Search

The Heart Failure (HF) Meta-score may be useful in predicting prognosis in patients with primary prevention cardiac resynchronization defibrillators (CRT-D) considering the competing risk of appropriate defibrillator shock versus mortality. Data from 648 consecutive patients from two centers were used for the evaluation of the performance of the HF Meta-score. The primary endpoint was mortality and the secondary endpoint was time to first appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shock or death without prior appropriate ICD shock. Fine-Gray model was used for competing risk regression analysis. In the entire cohort, 237 patients died over a median follow-up of 5.2 years. Five-year cumulative incidence of mortality ranged from 12% to 53%, for quintiles 1 through 5 of the HF Meta-score, respectively (log-rank P < 0.001). Compared with the lowest quintile, mortality risk was higher in the highest quintile (HR 6.9; 95%CI 3.7–12.8). The HF Meta-score had excellent calibration, accuracy, and good discrimination in predicting mortality (C -statistic 0.76 at 1-year and 0.71 at 5-year). The risk of death without appropriate ICD shock was higher in risk quintile 5 compared to quintile 1 (sub HR 5.8; 95%CI 3.1–11.0, P < 0.001). Our study demonstrated a good ability of the HF Meta-score to predict survival in HF patients treated with CRT-D as primary prevention. The HF Meta-score proved to be useful in identifying a subgroup with a significantly poor prognosis despite a CRT-D. • The Heart Failure Meta-score reliably predicts survival in patients who received a CRT-D as primary prevention of SCD. • The Heart Failure Meta-score is able to discriminate between patients with a low or high risk for mortality • The majority of patients died without experiencing an appropriate ICD shock • The Heart Failure Meta-score can be used to identify a subgroup with a significantly poor prognosis despite a CRT-D [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: It is not clear whether patients who received an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) for primary prevention should undergo device replacement if they never experienced an appropriate ICD therapy during the first generator longevity. This study evaluated the incidence and predictors of appropriate ICD therapy after device replacement in this specific population. Methods: From two large prospective ICD registries, we identified all primary prevention patients who had a first ICD replacement without previous appropriate ICD therapy. Cox regression analysis was used to identify predictors of appropriate ICD therapy. Results: Of 403 primary prevention patients needing first ICD replacement, 275 patients (68%) had not received previous appropriate ICD therapy. Patients without previous appropriate ICD therapy before first ICD replacement (mean age at replacement 62±12 years, 75% male) had a mean follow-up of 86±24 months after the initial implantation and 30±24 months after device replacement. Following replacement, 3-year cumulative incidence of appropriate ICD therapy was 13.7% (95% CI 8.6 to 18.8%). No predictive factors associated with appropriate ICD therapy after replacement could be identified in spite of including seven clinically relevant factors. Conclusions: A considerable number of primary prevention patients without previous appropriate ICD therapy before first ICD replacement received appropriate ICD therapy after replacement. As there were no predictors of appropriate ICD therapy after replacement, replacing an ICD is still recommended in all primary prevention patients despite the lack of appropriate ICD therapy during first battery service life. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Cardiac resynchronization defibrillator (CRT‐D) as primary prevention is known to reduce mortality. At the time of replacement, higher age and comorbidities may attenuate the benefit of implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator (ICD) therapy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the progression of comorbidities after implantation and their association with mortality following CRT‐D generator replacement. In addition, a risk score was developed to identify patients at high risk for mortality after replacement. Methods and Results: We identified patients implanted with a primary prevention CRT‐D (n = 648) who subsequently underwent elective generator replacement (n = 218) from two prospective ICD registries. The cohort consisted of 218 patients (median age: 70 years, male gender: 73%, mean left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF]: 36 ± 11% at replacement). Median follow‐up after the replacement was 4.2 years during which 64 patients (29%) died and 11 patients (5%) received appropriate ICD shocks. An increase in comorbidities was observed in 77 patients (35%). The 5‐year mortality rate was 41% in patients with ≥2 comorbidities at the time of replacement. A risk score incorporating age, gender, LVEF, atrial fibrillation, anemia, chronic kidney disease, and history of appropriate ICD shocks at time of replacement accurately predicted 5‐year mortality (C‐statistic 0.829). Patients with a risk score of greater than 2.5 had excess mortality at 5‐year postreplacement compared with patients with a risk score less than 1.5 (57% vs. 6%; p <.001). Conclusion: A simple risk score accurately predicts 5‐year mortality after replacement in CRT‐D patients, as patients with a risk score of greater than 2.5 are at high risk of dying despite ICD protection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Device patients may require upgrade interventions from simpler to more complex cardiac implantable electronic devices. Prior to upgrading interventions, clinicians need to balance the risks and benefits of transvenous lead extraction (TLE), additional lead implantation or lead abandonment. However, evidence on procedural outcomes of TLE at the time of device upgrade is scarce. Methods: This is a post hoc analysis of the investigator-initiated multicenter Swiss TLE registry. The objectives were to assess patient and procedural factors influencing TLE outcomes at the time of device upgrades. Results: 941 patients were included, whereof 83 (8.8%) had TLE due to a device upgrade. Rotational mechanical sheaths were more often used in upgraded patients (59% vs. 42.7%, p = 0.015) and total median procedure time was longer in these patients (160 min vs. 105 min, p < 0.001). Clinical success rates of upgraded patients compared to those who received TLE due to other reasons were not different (97.6% vs. 93.0%, p = 0.569). Moreover, multivariable analysis showed that upgrade procedures were not associated with a greater risk for complications (HR 0.48, 95% confidence interval 0.14–1.57, p = 0.224; intraprocedural complication rate of upgraded patients 7.2% vs. 5.5%). Intraprocedural complications of upgraded patients were mostly associated with the implantation and not the extraction procedure (67% vs. 33% of complications). Conclusions: TLE during device upgrade is effective and does not attribute a disproportionate risk to the upgrade procedure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Electrophysiological testing has been proposed in the latest European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for cardiac pacing to identify left bundle branch block (LBBB) patients with infrahisian conduction delay (IHCD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). While in general IHCD is defined by a His‐ventricular (HV) interval of >55 ms, a cut‐off of ≥70 ms to trigger pacemaker (PM) implantation has been proposed in the latest ESC guidelines. The ventricular pacing (VP) burden during follow‐up in such patients is largely unknown. As such, we aimed to assess the VP burden during follow‐up of patients receiving PM therapy for LBBB after TAVR based on an HV interval > 55 ms and ≥70 ms. Methods: All patients with new‐onset or pre‐existing LBBB after undergoing TAVR at a tertiary referral center underwent EP testing the day after TAVR. In patients with a prolonged HV interval (>55 ms), PM implantation was performed by a trained electrophysiologist in a standardized fashion. All devices were programmed to avoid unnecessary VP by specific algorithms (e.g., AAI‐DDD). Results: 701 patients underwent TAVR at the University Hospital of Basel. One hundred seventy‐seven patients presented with new‐onset or pre‐existing LBBB the day following TAVR and underwent EP testing. An HV interval > 55 ms was found in 58 patients (33%) and an HV interval ≥ 70 ms in 21 patients (12%). 51 patients (mean age 84 ± 6.2 years, 45% women) agreed to receive a PM, out of which 20 (39%) patients had an HV Interval over 70 ms. Atrial fibrillation was present in 53% of the patients. A dual chamber PM was implanted in 39 (77%), and a single chamber PC in 12 (23%) patients, respectively. Median follow‐up was 21 months. The median VP burden overall was 3%. The median VP burden was not significantly different between patients with an HV ≥ 70 ms (6.5 [0.8−52]) and those with an HV between 55 and 69 ms (2 [0−17], p =.23). 31% of patients demonstrated a VP burden < 1%, 27% 1%−5% and 41% > 5%. The median HV intervals in patients with VP burdens < 1%, 1%−5% and >5% were 66 (IQR 62−70) ms, 66 (IQR 63−74) ms and 68 (IQR 60−72) ms, respectively, p =.52. When only assessing patients with an HV interval 55−69 ms, 36% demonstrated a VP burden of <1%, 29% of 1%−5% and 35% of >5%. In patients with an HV Interval ≥ 70 ms, 25% demonstrated a VP burden < 1%, 25% of 1%−5% and 50% of >5% %, p =.64 (Figure). Conclusion: In patients with LBBB after TAVR and IHCD defined by an HV interval > 55 ms, VP burden is relevant in a non‐negligible amount of patients during follow‐up. Further studies are warranted to define the optimal cut‐off value for the HV interval or to develop risk models incorporating HV measurements and other risk factors to trigger PM implantation in patients with LBBB after TAVR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: A pace and ablate strategy may be performed in refractory atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response. Objective: We aimed to assess sex-related differences in patient selection and clinical outcomes after pace and ablate. Methods: In a retrospective multicentre study, patients undergoing AV junction ablation were studied. Sex-related differences in baseline characteristics, all-cause mortality, heart failure (HF) hospitalizations, and device-related complications were assessed. Results: Overall, 513 patients underwent AV junction ablation (median age 75 years, 50% men). At baseline, men were younger (72 vs. 78 years, p < 0.001), more frequently had non-paroxysmal AF (82% vs. 72%, p = 0.006), had a lower LVEF (35% vs. 55%, p < 0.001) and more frequently had cardiac resynchronization therapy (75% vs. 25%, p < 0.001). Interventional complications were rare in both groups (1.2% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.72). Patients were followed for a median of 42 months in survivors (IQR 22–62). After 4 years of follow-up, the combined endpoint of all-cause death or HF hospitalization occurred more often in men (38% vs. 27%, p = 0.008). The same was observed for HF hospitalizations (22% vs. 11%, p = 0.021) and all-cause death (28% vs. 21%, p = 0.017). Sex category remained an independent predictor of death or HF hospitalization after adjustment for age, LVEF and type of stimulation. Lead-related complications, infections, and upgrade to ICD or CRT occurred in 2.1%, 0.2% and 3.5% of patients, respectively. Conclusions: Pace and ablate is safe with a need for subsequent device-related re-interventions in 5.8% over 4 years. We found significant sex-related differences in patient selection, and women had a more favourable clinical course after AV junction ablation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background To compare the feasibility and efficiency of atrioventricular junction (AVJ) ablation and device implantation in patients with drug-refractory atrial fibrillation using three different approaches. Methods Sixty-nine patients (57% male; age 72 ± 10; ejection fraction 45 ± 15%) undergoing device implantation and AVJ ablation were retrospectively studied at a tertiary referral center. In 20 patients (29%) AVJ ablation was performed via the femoral vein immediately following device implantation (group 1), whereas 33 patients (48%) underwent a staged procedure with AVJ ablation via the femoral vein >3 weeks after device implantation (group 2). In a third group of 16 patients (23%), AVJ ablation was performed during device implantation through the pocket using the same axillary vein access site (group 3). The main outcome measures were: procedure time, fluoroscopy time, laboratory occupancy time, and success rate. Results There was a significant difference in procedure time (118 ± 45 minutes. in group 1, 133 ± 32 minutes in group 2, and 87 ± 26 minutes in group 3, P < 0.001) and the laboratory occupancy time (175 ± 48 minutes in group 1, 200 ± 32 minutes in group 2, and 121 ± 27 minutes in group 3, P < 0.001). There was no difference in fluoroscopy time (group 1: 20 ± 15 minutes, group 2: 27 ± 22 minutes, and group 3: 24 ± 9 minutes P = 0.4). The procedure was successfully completed in all patients, but cross-over to a femoral approach was required in one patient in group 3. Conclusion The alternative approach of AVJ ablation during permanent pacemaker implantation from the same axillary vein access site is feasible and more efficient compared to the femoral approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Radiofrequency catheter ablation of idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) is performed to eliminate symptoms and to prevent or reverse arrhythmia‐induced cardiomyopathy. Preprocedural prediction of the chamber of VA origin is critical for patient counseling, procedure planning, and guidance of invasive mapping. Objective: We aimed to assess the performance of manual expert versus automated 12‐lead electrocardiogram (ECG) analysis in the prediction of VA origin. Methods: Patients with ablation of idiopathic VA and sustained success were included. The VA origin was defined as the site where ablation caused arrhythmia suppression. Standard baseline 12‐lead ECGs with documentation of the VA were analyzed manually in a blinded fashion by three electrophysiologists and three electrophysiology (EP) fellows. In addition, the same standard 12‐lead ECG was analyzed by an automated computer algorithm using a vectorcardiographic approach. Results: Thirty‐eight patients (median age, 47 [interquartile range, 37–58]; 68% female) were enrolled. The VA originated from the right ventricle in 24 (63%) and the left ventricle in 14 (37%) patients. The electrophysiologists and EP fellows identified the VA chamber of origin with a similar accuracy of 73% and 72% (P =.72). The automated algorithm showed a higher accuracy of 89% (P =.03 compared with electrophysiologists and EP fellows). This resulted in a sensitivity of 95% and specificity of 86%. Conclusion: While the manual ECG analysis of the standard 12‐lead ECG by both electrophysiologists and EP fellows correctly identified the chamber of VA origin in around 75% of cases, an automated vectorcardiographic computer algorithm achieved an accuracy of 89% with clinically acceptable diagnostic parameters. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Due to high failure rates, Medtronic withdrew the Sprint Fidelis lead (SFL) from the market. Passive fixation lead models exhibited better survival than active models, but most studies have limited follow‐up. Aim of this study was to give insights into passive lead survival with a follow‐up of 10 years. Methods: In two large Swiss centers, patients with passive SFLs were identified and data from routine implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) follow‐ups were collected. Patients were censored at time of death, last device interrogation (if lost to follow‐up), time of lead revision (in non‐SFL‐related problems), or at database closure (31th December 2017). We defined lead failure as any of the following: lead fracture with inappropriate discharge; sudden increase in low‐voltage impedance to >1500 or high‐voltage impedance to >100 Ω; >300 nonphysiological short VV‐intervals. Results: We identified 145 patients. Age at implant was 60 ± 12 years with a median follow‐up of 10.2 (interquartile range [IQR]: 5.0‐11.2) years. Thirty‐five percent of patients died after 5.4 ± 2.7 years. A total of 19 leads (13%) failed after 6.7 ± 3.2 years (range: 1.2‐12.0). Overt malfunction with shocks existed in four patients (3%). Cumulative lead survival was 93.1% at 6, 88.2% at 8, 83.8% at 10, and 77.6% at 11 years, respectively, with 35% of implanted leads under monitoring at 10 years. Lead survival fits best a Weibull distribution with accelerating failure rates (k = 1.95, 95% CI 1.32‐2.87, P < 0.001). Conclusions: During very long‐term follow‐up, failure rate of the passive SFL shows an increase resulting in an impaired lead survival of 84% at 10 years. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Difference between high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T concentrations (hs-cTnT) before and after ablation procedure (delta concentration) reflects the amount of myocardial injury. The aim of the study was to investigate hs-cTnT prognostic power for predicting atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after repeat pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) procedure. Materials and methods: Consecutive patients with paroxysmal AF undergoing repeat PVI using a focal radiofrequency catheter were included in the study. Hs-cTnT was measured before and 18-24 hours after the procedure. Standardized 3, 6 and 12-month follow-up was performed. Cox-regression analysis was used to identify predictors of AF recurrence. Results: A total of 105 patients undergoing repeat PVI were analysed (24% female, median age 61 years). Median (interquartile range) hs-cTnT delta after repeat PVI was 283 (127 - 489) ng/L. After a median follow-up of 12 months, AF recurred in 24 (23%) patients. A weak linear relationship between the total radiofrequency energy delivery time and delta hs-cTnT was observed (Pearson R2 = 0.31, P = 0.030). Delta Hs-cTnT was not identified as a significant long-term predictor of AF recurrence after repeated PVI (P = 0.920). Conclusion: This was the first study evaluating the prognostic power of delta hs-cTnT in predicting AF recurrence after repeat PVI. Delta hs-cTnT does not predict AF recurrence after repeat PVI procedures. Systematic measurement of hs-cTnT after repeat PVI does not add information relevant to outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are novel direct-acting medications that are selective for either thrombin or activated factor X. Due to their obvious benefits for patients (fewer interactions, broader therapeutic window, etc.), they are increasingly used as an alternative to warfarin, phenprocoumon, or acenocoumarol. One of the major indications for use of DOACs is stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, interactions still exist, especially in combination with antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs), which are frequently given to AF patients for rhythm or rate control. These interactions are due to the cytochrome P450 system and the P-glycoprotein (permeability glycoprotein or multidrug resistance protein) transport system. For some combinations, dose reduction of the DOAC is recommended and in some cases contraindications exist. In addition, impairment in renal and hepatic function plays an important role in this context. However, compared with pure interactions where data are quite convincing, the latter topic has been studied only rudimentarily. This review summarizes the literature on the safety and interactions of AADs when used with DOACs [dabigatran (a direct inhibitor of factor IIa) and rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban (direct inhibitors of factor Xa)] and the impact of renal and hepatic impairment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Studies have shown that remote patient monitoring (RPM) of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) is at least comparable to in-clinic follow-up with regard to clinical outcomes and might be cost-effective, yet RPM is not standard clinical practice within Europe. Better insight into the patient perspective on RPM may aid in its acceptance, implementation, and reimbursement. This narrative review (1) summarizes existing evidence on the impact of RPM on patient-reported outcomes and (2) discusses future directions in examining the patient perspective. Methods and Results Literature review indicated that only five randomized trials on RPM in ICD patients included patient-reported outcomes, with inconclusive results. Observational studies show a trend toward good patient satisfaction and acceptation of RPM. Yet, results should be interpreted with caution due to a number of limitations including a potential selection bias, use of generic/nonvalidated questionnaires, relatively short follow-up durations, and a lack of subgroup identification. Conclusion Although RPM seems to be safe, effective, timely, and efficient, the patient perspective has received little attention so far. The scarce evidence on patient-reported outcomes in RPM studies seems to be positive, but future trials with a follow-up of ≥12 months and validated patient-reported outcome measures are needed. The REMOTE-CIED study from our group is the first prospective randomized controlled trial primarily designed to examine the patient perspective on RPM, and is powered to identify characteristics associated with RPM satisfaction and benefit. Results are expected in 2018 and will add valuable information to the current evidence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The advent of electroanatomical mapping (EAM) systems for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has dramatically decreased radiation exposure. However, the need for some fluoroscopy remains for obtaining left atrial (LA) access. The aim was to test the feasibility of fluoroscopy-free PVI in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and a patent foramen ovale (PFO) guided solely by an EAM system. Methods: Consecutive patients with AF undergoing PVI and documented PFO were studied. An EAM-guided approach without fluoroscopy and ultrasound was used. After completing the map of the right atrium, the superior vena cava and the coronary sinus, a catheter pull-down to the PFO was performed allowing LA access. The map of the LA and subsequent PVI was also performed without fluoroscopy. Results: 30 patients [age 61±12 years, 73% male, ejection fraction 0.64 (0.53–0.65), LA size in parasternal long axis 38±7 mm] undergoing PVI were included. The time required for right atrial mapping including transseptal crossing was 9±4 minutes. Total procedure time was 127±37 minutes. Fluoroscopy-free PVI was feasible in 26/30 (87%) patients. In four patients, fluoroscopy was needed to access (n = 3) or to re-access (n = 1) the LA. In these four patients, total fluoroscopy time was 5±3 min and the DAP was 14.9±13.4 Gy*cm2. Single-procedure success rate was 80% (24/30) after a median follow-up of 12 months. Conclusion: In patients with a documented PFO, completely fluoroscopy-free PVI is feasible in the vast majority of cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Many patients receiving an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) also have atrial fibrillation (AF). Shock testing during ICD implantation carries a potential risk of cardioversion to sinus rhythm (SR) and thrombembolic events. We aimed to analyze the recurrence of AF after cardioversion to SR during ICD shock testing. Methods A total of 555 consecutive patients referred to a tertiary hospital in Switzerland for ICD implantation or generator exchange between 02/2002 and 03/2010 were screened for AF. Fifty-seven patients who were in AF at the time of ICD shock testing were included. Results Forty-four patients (77%) were successfully cardioverted from AF to SR. Type of AF (persistent, not permanent 64 vs 31% of cardioverted patients) was the only predictor. Thirty-nine patients (89%) experienced a recurrence of AF/atrial flutter after a median of 54 days (interquartile range 35-251 days). The only predictor for recurrence of AF was previous AF declared as permanent. No ischemic stroke occurred during hospitalization for the procedure. Conclusions For patients in AF undergoing shock testing at the time of ICD implant, there is a high chance of cardioversion from AF to SR, but there is also a high risk of early recurrence. Decisions regarding long-term anticoagulation should not be based on the heart rhythm immediately following shock testing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background The Medtronic Sprint Fidelis lead (SFL; Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) has a significantly impaired long-term survival, and active fixation leads fare worse than passive leads. The goal of this study was to present data of a series of passive SFL only with very long mean follow-up of more than 6 years. Methods Patients in whom a passive SFL was implanted in two large Swiss centers were followed. We excluded eight (5.5%) patients with a follow-up of <6 months. Patients who died or were lost during follow-up were censored at death or last device check, all others on January 31, 2014. We employed two different definitions of failure: strict = fracture with inappropriate discharge; sudden increase in impedance >1,500 or high-voltage impedance >100 Ohm; >300 nonphysiological short interventricular-intervals. Lenient = any of the above plus a linear increase in impedance >1,500 Ohm or a linear decrease in sensing to a level that treating cardiologists considered inappropriate. Results We included 137 patients. Age was 60 ± 12 years. Mean and median follow-up were 6.2 ± 2.1 and 6.8 (interquartile range 4.8-7.8) years. Applying the strict definition, 12 leads (8.8%) were replaced after 4.9 ± 2.4 years (range 1.2-8.1). Applying the lenient definition, 14 leads (10.2%) failed. Cumulative lead survival was 98.5% at 3, 96.9% at 4, 94.2% at 5, and 93.1% at 6 years. Leads 'at risk' were: n = 122 (89%), 115 (84%), 101 (74%), and 88 (64%). Conclusions In this population with passive SFLs, 5-year lead survival is impaired with 94.2% based on 74% of leads 'at risk' at this time point. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background To categorize indications of permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), to determine predictors for conduction disturbances and to quantify the need for ventricular pacing during follow-up. Method We studied 97 patients (median age 83 years, 58% female) undergoing TAVI using the Medtronic CoreValve Revalving System (MCRS; Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) or Edwards-Sapien Valve (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA). During follow-up, no need for ventricular pacing was defined as <1% ventricular pacing and intrinsic 1:1 atrioventricular (AV) conduction. Results In the 35 patients (36.1%) undergoing PPM implantation three indication categories were identified: (1) high-grade AV block (Mobitz 2 or higher), (2) new-onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) with a prolonged PR interval, and (3) new-onset LBBB. The only independent predictors of high-grade AV block were the use of MCRS (odds ratio [OR] 79.25; 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.57-1373.31) and the presence of preprocedural right bundle branch block (OR 81.95; 95% 95% CI 8.72-770.46). Whereas high-grade AV block resolved only in 17% of cases, none of the patients receiving a PPM due to LBBB with or without PR prolongation required ventricular pacing during follow-up. Conclusion Our findings justify early PPM implantation in patients with high-grade AV block and may suggest a more conservative approach to PPM implantation in patients with new-onset LBBB after TAVI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Although radiofrequency (RF) and cryoballoon (CB) based technologies for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) have both individually been demonstrated to be effective and safe for the treatment of paroxysmal AF, head-to-head comparisons are lacking. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome of cryoballoon versus radiofrequency ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation undergoing pulmonary vein isolation. Methods Out of a prospective registry of 327 patients undergoing PVI, 208 patients (age 58 ± 11 years, ejection fraction 59 ± 6%, left atrial size 39 ± 6 mm) with paroxysmal AF were identified. The presented dataset was obtained by 1:1 propensity score matching and contained 142 patients undergoing CB-PVI or RF-PVI in conjunction with a 3D mapping system, respectively. We compared single procedure efficacy of the two methods using a Cox proportional hazards model. Results After a mean follow-up of 28 months and a single procedure, AF recurred in 37 of 71 (52%) in the CB-PVI group and in 31 of 71 patients (44%) in the RF-PVI group (HR [95% CI] = 1.19 [0.74, 1.92], p = 0.48). Recurrence of AF for PVI using solely the CB was observed in 23 of 51 (45%) patients and in 23 of 51 (45%) patients in the corresponding RF-PVI group (HR [95% CI] = 0.93 [0.52, 1.66], p = 0.81). Complication rate was not different between the groups. Conclusion A propensity score matched comparison between CB-PVI and RF-PVI using a 3D-mapping system for AF ablation showed similar long-term success rates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD) uses surface electrodes to detect arrhythmia before initiating a treatment sequence. However, it is also prone to inappropriate detection due to artefacts. Objective: The aim of this study is to assess the alarm burden in patients and its impact on clinical outcomes. Methods: Patients from the nationwide Swiss WCD Registry were included. Clinical characteristics and data were obtained from the WCDs. Arrhythmia recordings ≥30 s in length were analysed and categorized as VT/VF, atrial fibrillation (AF), supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) or artefact. Results: A total of 10653 device alarms were documented in 324 of 456 patients (71.1%) over a mean WCD wear-time of 2.0 ± 1.6 months. Episode duration was 30 s or more in 2996 alarms (28.2%). One hundred and eleven (3.7%) were VT/VF episodes. The remaining recordings were inappropriate detections (2736 (91%) due to artefacts; 117 (3.7%) AF; 48 (1.6%) SVT). Two-hundred and seven patients (45%) had three or more alarms per month. Obesity was significantly associated with three or more alarms per month (p = 0.01, 27.7% vs. 15.9%). High alarm burden was not associated with a lower average daily wear time (20.8 h vs. 20.7 h, p = 0.785) or a decreased implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation rate after stopping WCD use (48% vs. 47.3%, p = 0.156). Conclusions: In patients using WCDs, alarms emitted by the device and impending inappropriate shocks were frequent and most commonly caused by artefacts. A high alarm burden was associated with obesity but did not lead to a decreased adherence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

INTRODUCTION: Although radiation exposure has been reduced for some electrophysiological procedures (EP) by the use of mapping systems it still remains a concern for electrophysiologists. The aim was to evaluate the impact of a novel X-ray technology on the radiation doses during EP procedures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 183 consecutive patients undergoing ablation procedures or implantations of cardiovascular implantable devices were included. Procedures were performed using the Artis Q.zen (AQZ, n=93) and the Artis zee (AZ, n=90) X-ray systems (Siemens, Forchheim, Germany). Patients were categorized into four procedure groups -- pulmonary vein isolation, supraventricular tachycardia ablation, cardiac resynchronization therapy device implantation and pacemaker/ implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation. For all patients standardized settings for fluoroscopy and cine acquisitions were used. Radiation exposure was compared in total and in every group separately. RESULTS: The baseline patient parameters and procedural parameters, namely the procedure duration, the fluoroscopy and cine time were similar between the two systems. The total dose area product and the air kerma across all procedures was reduced by the use of the AQZ angiography system (1068 versus 1730 µGy*m², p=0.169, and 87.5 versus 172.4 Gy, p=0.019). The difference between the two systems was greatest for cine acquisition with roughly 70% for all radiological parameters of the exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Use of novel X-ray technology for standard EP procedures significantly reduces patient doses. The use of this technology further improves safety of angiography based EP procedures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]