Search

Your search keyword '"Simmonds, John"' showing total 102 results
Start Over Author "Simmonds, John" Publication Year Range Last 10 years
102 results on '"Simmonds, John"'

2. Sibling Co-placement as a Protective Factor: A Mixed Method Study on the Impact of Sibling Placement on Adolescent Adoptees' Emotional and Behavioral Development.

Author

Hillman, Saul, Lajmi, Nahed, Steele, Miriam, Hodges, Jill, Simmonds, John, and Kaniuk, Jeanne

Subjects
SIBLINGS, EMOTION regulation, SELF-evaluation, RESEARCH funding, INTERNALIZING behavior, RESEARCH methodology, EXTERNALIZING behavior, COMPARATIVE studies, PSYCHOSOCIAL factors, ADOLESCENCE
Abstract

The present study aimed to explore the impact of either being separated or adopted with sibling(s) on adolescent adoptees' emotional and behavioral development. Through a mixed method design, the study aimed to explore whether sibling placement had an effect on adolescents' internalizing and externalizing problems, as well as on the way they express and regulate their emotions in conflictual situations. Findings revealed that, although both groups of adoptees developed adaptive strategies to cope with challenging events, those placed with siblings were in general faring better than those placed alone. Being placed alone was, indeed, associated with clinical scores on the self-reported Youth Self Report (YSR) Total Problems' scale and to the greater use of maladaptive emotion regulation strategies. This highlights the significance of maintaining siblings' relationships when co-placement is not possible. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

5. Adoptive parents' worries and concerns about their adolescent adopted children.

Author

Hillman, Saul, Lajmi, Nahed, Steele, Miriam, Hodges, Jill, Simmonds, John, and Kaniuk, Jeanne

Subjects
PSYCHOLOGY of adoptive parents, AUTONOMY (Psychology), VIOLENCE, QUALITATIVE research, INTERVIEWING, PARENT-child relationships, PARENT attitudes, ANXIETY, PARENTING, DESCRIPTIVE statistics, ADOPTED children, THEMATIC analysis
Abstract

This study forms part of a major longitudinal research project collaboration between the Anna Freud Centre, Coram and Great Ormond Street Hospital, which set out to explore adopted children's and adoptive parents' outcomes and experiences from middle childhood through to adolescence. In this paper, 17 adoptive mothers of late adopted children, currently in early adolescence (aged 12 to 15 years), were interviewed. The focus of the study draws upon their worries and fears regarding their children during adolescence and as they approach adulthood. The Parent Development Interviews (PDI) were analysed using thematic analysis and generated five overarching themes: Vulnerability, Violence, Derailing opportunities, Autonomy and Anxieties about the birth family. This qualitative exploration provides strong evidence for how these parents reflected upon very concrete challenges and anxieties about their child's journey, including both their current context and anticipated outcomes. The overwhelming majority of research to date on this population examines negative outcomes quantitatively; this study adds an important qualitative layer of the parents' own perspectives. Plain Language Summary: This study draws upon the experiences of adoptive parents, all of whom were mothers, of late-adopted children, currently in early adolescence (aged 12 to 15 years). The study focused on their worries and fears regarding their children during adolescence and as they approach adulthood. Seventeen adoptive parents were interviewed using the Parent Development Interview (PDI) and the data were analysed using thematic analysis and generated five overarching themes: Vulnerability, Violence, Derailing opportunities, Autonomy and Anxieties about the birth family. This study provides strong evidence for how these parents identified and reflected upon very real challenges and anxieties about their child's journey including both their current lives and anticipated futures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

12. Attachment goes to court : child protection and custody issues

Author

Forslund, Tommie, Granqvist, Pehr, van IJzendoorn, Marinus H., Sagi-Schwartz, Avi, Glaser, Danya, Steele, Miriam, Hammarlund, Mårten, Schuengel, Carlo, Bakermans-Kranenburg, Marian J., Steele, Howard, Shaver, Phillip R., Lux, Ulrike, Simmonds, John, Jacobvitz, Deborah, Groh, Ashley M., Bernard, Kristin, Cyr, Chantal, Hazen, Nancy L., Foster, Sarah, Psouni, Elia, Cowan, Philip A., Pape Cowan, Carolyn, Rifkin-Graboi, Anne, Wilkins, David, Pierrehumbert, Blaise, Tarabulsy, George M., Carcamo, Rodrigo A., Wang, Zhengyan, Liang, Xi, Kázmierczak, Maria, Pawlicka, Paulina, Ayiro, Lilian, Chansa, Tamara, Sichimba, Francis, Mooya, Haatembo, McLean, Loyola, Verissimo, Manuela, Gojman-de-Millán, Sonia, Moretti, Marlene M., Bacro, Fabien, Peltola, Mikko J., Galbally, Megan, Kondo-Ikemura, Kiyomi, Behrens, Kazuko Y., Scott, Stephen, Rodriguez, Andrés Fresno, Spencer, Rosario, Posada, Germán, Cassibba, Rosalinda, Barrantes-Vidal, Neus, Duschinsky, Robbie, Forslund, Tommie, Granqvist, Pehr, van IJzendoorn, Marinus H., Sagi-Schwartz, Avi, Glaser, Danya, Steele, Miriam, Hammarlund, Mårten, Schuengel, Carlo, Bakermans-Kranenburg, Marian J., Steele, Howard, Shaver, Phillip R., Lux, Ulrike, Simmonds, John, Jacobvitz, Deborah, Groh, Ashley M., Bernard, Kristin, Cyr, Chantal, Hazen, Nancy L., Foster, Sarah, Psouni, Elia, Cowan, Philip A., Pape Cowan, Carolyn, Rifkin-Graboi, Anne, Wilkins, David, Pierrehumbert, Blaise, Tarabulsy, George M., Carcamo, Rodrigo A., Wang, Zhengyan, Liang, Xi, Kázmierczak, Maria, Pawlicka, Paulina, Ayiro, Lilian, Chansa, Tamara, Sichimba, Francis, Mooya, Haatembo, McLean, Loyola, Verissimo, Manuela, Gojman-de-Millán, Sonia, Moretti, Marlene M., Bacro, Fabien, Peltola, Mikko J., Galbally, Megan, Kondo-Ikemura, Kiyomi, Behrens, Kazuko Y., Scott, Stephen, Rodriguez, Andrés Fresno, Spencer, Rosario, Posada, Germán, Cassibba, Rosalinda, Barrantes-Vidal, Neus, and Duschinsky, Robbie

Abstract

Attachment theory and research are drawn upon in many applied settings, including family courts, but misunderstandings are widespread and sometimes result in misapplications. The aim of this consensus statement is, therefore, to enhance understanding, counter misinformation, and steer family-court utilisation of attachment theory in a supportive, evidence-based direction, especially with regard to child protection and child custody decision-making. The article is divided into two parts. In the first, we address problems related to the use of attachment theory and research in family courts, and discuss reasons for these problems. To this end, we examine family court applications of attachment theory in the current context of the best-interest-of-the-child standard, discuss misunderstandings regarding attachment theory, and identify factors that have hindered accurate implementation. In the second part, we provide recommendations for the application of attachment theory and research. To this end, we set out three attachment principles: the child’s need for familiar, non-abusive caregivers; the value of continuity of good-enough care; and the benefits of networks of attachment relationships. We also discuss the suitability of assessments of attachment quality and caregiving behaviour to inform family court decision-making. We conclude that assessments of caregiver behaviour should take center stage. Although there is dissensus among us regarding the use of assessments of attachment quality to inform child custody and child-protection decisions, such assessments are currently most suitable for targeting and directing supportive interventions. Finally, we provide directions to guide future interdisciplinary research collaboration.

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

13. Workshop on ICES reference points (WKREF2)

Author

Lordan, Colm, Orio, Alessandro, Kempf, Alexander, Pierucci, Andrea, Kuparinen, Anna, Rindorf, Anna, Peyronnet, Arnaud, Wilson, Ashley, Albertsen, Christoffer Moesgaard, Konrad, Christoph, Sparrevohn, Claus Reedtz, Minto, Cóilín, Howell, Daniel, Gilljam, David, Miller, David, Garcia, Dorleta, Armelloni, Enrico, Abad, Esther, Masnadi, Francesco, Scarcella, Giuseppe, Dingsør, Gjert Endre, Winker, Henning, Sparholt, Henrik, Farias, Inês, Horbowy, Jan, Lecomte, Jean-Baptiste, Hutchings, Jeffrey A., Fall, Johanna, Lövgren, Johan, Simmonds, John, Shrives, Jonathan, De Oliveira, José, Hommik, Kristiina, Kell, Laurence, Vansteenbrugge, Lies, Borges, Lisa, Batts, Luke, Taylor, Marc, Pastoors, Martin, Scanu, Martina, Cardinale, Massimiliano, Gras, Michaël, Deurs, Mikael van, Goñi, Nicolas, Graham, Norman, Silvar Viladomiu, Paula, Sampedro, Paz, Hilborn, Ray, Sharma, Rishi, Millar, Sarah, Nimmegeers, Sofie, Miethe, Tanja, Perälä, Tommi, Bartolino, Valerio, Lordan, Colm, Orio, Alessandro, Kempf, Alexander, Pierucci, Andrea, Kuparinen, Anna, Rindorf, Anna, Peyronnet, Arnaud, Wilson, Ashley, Albertsen, Christoffer Moesgaard, Konrad, Christoph, Sparrevohn, Claus Reedtz, Minto, Cóilín, Howell, Daniel, Gilljam, David, Miller, David, Garcia, Dorleta, Armelloni, Enrico, Abad, Esther, Masnadi, Francesco, Scarcella, Giuseppe, Dingsør, Gjert Endre, Winker, Henning, Sparholt, Henrik, Farias, Inês, Horbowy, Jan, Lecomte, Jean-Baptiste, Hutchings, Jeffrey A., Fall, Johanna, Lövgren, Johan, Simmonds, John, Shrives, Jonathan, De Oliveira, José, Hommik, Kristiina, Kell, Laurence, Vansteenbrugge, Lies, Borges, Lisa, Batts, Luke, Taylor, Marc, Pastoors, Martin, Scanu, Martina, Cardinale, Massimiliano, Gras, Michaël, Deurs, Mikael van, Goñi, Nicolas, Graham, Norman, Silvar Viladomiu, Paula, Sampedro, Paz, Hilborn, Ray, Sharma, Rishi, Millar, Sarah, Nimmegeers, Sofie, Miethe, Tanja, Perälä, Tommi, and Bartolino, Valerio

Abstract

The ICES Workshop on ICES reference points (WKREF2) was tasked review the WKREF1 report and based on the outcome develop updated guidelines for the ICES reference points system and recommendations for ACOM consideration. The WKREF1 report has suggested 5 key recommendations to simplify and harmonise the ICES reference points framework representing a major change to the current guidelines. At WKREF2, we detailed discussions and four key concerns were raised about the proposed approach. The first related to the simplification of rules to define Blim. Around two thirds of category 1 stocks would end up as WKREF1 “Blim Type 2” where Blim would be set as a fraction of B0. The Allee effect or “depensation” maybe more important than previously thought and should be furthered explored for ICES stocks since it has important consequences for Blim. A number of challenges and issues around defining Blim using the current guidelines were documented. Some suggestions on improvement criteria were discussed including using classifiers to define spasmodic stocks and using change point algorithms to address non-stationary productivity regimes. However, further work is need to make these approaches operational and there was no consensus that the WKREF1 Blim types should replace the current guidelines. WKREF1 recommended that the FMSY proxy should be based on a biological proxies and should be less than the deterministic FMSY. It was pointed out that the stochastic FMSY estimated in EqSim for example, is lower than the deterministic FMSY and that the current guidelines ensure that the FMSY should not pose a more than 5% risk to Blim. A large amount of work described in WD 1 was carried out to develop an MSE framework to consistency and robustness test a candidate reference point system for North East Atlantic stocks. However, WKREF2 recommended tha

Published
2022

14. Workshop on ICES Reference Points (WKREF1)

Author

Albertsen, Christoffer Moesgaard, Bartolino, Valerio, Nord, Mikaela Bergenius, Cerviño, Santiago, van Deurs, Mikael, Dingsør, Gjert Endre, Duplisea, Daniel, Fall, Johanna, Garcia, Dorleta, Gillijam, David, Goñji, NIcolas, Gras, Michaël, Gröhsler, Tomas, Hommik, Kristiina, Horbowy, Jan, Howell, Daniel, Ibaibarriaga, Leire, Jounela, Pekka, Kell, Laurence, Kvamme, Cecilie, Lambert, Debra, Lecomte, Jean-Baptiste, Lordan, Colm, Lövgren, Johan, Lynch, Patrick, Masnadi, Francesco, Methot, Richard D., Miethe, Tanja, Miller, David, Minto, Cóilín, Mosqueira, Iago, Nimmegeers, Sofie, De Oliveira, José, Orio, Alessandro, Pastoors, Martin, Reid, David, Sharma, Rishi, Silva, Andreia, Simmonds, John, Sparholt, Henrik, Stoetera, Sven, Taylor, Marc, Trijoulet, Vanessa, Uriarte, Andres, Vansteenbrugge, Lies, Vatnehol, Sindre, Villanueva, Ching, Wise, Laura, Albertsen, Christoffer Moesgaard, Bartolino, Valerio, Nord, Mikaela Bergenius, Cerviño, Santiago, van Deurs, Mikael, Dingsør, Gjert Endre, Duplisea, Daniel, Fall, Johanna, Garcia, Dorleta, Gillijam, David, Goñji, NIcolas, Gras, Michaël, Gröhsler, Tomas, Hommik, Kristiina, Horbowy, Jan, Howell, Daniel, Ibaibarriaga, Leire, Jounela, Pekka, Kell, Laurence, Kvamme, Cecilie, Lambert, Debra, Lecomte, Jean-Baptiste, Lordan, Colm, Lövgren, Johan, Lynch, Patrick, Masnadi, Francesco, Methot, Richard D., Miethe, Tanja, Miller, David, Minto, Cóilín, Mosqueira, Iago, Nimmegeers, Sofie, De Oliveira, José, Orio, Alessandro, Pastoors, Martin, Reid, David, Sharma, Rishi, Silva, Andreia, Simmonds, John, Sparholt, Henrik, Stoetera, Sven, Taylor, Marc, Trijoulet, Vanessa, Uriarte, Andres, Vansteenbrugge, Lies, Vatnehol, Sindre, Villanueva, Ching, and Wise, Laura

Abstract

The ICES Workshop on ICES reference points (WKREF1) was tasked to provide a thorough review of the ICES reference points system as a basis to re-evaluate the process for estimating, updating and communicating reference points in the context of the ICES advice. As part of the preparation leading to WKREF1 a large database of the most recent assessment outputs for 78 Category 1 stocks were collated in the form `FLStock` objects, which formed the basis for several components of the presented analyses. The first part of the meeting involved a detailed overview of the history and basis of the ICES references points system, which was aligned with the results of an empirical review of the procedures and choices made to derive ICES reference points for category 1 stocks. The ICES procedures were then contrasted with those used in the USA, Canada, New Zealand and across tuna Regional Fishery Management Organizations. A limitation in terms of transparency of the ICES procedures is a lack of complete documentation of the settings used for deriving reference points using, e.g., the EQSIM software. In comparison to other international standards, the main differences identified include the absence of a target biomass reference point and inconsistent estimates of the limit biomass reference point Blim, which is estimated to be below 10% of the unfished biomass (B0) for a high proportion of analysed stocks (around 50%). In addition, an important difference is that direct estimates of FMSY are used in ICES (which can be unreliable), whereas elsewhere FMSY is often replaced by more conservative biological proxies, such as Fspr% and FB%. The second part focused on the robustness evaluation of the current ICES reference point system. Work presented included examples that demonstrate differences in reference point estimates between standard ICES procedures (EQSIM) and full Management Strategy Evaluation (MSE) simulations, and a study th

Published
2022

15. El Apego Va a Juicio: Problemas de Custodia y Protección Infantil1 [Attachment goes to court: Child protection and custody issues]

Author

Forslund, Tommie, Granqvist, Pehr, IJzendoorn, Marinus H. van, Sagi-Schwartz, Avi, Glaser, Danya, Steele, Miriam, Hammarlund, Mårten, Schuengel, Carlo, Bakermans-Kranenburg, Marian J., Steele, Howard, Shaver, Phillip R., Lux, Ulrike, Simmonds, John, Jacobvitz, Deborah, Groh, Ashley M., Bernard, Kristin, Cyr, Chantal, Hazen, Nancy L., Foster, Sarah, Psouni, Elia, Cowan, Philip A., Cowan, Carolyn Pape, Rifkin-Graboi, Anne, Wilkins, David, Pierrehumbert, Blaise, Tarabulsy, George M., Cárcamo, Rodrigo A., Wang, Zhengyan, Liang, Xi, Kázmierczak, Maria, Pawlicka, Paulina, Ayiro, Lilian, Chansa, Tamara, Sichimba, Francis, Mooya, Haatembo, McLean, Loyola, Verissimo, Manuela, Gojman-de-Millán, Sonia, Moretti, Marlene M., Bacro, Fabien, Peltola, Mikko J., Galbally, Megan, Kondo-Ikemura, Kiyomi, Behrens, Kazuko Y., Scott, Stephen, Rodriguez, Andrés Fresno, Spencer, Rosario, Posada, Germán, Cassibba, Rosalinda, Barrantes-Vidal, Neus, Palacios, Jesús, Barone, Lavinia, Madigan, Sheri, Mason-Jones, Karen, Reijman, Sophie, Juffer, Femmie, Fearon, R. Pasco, Bernier, Annie, Cicchetti, Dante, Roisman, Glenn I., Cassidy, Jude, Kindler, Heinz, Zimmerman, Peter, Feldman, Ruth, Spangle, Gottfried, Zeanah, Charles H., Dozier, Mary, Belsky, Jay, Lamb, Michael E., and Duschinsky, Robbie

Abstract

Attachment theory and research are drawn upon in many applied settings, including family courts, but misunderstandings are widespread and sometimes result in misapplications. The aim of this consensus statement is, therefore, to enhance understanding, counter misinformation, and steer family-court utilisation of attachment theory in a supportive, evidence-based direction, especially with regard to child protection and child custody decision-making. This article is divided into two parts. In the first part, we address problems related to the use of attachment theory and research in family courts, and discuss reasons for these problems. To this end, we examine family court applications of attachment theory in the current context of the best-interest-of-the-child standard, discuss misunderstandings regarding attachment theory, and identify factors that have hindered accurate implementation. In the second part, we provide recommendations for the application of attachment theory and research. To this end, we set out three attachment principles: the child’s need for familiar, non-abusive caregivers; the value of continuity of good-enough care; and the benefits of networks of attachment relationships. We also discuss the suitability of assessments of attachment quality and caregiving behaviour to inform family court decision-making. We conclude that assessments of caregiver behaviour should take center stage. Although there is dissensus among us regarding the use of assessments of attachment quality to inform child custody and child-protection decisions, such assessments are currently most suitable for targeting and directing supportive interventions. Finally, we provide directions to guide future interdisciplinary research collaboration.

Published
2022

16. Workshop on ICES reference points (WKREF2)

Author

Orio, Alessandro, Kemp, Alexander, Pierucci, Andrea, Kuparinen, Anna, Rindorf, Anna, Peyronnet, Arnaud, Wilson, Ashley, Albertsen, Christoffer Moesgaard, Konrad, Christoph, Sparrevohn, laus Reedtz, Minto, Cóilín, Howell, Daniel, Gilljam, David, Miller, David, Garcia, Dorleta, Armelloni, Enrico, Abad, Esther, Masnadi, Francesco, Scarcella, Giuseppe, Dingsør, Gjert Endre, Winker, Henning, Sparholt, Henrik, Farias, Inês, Horbowy, Jan, Lecomte, Jean-Baptiste, Hutchings, Jeffrey A., Fall, Johanna, Lövgren, Johan, Simmonds, John, Shrives, Jonathan, Oliveira, José De, Hommik, Kristiina, Kel, Laurence, Vansteenbrugge, Lies, Borges, Lisa, Batts, Luke, Taylor, Marc, Pastoors, Martin, Scanu, Martina, Cardinale, Massimiliano, Gras, Michaël, Deurs, Mikael van, Goñi, Nicolas, Graham, Norman, Viladomiu, Paula Silvar, Sampedro, Paz, Hilborn, Ray, Sharma, Rishi, Millar, Sarah, Nimmegeers, Sofie, Miethe, Tanja, Perälä, Tommi, Bartolino, Valerio, Lordan, Colm, and ICES

Subjects
Fisheries and aquaculture, Fishery management reference points, ICES, Management advice, Reference points, Fisheries, ICES resources, All ICES Ecoregions
Abstract

The ICES Workshop on ICES reference points (WKREF2) was tasked review the WKREF1 report and based on the outcome develop updated guidelines for the ICES reference points system and recommendations for ACOM consideration. The WKREF1 report has suggested 5 key recom- mendations to simplify and harmonise the ICES reference points framework representing a ma- jor change to the current guidelines. At WKREF2, we detailed discussions and four key concerns were raised about the proposed approach. The first related to the simplification of rules to define Blim. Around two thirds of category 1 stocks would end up as WKREF1 “Blim Type 2” where Blim would be set as a fraction of B0. The Allee effect or “depensation” maybe more important than previously thought and should be furthered explored for ICES stocks since it has important consequences for Blim. A number of challenges and issues around defining Blim using the current guidelines were documented. Some suggestions on improvement criteria were discussed including using classifiers to define spas- modic stocks and using change point algorithms to address non-stationary productivity regimes. However, further work is need to make these approaches operational and there was no consen- sus that the WKREF1 Blim types should replace the current guidelines. WKREF1 recommended that the FMSY proxy should be based on a biological proxies and should be less than the deterministic FMSY. It was pointed out that the stochastic FMSY estimated in EqSim for example, is lower than the deterministic FMSY and that the current guidelines ensure that the FMSY should not pose a more than 5% risk to Blim. A large amount of work described in WD 1 was carried out to develop an MSE framework to consistency and robustness test a candidate refer- ence point system for North East Atlantic stocks. However, WKREF2 recommended that further work needs to be carried out to condition and test the simulation framework before the conclu- sions could be adopted by ICES and incorporated into the guidelines. A number of considerations for defining MSY related reference points were discussed including using model validation and prediction skill to ensure that ICES provide robust and credible ad- vice. There is evidence that density dependence (DD) is important in the majority of ICES stocks (68% in recruitment and 54% in growth). The correct prediction of the shape and strength of density-dependence in productivity is key to predicting future stock development and providing the best possible long-term fisheries management advice. A suggested approach to use surplus production models (SPMs) to account for DD in FMSY was suggested and discussed but there was no consensus on whether that approach was appropriate. There was consensus that the FECO approach as a means of adapting target fishing mortality to medium-term changes in productiv- ity should be included in the guidelines subject to a benchmark and ACOM approval. While WKREF1 and 2 focused mainly on Category 1 stocks ToR c) called for a “simplified and harmonised set of guidelines for estimating MSY and precautionary reference points applicable in the advice framework across various ICES stock categories.” Ideally the ICES assessment cat- egories should provide equivalent risk across all stocks. This issue was discussed but no recom- mendations emerged. There was no consensus a revised reference point framework was proposed at WKREF2. How- ever, it was agreed that it should be presented here for further discussion at ACOM and other fora. The key feature of the suggested approach is that the stock status evaluation is treated in- dependent of the Advice Rule (AR). The main feature of the system is that the biomass trigger is not linked to a stock status evaluation, it is linked to the expected biomass when fishing at the target fishing mortality, in contrast to the current ICES approach. It also entailed that FMSY would also become an upper limit of fishing mortality and that the advised fishing mortality would be set at or lower than that level. WKREF2 did not discuss what to do in situations where SSB< Blim or alternative forms of HCR for the advice rule. Building community understanding and con- sensus around simplified and harmonised guidelines has yet to be achieved. A further workshop WKREF3 will be required to achieve that aim. The report includes 6 recommendations for ACOM consideration. ICES The main objective of the workshop was to review the recommendations of WKREF1 and con- sider how these might feed into a new reference points framework and guidelines for ICES. There were a number of presentations on the wider issues of best practice for reference points, the Allee effect, density dependence and the WKIRISH approach. The starting point was to try and develop a set of simplified and harmonised guidelines based on the WKREF1 report rather than evolving the current guidelines to include the WKREF1 conclusions. A key aspect of the meeting was to allow for discussions in order to build a shared understanding of the strengths and weakness of the current framework and of the new framework emerging from WKREF1. Published Non Refereed

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

17. Methods for supporting stock assessment in the Mediterranean (STECF-21-02)

Author

Simmonds, John, Bitetto, Isabella, Cikes Kec, Vanja, Guijarro, Beatriz, Isajlovic, Igor, Ligas, Alessandro, Mantopoulou Palouka, Danai, Mannini, Alessandro, Maynou, Francesc, Moutopoulos, Dimitrios, Murenu, Matteo, Musumeci, Claudia, Pierucci, Andrea, Pinto, Cecilia, Sala, Antonello, Sbrana, Mario, Ticina, Vjekoslav, Touloumis, Konstantinos, Tsikliras, Athanassios, Simmonds, John, Mannini, Alessandro, Pinto, Cecilia, Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF), and Pinto, Cecelia

Subjects
Fisheries management, Stock assessment, Parameter Discipline - Fisheries and aquaculture
Abstract

Commission Decision of 25 February 2016 setting up a Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries, C(2016) 1084, OJ C 74, 26.2.2016, p. 4–10. The Commission may consult the group on any matter relating to marine and fisheries biology, fishing gear technology, fisheries economics, fisheries governance, ecosystem effects of fisheries, aquaculture or similar disciplines. This report, on methods for supporting stock assessment in the Mediterranean (STECF-21-02), addresses the data checking and preparation for stock assessment once the data has been submitted following the annual data calls. The report provides an overview of the data errors and quality control carried out on both commercial landings data and MEDITS survey data. The analyses reported also address the small fraction of commercial catch with sampling gaps, and how these are assigned appropriate length frequency distributions. The results of these check and assignments are provided by species, GSA and country. Quality checks were carried out on Medits data check consistency of the main reporting files and highlighting where data inconsistencies occurred. Additionally the total landings reported to the European Commission under the Black & Med-Sea data call, the Fisheries Independent Data call and the Annual Economic Report data call were compared at species aggregated to GSA. Some important differences were observed and these are reported. In addition the EWG reviewed a technical report on the sampling of commercial catch in the Greek Fisheries, the review and some suggested further work are included in this report. European Union, Joint Research Centre Published Refereed

Published
2021

18. La prise en compte des liens d’attachement au tribunal : protection de l’enfance et décisions de résidence des enfants dans les situations de séparation parentale

Author

Forslund, Tommie, primary, Granqvist, Pehr, additional, Hammarlund, Mårten, additional, van IJzendoorn, Marinus H., additional, Sagi-Schwartz, Avi, additional, Glaser, Danya, additional, Steele, Miriam, additional, Steele, Howard, additional, Shaver, Phillip R., additional, Schuengel, Carlo, additional, Bakermans-Kranenburg, Marian J., additional, Lux, Ulrike, additional, Simmonds, John, additional, Jacobvitz, Deborah, additional, Groh, Ashley M., additional, Bernard, Kristin, additional, Cyr, Chantal, additional, Hazen, Nancy L., additional, Foster, Sarah, additional, Psounih, Elia, additional, Cowan, Philip A., additional, Pape Cowan, Carolyn, additional, Rifkin-Graboi, Anne, additional, Wilkins, David, additional, Pierrehumbert, Blaise, additional, Tarabulsy, George M., additional, Cárcamo, Rodrigo A., additional, Wang, Zhengyan, additional, Liang, Xi, additional, Kaźmierczak, Maria, additional, Pawlicka, Paulina, additional, Ayiro, Lilian, additional, Chansa, Tamara, additional, Sichimba, Francis, additional, Mooya, Haatembo, additional, McLean, Loyola, additional, Veríssimo, Manuela, additional, Gojman-de-Millán, Sonia, additional, Moretti, Marlene M., additional, Bacro, Fabien, additional, Peltola, Mikko J., additional, Galbally, Megan, additional, Kondo-Ikemura, Kiyomi, additional, Behrens, Kazuko Y., additional, Scott, Stephen, additional, Fresno Rodriguez, Andrés, additional, Spencer, Rosario, additional, Posada, Germán, additional, Cassibba, Rosalinda, additional, Barrantes-Vidal, Neus, additional, Palacios, Jesús, additional, Barone, Lavinia, additional, Madigan, Sheri, additional, Jones-Mason, Karen, additional, Juffer, Femmie, additional, Pasco Fearon, Richard, additional, Bernier, Annie, additional, Cicchetti, Dante, additional, Roisman, Glenn I., additional, Cassidy, Jude, additional, Kindler, Heinz, additional, Zimmermann, Peter, additional, Feldman, Ruth, additional, Spangler, Gottfried, additional, Zeanah, Charles H., additional, Dozier, Mary, additional, Belsky, Jay, additional, Lamb, Michael E., additional, Reijman, Sophie, additional, and Duschinsky, Robbie, additional

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

19. El Apego Va a Juicio: Problemas de Custodia y Protección Infantil1

Author

Forslund, Tommie, primary, Granqvist, Pehr, additional, IJzendoorn, Marinus H. van, additional, Sagi-Schwartz, Avi, additional, Glaser, Danya, additional, Steele, Miriam, additional, Hammarlund, Mårten, additional, Schuengel, Carlo, additional, Bakermans-Kranenburg, Marian J., additional, Steele, Howard, additional, Shaver, Phillip R., additional, Lux, Ulrike, additional, Simmonds, John, additional, Jacobvitz, Deborah, additional, Groh, Ashley M., additional, Bernard, Kristin, additional, Cyr, Chantal, additional, Hazen, Nancy L., additional, Foster, Sarah, additional, Psouni, Elia, additional, Cowan, Philip A., additional, Cowan, Carolyn Pape, additional, Rifkin-Graboi, Anne, additional, Wilkins, David, additional, Pierrehumbert, Blaise, additional, Tarabulsy, George M., additional, Cárcamo, Rodrigo A., additional, Wang, Zhengyan, additional, Liang, Xi, additional, Kázmierczak, Maria, additional, Pawlicka, Paulina, additional, Ayiro, Lilian, additional, Chansa, Tamara, additional, Sichimba, Francis, additional, Mooya, Haatembo, additional, McLean, Loyola, additional, Verissimo, Manuela, additional, Gojman-de-Millán, Sonia, additional, Moretti, Marlene M., additional, Bacro, Fabien, additional, Peltola, Mikko J., additional, Galbally, Megan, additional, Kondo-Ikemura, Kiyomi, additional, Behrens, Kazuko Y., additional, Scott, Stephen, additional, Rodriguez, Andrés Fresno, additional, Spencer, Rosario, additional, Posada, Germán, additional, Cassibba, Rosalinda, additional, Barrantes-Vidal, Neus, additional, Palacios, Jesús, additional, Barone, Lavinia, additional, Madigan, Sheri, additional, Mason-Jones, Karen, additional, Reijman, Sophie, additional, Juffer, Femmie, additional, Fearon, R. Pasco, additional, Bernier, Annie, additional, Cicchetti, Dante, additional, Roisman, Glenn I., additional, Cassidy, Jude, additional, Kindler, Heinz, additional, Zimmerman, Peter, additional, Feldman, Ruth, additional, Spangle, Gottfried, additional, Zeanah, Charles H., additional, Dozier, Mary, additional, Belsky, Jay, additional, Lamb, Michael E., additional, and Duschinsky, Robbie, additional

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

20. YOUR MBY.

Author

Alex, Hugo, Shaw, Terry, Skinner, Alistair, Simmonds, John, and Sandra, Smith

Subjects
BOAT chartering
Abstract

The article from Motor Boat & Yachting discusses various topics related to boating and yachting. It includes a photo contest, advice on towing boats, tips for buying a motoryacht for charter, a preview of the next issue, and a discussion on powercats. The article provides practical information and addresses reader questions. It also acknowledges different perspectives on powercats, highlighting their growing popularity and the diversity of opinions on their aesthetics and performance. [Extracted from the article]

Published
2024

21. El Apego Va a Juicio: Problemas de Custodia y Protección Infantil : [Attachment goes to court: Child protection and custody issues]

Author

Forslund, Tommie, Granqvist, Pehr, van IJzendoorn, Marinus H., Sagi-Schwartz, Avi, Glaser, Danya, Steele, Miriam, Hammarlund, Mårten, Schuengel, Carlo, Bakermans-Kranenburg, Marian J., Steele, Howard, Shaver, Phillip R., Lux, Ulrike, Simmonds, John, Jacobvitz, Deborah, Groh, Ashley M., Bernard, Kristin, Cyr, Chantal, Hazen, Nancy L., Foster, Sarah, Psouni, Elia, Cowan, Philip A., Cowan, Carolyn Pape, Rifkin-Graboi, Anne, Wilkins, David, Pierrehumbert, Blaise, Tarabulsy, George M., Cárcamo, Rodrigo A., Wang, Zhengyan, Liang, Xi, Kázmierczak, Maria, Pawlicka, Paulina, Ayiro, Lilian, Chansa, Tamara, Sichimba, Francis, Mooya, Haatembo, McLean, Loyola, Verissimo, Manuela, Gojman-de-Millán, Sonia, Moretti, Marlene M., Bacro, Fabien, Peltola, Mikko J., Galbally, Megan, Kondo-Ikemura, Kiyomi, Behrens, Kazuko Y., Scott, Stephen, Fresno Rodriguez, Andrés, Spencer, Rosario, Posada, Germán, Cassibba, Rosalinda, Barrantes-Vidal, Neus, Palacios, Jesús, Barone, Lavinia, Madigan, Sheri, Mason-Jones, Karen, Reijman, Sophie, Juffer, Femmie, Fearon, R. Pasco, Bernier, Annie, Cicchetti, Dante, Roisman, Glenn, Cassidy, Jude, Kindler, Heinz, Zimmerman, Peter, Feldman, Ruth, Spangle, Gottfried, Zeanah, Charles H., Dozier, Mary, Belsky, Jay, Lamb, Michael E., Duschinsky, Robbie, Forslund, Tommie, Granqvist, Pehr, van IJzendoorn, Marinus H., Sagi-Schwartz, Avi, Glaser, Danya, Steele, Miriam, Hammarlund, Mårten, Schuengel, Carlo, Bakermans-Kranenburg, Marian J., Steele, Howard, Shaver, Phillip R., Lux, Ulrike, Simmonds, John, Jacobvitz, Deborah, Groh, Ashley M., Bernard, Kristin, Cyr, Chantal, Hazen, Nancy L., Foster, Sarah, Psouni, Elia, Cowan, Philip A., Cowan, Carolyn Pape, Rifkin-Graboi, Anne, Wilkins, David, Pierrehumbert, Blaise, Tarabulsy, George M., Cárcamo, Rodrigo A., Wang, Zhengyan, Liang, Xi, Kázmierczak, Maria, Pawlicka, Paulina, Ayiro, Lilian, Chansa, Tamara, Sichimba, Francis, Mooya, Haatembo, McLean, Loyola, Verissimo, Manuela, Gojman-de-Millán, Sonia, Moretti, Marlene M., Bacro, Fabien, Peltola, Mikko J., Galbally, Megan, Kondo-Ikemura, Kiyomi, Behrens, Kazuko Y., Scott, Stephen, Fresno Rodriguez, Andrés, Spencer, Rosario, Posada, Germán, Cassibba, Rosalinda, Barrantes-Vidal, Neus, Palacios, Jesús, Barone, Lavinia, Madigan, Sheri, Mason-Jones, Karen, Reijman, Sophie, Juffer, Femmie, Fearon, R. Pasco, Bernier, Annie, Cicchetti, Dante, Roisman, Glenn, Cassidy, Jude, Kindler, Heinz, Zimmerman, Peter, Feldman, Ruth, Spangle, Gottfried, Zeanah, Charles H., Dozier, Mary, Belsky, Jay, Lamb, Michael E., and Duschinsky, Robbie

Abstract

Attachment theory and research are drawn upon in many applied settings, including family courts, but misunderstandings are widespread and sometimes result in misapplications. The aim of this consensus statement is, therefore, to enhance understanding, counter misinformation, and steer family-court utilisation of attachment theory in a supportive, evidence-based direction, especially with regard to child protection and child custody decision-making. This article is divided into two parts. In the first part, we address problems related to the use of attachment theory and research in family courts, and discuss reasons for these problems. To this end, we examine family court applications of attachment theory in the current context of the best-interest-of-the-child standard, discuss misunderstandings regarding attachment theory, and identify factors that have hindered accurate implementation. In the second part, we provide recommendations for the application of attachment theory and research. To this end, we set out three attachment principles: the child's need for familiar, non-abusive caregivers; the value of continuity of good-enough care; and the benefits of networks of attachment relationships. We also discuss the suitability of assessments of attachment quality and caregiving behaviour to inform family court decision-making. We conclude that assessments of caregiver behaviour should take center stage. Although there is dissensus among us regarding the use of assessments of attachment quality to inform child custody and child-protection decisions, such assessments are currently most suitable for targeting and directing supportive interventions. Finally, we provide directions to guide future interdisciplinary research collaboration., La teoría y la investigación sobre el apego se utilizan en muchos contextos aplicados, incluidos los juzgados de familia, pero hay malentendidos muy extendidos y que a veces dan lugar a aplicaciones erróneas. El objetivo de este documento de consenso es, por lo tanto, mejorar la comprensión, contrarrestar la desinformación y dirigir el uso de la teoría del apego por parte de los juzgados de familia en la dirección de un apoyo basado en la evidencia, especialmente en lo que respecta a la protección de niñas y niños y las decisiones sobre su custodia. El artículo se divide en dos partes. En la primera abordamos los problemas relacionados con el uso de la teoría y la investigación sobre apego en los juzgados de familia, analizando las causas de tales problemas. Para ello examinamos las aplicaciones de la teoría del apego en los juzgados de familia en el marco del concepto de interés superior de niños y niñas, analizamos los malentendidos relacionados con la teoría del apego e identificamos los factores que han obstaculizado su adecuada aplicación. En la segunda parte ofrecemos recomendaciones para la aplicación de la teoría y la investigación sobre apego. Para ello establecemos tres principios del apego: la necesidad de niñas y niños de cuidadoras y cuidadores habituales que no maltraten, el valor de la continuidad de cuidados de calidad suficientemente buena y los beneficios de las redes de relaciones de apego. También analizamos la idoneidad de las evaluaciones de los estilos de apego y del comportamiento de los cuidadores para fundamentar la toma de decisiones de los juzgados de familia. Llegamos a la conclusión de que las evaluaciones de quienes cuidan deberían ocupar un lugar central. Aunque no hay consenso entre nosotros sobre el uso de las evaluaciones del estilo de apego para fundamentar las decisiones sobre custodia y protección infantil, dichas evaluaciones son actualmente las más adecuadas para orientar y dirigir las intervenciones de apoyo. Por último, prop

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

22. New DfE programme addresses adoption support services in the UK.

Author

Simmonds, John

Subjects
ADOPTION laws, EDUCATION of adopted children, CHILD welfare, DOCUMENTATION, WORLD Wide Web, ENDOWMENTS, FAMILIES, CHILD development, SOCIAL support, NEEDS assessment, PROFESSIONAL competence, ADOPTION
Abstract

The article informs about the need for adoption support services and the legal obligation of adoption agencies to provide them. Topic include It discusses the importance of evidence-based assessments and multidisciplinary approaches in addressing the diverse needs of adopted children and families, highlighting a two-year funding program by the Department for Education to develop innovative support services.

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

23. Attachment goes to court: child protection and custody issues

Author

Forslund, Tommie, primary, Granqvist, Pehr, additional, van IJzendoorn, Marinus H., additional, Sagi-Schwartz, Avi, additional, Glaser, Danya, additional, Steele, Miriam, additional, Hammarlund, Mårten, additional, Schuengel, Carlo, additional, Bakermans-Kranenburg, Marian J., additional, Steele, Howard, additional, Shaver, Phillip R., additional, Lux, Ulrike, additional, Simmonds, John, additional, Jacobvitz, Deborah, additional, Groh, Ashley M., additional, Bernard, Kristin, additional, Cyr, Chantal, additional, Hazen, Nancy L., additional, Foster, Sarah, additional, Psouni, Elia, additional, Cowan, Philip A., additional, Pape Cowan, Carolyn, additional, Rifkin-Graboi, Anne, additional, Wilkins, David, additional, Pierrehumbert, Blaise, additional, Tarabulsy, George M., additional, Carcamo, Rodrigo A., additional, Wang, Zhengyan, additional, Liang, Xi, additional, Kazmierczak, Maria, additional, Pawlicka, Paulina, additional, Ayiro, Lilian, additional, Chansa, Tamara, additional, Sichimba, Francis, additional, Mooya, Haatembo, additional, McLean, Loyola, additional, Verissimo, Manuela, additional, Gojman-de-Millán, Sonia, additional, Moretti, Marlene M., additional, Bacro, Fabien, additional, Peltola, Mikko J., additional, Galbally, Megan, additional, Kondo-Ikemura, Kiyomi, additional, Behrens, Kazuko Y., additional, Scott, Stephen, additional, Rodriguez, Andrés Fresno, additional, Spencer, Rosario, additional, Posada, Germán, additional, Cassibba, Rosalinda, additional, Barrantes-Vidal, Neus, additional, Palacios, Jesus, additional, Barone, Lavinia, additional, Madigan, Sheri, additional, Jones-Mason, Karen, additional, Reijman, Sophie, additional, Juffer, Femmie, additional, Pasco Fearon, R., additional, Bernier, Annie, additional, Cicchetti, Dante, additional, Roisman, Glenn I., additional, Cassidy, Jude, additional, Kindler, Heinz, additional, Zimmermann, Peter, additional, Feldman, Ruth, additional, Spangler, Gottfried, additional, Zeanah, Charles H., additional, Dozier, Mary, additional, Belsky, Jay, additional, Lamb, Michael E., additional, and Duschinsky, Robbie, additional

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

27. Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF) - Stock Assessments: demersal stocks in the western Mediterranean Sea (STECF-19-10)

Author

Simmonds, John, Bitetto, Isabella, Daskalov, G., Guijarro, Beatriz, Ligas, Alessandro, Mannini, Alessandro, Mantopoulou Palouka, Danai, Murenu, M., Musumeci, Claudia, Martín, Paloma, Pérez, José Luis, Pesci, Paola, Pinto, Cecilia, Romagnoni, Giovanni, Sbrana, Mario, and Ticina, Vjekoslav

Abstract

615 pages, Commission Decision of 25 February 2016 setting up a Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries, C(2016) 1084, OJ C 74, 26.2.2016, p. 4–10. The Commission may consult the group on any matter relating to marine and fisheries biology, fishing gear technology, fisheries economics, fisheries governance, ecosystem effects of fisheries, aquaculture or similar disciplines. This reportis from STECF Expert Working Group19-10: 2019stock assessments ofdemersal stocks in the western Mediterranean Seafrom the meeting in Arona Italy from 9thto 15rdSeptember 2019. A total of 19 fish stocks were evaluated. The EWG reports age based assessments and short term forecasts for 15 of the 19 stocks. Catch advice for the other four stocks was based on ICES category 3 evaluations of biomass indices. The content of the report gives the STECF terms of reference, the basis of the evaluationsand advice, summaries of state of stock and advised based on either the MSY approach for assessed stocks or the precautionary approachfor category 3 based advice. Thereport contains the full stock assessment reports for the 15 assessments, one full category3 evaluation and briefre-evaluations and validations of the 2018 results for the final three stocks for which two year’sadvice was given in 2018.The report also contains the STECF observations and conclusions on the assessment report. These conclusionscome from the STECF Plenary meeting November 2019

Published
2019

31. Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF) - Mediterranean assessments 2016 - part 2 (STECF-17-06)

Author

Simmonds, John, Martín, Paloma, Ramirez, John, Recasens, Laura, and Mannini, Alessandro

Abstract

Simmonds, John... et. al.-- This report was reviewed by the STECF during its 54 th plenary meeting held from 27 to 31 March 2017 at JRC, Ispra, Italy.-- 428 pages, Commission Decision of 25 February 2016 setting up a Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries, C(2016) 1084, OJ C 74, 26.2.2016, p. 4-10. The Commission may consult the group on any matter relating to marine and fisheries biology, fishing gear technology, fisheries economics, fisheries governance, ecosystem effects of fisheries, aquaculture or similar disciplines. The Expert Working Group meeting of the Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries EWG 16-17 was held from 19 Nov - 25 Nov 2016 in Ispra, Italy to assess the status of demersal and small pelagic stocks in the Mediterranean Sea against the proposed FMSY reference points.The he report was reviewed by the STECF plenary in March 2017

Published
2017

33. Fishing for MSY: using “pretty good yield” ranges without impairing recruitment

Author

Rindorf, Anna, Cardinale, Massimiliano, Shephard, Samuel, De Oliveira, José A. A., Hjorleifsson, Einar, Kempf, Alexander, Luzenczyk, Anna, Millar, Colin, Miller, David C. M., Needle, Coby L., Simmonds, John, Vinther, Morten, Rindorf, Anna, Cardinale, Massimiliano, Shephard, Samuel, De Oliveira, José A. A., Hjorleifsson, Einar, Kempf, Alexander, Luzenczyk, Anna, Millar, Colin, Miller, David C. M., Needle, Coby L., Simmonds, John, and Vinther, Morten

Abstract

Pretty good yield (PGY) is a sustainable fish yield corresponding to obtaining no less than a specified large percentage of the maximum sustainable yield (MSY). We investigated 19 European fish stocks to test the hypothesis that the 95% PGY yield range is inherently precautionary with respect to impairing recruitment. An FMSY range was calculated for each stock as the range of fishing mortalities (F) that lead to an average catch of at least 95% of MSY in long-term simulations. Further, a precautionary reference point for each stock (FP.05) was defined as the F resulting in a 5% probability of the spawning-stock biomass falling below an agreed biomass limit below which recruitment is impaired (Blim) in long-term simulations. For the majority of the stocks analysed, the upper bound of the FMSY range exceeded the estimated FP.05. However, larger fish species had higher precautionary limits to fishing mortality, and species with larger asymptotic length were less likely to have FMSY ranges impairing recruitment. Our study shows that fishing at FMSY generally is precautionary with respect to impairing recruitment for highly exploited teleost species in northern European waters, whereas the upper part of the range providing 95% of MSY is not necessarily precautionary for small- and medium-sized teleosts.

Published
2017

35. Is Early Experience Destiny? Review of Research on Long-Term Outcomes following International Adoption with Special Reference to the British Chinese Adoption Study

Author

Grant, Margaret, Rushton, Alan, and Simmonds, John

Subjects
Article Subject
Abstract

The pathway from adverse early experience to adulthood for internationally adopted children is complex in identifying key influences, impacts, and outcomes. This review arose from the authors’ involvement in the British Chinese Adoption Study, a recent outcomes study that explored the links between early orphanage care, adoptive experiences, and midadulthood. It differs from previous reviews in focusing on a greater length of time since adoption. Both quantitative and qualitative studies were included to allow for examination of a fuller range of adult-related outcomes rather than mental health scores alone. The sampling, methods, and results of reviewed articles are summarised and a critical commentary is provided. Despite methodological differences and identified strengths and weaknesses, conclusions are drawn on the basis of the evidence available. Special attention is paid to the interpretation of negative outcomes. Findings identify areas that should be explored further in order to gain a fuller understanding of midlife outcomes of people who experienced a poor start in life followed by international adoption. Such studies help in refining lifespan developmental theories.

Published
2016
Full Text
View/download PDF

36. Evidence for indigenous nitrogen in sedimentary and aeolian deposits from the Curiosity rover investigations at Gale crater, Mars

Author

Stern, Jennifer C., Sutter, Brad, Freissinet, Caroline, Navarro-González, Rafael, McKay, Christopher P., Archer, P. Douglas, Buch, Arnaud, Brunner, Anna E., Coll, Patrice, Eigenbrode, Jennifer L., Fairen, Alberto G., Franz, Heather B., Glavin, Daniel P., Kashyap, Srishti, McAdam, Amy C., Ming, Douglas W., Steele, Andrew, Szopa, Cyril, Wray, James J., Martín-Torres, F. Javier, Zorzano, Maria-Paz, Conrad, Pamela G., Mahaffy, Paul R., Kemppinen, Osku, Bridges, Nathan, Johnson, Jeffrey R., Minitti, Michelle, Cremers, David, Bell, James F., Edgar, Lauren, Farmer, Jack, Godber, Austin, Wadhwa, Meenakshi, Wellington, Danika, McEwan, Ian, Newman, Claire, Richardson, Mark, Charpentier, Antoine, Peret, Laurent, King, Penelope, Blank, Jennifer, Weigle, Gerald, Schmidt, Mariek, Li, Shuai, Milliken, Ralph, Robertson, Kevin, Sun, Vivian, Baker, Michael, Edwards, Christopher, Ehlmann, Bethany, Farley, Kenneth, Griffes, Jennifer, Grotzinger, John, Miller, Hayden, Newcombe, Megan, Pilorget, Cedric, Rice, Melissa, Siebach, Kirsten, Stack, Katie, Stolper, Edward, Brunet, Claude, Hipkin, Victoria, Léveillé, Richard, Marchand, Geneviève, Sánchez, Pablo Sobrón, Favot, Laurent, Cody, George, Flückiger, Lorenzo, Lees, David, Nefian, Ara, Martin, Mildred, Gailhanou, Marc, Westall, Frances, Israël, Guy, Agard, Christophe, Baroukh, Julien, Donny, Christophe, Gaboriaud, Alain, Guillemot, Philippe, Lafaille, Vivian, Lorigny, Eric, Paillet, Alexis, Pérez, René, Saccoccio, Muriel, Yana, Charles, Armiens-Aparicio, Carlos, Rodríguez, Javier Caride, Blázquez, Isaías Carrasco, Gómez, Felipe Gómez, Gómez-Elvira, Javier, Hettrich, Sebastian, Malvitte, Alain Lepinette, Jiménez, Mercedes Marín, Martínez-Frías, Jesús, Martín-Soler, Javier, Torres, F. Javier Martín, Jurado, Antonio Molina, Mora-Sotomayor, Luis, Caro, Guillermo Muñoz, López, Sara Navarro, Peinado-González, Verónica, Pla-García, Jorge, Manfredi, José Antonio Rodriguez, Romeral-Planelló, Julio José, Fuentes, Sara Alejandra Sans, Martinez, Eduardo Sebastian, Redondo, Josefina Torres, Urqui-O'Callaghan, Roser, Mier, María-Paz Zorzano, Chipera, Steve, Lacour, Jean-Luc, Mauchien, Patrick, Sirven, Jean-Baptiste, Manning, Heidi, Fairén, Alberto, Hayes, Alexander, Joseph, Jonathan, Squyres, Steven, Sullivan, Robert, Thomas, Peter, Dupont, Audrey, Lundberg, Angela, Melikechi, Noureddine, Mezzacappa, Alissa, DeMarines, Julia, Grinspoon, David, Reitz, Günther, Prats, Benito, Atlaskin, Evgeny, Genzer, Maria, Harri, Ari-Matti, Haukka, Harri, Kahanpää, Henrik, Kauhanen, Janne, Paton, Mark, Polkko, Jouni, Schmidt, Walter, Siili, Tero, Fabre, Cécile, Wray, James, Wilhelm, Mary Beth, Poitrasson, Franck, Patel, Kiran, Gorevan, Stephen, Indyk, Stephen, Paulsen, Gale, Gupta, Sanjeev, Bish, David, Schieber, Juergen, Gondet, Brigitte, Langevin, Yves, Geffroy, Claude, Baratoux, David, Berger, Gilles, Cros, Alain, d’Uston, Claude, Forni, Olivier, Gasnault, Olivier, Lasue, Jérémie, Lee, Qiu-Mei, Maurice, Sylvestre, Meslin, Pierre-Yves, Pallier, Etienne, Parot, Yann, Pinet, Patrick, Schröder, Susanne, Toplis, Mike, Lewin, Éric, Brunner, Will, Heydari, Ezat, Achilles, Cherie, Oehler, Dorothy, Cabane, Michel, Coscia, David, Dromart, Gilles, Robert, François, Sautter, Violaine, Le Mouélic, Stéphane, Mangold, Nicolas, Nachon, Marion, Stalport, Fabien, François, Pascaline, Raulin, François, Teinturier, Samuel, Cameron, James, Clegg, Sam, Cousin, Agnès, DeLapp, Dorothea, Dingler, Robert, Jackson, Ryan Steele, Johnstone, Stephen, Lanza, Nina, Little, Cynthia, Nelson, Tony, Wiens, Roger C., Williams, Richard B., Jones, Andrea, Kirkland, Laurel, Treiman, Allan, Baker, Burt, Cantor, Bruce, Caplinger, Michael, Davis, Scott, Duston, Brian, Edgett, Kenneth, Fay, Donald, Hardgrove, Craig, Harker, David, Herrera, Paul, Jensen, Elsa, Kennedy, Megan R., Krezoski, Gillian, Krysak, Daniel, Lipkaman, Leslie, Malin, Michael, McCartney, Elaina, McNair, Sean, Nixon, Brian, Posiolova, Liliya, Ravine, Michael, Salamon, Andrew, Saper, Lee, Stoiber, Kevin, Supulver, Kimberley, Van Beek, Jason, Van Beek, Tessa, Zimdar, Robert, French, Katherine Louise, Iagnemma, Karl, Miller, Kristen, Summons, Roger, Goesmann, Fred, Goetz, Walter, Hviid, Stubbe, Johnson, Micah, Lefavor, Matthew, Lyness, Eric, Breves, Elly, Dyar, M. Darby, Fassett, Caleb, Blake, David F., Bristow, Thomas, DesMarais, David, Edwards, Laurence, Haberle, Robert, Hoehler, Tori, Hollingsworth, Jeff, Kahre, Melinda, Keely, Leslie, McKay, Christopher, Bleacher, Lora, Brinckerhoff, William, Choi, David, Conrad, Pamela, Dworkin, Jason P., Eigenbrode, Jennifer, Floyd, Melissa, Garvin, James, Glavin, Daniel, Harpold, Daniel, Mahaffy, Paul, Martin, David K., McAdam, Amy, Pavlov, Alexander, Raaen, Eric, Smith, Michael D., Stern, Jennifer, Tan, Florence, Trainer, Melissa, Meyer, Michael, Posner, Arik, Voytek, Mary, Anderson, Robert C, Aubrey, Andrew, Beegle, Luther W., Behar, Alberto, Blaney, Diana, Brinza, David, Calef, Fred, Christensen, Lance, Crisp, Joy A., DeFlores, Lauren, Feldman, Jason, Feldman, Sabrina, Flesch, Gregory, Hurowitz, Joel, Jun, Insoo, Keymeulen, Didier, Maki, Justin, Mischna, Michael, Morookian, John Michael, Parker, Timothy, Pavri, Betina, Schoppers, Marcel, Sengstacken, Aaron, Simmonds, John J., Spanovich, Nicole, Juarez, Manuel de la Torre, Vasavada, Ashwin R., Webster, Christopher R., Yen, Albert, Archer, Paul Douglas, Cucinotta, Francis, Jones, John H., Ming, Douglas, Morris, Richard V., Niles, Paul, Rampe, Elizabeth, Nolan, Thomas, Fisk, Martin, Radziemski, Leon, Barraclough, Bruce, Bender, Steve, Berman, Daniel, Dobrea, Eldar Noe, Tokar, Robert, Vaniman, David, Williams, Rebecca M. E., Yingst, Aileen, Lewis, Kevin, Leshin, Laurie, Cleghorn, Timothy, Huntress, Wesley, Manhès, Gérard, Hudgins, Judy, Olson, Timothy, Stewart, Noel, Sarrazin, Philippe, Grant, John, Vicenzi, Edward, Wilson, Sharon A., Bullock, Mark, Ehresmann, Bent, Hamilton, Victoria, Hassler, Donald, Peterson, Joseph, Rafkin, Scot, Zeitlin, Cary, Fedosov, Fedor, Golovin, Dmitry, Karpushkina, Natalya, Kozyrev, Alexander, Litvak, Maxim, Malakhov, Alexey, Mitrofanov, Igor, Mokrousov, Maxim, Nikiforov, Sergey, Prokhorov, Vasily, Sanin, Anton, Tretyakov, Vladislav, Varenikov, Alexey, Vostrukhin, Andrey, Kuzmin, Ruslan, Clark, Benton, Wolff, Michael, McLennan, Scott, Botta, Oliver, Drake, Darrell, Bean, Keri, Lemmon, Mark, Schwenzer, Susanne P., Anderson, Ryan B., Herkenhoff, Kenneth, Lee, Ella Mae, Sucharski, Robert, Hernández, Miguel Ángel de Pablo, Ávalos, Juan José Blanco, Ramos, Miguel, Kim, Myung-Hee, Malespin, Charles, Plante, Ianik, Muller, Jan-Peter, Ewing, Ryan, Boynton, William, Downs, Robert, Fitzgibbon, Mike, Harshman, Karl, Morrison, Shaunna, Dietrich, William, Kortmann, Onno, Palucis, Marisa, Sumner, Dawn Y., Williams, Amy, Lugmair, Günter, Wilson, Michael A., Rubin, David, Jakosky, Bruce, Balic-Zunic, Tonci, Frydenvang, Jens, Jensen, Jaqueline Kløvgaard, Kinch, Kjartan, Koefoed, Asmus, Madsen, Morten Bo, Stipp, Susan Louise Svane, Boyd, Nick, Campbell, John L., Gellert, Ralf, Perrett, Glynis, Pradler, Irina, VanBommel, Scott, Jacob, Samantha, Owen, Tobias, Rowland, Scott, Savijärvi, Hannu, Boehm, Eckart, Böttcher, Stephan, Burmeister, Sönke, Guo, Jingnan, Köhler, Jan, García, César Martín, Mueller-Mellin, Reinhold, Wimmer-Schweingruber, Robert, Bridges, John C., McConnochie, Timothy, Benna, Mehdi, Franz, Heather, Bower, Hannah, Brunner, Anna, Blau, Hannah, Boucher, Thomas, Carmosino, Marco, Atreya, Sushil, Elliott, Harvey, Halleaux, Douglas, Rennó, Nilton, Wong, Michael, Pepin, Robert, Elliott, Beverley, Spray, John, Thompson, Lucy, Gordon, Suzanne, Newsom, Horton, Ollila, Ann, Williams, Joshua, Vasconcelos, Paulo, Bentz, Jennifer, Nealson, Kenneth, Popa, Radu, Kah, Linda C., Moersch, Jeffrey, Tate, Christopher, Day, Mackenzie, Kocurek, Gary, Hallet, Bernard, Sletten, Ronald, Francis, Raymond, McCullough, Emily, Cloutis, Ed, ten Kate, Inge Loes, Arvidson, Raymond, Fraeman, Abigail, Scholes, Daniel, Slavney, Susan, Stein, Thomas, Ward, Jennifer, Berger, Jeffrey, Moores, John E., NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC), NASA Johnson Space Center (JSC), NASA, Laboratorio de Química de Plasmas y Estudios Planetarios [Mexico], Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares [Mexico], Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México = National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM)-Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México = National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), NASA Ames Research Center (ARC), Laboratoire de Génie des Procédés et Matériaux - EA 4038 (LGPM), CentraleSupélec, ASU School of Earth and Space Exploration (SESE), Arizona State University [Tempe] (ASU), Laboratoire Interuniversitaire des Systèmes Atmosphériques (LISA (UMR_7583)), Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris Diderot - Paris 7 (UPD7)-Université Paris-Est Créteil Val-de-Marne - Paris 12 (UPEC UP12)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Department of Astronomy [Ithaca], Cornell University [New York], Centro de Astrobiologia [Madrid] (CAB), Instituto Nacional de Técnica Aeroespacial (INTA)-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas [Madrid] (CSIC), Center for Research and Exploration in Space Science and Technology [GSFC] (CRESST), Centre de Recherche Public Henri Tudor [Technoport] (CRP Henri Tudor), Centre de Recherche Public Henri-Tudor [Luxembourg] (CRP Henri-Tudor), Department of Microbiology [Amherst], University of Massachusetts [Amherst] (UMass Amherst), University of Massachusetts System (UMASS)-University of Massachusetts System (UMASS), Astromaterials Research and Exploration Science (ARES), NASA-NASA, Geophysical Laboratory [Carnegie Institution], Carnegie Institution for Science, PLANETO - LATMOS, Laboratoire Atmosphères, Milieux, Observations Spatiales (LATMOS), Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris 6 (UPMC)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris 6 (UPMC)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences [Atlanta], Georgia Institute of Technology [Atlanta], Instituto Andaluz de Ciencias de la Tierra (IACT), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas [Madrid] (CSIC)-Universidad de Granada (UGR), Department of Computer Science, Electrical and Space Engineering [Luleå], Luleå University of Technology (LUT), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM)-Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Carnegie Institution for Science [Washington], Universidad de Granada (UGR)-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas [Madrid] (CSIC), Université Paris-Est Créteil Val-de-Marne - Paris 12 (UPEC UP12)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris Diderot - Paris 7 (UPD7)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Cornell University, Instituto Nacional de Técnica Aeroespacial (INTA)-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas [Spain] (CSIC), Department of Microbiology, IMPEC - LATMOS, Universidad de Granada (UGR)-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas [Spain] (CSIC), and Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas [Madrid] (CSIC)-Universidad de Granada = University of Granada (UGR)

Subjects
Martian, Multidisciplinary, 010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences, Water on Mars, nitrates, astrobiology, [SDU.ASTR.EP]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Astrophysics [astro-ph]/Earth and Planetary Astrophysics [astro-ph.EP], Mars, Mars Exploration Program, 01 natural sciences, nitrogen, Astrobiology, Curiosity, 13. Climate action, Rocknest, 0103 physical sciences, Sample Analysis at Mars, Physical Sciences, Aeolian processes, Composition of Mars, 010303 astronomy & astrophysics, Nitrogen cycle, Geology, 0105 earth and related environmental sciences
Abstract

International audience; The Sample Analysis at Mars (SAM) investigation on the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) Curiosity rover has detected oxidized nitrogen-bearing compounds during pyrolysis of scooped aeolian sediments and drilled sedimentary deposits within Gale crater. Total N concentrations ranged from 20 to 250 nmol N per sample. After subtraction of known N sources in SAM, our results support the equivalent of 110–300 ppm of nitrate in the Rocknest (RN) aeolian samples, and 70–260 and 330–1,100 ppm nitrate in John Klein (JK) and Cumberland (CB) mudstone deposits, respectively. Discovery of indigenous martian nitrogen in Mars surface materials has important implications for habitability and, specifically, for the potential evolution of a nitrogen cycle at some point in martian history. The detection of nitrate in both wind-drifted fines (RN) and in mudstone (JK, CB) is likely a result of N2 fixation to nitrate generated by thermal shock from impact or volcanic plume lightning on ancient Mars. Fixed nitrogen could have facilitated the development of a primitive nitrogen cycle on the surface of ancient Mars, potentially providing a biochemically accessible source of nitrogen.

Published
2015

37. The diverse neurobiological processes and legacies of early adversity: implications for practice.

Author

Simmonds, John and Woolgar, Matt

Subjects
ADAPTABILITY (Personality), CHILD abuse, ADOPTED children, MENTAL health, NEUROBIOLOGY, SERIAL publications, SOCIAL context, ADVERSE childhood experiences
Abstract

An introduction is presented in which editor discusses articles in issue on topics including impact of neurobiological science on family placement policy; domestic violence as a risk factor for children and adults; and the planning and decision-making for children whose parents faces challenges.

Published
2019
Full Text
View/download PDF

38. Investigating special guardianship : experiences, challenges and outcomes

Author

Wade, Jim, Sinclair, Ian Alexander Charles, Stuttard, Lucy, and Simmonds, John

Abstract

Special guardianship is overwhelmingly used for children, predominantly young children, living with relatives or family friends (mostly grandparents or aunts and uncles). Its location within kinship care is the most marked difference with adoption. In excess of 13,000 special guardianship orders were made within the study period. Almost two-thirds of children were reported to have been at risk of abuse or neglect (63.5 per cent).

Published
2014

39. Fishing for MSY: using “pretty good yield” ranges without impairing recruitment

Author

Rindorf, Anna, primary, Cardinale, Massimiliano, additional, Shephard, Samuel, additional, De Oliveira, José A. A., additional, Hjorleifsson, Einar, additional, Kempf, Alexander, additional, Luzenczyk, Anna, additional, Millar, Colin, additional, Miller, David C. M., additional, Needle, Coby L., additional, Simmonds, John, additional, and Vinther, Morten, additional

Published
2016
Full Text
View/download PDF

42. The potential for use of the Development and Well-Being Assessment (DAWBA) in adoption support assessments1.

Author

Simmonds, John

Subjects
ADOPTION & psychology, EDUCATION of social workers, CHILD development, NEED (Psychology), QUESTIONNAIRES, WELL-being, RESEARCH methodology evaluation, FUNCTIONAL assessment
Abstract

The Adoption Support Fund in England, which was rolled out on 1 May 2015, seeks to improve the lives of adopted children and their families by providing resources to fund therapeutic interventions for the child. Accessing the Fund requires that the needs of the child and family are fully assessed and the expected outcomes are identified. This raises questions about the use of standardised and validated assessment tools as a part of the process. This article reviews the benefits and challenges of using established instruments, such as the Common Assessment Framework (CAF) and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), and considers the relevance of the Development and Well-Being Assessment (DAWBA) for adoption situations. It is argued that given the legal requirements to link need, services and outcomes, the importance of using validated assessment tools is strong. However, social workers need training to administer them and interpret the results. While using the SDQ should be firmly embedded in practice, the contribution of the DAWBA, although promising, requires further exploration. Social workers will also need training on how best to use it, and how to interpret the results and integrate these into a comprehensive assessment of the child and family. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2015
Full Text
View/download PDF

44. Policy context.

Author

Hayes, Derren, Michalska, Alison, and Simmonds, John

Published
2017

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results