Search

C-peptide is an increasingly used and established marker for beta cell function by assessing endogenous insulin secretion. Accurate and comparable C-peptide measurements are needed in clinical practice and research studies. For example, to calculate HOMA-indices, the C-peptide/glucose ratio, and the classification of recently published novel subgroups of diabetes and prediabetes have used C-peptide measurements. Although the process for standardization of C-peptide measurements is advanced, its full implementation is still missing; therefore, the current status of the comparability of C-peptide measurements using different immunoassays is unclear. Here we compared five widely used C-peptide immunoassays on different analyzers (Abbott ALINITY i, DiaSorin Liaison XL, Roche Cobas e411, Siemens Healthineers ADVIA Centaur XPT, and Immulite 2000 XPi) using serum samples covering the clinically relevant C-peptide concentration range. Although all investigated immunoassays are traceable to the international reference reagent for C-peptide (NIBSC code: 84/510), results of C-peptide measurements showed significant differences between analyzers in the entire concentration range, especially with increasing C-peptide concentrations. The mean bias was largest (36.6%) between results of the immunoassays by Roche and Siemens Healthineers (ADVIA Centaur XPT), and both assays revealed large discrepancies compared to immunoassays by Abbott, DiaSorin, and Siemens Healthineers (Immulite 2000 XPi). In contrast, the three latter assays showed similar C-peptide results (mean bias: 2.3% to 4.2%). Consequently, C-peptide discrepancies might affect clinical diagnosis and the interpretation of study results. Therefore, there is an urgent need to implement and finalize the standardization process of C-peptide measurements to improve patient care and the comparability of research studies.

Supplementary Figures S1-S5 Supplementary Tables S1-S3 revised

Patients with cancer, in particular patients with hematologic malignancies, are at increased risk for critical illness upon COVID-19. We here assessed antibody as well as CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses in unexposed and SARS-CoV-2–infected patients with cancer to characterize SARS-CoV-2 immunity and to identify immunologic parameters contributing to COVID-19 outcome. Unexposed patients with hematologic malignancies presented with reduced prevalence of preexisting SARS-CoV-2 cross-reactive CD4+ T-cell responses and signs of T-cell exhaustion compared with patients with solid tumors and healthy volunteers. Whereas SARS-CoV-2 antibody responses did not differ between patients with COVID-19 and cancer and healthy volunteers, intensity, expandability, and diversity of SARS-CoV-2 T-cell responses were profoundly reduced in patients with cancer, and the latter associated with a severe course of COVID-19. This identifies impaired SARS-CoV-2 T-cell immunity as a potential determinant for dismal outcome of COVID-19 in patients with cancer.Significance:This first comprehensive analysis of SARS-CoV-2 immune responses in patients with cancer reports on the potential implications of impaired SARS-CoV-2 T-cell responses for understanding pathophysiology and predicting severity of COVID-19, which in turn might allow for the development of therapeutic measures and vaccines for this vulnerable patient population.See related commentary by Salomé and Horowitz, p. 1877.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1861

T cell immunity is central for the control of viral infections. CoVac-1 is a peptide-based vaccine candidate, composed of SARS-CoV-2 T cell epitopes derived from various viral proteins1,2, combined with the Toll-like receptor 1/2 agonist XS15 emulsified in Montanide ISA51 VG, aiming to induce profound SARS-CoV-2 T cell immunity to combat COVID-19. Here we conducted a phase I open-label trial, recruiting 36 participants aged 18–80 years, who received a single subcutaneous CoVac-1 vaccination. The primary end point was safety analysed until day 56. Immunogenicity in terms of CoVac-1-induced T cell response was analysed as the main secondary end point until day 28 and in the follow-up until month 3. No serious adverse events and no grade 4 adverse events were observed. Expected local granuloma formation was observed in all study participants, whereas systemic reactogenicity was absent or mild. SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell responses targeting multiple vaccine peptides were induced in all study participants, mediated by multifunctional T helper 1 CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. CoVac-1-induced IFNγ T cell responses persisted in the follow-up analyses and surpassed those detected after SARS-CoV-2 infection as well as after vaccination with approved vaccines. Furthermore, vaccine-induced T cell responses were unaffected by current SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern. Together, CoVac-1 showed a favourable safety profile and induced broad, potent and variant of concern-independent T cell responses, supporting the presently ongoing evaluation in a phase II trial for patients with B cell or antibody deficiency., A phase I open-label trial evaluating the immunogencity, reactogenicity and safety of a peptide-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidate to induce SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell responses.

Several COVID-19 vaccines are approved to prevent severe disease outcome after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Whereas induction and functionality of antiviral antibody response are largely studied, the induction of T cells upon vaccination with the different approved COVID-19 vaccines is less studied. Here, we report on T cell immunity 4 weeks and 6 months after different vaccination regimens and 4 weeks after an additional booster vaccination in comparison with SARS-CoV-2 T cell responses in convalescents and prepandemic donors using interferon-gamma ELISpot assays and flow cytometry. Increased T cell responses and cross-recognition of B.1.1.529 Omicron variant–specific mutations were observed ex vivo in mRNA- and heterologous-vaccinated donors compared with vector-vaccinated donors. Nevertheless, potent expandability of T cells targeting the spike protein was observed for all vaccination regimens, with frequency, diversity, and the ability to produce several cytokines of vaccine-induced T cell responses comparable with those in convalescent donors. T cell responses for all vaccinated donors significantly exceeded preexisting cross-reactive T cell responses in prepandemic donors. Booster vaccination led to a significant increase in anti-spike IgG responses, which showed a marked decline 6 months after complete vaccination. In contrast, T cell responses remained stable over time after complete vaccination with no significant effect of booster vaccination on T cell responses and cross-recognition of Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 mutations. This suggested that booster vaccination is of particular relevance for the amelioration of antibody response. Together, our work shows that different vaccination regimens induce broad and long-lasting spike-specific CD4 + and CD8 + T cell immunity to SARS-CoV-2.

Both B cells and T cells are involved in an effective immune response to SARS‐CoV‐2, the disease‐causing virus of COVID‐19. While B cells—with the indispensable help of CD4+ T cells—are essential to generate neutralizing antibodies, T cells on their own have been recognized as another major player in effective anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 immunity. In this report, we provide insights into the characteristics of individual HLA‐A*02:01‐ and HLA‐A*24:02‐restricted SARS‐CoV‐2‐reactive TCRs, isolated from convalescent COVID‐19 patients. We observed that SARS‐CoV‐2‐reactive T‐cell populations were clearly detectable in convalescent samples and that TCRs isolated from these T cell clones were highly functional upon ectopic re‐expression. The SARS‐CoV‐2‐reactive TCRs described in this report mediated potent TCR signaling in reporter assays with low nanomolar EC50 values. We further demonstrate that these SARS‐CoV‐2‐reactive TCRs conferred powerful T‐cell effector function to primary CD8+ T cells as evident by a robust anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 IFN‐γ response and in vitro cytotoxicity. We also provide an example of a long‐lasting anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 memory response by reisolation of one of the retrieved TCRs 5 months after initial sampling. Taken together, these findings contribute to a better understanding of anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 T‐cell immunity and may contribute to paving the way toward immunotherapeutics approaches targeting SARS‐CoV‐2., T cell receptors (TCRs) directed against previously identified SARS‐CoV‐2 target epitopes were isolated from convalescent COVID‐19 patients by single‐cell sequencing. Upon ectopic re‐expression, these SARS‐CoV‐2 TCRs conferred potent effector functions such as cytotoxicity and Interferon‐gamma production.

Die Diagnose des Diabetes mellitus basiert masgeblich auf der Messung von Laborparamatern. Glukose- und HbA1c-Bestimmungen (HbA1c: glykiertes Hamoglobin Typ A1c) spielen fur die initiale Diagnose, die Prognose und die Therapiesteuerung eine zentrale Rolle. Diabetesassoziierte Autoantikorper konnen zur Klassifikation des Diabetes herangezogen werden, und C‑Peptid bzw. Insulin werden als Marker der korpereigenen Insulinsekretion angesehen. Damit Labormessergebnisse richtig bewertet werden konnen, mussen praanalytische und analytische Limitationen wie Einfluss- und Storfaktoren beachtet werden. Dazu mussen die Vorgaben in der Richtlinie der Bundesarztekammer zur Qualitatssicherung laboratoriumsmedizinischer Untersuchungen (Rili-BAK) beachtet werden.

Patients with cancer, in particular patients with hematologic malignancies, are at increased risk for critical illness upon COVID-19. We here assessed antibody as well as CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses in unexposed and SARS-CoV-2–infected patients with cancer to characterize SARS-CoV-2 immunity and to identify immunologic parameters contributing to COVID-19 outcome. Unexposed patients with hematologic malignancies presented with reduced prevalence of preexisting SARS-CoV-2 cross-reactive CD4+ T-cell responses and signs of T-cell exhaustion compared with patients with solid tumors and healthy volunteers. Whereas SARS-CoV-2 antibody responses did not differ between patients with COVID-19 and cancer and healthy volunteers, intensity, expandability, and diversity of SARS-CoV-2 T-cell responses were profoundly reduced in patients with cancer, and the latter associated with a severe course of COVID-19. This identifies impaired SARS-CoV-2 T-cell immunity as a potential determinant for dismal outcome of COVID-19 in patients with cancer. Significance: This first comprehensive analysis of SARS-CoV-2 immune responses in patients with cancer reports on the potential implications of impaired SARS-CoV-2 T-cell responses for understanding pathophysiology and predicting severity of COVID-19, which in turn might allow for the development of therapeutic measures and vaccines for this vulnerable patient population. See related commentary by Salomé and Horowitz, p. 1877. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1861

The presence of antibodies against endemic coronaviruses has been linked to disease severity after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Assays capable of concomitantly detecting antibodies against endemic coronaviridae such as OC43, 229E, NL63, and SARS-CoV-2 may help to elucidate this question. We developed a serum screening platform using a bead-based Western blot system called DigiWest, capable of running hundreds of assays using microgram amounts of protein prepared directly from different viruses. Characterization of the immunoassay for detection of SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies revealed a sensitivity of 90.3% and a diagnostic specificity of 98.1%. Concordance analysis with the SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays available by Roche, Siemens, and Euroimmun indicates comparable assay performances (Cohen's κ ranging from 0.8874 to 0.9508). Analogous assays for OC43, 229E, and NL63 were established and combined into one multiplex with the SARS-CoV-2 assay. Seroreactivity for different coronaviruses was detected with high incidence, and the multiplex assay was adapted for serum screening.

Background Accumulating evidence indicates toward an association between severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and procoagulatory state in blood. Thromboelastographic investigations are useful point-of-care devices to assess coagulation and fibrinolysis.Objectives We investigated the hypothesis that the procoagulatory state in COVID-19 patients is associated with impaired fibrinolysis system.Methods Altogether, 29 COVID-19 patients admitted to normal wards or to the intensive care unit (ICU) were included in this descriptive study. Whole blood samples were investigated by thromboelastography to assess coagulation and fibrinolysis. Additionally, standard routine coagulation testing and immunoassays for factors of fibrinolysis as plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), plasminogen activity and α2-antiplasmin (A2AP) were performed.Results A significantly increased lysis resistance and a significantly longer time of lysis after adding tissue plasminogen activator were observed in blood samples from ICU COVID-19 patients compared with healthy controls (maximal lysis: 3.25 ± 0.56 vs. 6.20 ± 0.89%, p = 0.0127; lysis time: 365.7 ± 44.6 vs. 193.2 ± 16.3 seconds, p = 0.0014). PAI-1 activity was significantly higher in plasma samples of ICU COVID-19 patients (PAI-1: 4.92 ± 0.91 vs. 1.28 ± 0.33 U/mL, p = 0.001). A positive correlation between the activity of PAI-1 and lysis time of the formed clot (r = 0.70, p = 0.0006) was observed.Conclusion Our data suggest that severe SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with impaired fibrinolytic activity in blood, where fibrinolytic inhibitors are elevated leading to an increased resistance to clot lysis. Thromboelastography could offer a tool to investigate the contribution of the fibrinolytic status to the procoagulatory condition in COVID-19.

The humoral immune response to SARS-CoV-2 is a benchmark for immunity and detailed analysis is required to understand the manifestation and progression of COVID-19, monitor seroconversion within the general population, and support vaccine development. The majority of currently available commercial serological assays only quantify the SARS-CoV-2 antibody response against individual antigens, limiting our understanding of the immune response. To overcome this, we have developed a multiplex immunoassay (MultiCoV-Ab) including spike and nucleocapsid proteins of SARS-CoV-2 and the endemic human coronaviruses. Compared to three broadly used commercial in vitro diagnostic tests, our MultiCoV-Ab achieves a higher sensitivity and specificity when analyzing a well-characterized sample set of SARS-CoV-2 infected and uninfected individuals. We find a high response against endemic coronaviruses in our sample set, but no consistent cross-reactive IgG response patterns against SARS-CoV-2. Here we show a robust, high-content-enabled, antigen-saving multiplex assay suited to both monitoring vaccination studies and facilitating epidemiologic screenings for humoral immunity towards pandemic and endemic coronaviruses., Serology is an important way to monitor SARS-CoV-2 infection in the population and support vaccine development. Here the authors develop a multiplex immunoassay including spike and nucleocapsid proteins of SARS-CoV-2 and the endemic human coronaviruses with high specificity and sensitivity.

ZusammenfassungDie bislang etablierte Klassifikation des Diabetes mellitus hat sich in der Praxis zwar bewährt, spiegelt aber die Heterogenität der Erkrankung nicht wider. In einer Clusteranalyse einer schwedischen Arbeitsgruppe wurde eine neue Klassifikation vorgeschlagen, die den Diabetes mellitus in 5 Subgruppen unterteilt. Diese unterscheiden sich maßgeblich in der Prädiktion und Therapie von Folgeerkrankungen von Menschen mit Diabetes. Zur Klassifikation wurden unter anderem GAD-Autoantikörper, HbA1c, HOMA2-B und HOMA2-IR verwendet, wobei die Berechnung der HOMA-Indizes auf den Messgrößen Glukose und Insulin beziehungsweise C-Peptid beruht. Die Messverfahren der dabei verwendeten Labormessgrößen müssen notwendigerweise standardisiert und damit vergleichbar sein. Erst dann kann diese Klassifikation weltweit angewendet werden. Unabhängig davon ist die Vergleichbarkeit von Laborergebnissen auch für die Diagnosestellung, Prädiktion und Therapiesteuerung von Menschen mit Diabetes zwingend notwendig. In den letzten Jahrzehnten wurden daher bei den diabetesrelevanten Labormessgrößen große Anstrengungen unternommen, um eine Standardisierung dieser Parameter zu erreichen. Für Glukose und HbA1c-Wert konnte dies inzwischen erreicht werden, sodass diese Parameter international vergleichbar gemessen werden. Der Prozess der Standardisierung der C-Peptid-Bestimmung soll 2020 fertiggestellt sein und anschließend umgesetzt werden. Dagegen ist die Standardisierung der Insulinbestimmung bisher nur unzureichend fortgeschritten. Die Bestimmung von GAD-Autoantikörpern kann aufgrund der biologischen Heterogenität von Autoantikörpern nicht standardisiert werden, jedoch ist in den letzten Jahren eine weitgehende Harmonisierung erzielt worden. Durch eine weltweite Standardisierung dieser Parameter können fehlerhafte Diagnosen und falsche klinische Entscheidungen, die auf Labormessgrößen beruhen, zum Nutzen der Patienten reduziert werden.

Objectives Serological assays for detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies are increasingly used during the COVID-19 pandemic caused by the SARS-Coronavirus-2. Here we evaluated the analytical and clinical performance of three commercially available SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays. Methods A total of 186 samples from 58 patients with PCR-confirmed COVID-19 infection were measured using SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays by Siemens Healthineers, Roche Diagnostics and Euroimmun. Additionally, 123 control samples, including samples collected before December 2019 and samples with potential cross-reactive antibodies were analyzed. Diagnostic specificity, sensitivity, agreement between assays and ROC curve-derived optimized thresholds were determined. Furthermore, intra- and inter-assay precision and the potential impact of interfering substances were investigated. Results SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays by Siemens and Roche showed 100% specificity. The Euroimmun assay had 98 and 100% specificity, when borderline results are considered as positive or negative, respectively. Diagnostic sensitivity for samples collected ≥14 days after PCR-positivity was 97.0, 89.4 and 95.5% using the Siemens, Roche and Euroimmun assay, respectively. Sensitivity of the Roche assay can be increased using an optimized cut-off index (0.095). However, a simultaneous decrease in specificity (98.4%) was observed. Siemens showed 95.8 and 95.5% overall agreement with results of Euroimmun and Roche assay, respectively. Euroimmun and Roche assay exhibited 92.6% overall agreement. Discordant results were observed in three COVID-19 patients and in one COVID-19 patient none of the investigated assays detected antibodies. Conclusions The investigated assays were highly specific and sensitive in detecting SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in samples obtained ≥14 days after PCR-confirmed infection. Discordant results need to be investigated in further studies.

Edoxaban, alongside other direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC), is increasingly used for prevention of thromboembolism, including stroke. Despite DOAC therapy, however, annual stroke rate in patients with atrial fibrillation remains 1–2%. Rapid exclusion of relevant anticoagulation is necessary to guide thrombolysis or reversal therapy but, so far, no data exists on the effect of edoxaban on available point-of-care test systems (POCT). To complete our previous investigation on global coagulation-POCT for the detection of DOAC, we evaluated whether CoaguChek®-INR (CC-INR) is capable of safely ruling out edoxaban concentrations above the current treatment thresholds of 30/50 ng/mL in a blood sample. We studied patients receiving a first dose of edoxaban; excluding subjects receiving other anticoagulants. Six blood samples were collected from each patient: before drug intake, 0.5, 1, 2 and 8 h after intake, and at trough (24 h). CC-INR and mass spectrometry for edoxaban concentrations were performed for each time-point. One hundred and twenty blood samples from 20 patients contained 0–302 ng/mL of edoxaban. CC-INR ranged from 0.9 to 2.3. Pearson’s correlation coefficient showed strong correlation between CC-INR and edoxaban concentrations (r = 0.73, p 30 and > 50 ng/mL were ruled out by CC-INR ≤ 1.0 and ≤ 1.1, respectively, with high specificity (> 95%), and a sensitivity of 44% (95%-confidence interval: 30–59%) and 86% (74–93%), respectively. Our study represents the first evaluation of coagulation-POCT in edoxaban-treated patients. CC-POCT is suitable to safely exclude clinically relevant edoxaban concentrations prior to thrombolysis, or guide reversal therapy in stroke patients.

Background and aimsWith prediabetes and diabetes increasingly recognized as heterogenous conditions, assessment of beta-cell function is gaining clinical importance to identify disease subphenotypes. Our study aims to comprehensively validate all types of surrogate indices based on OGTT- and fasting-measurements in comparison with gold standard methods.Materials and methodsThe hyperglycaemic clamp extended with GLP-1 infusion and IVGTT, as well as OGTT, was performed in two well-phenotyped cohorts. The gold-standard-derived indices were compared with surrogate insulin secretion markers, derived from fasting state and OGTT, using both Pearson’s and Spearman’s correlation coefficients. The insulin- and C-peptide-based indices were analysed separately in different groups of glucose tolerance and the entire cohorts.ResultsThe highest correlation coefficients were found for AUC (I0-30)/AUC (G0-30), first-phase Stumvoll and Kadowaki model. These indices have high correlation coefficients with measures obtained from both insulin and C-peptide levels from IVGTT and hyperglycaemic clamp. AUC (I0-30)/AUC (G0-30), first-phase Stumvoll, AUC (I0-120)/AUC (G0-120) and BIGTT-AIR0-60-120 demonstrated the strongest association with incretin-stimulated insulin response.ConclusionWe have identified glucose- and GLP-1-stimulated insulin secretion indices, derived from OGTT and fasting state, that have the strongest correlation with gold-standard measures and could be potentially used in future researches and clinical practice.

Objectives Antigen tests are an essential part of SARS-CoV-2 testing strategies. Rapid antigen tests are easy to use but less sensitive compared to nucleic acid amplification tests (NAT) and less suitable for large-scale testing. In contrast, laboratory-based antigen tests are suitable for high-throughput immunoanalyzers. Here we evaluated the diagnostic performance of the laboratory-based Siemens Healthineers SARS-CoV-2 Antigen (CoV2Ag) assay. Methods In a public test center, from 447 individuals anterior nasal swab specimens as well as nasopharyngeal swab specimens were collected. The nasal swab specimens were collected in sample inactivation medium and measured using the CoV2Ag assay. The nasopharyngeal swab specimens were measured by RT-PCR. Additionally, 9,046 swab specimens obtained for screening purposes in a tertiary care hospital were analyzed and positive CoV2Ag results confirmed by NAT. Results In total, 234/447 (52.3%) participants of the public test center were positive for SARS-CoV-2-RNA. Viral lineage B1.1.529 was dominant during the study. Sensitivity and specificity of the CoV2Ag assay were 88.5% (95%CI: 83.7–91.9%) and 99.5% (97.4–99.9%), respectively. Sensitivity increased to 93.7% (97.4–99.9%) and 98.7% (97.4–99.9%) for swab specimens with cycle threshold values Conclusions Using sample tubes containing inactivation medium the laboratory-based high-throughput CoV2Ag assay is a very specific and highly sensitive assay for detection of SARS-CoV-2 antigen in nasal swab specimens including the B1.1.529 variant. In low prevalence settings confirmation of positive CoV2Ag results by SARS-CoV-2-RNA testing is recommended.

IntroductionSince the introduction of the new International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in 2012, diagnosis and treatment of GDM has improved. But even well-treated GDM might still have impact on long-term health of the mother and her offspring, though, this relation has not been conclusively studied yet.MethodsThe multicenter PREG study is designed to metabolically and phenotypically characterize women with a 75 g five-point oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) during and repeatedly after pregnancy. The offspring of the study participants are followed up until adulthood with developmental tests and metabolic and epigenetic phenotyping in the PREG offspring study. By in-depth phenotyping of the mother and her offspring, we aim to elucidate the relationship of maternal hyperglycemia during pregnancy and adequate treatment and its impact on the long-term health for both.Ethics and disseminationThe study protocol has been reviewed and approved by the ethics committee of the University Hospital Tübingen (protocol numbers 218/2012BO2 and 617/2020BO1), the ethics committee of the Technical University Dresden (protocol number EK263072013), the ethics committee of the medical school of the Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (protocol number 4051) and the ethics committee of the medical school of University of Leipzig (protocol number 038-15-09032015). The results will be disseminated through conference presentations and peer-reviewed publications.RegistrationThe PREG study and the PREG offspring study are registered with Clinical Trials (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT04270578, NCT04722900).Strengths and limitations of this studyThe main strength of the multicenter PREG study are the in-depth phenotyping of mothers during pregnancy and repeatedly after delivery.Data acquisition and sample handling are done according to standard operating procedures in all study sites, thus, ensuring a high quality for each data point.A PREG biobank is set up and samples are available for researchers of the German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD).Children of the study participants are repeatedly examined to cover the period of childhood and adolescence.The PREG study is not planned as a population-based cohort but is enriched for GDM cases.Data Availability StatementAll requests for data and materials will be promptly reviewed by the Data Access Steering Committee to verify whether the request is subject to any intellectual property or confidentiality obligations. Individual-level data may be subject to confidentiality. Any data and materials that can be shared will be released via a Material Transfer Agreement.

T-cell immunity is central for the control of viral infections. CoVac-1 is a peptide-based vaccine candidate, composed of SARS-CoV-2 T-cell epitopes derived from various viral proteins, combined with the toll-like receptor 1/2 agonist XS15 emulsified in MontanideTM ISA51 VG, aiming to induce superior SARS-CoV-2 T-cell immunity to combat COVID-19. We conducted a Phase I open-label trial, including 36 participants aged 18 to 80 years, who received one single subcutaneous CoVAC-1 vaccination. The primary endpoint was safety analyzed until day 56. Immunogenicity in terms of CoVac-1-induced T-cell response was analyzed as main secondary endpoint until day 28. No serious adverse events and no grade 4 adverse events were observed. Expected local granuloma formation was observed in all study subjects, while systemic reactogenicity was absent or mild. SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell responses targeting multiple vaccine peptides were induced in all study participants, mediated by multifunctional T-helper 1 CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. CoVac-1-induced interferon-γ T-cell responses by far surpassed those detected in COVID-19 convalescents and were unaffected by current SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOC). Together, CoVac-1 showed a favorable safety profile and induced broad, potent, and VOC-independent T-cell responses, supporting the presently ongoing evaluation in a Phase II trial for patients with B-cell/antibody deficiency. Funded by the Ministry of Science, Research and the Arts Baden-Württemberg, Germany; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04546841.

Introduction: Fully-automated coagulation analyzers are key components of a high-throughput central laboratory. The novel Atellica COAG 360 (Siemens Healthineers) is a high-volume coagulation analyzer approved for hemostasis diagnostics. The aim of the study was to evaluate the analytical performance of this coagulation analyzer in a central laboratory. Methods: Intra (n=10)- and inter (n=20)-assay precision of the Atellica COAG 360 was determined using commercially available control samples. Patient samples (n=74-104) were used for comparison analyses with the Sysmex CS-5100 (Siemens Healthineers). Effects of visual interferences on coagulation testing were assessed and the sample throughput rate of the Atellica COAG 360 was determined. Results: Intra- and inter-assay precision of the Atellica COAG 360 showed coefficient of variations (CVs)&nbsp

The direct oral anticoagulant dabigatran does not require therapeutic drug monitoring, however emergency measurements are gaining importance. Current assays feature good performance at intermediate and high dabigatran concentrations but show limited accuracy at low concentrations. This area requires more attention as clinical decision threshold values currently lie at 30 and 50 ng/ml. The objective of the study was to evaluate and compare diagnostic performance of dabigatran assays at these thresholds. Dabigatran concentrations of 293 plasma samples taken from 50 patients were measured with the INNOVANCE direct thrombin inhibitor assay (DTI) from Siemens, the Biophen direct thrombin inhibitor assay (BDTI), the BDTI using a low range calibrator (BDTI-low), the Hemoclot direct thrombin inhibitor assay (HTI) and an ecarin clotting time assay (ECT). Assay results were compared to ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS), and test characteristics were calculated for thresholds of 30 and 50 ng/ml. DTI, BDTI-low and ECT showed very strong correlation and high agreement with UPLC-MS/MS and an improved determination of low dabigatran concentrations. ROC curve analyses revealed very high accuracy at the 30/50 ng/ml thresholds for DTI (AUC = 0.989/0.995), BDTI-low (AUC = 0.980/0.991) and ECT (AUC = 0.990/0.996) measurements. Sensitivity and specificity in detecting were calculated for DTI (98/92%), BDTI-low (87/95%), ECT (97/96%), BDTI (99/82%) and HTI (86/89%) measurements. Compared to the previously available HTI and BDTI, both novel assays, DTI and BDTI-low, reliably determine low dabigatran plasma concentrations around the clinical decision thresholds with very high sensitivity and specificity.

Laboratory parameters are essential for diagnosis, prognosis and therapy control of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes-specific parameters including glucose, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), C-peptide and autoantibodies against beta cell epitopes as well as parameters of lipid metabolism and renal function should be taken into account. The precise and reliable determination of these parameters in accordance with the guidelines of the German Federal Medical Council for the determination of laboratory diagnostics is fundamental for the correct classification and evaluation of the measurement results. For this, important pre-analytical and analytical limitations must be considered.

Background Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) including edoxaban are increasingly used for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Despite treatment, annual stroke rate in these patients remains 1–2%. Rapid assessment of coagulation would be useful to guide thrombolysis or reversal therapy in this growing population of DOAC/edoxaban-treated stroke patients. Employing the Hemochron™ Signature Elite point-of-care test system (HC-POCT), clinically relevant plasma concentrations of dabigatran and rivaroxaban can be excluded in a blood sample. However, no data exists on the effect of edoxaban on HC-POCT results. We evaluated whether edoxaban plasma concentrations above the current treatment thresholds for thrombolysis or anticoagulation reversal (i.e., 30 and 50 ng/mL) can be ruled out with the HC-POCT. Methods We prospectively studied patients receiving a first dose of edoxaban. Six blood samples were collected from each patient: before, 0.5, 1, 2, 8, and 24 h after drug intake. HC-POCT-based INR (HC-INR), activated clotting time (HC-ACT+ and HC-ACT-LR), activated partial thromboplastin time (HC-aPTT), and mass spectrometry for edoxaban plasma concentrations were performed at each time-point. We calculated correlations, receiver operating characteristics (ROC) and test-specific cut-offs for ruling out edoxaban concentrations > 30 and > 50 ng/mL in a blood sample. Results One hundred twenty blood samples from 20 edoxaban-treated patients were analyzed. Edoxaban plasma concentrations ranged from 0 to 512 ng/mL. HC-INR/HC-ACT+/HC-ACT-LR/HC-aPTT ranged from 0.7–8.3/78–310 s/65–215 s/19–93 s, and Pearson’s correlation coefficients showed moderate to very strong correlations with edoxaban concentrations (r = 0.95/0.79/0.70/0.60). With areas under the ROC curve of 0.997 (95% confidence interval: 0.991–0.971) and 0.989 (0.975–1.000), HC-INR most reliably ruled out edoxaban concentrations > 30 and > 50 ng/mL, respectively, and HC-INR results ≤1.5 and ≤ 2.1 provided specificity/sensitivity of 98.6% (91.2–99.9)/98.0% (88.0–99.9) and 96.8% (88.0–99.4)/96.5% (86.8–99.4). Conclusions Our study represents the first systematic evaluation of the HC-POCT in edoxaban-treated patients. Applying sufficiently low assay-specific cut-offs, the HC-POCT may not only be used to reliably rule out dabigatran and rivaroxaban, but also very low edoxaban concentrations in a blood sample. Because the assay-specific cut-offs were retrospectively defined, further investigation is warranted. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, registration number: NCT02825394, registered on: 07/07/2016, URL

Long-term immunological memory to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is crucial for the development of population-level immunity, which is the aim of vaccination approaches. Reports on rapidly decreasing antibody titers have led to questions regarding the efficacy of humoral immunity alone. The relevance of T cell memory after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains unclear. Here, we investigated SARS-CoV-2 antibody and T cell responses in matched samples of COVID-19 convalescent individuals up to six months post-infection. Longitudinal analysis revealed decreasing and stable spike- and nucleocapsid-specific antibody responses, respectively. In contrast, functional T cell responses remained robust, and even increased, in both frequency and intensity. Single peptide mapping of T cell diversity over time identified open reading frame-independent, dominant T cell epitopes mediating long-term SARS-CoV-2 T cell responses. Identification of these epitopes may be fundamental for COVID-19 vaccine design., Longitudinal analysis identifies SARS-CoV-2 peptide targets of durable memory T cell responses in COVID-19 convalescent individuals.

Cancer patients, in particular patients with hematological malignancies, are at increased risk for critical illness upon COVID-19. We here assessed antibody as well as CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses in unexposed and SARS-CoV-2-infected cancer patients to characterize SARS-CoV‑2 immunity and to identify immunological parameters contributing to COVID-19 outcome. Unexposed patients with hematological malignancies presented with reduced prevalence of pre-existing SARS-CoV-2 cross-reactive CD4+ T cell responses and signs of T cell exhaustion when compared to solid tumor patients and healthy volunteers. Whereas SARS-CoV-2 antibody responses did not differ between COVID-19 cancer patients and healthy volunteers, intensity, expandability, and diversity of SARS-CoV-2 T cell responses were profoundly reduced in cancer patients, and the latter associated with a severe course of COVID-19. This identifies impaired SARS-CoV-2 T cell immunity as determinant for dismal outcome of COVID-19 in cancer patients.

Context Patients with obesity and insulin resistance are at higher risk for arterial and venous thrombosis due to a prothrombotic state. Objective The present study addressed whether this is reversible by lifestyle intervention and elucidated potential underlying associations. Methods A total of 100 individuals with impaired glucose tolerance or impaired fasting plasma glucose participated in a 1-year lifestyle intervention, including precise metabolic phenotyping and MRS-based determination of liver fat content as well as a comprehensive analysis of coagulation parameters before and after this intervention. Results During the lifestyle intervention, significant reductions in coagulation factor activities (II, VII, VIII, IX, XI, and XII) were observed. Accordingly, prothrombin time (PT%) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) were slightly decreased and prolonged, respectively. Moreover, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), von Willebrand factor (vWF), and also protein C and protein S decreased. Fibrinogen, antithrombin, D-dimer, and FXIII remained unchanged. Searching for potential regulators, especially weight loss, but also liver fat reduction, improved insulin sensitivity, and decreased low-grade inflammation were linked to favorable changes in hemostasis parameters. Independent of weight loss, liver fat reduction (FII, protein C, protein S, PAI-1, vWF), improved insulin sensitivity (protein S, PAI-1), and reduced low-grade inflammation (PT%, aPTT, FVIII/IX/XI/XII, vWF) were identified as single potential regulators. Conclusion Lifestyle intervention is able to improve a prothrombotic state in individuals at high risk for type 2 diabetes. Besides body weight, liver fat content, insulin sensitivity, and systemic low-grade inflammation are potential mechanisms for improvements in hemostasis and could represent future therapeutic targets.

Long-term immunity to SARS-CoV-2 is crucial for the development of herd immunity and the aim of vaccination approaches. Reports on rapidly decreasing antibody titers question the efficacy of humoral immunity. The relevance of T cell memory after COVID-19 is yet unclear. Longitudinal analysis of SARS-CoV-2 immunity in convalescents up to six months post-infection revealed decreasing and stable spike and nucleocapsid antibody responses, respectively. In contrast, T cell responses remained robust and even increased in frequency and intensity. Single epitope mapping of T cell diversity over time identified ORF-independent, dominant T cell epitopes mediating long-term SARS-CoV-2 T cell responses and may be fundamental for vaccine design. Funding: This work was supported by the Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung (BMBF, FKZ:01KI20130; J.W.), the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation, Grant WA 4608/1-2; J.W.), the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft under Germany’s Excellence Strategy (Grant EXC2180-390900677; S.S., H.-G.R., H.R.S., J.W.), the German Cancer Consortium (DKTK; S.S., H.-G.R., H.R.S.), the Wilhelm Sander Stiftung (Grant 2016.177.2; J.W.), the Jose Carreras Leukamie-Stiftung (Grant DJCLS 05 R/2017; J.W.) and the Fortune Program of the University of Tubingen (Fortune number 2451-0-0 and 2581-0-0; J.W.). Conflict of Interest: H.-G.R. is shareholder of Immatics Biotechnologies GmbH and Curevac AG. A.N., T.B., H.-G.R., and J.S.W. hold patents on peptides described in this manuscript secured under the numbers 20 169 047.6 and 20 190 070.1. The other authors declare no competing interests. Ethical Approval: The study was approved by and performed according to the guidelines of the local ethics committees (179/2020/BO2).

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic calls for the rapid development of diagnostic, preventive, and therapeutic approaches. CD4+ and CD8+ T cell-mediated immunity is central for control of and protection from viral infections[1-3]. A prerequisite to characterize T-cell immunity, but also for the development of vaccines and immunotherapies, is the identification of the exact viral T-cell epitopes presented on human leukocyte antigens (HLA)[2-8]. This is the first work identifying and characterizing SARS-CoV-2-specific and cross-reactive HLA class I and HLA-DR T-cell epitopes in SARS-CoV-2 convalescents (n = 180) as well as unexposed individuals (n = 185) and confirming their relevance for immunity and COVID-19 disease course. SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell epitopes enabled detection of post-infectious T-cell immunity, even in seronegative convalescents. Cross-reactive SARS-CoV-2 T-cell epitopes revealed preexisting T-cell responses in 81% of unexposed individuals, and validation of similarity to common cold human coronaviruses provided a functional basis for postulated heterologous immunity[9] in SARS-CoV-2 infection[10,11]. Intensity of T-cell responses and recognition rate of T-cell epitopes was significantly higher in the convalescent donors compared to unexposed individuals, suggesting that not only expansion, but also diversity spread of SARS-CoV-2 T-cell responses occur upon active infection. Whereas anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels were associated with severity of symptoms in our SARS-CoV-2 donors, intensity of T-cell responses did not negatively affect COVID-19 severity. Rather, diversity of SARS-CoV-2 T-cell responses was increased in case of mild symptoms of COVID-19, providing evidence that development of immunity requires recognition of multiple SARS-CoV-2 epitopes. Together, the specific and cross-reactive SARS-CoV-2 T-cell epitopes identified in this work enable the identification of heterologous and post-infectious T-cell immunity and facilitate the development of diagnostic, preventive, and therapeutic measures for COVID-19.

T cell immunity is central for the control of viral infections. To characterize T cell immunity, but also for the development of vaccines, identification of exact viral T cell epitopes is fundamental. Here we identify and characterize multiple dominant and subdominant SARS-CoV-2 HLA class I and HLA-DR peptides as potential T cell epitopes in COVID-19 convalescent and unexposed individuals. SARS-CoV-2-specific peptides enabled detection of post-infectious T cell immunity, even in seronegative convalescent individuals. Cross-reactive SARS-CoV-2 peptides revealed pre-existing T cell responses in 81% of unexposed individuals and validated similarity with common cold coronaviruses, providing a functional basis for heterologous immunity in SARS-CoV-2 infection. Diversity of SARS-CoV-2 T cell responses was associated with mild symptoms of COVID-19, providing evidence that immunity requires recognition of multiple epitopes. Together, the proposed SARS-CoV-2 T cell epitopes enable identification of heterologous and post-infectious T cell immunity and facilitate development of diagnostic, preventive and therapeutic measures for COVID-19.

Objectives Due to its high specificity, liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is considered the gold standard in diagnostic areas such as therapeutic monitoring of immunosuppressive drugs (ISDs). However, many laboratories still rely on immunoassays for ISD quantification in a tradeoff between analytical performance and the advantages of fully automated analyzers – shorter turnaround times, greater ease of use, and 24/7 availability. Methods The LC-MS/MS-based Thermo Scientific™ Cascadion™ SM Immunosuppressant Panel was evaluated for >6 months in the routine laboratory of a university hospital. We assessed the analytical performance of the panel and compared it to conventional LC-MS/MS as well as to immunoassays (cyclosporine A, sirolimus, tacrolimus (Siemens) and everolimus (Thermo Fisher)). In addition, both ISD panel and Cascadion analyzer were scrutinized with regards to, e.g., turnaround time, usability, and robustness. Results All ISDs showed high linearity and precision (CV≤6%) and a good correlation with conventional LC-MS/MS. The mean deviation to the immunoassays was 17–19% and negative for all ISDs except everolimus with a positive 19% bias. No weak points were revealed when challenging assay and system with, e.g., high haematocrit, sedimented whole blood or priority samples. The Cascadion integrated well into our 24/7 routine and could easily be operated simultaneously with several other analyzers by technical staff without LC-MS experience. Conclusions The ISD panel showed excellent analytical performance and demonstrated that a fully automated LC-MS-based analysis starting from primary samples is feasible, suggesting that LC-MS could become an integral part of 24/7 diagnostics in the near future.

Background Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) promotes the development of atherosclerosis and is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) assays fundamentally improved the diagnosis of myocardial injury and even enable the prediction of future cardiovascular events in the general population. However, data about the association of hs-cTnI with cardiovascular risk factors and carotid intima media thickness (cIMT) as a marker of atherosclerosis are limited, especially in patients with T2DM. Methods In this cross-sectional study we analyzed clinical and laboratory parameters of 234 patients (43% women) with T2DM and a median age of 65 years (interquartile range: 57–71). The median duration of diabetes mellitus was 10 years (6–17). Anthropometric data, blood pressure, glycemic parameters and lipid profiles were determined. Hs-cTnI plasma concentrations were measured on an ADVIA Centaur XPT immunoassay analyzer and cIMT was evaluated by high-resolution ultrasound. Results Hs-cTnI plasma concentrations were below the gender-specific 99th percentile in 93% of T2DM patients with a median concentration of 4.0 ng/l (interquartile range: 2.0–10.0). Hs-cTnI was significantly associated with gender, renal function and C-reactive protein in the entire study cohort. Gender-specific analyses revealed cIMT and renal function to be significantly associated with hs-cTnI in men. Contrary, only age was significantly associated with hs-cTnI in women. Conclusion In a real-world clinical setting in patients with T2DM, cIMT is a predictor of subclinical myocardial damage in men, but not in women.

IntroductionEven well-treated gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) might still have impact on long-term health of the mother and her offspring, although this relationship has not yet been conclusively studied. Using in-depth phenotyping of the mother and her offspring, we aim to elucidate the relationship of maternal hyperglycaemia during pregnancy and adequate treatment, and its impact on the long-term health of both mother and child.MethodsThe multicentre PREG study, a prospective cohort study, is designed to metabolically and phenotypically characterise women with a 75-g five-point oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) during, and repeatedly after pregnancy. Outcome measures are maternal glycaemia during OGTTs, birth outcome and the health and growth development of the offspring. The children of the study participants are followed up until adulthood with developmental tests and metabolic and epigenetic phenotyping in the PREG Offspring study. A total of 800 women (600 with GDM, 200 controls) will be recruited.Ethics and disseminationThe study protocol has been approved by all local ethics committees. Results will be disseminated via conference presentations and peer-reviewed publications.Trial registration numberThe PREG study and the PREG Offspring study are registered with Clinical Trials (ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT04270578, NCT04722900).

Harmonization of biomarkers is important for the comparability of laboratory results as it allows the definition of universal reference values and clinical decision limits. In diabetology, immunoassays are widely used to determine HbA1c, C-peptide, insulin, and autoantibodies to beta cell proteins, which are essential biomarkers for the diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Furthermore, as large clinical studies have identified HbA1c as a predictor for the development of diabetic complications, HbA1c has evolved as the general treatment target. For decades, the use of non-harmonized assays caused confusion. After the standardization of HbA1c, the worldwide comparability improved and increased the confidence in this laboratory biomarker. Insulin and C-peptide are not only valuable biomarkers to assess beta-cell function, but may also be used to evaluate insulin resistance, a metabolic feature of type 2 diabetes often occurring before its manifestation. Long-lasting efforts led to substantial improvements in the harmonization process of C-peptide assays, but harmonization of insulin assays is still ongoing. Therefore, C-peptide is now sometimes used as a surrogate biomarker for insulin. Furthermore, autoantibodies against beta cell components are important biomarkers for the accurate differentiation of type 1, type 2, and other special types of diabetes. Owing to the heterogeneity of these autoantibodies against beta cell proteins, harmonization is very difficult to achieve. International efforts are in progress to harmonize the current assays, as the presence of autoantibodies against beta cell proteins predicts the development of type 1 diabetes in early life. In conclusion, clinical studies linking diagnosis, classification, prediction, and treatment to laboratory values of the respective biomarkers need to be harmonized to avoid misdiagnosis and incorrect clinical decisions, thus improving patient care and safety.

The measurement of serum-free light chains (FLC) is standard of care in the diagnosis and management of multiple myeloma (MM). The revised international myeloma working group (IMWG) implemented the involved FLC/noninvolved FLC (iFLC/niFLC) ratio as a biomarker for MM requiring treatment. Recently, a new definition of high-risk smoldering MM (SMM) including iFLC/niFLC ratio was published. These recommendations were solely based on a single assay method (Freelite assay). Today, two additional assays, N Latex FLC and ELISA-based Sebia FLC, are available. Here, we report on a single-center-study comparing results of all three different assays for FLC correlation and its potential implications for diagnostic and clinical use. In total, 187 samples from 47 MM patients were examined, and determination of FLC was performed. Comparison analyses showed similar FLC results for Sebia FLC and N Latex FLC assay with markedly lower absolute values for κ/λ ratio compared with Freelite. Values of λ FLC exhibited high variability. The ratio of iFLC/niFLC showed significant discrepancies among these assays. Our data demonstrate that the three available assays may result in markedly discrepant results, and should not be used interchangeably to monitor patients. Furthermore, modifications of the assay-specific diagnostic (iFLC/niFLC) thresholds for SMM and MM are recommended.

BACKGROUND Determination and quantification of serum free light chains (FLC) is essential for the diagnosis and monitoring of patients with monoclonal gammopathies. Currently, the Freelite assay (The Binding Site, United Kingdom) and the N Latex FLC assay (Siemens Healthineers, Germany) are available for FLC determination. Data concerning stability of FLC following long-term storage are limited. Therefore, the aim of the present study is to investigate the stability of FLC in frozen samples determined by the N latex FLC assay. METHODS One hundred eighty-eight serum samples from 47 patients with monoclonal gammopathies were analyzed at the beginning and after long-term storage (-20°C, 193 - 568 days). Serum free light chain kappa (κFLC) and lambda (λFLC) concentrations were measured, and the corresponding kappa/lambda (κ/λ FLC) ratios were calculated. All samples were analyzed with the N latex FLC assay on a single BNII System. RESULTS Comparison analyses between fresh and stored samples revealed very strong correlations for the determination of κFLC (r = 0.993), λFLC (r = 0.998) and the calculated κ/λ FLC ratio (r = 0.997). Median percentage changes of κFLC (-0.5%) and λFLC (-0.8%) measurements and the calculated κ/λ FLC ratios (-3.7%) were within the calculated analytical imprecision of the FLC assay. Changes of κFLC (r = 0.17, p = 0.02) and λFLC (r = 0.28, p < 0.01) concentrations and of the κ/λ FLC ratio (r = 0.18, p = 0.01) over time were very weak, but statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS Serum free light chains in serum samples are sufficiently stable following long-term frozen storage and are therefore suitable to be measured with the N Latex FLC assay.

Background Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly replacing vitamin K antagonists (VKA) for clinical indications requiring long-term oral anticoagulation. In contrast to VKA, treatment with DOAC including dabigatran—the only direct thrombin inhibitor amongst them—does not require therapeutic drug monitoring. However, in case of treatment complications (e.g., major haemorrhage) and conditions requiring urgent surgery or thrombolytic therapy, information about actual DOAC plasma levels is needed to guide treatment decisions. Due to short reagent stability, limited accuracy at low dabigatran levels and high heparin sensitivity, the applicability of the widely used Hemoclot thrombin inhibitor (HTI) coagulation assay is limited in the emergency setting. Methods Dabigatran concentrations of 288 citrated plasma samples taken from 48 dabigatran-treated patients with drug concentrations of up to 300 ng/mL were measured with the chromogenic anti-IIa Biophen direct thrombin inhibitor (BDTI) assay and results compared with HTI using ultra performance liquid chromatography—tandem mass spectrometry as the reference method for measuring dabigatran plasma concentrations. Results BDTI results showed a very strong correlation with dabigatran concentrations (r = 0.965, p Conclusion The BDTI is an ideal coagulation assay for the around-the-clock determination of dabigatran plasma levels in clinical routine including emergency situations.

Macrophages constitute a first line of pathogen defense by triggering a number of inflammatory responses and the secretion of various pro-inflammatory cytokines. Recently, we and others found that IκBζ, an atypical IκB family member and transcriptional coactivator of selected NF-κB target genes, is essential for macrophage expression of a subset of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-6, IL-12, and CCL2. Despite defective pro-inflammatory cytokine expression, however, IκBζ-deficient mice develop symptoms of chronic inflammation. To elucidate this discrepancy, we analyzed a regulatory role of IκBζ for the expression of anti-inflammatory cytokines and identified IκBζ as an essential activator of IL-10 expression. LPS-challenged peritoneal and bone marrow-derived macrophages from IκBζ-deficient mice revealed strongly decreased transcription and secretion of IL-10 compared with wild-type mice. Moreover, ectopic expression of IκBζ was sufficient to stimulate Il10 transcription. On the molecular level, IκBζ directly activated the Il10 promoter at a proximal κB site and was required for the transcription-enhancing trimethylation of histone 3 at lysine 4. Together, our findings show for the first time the IκBζ-dependent expression of an anti-inflammatory cytokine that is crucial in controlling immune responses.

Nach Schnittverletzung an einem Aquarium stellte sich eine 46-jährige gesunde Patientin mit einer seit einigen Wochen bestehenden Wundheilungsstörung am linken Zeigefinger vor. In der klinischen Untersuchung zeigte sich dort eine serös sezernierende Wunde mit Umgebungsrötung dorsal über dem proximalen Interphalangealgelenk (PIP; Abb. 1a ). Des Weiteren zeigte sich eine Bewegungseinschränkung mit Beugefehlstellung im distalen Interphalangealgelenk bei bekannter Heberden-Arthrose. Druckschmerzen waren über den Gelenken nicht auslösbar. In der durchgeführten Röntgendiagnostik zeigte sich eine fortgeschrittene Heberden-Arthrose des betroffenen Zeigefingers. Trotz antibiotischer Behandlung und Schienenimmobilisation zeigte die Wunde nach zwei weiteren Wochen keine Heilungstendenz, sodass der Patientin eine Exzision zur Gewinnung von Biopsiematerial mit anschließender Sekundärnaht empfohlen wurde. Dies wurde jedoch von der Patientin zunächst abgelehnt. Ein Hautarzt stellte die Verdachtsdiagnose einer Aquariumdermatose und empfahl eine Umstellung der antibiotischen Therapie auf Clarithomycin für 6 Wochen.