tumor vessels inefficiently deliver chemotherapy to tumor cells; vessel hyper-permeability promotes chemotherapy delivery primarily to a tumor's periphery. Here, we identify a method for enhancing chemotherapy efficacy in Ewing sarcoma (ES) in mice by modulating tumor vessel permeability. Vessel permeability is partially controlled by the G protein-coupled Sphinosine-1-phosphate receptors 1 and 2 (S1PR1 and S1PR2) on endothelial cells. S1PR1 promotes endothelial cell junction integrity while S1PR2 destabilizes it. We hypothesize that an imbalance of S1PR1:S1PR2 is partially responsible for the dysfunctional vascular phenotype characteristic of ES and that by altering the balance in favor of S1PR1, ES vessel hyper-permeability can be reversed. In our study, we demonstrate that pharmacologic activation of S1PR1 by SEW2871 or inhibition of S1PR2 by JTE-013 caused more organized, mature and functional tumor vessels. Importantly, S1PR1 activation or S1PR2 inhibition improved antitumor efficacy. Our data suggests that pharmacologic targeting of S1PR1 and S1PR2 may be a useful adjuvant to standard chemotherapy for ES patients.

Background and objectivesFTY720 ((2-amino-2-)2-[4-octylphenyl]ethyl)-1,3-propanediol) is an Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved immunomodulatory drug for treating multiple sclerosis. It inhibits lymphocyte egression from lymphoid tissues by downregulating sphingosine-1 phosphate receptor (S1PR). To date, there has been no study on the effects of FTY720 on the chronic stage of the complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) rodent model, despite its antiallodynic effect in previous studies. Thus, the aim of this study is to investigate the effect of FTY720 in a chronic stage of the CRPS mouse model.MethodThe authors used a mouse model of CRPS, involving tibia fracture/cast immobilization, to test the efficacy of intrathecal FTY720 (2.5 or 25 ng daily; 6 days) or vehicle during the chronic (7 weeks after fracture) stage of CRPS.ResultsIntrathecal recombinant FTY720 administration was antiallodynic in the chronic stage of the CRPS mouse model, and such an effect of FTY720 developed by modulating astrocyte activation in the spinal cord. Additionally, according to the in vitro data, the FTY720 treatment inhibited S1P-induced increase in the nitric oxide production and suppression of the NF-κB pathway, by inhibiting the phosphorylation of NF-κB/p65 in astrocytes without toxic effect on astrocytes.ConclusionCollectively, these results demonstrate that intrathecally administered FTY720 attenuates mechanical allodynia in the chronic stage of the CRPS mouse model.

Purpose The goal of this study was to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacodynamics (PD) and pharmacokinetics (PK) of intravenous (IV) siponimod in healthy subjects. Methods This randomized, open-label study was conducted in 2 parts. In Part 1, a total of 16 eligible subjects received either a single oral dose of siponimod (0.25 mg) followed by a single IV infusion (0.25 mg/3 h) in Sequence 1, or vice versa in Sequence 2. In Part 2, a total of 17 eligible subjects received single IV infusions of siponimod (1 mg/24 h). Findings No clinically relevant effect on mean 5-minute or hourly average heart rate was observed following the siponimod IV dosing regimens and both remained above 50 beats/min. Observed atrioventricular blocks and sinus pauses were asymptomatic. The mean change in absolute lymphocyte count from baseline was comparable for the siponimod 0.25 mg oral regimen and the two IV siponimod regimens. Oral siponimod displayed a good absolute bioavailability of 84%. The mean peak exposure of oral siponimod was approximately 48% lower than that of IV siponimod. The M17 metabolite was found to be the most prominent systemic metabolite of siponimod in humans. Implications Siponimod IV infusions were well tolerated, with safety and PD (absolute lymphocyte count) profiles similar to those of oral siponimod. The PD/PK findings supported the development of an innovative rapid IV titration regimen for patients with intracerebral hemorrhage.

As a critical sphingolipid metabolite, sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) plays an essential role in immune and vascular systems. There are five S1P receptors, designated as S1PR1-5, encoded in the human genome, and their activities are governed by endogenous S1P, lipid-like S1P mimics, or non-lipid-like therapeutic molecules. Among S1PRs, S1PR1 stands out due to its non-redundant functions, such as the egress of T and B cells from the thymus and secondary lymphoid tissues, making it a potential therapeutic target. However, the structural basis of S1PR1 activation and regulation by various agonists remains unclear. Here we reported four atomic resolution cryo-EM structures of Gi-coupled human S1PR1 complexes: bound to endogenous agonist d18:1 S1P, benchmark lipid-like S1P mimic phosphorylated Fingolimod ((S)-FTY720-P), or non-lipid-like therapeutic molecule CBP-307 in two binding modes. Our results revealed the similarities and differences of activation of S1PR1 through distinct ligands binding to the amphiphilic orthosteric pocket. We also proposed a two-step “shallow to deep” transition process of CBP-307 for S1PR1 activation. Both binding modes of CBP-307 could activate S1PR1, but from shallow to deep transition may trigger the rotation of the N-terminal helix of Gαi and further stabilize the complex by increasing the Gαi interaction with the cell membrane. We combine with extensive biochemical analysis and molecular dynamic simulations to suggest key steps of S1P binding and receptor activation. The above results decipher the common feature of the S1PR1 agonist recognition and activation mechanism and will firmly promote the development of therapeutics targeting S1P receptors.

Identifying the transition of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) to the secondary-progressive MS form remains a clinical challenge due to the gradual nature of the transition, superimposed relapses, the heterogeneous course of disease among patients and the absence of validated biomarkers and diagnostic tools. The uncertainty associated with the transition makes clinical care challenging for both patients and physicians. The emergence of new disease-modifying treatments for progressive MS and the increasing emphasis of nonpharmacological strategies mark a new era in the treatment of progressive MS. This article summarizes challenges in diagnosis and management, discusses novel treatment strategies and highlights the importance of establishing a clear diagnosis and instituting an interdisciplinary management plan in the care of patients with progressive MS.

FTY720 (fingolimod) is a FDA-approved sphingosine analog that is phosphorylated in vivo to modulate sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor (S1PR) signaling for immunosuppression in patients with refractory multiple sclerosis. FTY720 also exhibits promising anticancer efficacy in several preclinical models. While FTY720-induced cytotoxicity is not due to S1PR signaling, the mechanism remains unclear and is reported to occur through various cell death pathways. Here, we performed a systematic, mechanistic study of FTY720-induced cell death in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We found that FTY720 induced cell death in a panel of genetically diverse AML cell lines that was accompanied by rapid phosphatidylserine (PS) externalization. Importantly, FTY720-induced PS exposure was not due to any direct effects on plasma membrane integrity and was independent of canonical signaling by regulated cell death pathways known to activate lipid flip-flop, including caspase-dependent apoptosis/pyroptosis, necroptosis, ferroptosis, and reactive oxygen species-mediated cell death. Notably, PS exposure required cellular vacuolization induced by defects in endocytic trafficking and was suppressed by the inhibition of PP2A and shedding of Annexin V-positive subcellular particles. Collectively, our studies reveal a non-canonical pathway underlying PS externalization and cell death in AML to provide mechanistic insight into the antitumor properties of FTY720.

Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulators are a new class of oral disease-modifying therapies used for Multiple Sclerosis (MS). These are immunomodulatory drugs and can thus increase the risk of certain infections in these patients. This paper summarizes the existing data on the most common opportunistic infections associated with the drugs in this class: Varicella Zoster Virus (VZV), Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV), and Cryptococcus neoformans. A literature review and descriptive analysis of reported cases and clinical phase III study findings on the incidences of these infections were conducted using PubMed and Google Scholar. Results regarding fingolimod, siponimod, ozanimod, and ponesimod were obtained. Overall, the incidence of these infections was found to be extremely low in MS patients treated with S1P receptor modulators. Among the four drugs in this class, the incidence rates of VZV, HSV, and cryptococcal infections were either similar or slightly higher than placebo, with some infections not reported in cases of ozanimod and ponesimod. Most of these resulted in favorable outcomes, with very few disabilities or fatalities. However, this paper highlights the increasing relevance of assessing infectious risk factors to promote the early identification of serious complications related to these drugs. Opportunistic infections should be considered in the differential diagnosis of an MS relapse in the setting of disease-modifying treatment.

BackgroundAll agents engaging sphongosine-1-phospate receptors (S1PRs) will have some cardiovascular effect. This study aimed to elucidate the risk of cardiovascular adverse events (AEs) in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) treated with S1PR modulators (S1PRMs).MethodsWe systematically searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published through January 5, 2021. Relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the random-effects model. Sensitivity analyses and meta-regression were performed.ResultsSeventeen RCTs (12 for fingolimod; 3 for ozanimod; 2 for siponimod) involving 13,295 patients were included. Compared with the control treatment, S1PRMs significantly increased the risk of cardiovascular AEs (RR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.58–3.10; I2, 75.6%). Notably, the high-risk cardiovascular AEs associated with S1PRMs were primarily bradyarrhythmia (RR, 2.92; 95% CI, 1.91–4.46; I2, 30.8%) and hypertension (RR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.49–2.67; I2, 56.5%). Subgroup analysis results were consistent with the primary outcomes except that ozanimod was associated with a higher risk of hypertension only (RR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.10–2.82; I2, 0.0%), while siponimod was associated with a higher risk of bradyarrhythmia only (RR, 2.75; 95% CI, 1.75–4.31; I2, 0.0%). No significant inter-subgroup differences were observed (Pinteraction > 0.05).ConclusionsS1PRM use increased the risk of cardiovascular AEs by 1.21 times in patients with MS, and increased risks for bradyarrhythmia and hypertension were at 2.92- and 2.00-fold, respectively. These findings can help clinicians assess the risk of cardiovascular AEs in patients treated with S1PRMs.Systematic Review RegistrationThe PROSPERO ID is CRD42020183215.