Orozco-Aguilar, Luis, Lopez-Sampson, Arlene, Cerda, Rolando H., Casanoves, Fernando, Ramirez-Argueta, Oscar, Matute, Javier Diaz, Suárez Salazar, Juan Carlos, Rüegg, Johanna, Saj, Stephane, Milz, Joaquin, Schneidewind, Ulf, Garces, Argenis Mora, Daza, Eliana Baez, Molina, Jairo Rojas, Suarez, Yeirme Jaimes, Agudelo-Casta˜neda, Genaro A., Deheuvels, Olivier, Sosa, Enelvi Brito, Gómez, Jaime Hinojosa, and Jaimez, Ramon E.
A network of agronomists, researchers, and practitioners associated with cacao farming provided open access to their independent field trials across Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC). A centralized dataset was assembled using qualitative and quantitative data from 25 experimental field trials (hereafter referred to as “CacaoFIT”) spanning several LAC agroecosystems. This dataset was used to document the main traits and agroclimatic attributes of the cacao cultivation model being tested within the CacaoFIT network. By synthesizing data from an entire network of cacao trials, this study aimed to highlight specific design features and management practices that may contribute to better cacao farming sustainability. The CacaoFIT network comprises 200 ha of field trials testing over 150 cacao genotypes and set up under dierent shade canopy design, management, and research goals. Small-sized trials were common across Mesoamerica, whereas medium to large-size trials were distinct to South America. Cacao trials were 15 years old (on average) and ranged from 3 to 25 years of establishment. Most cacao trials were managed conventionally (i.e., 55%), while 20% were under organic practices, and the remaining 25% presented both conventional and organic management approaches. Most field trials (ca. 60%) planted an average of 10 international clones or national cultivars at high (1,230–1,500 plants ha−1 ) and medium density (833–1,111 plants ha−1 ). Mixed shade canopies were the dominant agroforestry model, while timber vs. leguminous shade canopies were also common. The diversity and depth of research domains examined across the CacaoFIT network varied widely. Agronomy and agroforestry topics dominated the research agenda across all trials, followed by environmental services domains. Cacao physiology and financial performance were researched to a lesser extent within the network. Five featured field trials from CacaoFIT oered technical guidelines to inform cacao farming within similar contexts. This collaborative work is a scaold to encourage public–private partnerships, capacity building, and data sharing amongst cacao researchers across the tropic [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]