Search

This is a case of a 31-year-old male patient who presented with signs and symptoms of an incarcerated inguinal hernia. The patient's preoperative imaging showed a tubular structure in the inguinal canal and given the patient's history at presentation, there was a concern for herniation of the appendix, known as an Amyand hernia. On laparoscopy, there was no evidence of appendiceal involvement and a standard open inguinal hernia was completed. On the final pathology of the hernia sac, roundworms were identified with Y-shaped lateral cords suggesting infection by Anisakis spp. On a further interview with the patient, he revealed that he had recently travelled to Alaska and had consumed raw salmon on a fishing trip. This case demonstrates the importance of a thorough social and travel history. One should also have a low threshold to broaden the differential diagnosis when medical work-up deviates from the standard course., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Intraoperative assessment of pancreatic parenchymal margin during pancreatectomies is challenging and misinterpretation by the pathologist is a cause of incorrect frozen section (FS) diagnosis. Although the current literature supports that pancreatic margin FS diagnosis and its accuracy has no impact on the patient outcome for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients and reexcision in an attempt to achieve a negative intraoperative pancreatic margin after positive FS is not associated with increased overall survival; still it remains a routine practice in many institutions. To this end, we sought to assess the interobserver variation and accuracy of FS diagnosis between subspecialized gastrointestinal/pancreatobiliary (GI) and general pathologists. Seventy seven consecutive pancreatic parenchymal margin FSs performed on pancreatectomies for PDAC from 2010 to 2013 were retrieved at our institution. These were retrospectively evaluated by 2 GI and 2 general pathologists independently without knowledge of the original FS diagnosis or the final diagnosis. The specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of GI versus general pathologist was 97.8% versus 87.5%, 61.1% versus 66.7%, 78.6% versus 41.4%, 95% versus 95.2%, and 93.5% versus 85.1%, respectively. The interobserver agreement between GI and general pathologists was fair (κ = .337, P < .001). The interobserver agreement between 2 GI pathologists was fair (κ = .373, P = .0005) and between 2 general pathologists was slight (κ = .195, P = .042). Although overall accuracy of subspecialized GI pathologists was higher than that of general pathologists, none had an accuracy of 100%. Our study reaffirms the challenging nature of these FSs., (© The Author(s) 2015.)

We report a case of a 72-year-old woman who underwent a right hemicolectomy for a near-obstructing mass in the ileocecal valve. The histologic diagnosis was inflammatory fibroid polyp (IFP). IFPs are rare mesenchymal lesions that can arise throughout the gastrointestinal tract. Originally considered reactive or inflammatory, recent studies report activating mutations of platelet derived growth factor receptor-alpha (PDGFRA) in IFPs, suggesting that these may in fact be neoplastic. Nonetheless, these are benign lesions cured by local excision and typically do not recur or metastasize. Our patient also had no evidence of local recurrence one year after the surgery. Hence, the clinical importance lies in distinguishing these lesions from other benign and malignant mesenchymal proliferative lesions both on a biopsy and resection specimen. We review the literature on clinicopathologic features, immunohistochemical profile, pathogenesis, recent advances, differential diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of these uncommon lesions., (© 2015 by the Association of Clinical Scientists, Inc.)