Search

Objectives: To identify possible etiology-specific differences in preoperative risk factors for major adverse events during Impella 5.5 support in patients with ischemic (ICM) and nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM). Methods: From October 2019 to January 2023, 228 Impella 5.5 devices were inserted at our institution. Patients were stratified into ICM (n = 124) and NICM (n = 104) cohorts. The primary outcome was a composite of death/stroke/new-onset dialysis while actively receiving Impella 5.5 support. Random forests identified preoperative factors predictive of the primary outcome separately for each cohort, with ranking by variable importance. Results: The primary outcome occurred in 42 (34%) patients with ICM and 35 (34%) patients with NICM. Twenty-one (17%) patients with ICM and 21 (20%) patients with NICM died on Impella 5.5; stroke occurred in 12 (9.7%) patients with ICM and 3 (2.9%) patients with NICM, and new-onset dialysis was initiated in 23 (19%) patients with ICM and 24 (23%) patients with NICM while actively receiving Impella 5.5 support. Risk factors reflecting systemic and myocardial cellular injury, end-organ and cardiopulmonary failure, right ventricular dysfunction, and smaller left ventricular dimensions were most predictive of adverse outcomes in both cohorts. Indications for Impella 5.5 and device strategy (bridge to recovery, advanced therapies, or decision) were not top risk factors in either cohort. Conclusions: Risk factors related to preoperative stability, right ventricular dysfunction, and left ventricular size were more predictive of adverse outcomes while actively receiving Impella 5.5 support than indication or device strategy. These factors could help identify high-risk patients who may benefit from additional tailored management to reduce their risk for these impactful adverse outcomes while on Impella 5.5 support.

Objective: Anterior mitral anular calcification, particularly in radiation heart disease, and previous valve replacement with destroyed intervalvular fibrosa are challenging for prosthesis sizing and placement. The Commando procedure with intervalvular fibrosa reconstruction permits double-valve replacement in these challenging conditions. We referenced outcomes after Commando procedures to standard double-valve replacements. Methods: From January 2011 to January 2022, 129 Commando procedures and 1191 aortic and mitral double-valve replacements were performed at the Cleveland Clinic, excluding endocarditis. Reasons for the Commando were severe calcification after radiation (n = 67), without radiation (n = 43), and others (n = 19). Commando procedures were referenced to a subset of double-valve replacements using balancing-score methods (109 pairs). Results: Between balanced groups, Commando versus double-valve replacement had higher total calcium scores (median 6140 vs 2680 HU, P = .03). Hospital outcomes were similar, including operative mortality (12/11% vs 8/7.3%, P = .35) and reoperation for bleeding (9/8.3% vs 5/4.6%, P = .28). Survival and freedom from reoperation at 5 years were 54% versus 67% (P = .33) and 87% versus 100% (P = .04), respectively. Higher calcium score was associated with lower survival after double-valve replacement but not after the Commando. The Commando procedure had lower aortic valve mean gradients at 4 years (9.4 vs 11 mm Hg, P = .04). After Commando procedures for calcification, 5-year survival was 60% and 59% with and without radiation, respectively (P = .47). Conclusions: The Commando procedure with reconstruction of the intervalvular fibrosa destroyed by mitral anular calcification, radiation, or previous surgery demonstrates acceptable outcomes similar to standard double-valve replacement. More experience and long-term outcomes are required to refine patient selection for and application of the Commando approach.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement is not widely used in patients with congenital heart disease. We describe our single-center experience of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in congenital heart disease, demonstrating short-term feasibility and safety, role in lifetime management of congenital aortic valve disease, and use as a bridge to recovery, future surgery, or transplantation.

Background: The Ozaki procedure using autologous pericardium is an interesting but complex alternative for aortic valve replacement. We present a standardized approach to minimize the learning curve and confirm reproducibility. Methods: After careful preparation, from May 2015 to February 2021, an Ozaki procedure was performed on 46 patients age 51 ± 14 years. Seven had unicuspid (15%), 29 bicuspid (63%), and 10 tricuspid (22%) aortic valves, and 2 patients had endocarditis. Endpoints were operative learning curves, perioperative outcomes, intermediate-term valve hemodynamics, reintervention, health-related quality of life (MacNew Heart Disease Health-Related Quality of Life questionnaire), and mortality. Results: Cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic clamp times decreased from 145 to 125 ​minutes and 120 to 100 ​minutes, respectively, over the first 20 cases, reflecting the learning curve. There was no major perioperative morbidity or mortality. Median postoperative stay was 6.9 days. Aortic regurgitation was mild or less in all but 2 patients who developed moderate aortic regurgitation. Mean aortic valve gradient was 7.9 mmHg postoperatively, 9.2 mmHg by 6 months, and constant thereafter. Left ventricular ejection fraction was 58% preoperatively, 60% at 6 months, and remained stable thereafter. One patient developed infective endocarditis 7 months postoperatively, failed medical management, and underwent valve replacement at 14 months. Two-year survival was 96%, with 1 noncardiac death at 16 months. Health-related quality of life in mental, physical, and emotional domains was better than matched norms, global 6.2 vs. 5.0 (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Using a well-prepared standardized approach, the Ozaki procedure is reproducible with a short learning curve, excellent hemodynamic performance, and good quality of life.