Search

Introduction: Some studies have suggested that baseline tumor-infiltrating-lymphocytes (TILs), such as CD8+ and FoxP3+ T-cells, may be associated with a better prognosis in colorectal cancer. We sought to investigate modulation of the immune response by preoperative radiotherapy (preopRT) and its impact on survival in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Materials & Methods: We analyzed data for 237 patients with LARC who received RT. Density of TILS (CD8+ and FoxP3+) in intraepithelial (iTILs) and stromal compartments (sTILs) were evaluated from surgery pathological specimens and biopsies performed at baseline. The primary endpoint was to assess the impact of infiltration of the tumor or tumor site after preopRT on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were the impact of dose fractionation scheme on TILs. Results: In univariate analysis, several factors significantly correlated (p

Introduction The combination of a CDK4/6 inhibitor with an aromatase inhibitor (AI) has recently become the gold standard for AI-sensitive first line treatment of oestrogen receptor-positive (ER+) HER2-negative (HER2−) advanced breast cancer. However, most patients receiving this combination will ultimately progress and require further therapies.Several studies have demonstrated that the onset of a ESR1 gene mutation lead to AIs resistance in the advanced setting. ESR1 mutations can be detected in circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) using a digital PCR assay. Our study aims to prove the clinical efficacy of periodic monitoring for emerging or rise of ESR1 mutations in ctDNA to trigger an early change from AI plus palbociclib to fulvestrant plus palbociclib treatment while assessing global safety.Methods PADA-1 is a randomised, open-label, multicentric, phase III trial conducted in patients receiving AI and palbociclib as first line therapy for metastatic ER +HER2- breast cancer. 1000 patients will be included and treated with palbociclib in combination with an AI. Patients will be screened for circulating blood ESR1 mutation detection at regular intervals. Patients for whom a rising circulating ESR1 mutation is detected without tumour progression (up to N=200) will be randomised (1:1) between (1) Arm A: no modification of therapy; and (2) Arm B: palbociclib in combination with fulvestrant, a selective ER down-regulator. At tumour progression, an optional crossover will be offered to patients randomised in arm A. The coprimary endpoints are (1) Grade ≥3 haematological toxicities and their associations with baseline characteristics and (2) progression-free survival in randomised patients.Ethics and dissemination The study has been approved by the French medicines agency (ANSM) and by an ethics committee (ref 01/17_1 CPP Ouest-IV Nantes) in January 2017. The trial results will be published in academic conference presentations and international peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration numbers EudraCT: 2016-004360-18; NCT03079011.

Purpose: Immune Checkpoints Inhibitors (ICI) have changed the therapeutic landscape of metastatic renal cell carcinoma first-line treatment with complete response (CR) at metastatic sites observed in 10 to 15% of cases. Delayed nephrectomy could be discussed for patients having a clinical benefit from immunotherapy-based treatment. However, it is unclear whether prior immunotherapy exposure adversely influences the complexity of surgery. The aim of this study was to assess oncological outcomes of differed nephrectomy after immunotherapy, and to identify predictive factors associated with surgical complexity., Methods: This is a multicenter retrospective study from a national cohort of 102 patients treated between March 2015 and March 2023 by differed nephrectomy after complete response (CR) or major partial response (mPR defined as > 80% according to RECIST criteria) on metastatic sites following immunotherapy-based combination treatment. Tumor downsizing was assessed by calculating the percentage reduction from the largest measured tumor diameter, comparing before and after immunotherapy., Results: A total of 102 patients (median age 63.3 years) were included. ICI was administered as first-line in 84.3% of cases, with an ICI-ICI (74.5%) or ICI-TKI combination (25.5%), and with a median duration of treatment of 10 [1-57] months. The majority of procedures are radical nephrectomies (n = 85, 83.3%) with an open approach performed in 52.9% of cases (n = 54). Median operative time was 180 [90-563] minutes and median blood loss was 300 cc [0-4000] cc. Surgeons experienced difficulties due to adhesions and inflammatory reactions at the kidney and the surrounding tissue in 65.7% of cases (n = 67), more frequently in case of partial nephrectomy compared to radical surgery (85% vs. 61%, p = 0.04). In 15 cases (14.7%), the surgical approach changed during the procedure due to these intraoperative difficulties (including 10 patients with open conversion and 3 partial nephrectomies finally converted to radical). We highlighted a relationship between primary renal tumor downsizing and intraoperative complexity. Tumor downsizing > 10% is more likely to induce surgical difficulties (76.1% vs. 45.7%, p = 0.002), but without any impact on postoperative complications rate. Pathology reports show a complete response in 13.7% (n = 14), a pT1-pT2 stage in 29.4% (n = 30) and a pT3-pT4 stage in 56.9% (n = 58), a median ISUP grade 3 and a clear cell carcinoma histology in 95.1% (n = 97). After a median follow-up of 29.6 months, 48% of patients were free from progression and without systemic treatment. Patients with a complete response at the metastatic sites had a better prognosis in terms of recurrence-free survival (82.1% vs. 37.9% at 3 years, p = 0.001)., Conclusion: Delayed nephrectomy after immunotherapy could be a challenging surgical procedure but offers encouraging oncological outcomes., Competing Interests: Declarations. Research involving human participants and/or animals: N/A. Informed consent: N/A. Financial interests: None. Non-financial interests: None. Conflicts of interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background and Objective: Metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) harbors genomic alterations that may predict targeted therapy efficacy. These alterations can be identified not only in tissue but also directly in biologic fluids (ie, liquid biopsies), mainly blood. Liquid biopsies may represent a safer and less invasive alternative for monitoring patients treated for mPCa. Current research focuses on the description and validation of novel predictive biomarkers to improve precision medicine in mPCa. Our aim was to systematically review the current evidence on liquid biopsy biomarkers for predicting treatment response in mPCa., Methods: We systematically searched Medline, Web of Science, and evidence-based websites for publications on circulating biomarkers in mPCa between March 2013 and February 2024 for review. Endpoints were: prediction of overall survival, biochemical or radiographic progression-free survival after treatment (chemotherapy, androgen deprivation therapy, androgen receptor pathway inhibitors [ARPIs], immunotherapy, or PARP inhibitors [PARPIs]). For each biomarker, the level of evidence (LOE) for clinical validity was attributed: LOE IA and IB, high level of evidence; LOE IIB and IIC, intermediate level; and LOE IIIC and LOE IV-VD, weak level., Key Findings and Limitations: The predictive value of each biomarker for the response to several therapies was evaluated in both metastatic hormone-sensitive (mHSPC) and castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). In patients with mCRPC, BRCA1/2 or ATM mutations predicted response to ARPIs (LOE IB) and PARPIs (LOE IIB), while AR-V7 transcripts or AR-V7 protein levels in circulating tumor cells (CTCs) predicted response to ARPIs and taxanes (LOE IB). CTC quantification predicted response to cabazitaxel, abiraterone, and radium-223 (LOE IIB), while TP53 alterations predicted response to 177 Lu prostate-specific membrane antigen radioligand treatment (LOE IIB). AR copy number in circulating tumor DNA before the first treatment line and before subsequent lines predicted response to docetaxel, cabazitaxel, and ARPIs (LOE IIB). In mHSPC, DNA damage in lymphocytes was predictive of the response to radium-223 (LOE IIB)., Conclusions and Clinical Implications: BRCA1/2, ATM, and AR alterations detected in liquid biopsies may help clinicians in management of patients with mPCa. The other circulating biomarkers did not reach the LOE required for routine clinical use and should be validated in prospective independent studies., Patient Summary: We reviewed studies assessing the value of biomarkers in blood or urine for management of metastatic prostate cancer. The evidence indicates that some biomarkers could help in selecting patients eligible for specific treatments., (Copyright © 2024 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: The results of the OlympiA study led to the approval of a PARP inhibitor (olaparib) as adjuvant treatment for early breast cancer (eBC) at high risk of relapse in patients with a germline BRCA1/2 mutation (gBRCAm). However, the proportion of patients in routine practice who meet the "high-risk" criteria applied in the OlympiA study, and for whom gBRCAm testing would now be mandatory, remains unknown., Patients and Methods: In this population-based study, we use unique data from the French specialized Côte d'Or Breast and Gynecological Cancer Registry, to assess the real-life proportion, and long-term prognosis of patients treated for eBC between 2005 and 2015 with standard treatment, and at "high risk" of relapse according to the OlympiA trial criteria., Results: We included 3483 patients treated for HER2-negative eBC (N = 380 with ER-, and N = 3103 with ER + tumor). We found N = 62 (1.8 %) patients with gBRCA1/2 mutations. A total of 494 patients (14.2 %) were classified as "high risk" according to the Olympia criteria; 55 % with ER-tumors, and 9.1 % with ER + tumors, respectively. Despite more intensive systemic treatments in "high risk" patients, 10-year overall survival was much worse in these "high risk" patients compared to the others: 60.1 % vs 83.8 % in ER-tumors, and 55.4 % vs 84.1 % in ER + tumors. Our estimates of net survival show an even greater difference., Conclusion: This study provides real-life insights into the prevalence and prognosis of patients with high-risk eBC, in a context where the approval of adjuvant olaparib requires careful reorganization of care, so as not to overlook a patient with gBRCAm who could benefit from adjuvant olaparib., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest SL, ID, DM, CC, LA, and MR report travel accommodations and expenses from AstraZeneca., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted therapy is standard of care for HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer, but most patients develop progressive disease with persistent HER2 expression. No definitive treatment guidance currently exists beyond second line. Trastuzumab duocarmazine (T-Duo) is a third-generation, HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugate that demonstrated efficacy and acceptable safety in phase I studies of heavily pretreated patients with HER2+/HER2-low breast cancer., Methods: In this open-label, randomized, phase III trial, T-Duo was compared with physician's choice (PC) in patients with unresectable locally advanced/metastatic HER2+ breast cancer with progression during/after ≥2 HER2-targeted therapies or after trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review., Results: In total, 437 patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to T-Duo (n = 291) or PC (n = 146). The median age was 56.0 years (range, 24-86); most patients (93.6%) had metastatic disease. The median time from diagnosis of metastatic disease to trial entry was 3.5 years; the median number of prior HER2-targeted therapies in metastatic setting was three. The median PFS was 7.0 months (95% CI, 5.4 to 7.2) with T-Duo versus 4.9 months (95% CI, 4.0 to 5.5; hazard ratio [HR], 0.64 [95% CI, 0.49 to 0.84]; P = .002) with PC. PFS benefit was maintained across most predefined subgroups. The median overall survival (first analysis) was 20.4 (T-Duo) versus 16.3 months (PC; HR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.62 to 1.09]; P = .153). Objective response rate was 27.8% (T-Duo) versus 29.5% (PC); other efficacy end points-clinical benefit rate, duration of response, and reduction in target lesion measurement-tended to favor T-Duo. Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 52.8% (T-Duo) versus 48.2% (PC)., Conclusion: Treatment with T-Duo was manageable, but tolerability was affected by prevalent ocular toxicity, leading to a higher discontinuation rate in the T-Duo arm. T-Duo significantly reduced the risk of progression in patients with advanced HER2+ breast cancer who have progressed during/after ≥2 HER2-targeted therapies or after T-DM1.

Purpose: Cancers with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) can benefit from platinum salts and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors. Standard diagnostic tests for detecting HRD require molecular profiling, which is not universally available., Methods: We trained DeepHRD, a deep learning platform for predicting HRD from hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained histopathological slides, using primary breast (n = 1,008) and ovarian (n = 459) cancers from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). DeepHRD was compared with four standard HRD molecular tests using breast (n = 349) and ovarian (n = 141) cancers from multiple independent data sets, including platinum-treated clinical cohorts with RECIST progression-free survival (PFS), complete response (CR), and overall survival (OS) endpoints., Results: DeepHRD predicted HRD from held-out H&E-stained breast cancer slides in TCGA with an AUC of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.77 to 0.85). This performance was confirmed in two independent primary breast cancer cohorts (AUC, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.71 to 0.82]). In an external platinum-treated metastatic breast cancer cohort, samples predicted as HRD had higher complete CR (AUC, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.54 to 0.93]) with 3.7-fold increase in median PFS (14.4 v 3.9 months; P = .0019) and hazard ratio (HR) of 0.45 ( P = .0047). There were no significant differences in nonplatinum treatment outcome by predicted HRD status in three breast cancer cohorts, including CR (AUC, 0.39) and PFS (HR, 0.98, P = .95) in taxane-treated metastatic breast cancer. Through transfer learning to high-grade serous ovarian cancer, DeepHRD-predicted HRD samples had better OS after first-line (HR, 0.46; P = .030) and neoadjuvant (HR, 0.49; P = .015) platinum therapy in two cohorts., Conclusion: DeepHRD can predict HRD in breast and ovarian cancers directly from routine H&E slides across multiple external cohorts, slide scanners, and tissue fixation variables. When compared with molecular testing, DeepHRD classified 1.8- to 3.1-fold more patients with HRD, which exhibited better OS in high-grade serous ovarian cancer and platinum-specific PFS in metastatic breast cancer.

Background: Current guidelines recommend that patients with HER2-low metastatic breast cancer (MBC) receive sequentially two antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs): Sacituzumab Govitecan (SG) and Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd), despite a similar payload. However, the effectiveness of one after another is unknown., Methods: ADC-Low is a multicentre, retrospective study evaluating the efficacy of SG and T-DXd, one after another, with or without intermediary lines of chemotherapy, in patients with HER2-low MBC., Results: One hundred and seventy-nine patients were included: the majority with HR-negative tumours received SG first (ADC1) (n = 100/108) while most with HR-positive tumours received T-DXd first (n = 56/71). Median progression-free survival 2 was short: 2.7 months (95% CI: 2.4-3.3) in the whole population, respectively, 3.1 (95% CI: 2.6-3.6) and 2.2 months (95% CI: 1.9-2.7) for patients receiving T-DXd or SG second (ADC2). Intermediary lines of chemotherapy between ADC1 and ADC2 had no impact. Primary resistance to ADC2 occurred in 54.4% of patients. Certain patients showed initial response to ADC2., Conclusions: Clinical benefit of sequentially administered SG and T-DXd is limited for most patients. Nevertheless, a subset of patients might benefit-on the short term-from a second ADC. Additional studies are needed to identify patients who could benefit from two ADCs with similar payloads., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

A patient with a PD-L1-negative, TMB-low, KEAP1/STK11 co-mutated metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) experienced a multisite radiological progression at 3 months after initiation of chemoimmunotherapy as first-line treatment for metastatic disease. After the radiological progression, while she was not undergoing treatment, the patient had spontaneous lesions shrinkage and further achieved a prolonged complete response. Genomic and transcriptomic data collected at baseline and at the time of pseudoprogression allowed us to biologically characterize this rare response pattern. We observed the presence of a tumor-specific T-cell response against tumor-specific neoantigens (TNAs). Endogenous retroviruses (ERVs) expression following chemoimmunotherapy was also observed, concurrent with biological features of an anti-viral-like innate immune response with type I IFN signaling and production of CXCR3-associated chemokines. This is the first biological characterization of a NSCLC pseudoprogression under chemoimmunotherapy followed by a prolonged complete response in a PD-L1-negative, TMB-low, KEAP1/STK11 co-mutated NSCLC. These clinical and biological data underline that even patients with multiple factors of resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors could trigger a tumor-specific immune response to tumor neoantigen, leading to complete eradication of the tumor and probably a vaccinal immune response., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Roussot, Thibaudin, Fumet, Daumoine, Hampe, Rébé, Limagne, Lagrange, Herreros, Lecuelle, Mananet, Ilie, Rageot, Boidot, Goussot, Comte, Jacob, Beltjens, Bergeron, Charon-Barra, Arnould, Derangère, Ladoire, Truntzer and Ghiringhelli.)

Background: The treatment of stage I-III HPV+ oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV-OPSCC) is based on either surgery ± adjuvant therapy or exclusive radio±chemotherapy. We sought to compare these two therapeutic strategies in terms of efficacy, tolerance and quality of life (QoL)., Methods: Patients treated for stage I-III HPV-OPSCC from 2010 to 2021 in 3 academic centers were included and sorted according to the treatment strategy: surgery or exclusive radio±chemotherapy. Efficacy and tolerance were retrospectively assessed, and a transversal exploratory QoL assessment was performed using QoL instruments., Results: A total of 83 patients were included, with 21 undergoing non-minimally invasive surgery and 62 receiving definitive radio-±chemotherapy. 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were respectively 80% and 86% in the surgical group and 92% and 95% in the non-surgical group, with no significant difference. At the end of treatment, 64.5% of patients presented with a grade III toxicity, without significant difference between the two groups. No patient had late grade III toxicity at 24 months. Forty-five patients (11 in the surgical group, 34 in the non-surgical group) participated in an exploratory quality-of-life analysis. Patients reported significantly more fatigue and loss of appetite after surgery, whereas patients in the radio±chemotherapy group described significantly more salivary and oral problems and difficulty swallowing, but the median time between treatment completion and the response to the questionnaires., Conclusion: There was no significant difference in efficacy, physician-reported toxicity and overall patient-reported quality of life was found between non-minimally invasive surgery and radio±chemotherapy in the treatment of stage I-III HPV-OPSCC., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2024 Baude et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Background: The aim of this study is to investigate the added value of combining tumour blood flow (BF) and metabolism parameters, including texture features, with clinical parameters to predict, at baseline, the pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer (BC)., Methods: One hundred and twenty-eight BC patients underwent a 18 F-FDG PET/CT before any treatment. Tumour BF and metabolism parameters were extracted from first-pass dynamic and delayed PET images, respectively. Standard and texture features were extracted from BF and metabolic images. Prediction of pCR was performed using logistic regression, random forest and support vector classification algorithms. Models were built using clinical (C), clinical and metabolic (C+M) and clinical, metabolic and tumour BF (C+M+BF) information combined. Algorithms were trained on 80% of the dataset and tested on the remaining 20%. Univariate and multivariate features selections were carried out on the training dataset. A total of 50 shuffle splits were performed. The analysis was carried out on the whole dataset (HER2 and Triple Negative (TN)), and separately in HER2 (N=76) and TN (N=52) tumours., Results: In the whole dataset, the highest classification performances were observed for C+M models, significantly (p-value<0.01) higher than C models and better than C+M+BF models (mean balanced accuracy of 0.66, 0.61, and 0.64 respectively). For HER2 tumours, equal performances were noted for C and C+M models, with performances higher than C+M+BF models (mean balanced accuracy of 0.64, and 0.61 respectively). Regarding TN tumours, the best classification results were reported for C+M models, with better performances than C and C+M+BF models but not significantly (mean balanced accuracy of 0.65, 0.63, and 0.62 respectively)., Conclusion: Baseline clinical data combined with global and texture tumour metabolism parameters assessed by 18 F-FDG PET/CT provide a better prediction of pCR after NAC in patients with BC compared to clinical parameters alone for TN, and HER2 and TN tumours together. In contrast, adding BF parameters to the models did not improve prediction, regardless of the tumour subgroup analysed., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background and Objective: Trough abiraterone concentration (ABI C min ) of 8.4 ng/mL has been identified as an appropriate efficacy threshold in patients treated for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The aim of the phase II OPTIMABI study was to evaluate the efficacy of pharmacokinetics (PK)-guided dose escalation of abiraterone acetate (AA) in underexposed patients with mCRPC with early tumour progression., Methods: This multicentre, non-randomised study consisted of two sequential steps. In step 1, all patients started treatment with 1000 mg of AA once daily. Abiraterone C min was measured 22-26 h after the last dose intake each month during the first 12 weeks of treatment. In step 2, underexposed patients (C min < 8.4 ng/mL) with tumour progression within the first 6 months of treatment were enrolled and received AA 1000 mg twice daily. The primary endpoint was the rate of non-progression at 12 weeks after the dose doubling. During step 1, adherence to ABI treatment was assessed using the Girerd self-reported questionnaire. A post-hoc analysis of pharmacokinetic (PK) data was conducted using Bayesian estimation of C min from samples collected outside the sampling guidelines (22-26 h)., Results: In the intention-to-treat analysis (ITT), 81 patients were included in step 1. In all, 21 (26%) patients were underexposed in step 1, and 8 of them (38%) experienced tumour progression within the first 6 months. A total of 71 patients (88%) completed the Girerd self-reported questionnaire. Of the patients, 62% had a score of 0, and 38% had a score of 1 or 2 (minimal compliance failure), without a significant difference in mean ABI C min in the two groups. Four patients were enrolled in step 2, and all reached the exposure target (C min > 8.4 ng/mL) after doubling the dose, but none met the primary endpoint. In the post-hoc analysis of PK data, 32 patients (39%) were underexposed, and ABI C min was independently associated with worse progression-free survival [hazard ratio (HR) 2.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07-5.81; p = 0.03], in contrast to the ITT analysis., Conclusion: The ITT and per-protocol analyses showed no statistical association between ABI underexposure and an increased risk of early tumour progression in patients with mCRPC, while the Bayesian estimator showed an association. However, other strategies than dose escalation at the time of progression need to be evaluated. Treatment adherence appeared to be uniformly good in the present study. Finally, the use of a Bayesian approach to recover samples collected outside the predefined blood collection time window could benefit the conduct of clinical trials based on drug monitoring. OPTIMABI trial is registered as National Clinical Trial number NCT03458247, with the EudraCT number 2017-000560-15)., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Background: With the development of some new antibody-drug conjugates, the HER2 classification of breast carcinomas now includes the HER2-low (H2L) category: IHC 1+, 2+ non-amplified by ISH, and double-equivocal carcinomas, mostly luminal, expressing hormone receptors (HR+)., Methods: We analyzed mutational status and transcriptomic activities of three HER2 effector pathways: PI3K-AKT, MAPK, and JAK-STAT, in association with clinicopathologic features, in 62 H2L carcinomas compared to 43 HER2-positive and 20 HER2-negative carcinomas, all HR+., Results: H2L carcinomas had significantly lower histoprognostic grades and mitotic and Ki67 proliferation indexes than HER2-positive carcinomas. Their PIK3CA mutation rates were close to those of HER2-negative and significantly higher than in HER2-positive carcinomas, contrary to TP53 mutations. At the transcriptomic level, we identified three distinct groups which did not reflect the new HER2 classification. H2L and HER2-negative carcinomas shared most of clinicopathological and molecular characteristics, except HER2 membrane expression (mRNA levels). The presence of a mutation in a signaling pathway had a strong pathway activation effect. PIK3CA mutations were more prevalent in H2L carcinomas, leading to a strong activation of the PI3K-AKT signaling pathway even in the absence of HER2 overexpression/amplification., Conclusion: PIK3CA mutations may explain the failure of conventional anti-HER2 treatments, suggesting that new antibody-drug conjugates may be more effective.

Background: The relevance of next-generation hormone therapies and circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are not elucidated in biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy., Objective: To evaluate the combination of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AAP), prostate bed radiotherapy (PBRT), and goserelin in biochemically relapsing men after prostatectomy, and to investigate the utility of CTCs., Design, Setting, and Participants: In this single-arm multicenter phase 2 trial, 46 biochemically relapsing men were enrolled between December 2012 and January 2019. The median follow-up was 47 mo., Intervention: All patients received AAP 1000 mg daily (but 750 mg during PBRT), salvage PBRT, and goserelin., Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis: The primary outcome was 3-yr biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS) when prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels were ≥0.2 ng/ml. The secondary outcomes included alternative bRFS (alt-bRFS) when PSA levels were ≥0.5 ng/ml and safety assessment. CTC count was assessed., Results and Limitations: The 3-yr bRFS and alt-bRFS were 81.5% (95% confidence interval or CI [66.4-90.3%]) and 95.6% (95% CI [83.5-98.9%]), respectively. The most common acute radiotherapy-related adverse effect (AE; all grades was pollakiuria (41.3%). The most common late AE (all grades) was urinary incontinence (15.2%). Grade 3-4 acute or late radiotherapy-related AEs were scarce. Most frequent AEs nonrelated to radiotherapy were hot flashes (76%), hypertension (63%), and hepatic cytolysis (50%, of which 20% were of grades 3-4). Of the patients, 11% had a CTC count of ≥5, which was correlated with poorer bRFS (p = 0.042) and alt-bRFS (p = 0.008). The association between CTC count and higher rates of relapse was independent of the baseline PSA level and PSA doubling time (p = 0.42 and p = 0.09, respectively). This study was nonrandomized with a limited number of patients, and few clinical events were reported., Conclusions: Adding AAP to salvage radiation therapy and goserelin resulted in high bRFS and alt-bRFS. AEs remained manageable, although a close liver surveillance is advised. CTC count appears as a promising biomarker for prognosis and predicting response to treatment., Patient Summary: Our study was a phase 2 clinical trial that exhibited the efficacy and tolerance of a novel androgen-receptor targeting agent (abiraterone acetate plus prednisone) in patients with prostate cancer who experienced rising prostate-specific antigen after radical prostatectomy, in combination with prostate bed radiotherapy. The results also indicated the feasibility and potential value of circulating tumor cell detection, which constitutes a possible advance in managing prostate cancers., (Copyright © 2024 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: The CPS+EG scoring system was initially described in unselected early breast cancer (eBC) patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), leading to refined prognostic stratification, and thus helping to select patients for additional post-NAC treatments. It remains unknown whether the performance is the same in new biological breast cancer entities such as the HER2-low subtype., Patients and Methods: Outcomes (disease-free (DFS) and overall survival OS)) of 608 patients with HER2-non amplified eBC and treated with NAC were retrospectively analyzed according to CPS-EG score. We compared the prognostic stratification abilities of the CPS+EG in HER2-low and HER2-0 eBC, analyzing ER+ and ER- tumors separately., Results: In ER+ eBC, the CPS+EG scoring system seems to retain a prognostic value, both in HER2-low and HER2-0 tumors, by distinguishing populations with significantly different outcomes (good: score 0-1, poor: score 2-3, and very poor: score 4-5). Using C-indices for DFS and OS, CPS+EG provided the highest prognostic information in ER+ eBC, especially in HER2-0 tumors. In contrast, in ER- eBC, the CPS+EG does not appear to be able to distinguish different outcome groups, either in HER2-low or HER2-0 tumors. In ER- eBC, C-indices for DFS and OS were highest for pathological stage, reflecting the predominant prognostic importance of residual disease in this subtype., Conclusions: HER2-low status does not influence the prognostic performance of the CPS+EG score. Our results confirm the usefulness of the CPS+EG score in stratifying the prognosis of ER+ eBC after NAC, for both HER2-0 and HER2-low tumors. For ER- eBC, HER2-low status does not influence the performance of the CPS+EG score, which was lower than that of the pathological stage alone., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Darolutamide and enzalutamide are second-generation androgen receptor inhibitors with activity in men with castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and different toxicity profiles., Objective: ODENZA is a prospective, randomized, multicenter, cross-over, phase 2 trial designed to assess preference between darolutamide and enzalutamide in men with asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic metastatic CRPC (mCRPC)., Design, Setting, and Participants: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either darolutamide 1200 mg/d for 12 wk followed by enzalutamide 160 mg/d for 12 wk or enzalutamide followed by darolutamide. In both arms, the second treatment was given in absence of cancer progression., Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis: The primary endpoint was patient preference between the two drugs, as assessed by a preference questionnaire (p value calculated with the Prescott test). After week 24, patients entered an extension period during which they received their preferred treatment until progression or toxicity. The main secondary objectives included reasons for patient preference, response at week 12, tolerance of each drug, and measurement compared with baseline of cognitive outcomes assessed using tablet questionnaires., Results and Limitations: Overall, 249 patients, with a median age of 72 yr, were randomized. Among the 200 patients who fulfilled the preplanned criteria for the evaluation of the primary endpoint of preference, 97 (49% [41; 56]), 80 (40% [33; 47]), and 23 (12% [7; 16]) chose darolutamide, chose enzalutamide, and had no preference, respectively (p = 0.92). Reduced fatigue, easier administration, and better quality of life were the main criteria that influenced patient choice. A moderate benefit in episodic memory from darolutamide was observed for the acquisition of new information (least square [LS] means difference = 2.2, effect size = 0.5) and for the recall of that information after a brief delay (LS means difference = 0.7, effect size = 0.3). Using the Brief Fatigue Inventory questionnaire, patients reported greater fatigue with enzalutamide (3.3 [3.0; 3.6]) than with darolutamide (2.7 [2.4; 3.0]). There was no difference in terms of depression, seizures, and falls., Conclusions: The study did not show a difference in preference between the two treatments. In men with mCRPC, darolutamide was associated with a clinically meaningful benefit in episodic memory and less fatigue compared with enzalutamide., Patient Summary: Preference between darolutamide and enzalutamide was well balanced in men with castrate-resistant prostate cancer. Darolutamide was associated with a significant benefit in verbal learning and less fatigue compared with enzalutamide., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported .In patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer, the STIC CTC trial established that, for choosing between endocrine therapy (ET) or chemotherapy, the use of circulating tumor cell (CTC) count is noninferior to the investigator's choice in terms of progression-free survival. Here, we report overall survival (OS) results, a secondary end point. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to have their first-line treatment (ET or chemotherapy) determined by investigators or CTC count (chemotherapy if ≥ 5 CTCs/7.5 mL; ET if low CTC count; CellSearch). OS was assessed at the discontinuation of follow-up. After a median follow-up of 4.7 years, 382 deaths (50.6%) had occurred among 755 patients. Median OS was 51.3 months (95% CI, 46.8 to 55.1) in the CTC arm and 45.5 months (95% CI, 40.9 to 51.1) in the standard arm (hazard ratio [HR] for death, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.03; P = .11). Among 189 patients (25.0%) with ET recommended by clinicians and high CTC count, chemotherapy was superior to ET (HR for death, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.78; P = .001). In case of a discordant estimate, OS data demonstrate the clinical utility of CTC count.

Background: The persistence of residual tumour after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in localised triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is known to have a negative prognostic value. However, different degrees of expression of some immunohistochemical markers may correlate with different prognoses., Methods: The expression of biomarkers with a known prognostic value, i.e., cytokeratin 5/6 (CK5/6), androgen receptor (AR), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) proliferation-related nuclear antigen Ki-67, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), protein 53 (p53), forkhead box protein 3 (FOXP3), and cluster differentiation 8 (CD8), was analysed by immunohistochemistry in 111 samples after NAC in non-metastatic TNBC patients addressed to Georges-François Leclerc Cancer Centre Dijon, France. Clinical and pathological variables were retrospectively collected. Cox regression was used to identify immunohistochemical (IHC) and clinicopathological predictors of event-free survival (EFS) (relapse or death)., Results: Median age was 50.4 years (range 25.6-88.3), 55.9% (n = 62) were non-menopausal, 70 (63.1%) had stage IIA-IIB disease. NAC was mostly sequential anthracycline-taxanes (72.1%), and surgical intervention was principally conservative (51.3%). We found 65.7% ypT1, 47.2% lymph node involvement (ypN+), and 29.4% lymphovascular invasion (LVI). Most residual tumours were EGFR >110 (H-score) (60.5%, n = 66), AR ≥4% (53.2%, n = 58), p53-positive mutated (52.7%, n = 58), CD8 ≥26 (58.1%, n = 61), FOXP3 ≥7 (51.4%, n = 54), more than half in the stroma, and 52.3% (n = 58) HER2 score 0. After a median follow-up of 80.8 months, 48.6% had relapsed. Median EFS was 62.3 months (95% CI, 37.2-not reached (NR)). Factors independently associated with poor EFS were AR-low (p = 0.002), ypN+ (p < 0.001), and LVI (p = 0.001). Factors associated with lower overall survival (OS) were EGFR-low (p = 0.041), Ki-67 high (p = 0.024), and ypN+ (p < 0.001)., Conclusion: Post-NAC residual disease in TNBC showed biomarkers specific to a basal-like subtype and markers of lymphocyte infiltration mostly present in the stroma. Prognostic markers for EFS were AR, LVI, and ypN and warrant further validation in a prognostic model., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Ilie, Briot, Constatin, Ilie, Beltjens, Ladoire, Desmoulins, Hennequin, Bertaut, Coutant, Causeret, Ghozali, Coudert and Arnould.)

Background: Chemotherapy using carboplatin and etoposide (CE) is frequently pragmatically proposed to treat metastatic prostate cancer (mPC), both primary small-cell neuroendocrine (PSC-NE) carcinoma and adenocarcinoma with or without neuroendocrine (NE) marker elevation. However, the real benefit of CE is poorly reported in the recent therapeutic context., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and tolerance of CE chemotherapy in these three different groups of mPC patients. Efficacy endpoints included radiological response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS), as well as PSA response and PFS2/PFS1 ratio in patients with adenocarcinoma., Results: Sixty-nine patients were included in this single-center study ( N = 18 with PSC-NE carcinoma and 51 with adenocarcinoma with ( N = 18) or without ( N = 33) NE marker elevation). Patients with adenocarcinoma were highly pretreated with next-generation hormonal agents (NHAs) and taxanes. In patients with adenocarcinoma, a PSA response ≥50% was observed in six patients (15.8%), four of whom had NE marker elevation. The radiological response was higher in PSC-NE and tended to be higher in adenocarcinoma when NE marker elevation was present. Comparing patients with adenocarcinoma with vs. without NE marker elevation, the median PFS was 3.7 and 2.1 months and the median OS was 7.7 and 4.7 months, respectively. Overall, 62.3% of patients experienced grade 3-4 adverse events (mainly hematological), and three treatment-related deaths were recorded., Conclusion: Reports of the clinical results of CE suggest that we should not mix PSC-NE and castration-resistant adenocarcinoma of the prostate. In patients with heavily pretreated adenocarcinoma, the benefit/risk ratio of CE chemotherapy seems unfavorable due to poor response and high toxicity.

Background: In metastatic renal clear cell carcinoma (ccRCC), vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) and immune checkpoint are 2 main therapeutic targets. We investigated the impact of duration exposure to antiangiogenic on immunotherapy clinical outcomes in metastatic ccRCC., Methods: Patients from NIVOREN trial who received nivolumab after only 1 prior antiangiogenic therapy were included. Response rate, clinical benefit, progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were prospectively analyzed depending on the duration of the first line (< 6 months, ≥6 months) and exploratory in patients with long first line exposure (≥18 months). The circulating levels of 8 plasma proteins and cytokines at baseline were collected and compared according to first line antiangiogenic duration., Results: Among 354 patients, 127 (36%) and 227 (64%) patients had received first line antiangiogenic for < 6months and ≥ 6months respectively. Respective duration of first line therapy was not associated with objective response to nivolumab (20.5% vs. 23.9%, P = .50), or PFS (HR 0.92; P = .421). Median OS was respectively 16.6 and 31.3 months in the <6 and ≥6 months subgroups respectively. Adjusted on international metastatic renal cell carcinoma database consortium risk, age and metastatic site, OS was longer in patients with longer treatment duration in the first line setting (HR 0.73; P = .017). Duration of first line VEGFR TKI was independent from circulating levels of 8 proteins and cytokines at nivolumab baseline., Conclusion: Nivolumab activity in second line is independent from first-line duration of VEGFR TKI. However, first line VEGFR TKI duration ≥ 6 months is associated with longer OS., Competing Interests: Disclosure GGD, CD, BE : no conflict of interest; SN:Honoraria: Bristol-MyersSquibb; Ipsen; MSD Oncology; Novartis; Pfizer.Consulting or advisory role e Bristol-Myers Squibb;Ipsen; MSD Oncology; Novartis; Pfizer. ResearchFunding: IPSEN (Inst); Pfizer (Inst). Travel, accommodations, and expenses :Bristol-Myers Squibb;IPSEN; Novartis; Pfizer. . GG: Speaker bureau: Janssen, Amgen, BMS, IPSEN, AAA, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Pfizer Merck, Astellas. Recipient: my institution.Board: Janssen, Amgen, BMS, Curium, Bayer, Pfizer Merck. Recipient: my institution.Expert: BMS, Bayer, Pfizer/ merck. Recipient: my institution. BL: personal fees from Pfizer, Ipsen, MSD, Eisai, Astellas Pharma, and Janssen andnonfinancial support from Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb, and MSD; CC: advisory board ordata safety monitoring committee for Ipsen, Pfizer, Esaï, and GSK;and has received support for travel or meetings from Pfizer. SO :  fundings: Astellas, Astra Zeneca, Ipsen, Janssen, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Bayer, BMS and Novartis. PB: Honoraria Astellas Pharma; BMS; IPSEN;Janssen-Cilag; Merck KGaA; MSD; Novartis; Pfizer.Consulting or advisory role e Amgen; AstraZeneca;BMS; Eisai; Ipsen; Janssen-Cilag; Merck KGaA; MSDOncology; Pfizer. Travel, accommodations, and expenses :Astellas Pharma; BMS; IPSEN; Janssen-Cilag;MSD; SL:Honoraria: BMS; Ipsen; Merck serono;Pfizer. Consulting or advisory role: Ipsen; DB:consulting and advisoryfees from Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bristol-MyersSquibb, Ipsen, Janssen-Cilag, MSD Oncology, Novartis, Pfizer, and Sanofi; research funding from AstellasPharma, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Exelixis,Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, MSD, and Roche;and travel and accommodations expenses from BristolMyers Squibb, Janssen, Pfizer, and Roche. CL: employment for Chugai (immediate family member); honoraria forPfizer, Astellas, Sanofi, Roche, and Ipsen; consulting/advisory role forAstellas; research funding for Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, BMS, MSD, and Ipsen(paid to institution); expert testimony for Astellas; travel/accommodation/expenses for Ipsen, Astellas, and Pfizer. RF:Honoraria: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Ipsen, Astellas Pharma, MSD Oncology, Consulting or Advisory Role: Ipsen, Janssen Oncology, Research Funding: Bayer ; LA: grants and honoraria from Pfizer, Novartis, BMS, Ipsen, Roche, AstraZeneca, Amgen, Astellas, Exelixis, Corvus Pharmaceuticals, Peloton therapeutics, MSD and Merck, outside the submitted work. MGG: honoraria for consultancy: BMS, MSD, Ipsen, Pfizer, Eisai;, (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Breast cancers without HER2 amplification but still expressing this membrane protein constitute a new entity called HER2-low tumors. It is important to characterize them in terms of sensitivity to treatment and prognosis., Patients and Methods: To investigate chemosensitivity and long-term prognosis of HER2-low early breast cancer (eBC), compared to HER2-0 tumors, we retrospectively retrieved clinicopathological characteristics, response to treatment, and survival data from 511 patients treated for eBC with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in a French cancer center between 2007 and 2018. Factors associated with the achievement of pathologic complete response (pCR) and survival were studied among hormone receptor positive (HR+) and negative (HR-) eBC., Results: A total of 280 HR+ (61% HER2-low), and 231 HR- (28% HER2-low) eBC were included. We found classical clinicopathological factors usually associated with chemosensitivity and prognosis, in both HR+ and HR- eBC. By uni- and multivariable analysis, HER2 status (low vs 0) was not independently associated with pCR, either in HR+ or HR- eBC. Relapse free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were not significantly different between HER2-low and HER2-0 among HR+ tumors. In contrast, among HR- negative tumors, RFS and OS were slightly better in HER2-0 eBC by univariable but not by multivariable analysis., Conclusions: In eBC patients treated with NAC, taking into account HR expression subtype and other current clinicopathological features, HER2-low tumors did not appear to have different chemosensitivity or prognosis, compared to their HER2-0 counterparts., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Following the results of the IMpassion130 trial, an early access program (EAP) was opened in France, allowing patients with PD-L1-positive advanced triple negative breast cancer (aTNBC) to receive a combination of paclitaxel and atezolizumab as first line therapy. This EAP was later discontinued when the IMpassion131 trial read out with negative results. We performed a retrospective multicentric analysis in patients who were prospectively enrolled in the French EAP. Efficacy and toxicity data were obtained on 64 patients treated from August 2019 to August 2020 in 10 French cancer centers. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 4.1 months (95% CI [3.0-5.8]) and 17.9 months (95% CI [12.4-NR]), respectively. The 6-months PFS rate was 28% (95% CI [16-40%]) (N = 18/64), while N = 33/64 patients (52%, 95% CI [38-63%]) experienced a tumor response. Exploratory subgroup analyses retrieved that corticosteroid use at inclusion in the EAP, before treatment initiation, was the only independent unfavorable prognostic factor for PFS (HR 2.7, 95% CI [1.3-5.6]). No new safety signal was observed. This real-life study, unique by its setting (EAP granted by anticipation and later withdrawn), suggests atezolizumab and paclitaxel has a limited efficacy in PD-L1-positive aTNBC, especially in patients receiving corticosteroids as comedication before treatment start., (© 2023. Springer Nature Limited.)

Background: HER2 expression is often negative or low in primary breast cancers (BCs) but its changes with disease progression remain poorly known. We aimed to estimate them between primary and recurrent tumours, and identify predictive factors., Methods: We compared the HER2 status, and clinical and pathological characteristics by its evolution category (stable or changed), between all primary BCs and matched recurrences registered in our database in 2000-2020 (n = 512)., Results: HER2-low tumours were the most prevalent at diagnosis (44.9%), followed by HER2-negative tumours (39.3%). HER2 status significantly changed in 37.3% of recurrences, mainly of HER2-negative and HER2-low tumours. HER2-negative tumours which relapsed as HER2-low significantly more frequently expressed oestrogen receptors (ER) and recurred later than stably HER2-negative tumours. Changed HER2 status in distant metastases correlated with lower proliferation rates and higher ER expression in primary tumours, and among metastases of hormone receptor-positive (HR+) tumours-with weak progesterone receptor (PR) expression in primary tumours., Conclusions: HER2 status changes with BC progression, with enrichment of HER2-low tumours in advanced stages. The ER+/PR- status, low proliferation index and time to late recurrence correlated with these changes. These findings highlight the need of retesting recurrences, especially of HR + primary tumours, to identify candidates for new anti-HER2 therapies., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Purpose: To retrospectively assess the rate of pathologic complete response in the axilla according to breast cancer biologic subtypes, and to study the impact of nodal response on survival., Methods: Inclusion criteria were all T-stage breast cancers with initial lymph node involvement, non-metastatic, treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery with axillary lymph node dissection, managed at the George-François Leclerc Cancer Center in Dijon, France, between 2000 and 2018., Results: Among 437 patients included, the rate of complete nodal response rate varied according to tumor subtypes: 69.4% in Hormone Receptors (HR)-/HER2-positive, 47.4% in HR-/HER2-negative, 46.7% in HR+/HER2-positive, 8.5% in HR+/HER2-negative. By multivariate analysis, the factors significantly associated with complete nodal response were HER2-positive profile (OR 4.48 [2.14-9.65], P<0.001 if HR+; OR 8.02 [3.54-18.74], P<0.001 if HR-), triple negative tumors (OR 3.01 [1.40-6.58], P=0.005), SBRIII grade (OR 6.85 [2.28-29.58], P=0.002) and breast complete response (OR 18.69 [9.67-38.53], P<0.001). Five-year recurrence rates were 15.7% in ypN0, 23% in ypN1, 41.2% in ypN2, 50% in ypN3 patients (P<0.001). Five-year overall survival rates were 92.2% in ypN0, 85.7% in ypN1, 72.2% in ypN2, 65.4% in ypN3 patients (P<0.001)., Conclusion: The impact of nodal response on survival was significant. Pathologic complete response in the axilla appears to be a good surrogate marker of long-term outcome in patients treated for these cancers., (Copyright © 2023 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: HER2-positive (HER2 +) invasive lobular breast cancer (ILC) is rare and poorly characterised. In particular, patient outcomes compared to those associated with HER2 + invasive ductal cancer (IDC) and HER2-negative (HER2 -) ILC, as well as the benefits of anti-HER2 therapy, are not well established., Methods: We analysed the data from the Côte d'Or Registry of Breast and Gynaecological Cancers (France) for all patients diagnosed with early-stage HER2 + ILC (62 cases), HER2 + IDC (833 cases) and HER2 - ILC (685 cases) between 1998 and 2015 to compare overall and disease-free survival (OS and DFS) between these groups in correlation with anti-HER2 therapy., Results: ILCs were associated with older age, larger tumours, lower histological grades, higher hormonal receptor positivity rates and multifocality, and more common endocrine therapy. OS and DFS between the three groups did not differ. We found that anti-HER2 therapy was associated with a survival benefit in patients with HER2 + IDC. In contrast, the survival of HER2 + ILC patients was not improved by anti-HER2 treatment, remaining close to that of HER2 - ILC patients., Conclusion: HER2 + ILC seems not to be associated with better outcomes than HER2 + IDC but may not differ from HER2 - ILC in terms of survival., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Japanese Breast Cancer Society.)

The detection of tumour gene mutations by DNA or RNA sequencing is crucial for the prescription of effective targeted therapies. Recent developments showed promising results for tumoral mutational status prediction using new deep learning based methods on histopathological images. However, it is still unknown whether these methods can be useful aside from sequencing methods for efficient population diagnosis. In this retrospective study, we use a standard prediction pipeline based on a convolutional neural network for the detection of cancer driver genomic alterations in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) breast (BRCA, n = 719), lung (LUAD, n = 541) and colon (COAD, n = 459) cancer datasets. We propose 3 diagnostic strategies using deep learning methods as first-line diagnostic tools. Focusing on cancer driver genes such as KRAS, EGFR or TP53, we show that these methods help reduce DNA sequencing by up to 49.9% with a high sensitivity (95%). In a context of limited resources, these methods increase sensitivity up to 69.8% at a 30% capacity of DNA sequencing tests, up to 85.1% at a 50% capacity, and up to 91.8% at a 70% capacity. These methods can also be used to prioritize patients with a positive predictive value up to 90.6% in the 10% patient most at risk of being mutated. Limitations of this study include the lack of external validation on non-TCGA data, dependence on prevalence of mutations in datasets, and use of a standard DL method on a limited dataset. Future studies using state-of-the-art methods and larger datasets are needed for better evaluation and clinical implementation., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Invasive lobular carcinoma accounts for 10 to 15% of all breast cancers. The first objective of this retrospective study was to assess the diagnostic performance of FDG-PET/CT scanning in women previously treated for invasive lobular carcinoma with suspected first recurrence. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the impact of PET/CT in a change in treatment and its prognostic value on specific survival., Methods: Patients in whom a PET/CT scan was performed from January 2011 to July 2019 in our Cancer Research Center were enrolled. Recurrence was suspected based on clinical symptoms, abnormal findings on conventional imaging, and/or elevated tumor markers. The diagnosis of recurrence was established by the oncologist after integration of all clinical, biological, histological, imaging, and follow-up data. Prognostic factors of recurrence as predicted by PET were determined using univariate logistic regression. KI67, mitotic index, or grade of mitosis were tested. Survival curves were compared using the log-rank test. Sixty-four patients (mean age: 60.3; SD = 12.4 years) were enrolled. The average time from initial diagnosis of the primary tumor to suspicion of recurrence was 5.2 ± 4.1 years. Forty-eight patients (75%) were judged to have recurrence by the oncologist: 7 local and 41 metastatic, with mainly bone ( n = 24), lymph node ( n = 14) and liver ( n = 10) metastases., Results: Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of PET/CT to predict recurrence were, respectively: 87%, 87%, 95%, and 70%. SUVmax at recurrence sites was generally high (mean: 6.4; SD = 2.9). False negative PET/CT results occurred with local ( n = 2), peritoneal ( n = 2), meningeal ( n = 1), or bladder ( n = 1) recurrences. In 40 patients with available histopathological data from suspected sites of recurrence, 30 PET/CT were true positive. In four patients, primary lung ( n = 1) or gastric ( n = 1) tumors or lymphomas ( n = 2) were found. The detection of a recurrence resulted in a change in treatment in 44/48 patients (92%). No association between recurrence predicted by PET and biological biomarkers was found. Median specific survival appears shorter in patients with metastatic recurrence versus patients with local or no recurrence on PET/CT ( p = 0.067)., Conclusions: FDG-PET/CT is an effective and reliable tool for the detection of invasive lobular carcinoma recurrence, although certain recurrence sites specific to this histological type can impair its diagnostic performance.

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), particularly inhibitors of the PD-1/PD-L1 (Programmed Death 1/Programmed Death-Ligand 1) axis, have modified the management of many types of cancer over the last 10 years. However, both intrinsic and acquired resistance are major clinical issues with these therapies, and only a few patients are cured by ICI monotherapy. To overcome resistance, the concept of combining ICIs with other therapies is emerging and supported by many preclinical trials. Besides associations of ICIs with chemotherapy or radiotherapy, now used in clinical practice, some targeted therapies have also been reported to influence immune response of patients against cancer cells, thus showing potential synergy with ICIs. In this review, we describe the preclinical and clinical advances to date in the use of these combination strategies., (©2022 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background: Taxanes are major drugs for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) treatment, and are generally well tolerated, making them attractive for therapeutic reintroduction (rechallenge) during metastatic course. In view of the paucity of current literature, we questioned the usefulness of taxane rechallenge in a population of patients previously treated with taxanes in a metastatic setting., Methods: From the local database of a French cancer center, we retrospectively identified 756 patients diagnosed with ER+/HER2-, or triple negative MBC, and treated between 2008 and 2021. Among them, 58 patients (7.8%) were rechallenged with taxanes. Clinical characteristics, response rates, and survival were retrospectively evaluated and compared to patients who received taxanes only once., Results: Compared to non-rechallenged population, patients treated with taxane rechallenge were significantly younger, with better general status, and received more treatment. First taxane exposure led to better tumor response and was more frequently discontinued for reasons other than progression, compared to the non-rechallenged population. Taxane rechallenge led to an objective response rate of 27.6%, and a clinical benefit rate of 46.6%, with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 5.7 months, and a median overall survival (OS) of 11.6 months. We also found a PFS2/PFS1 ratio >1.3 in 55.2% of the rechallenge population., Conclusion: Although only a minority of MBC patients are concerned, taxane rechallenge appears to be a pragmatic option with an acceptable tolerance, and good efficacy, especially when these drugs have shown clinical activity earlier in the disease course, and/or have been stopped for reasons other than progression., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

There is little data concerning the implications of PIK3CA mutations outside of the known hotspots described in ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Similarly, PIK3R1 mutations could also lead to activation of PI3K pathway, but are poorly described. We determined the incidence and type of all somatic PIK3CA and PIK3R1 mutations by whole exome sequencing (WES) in a pan-cancer cohort of 1200 patients. Activation of the PI3K pathway was studied using phospho-AKT immunohistochemistry. Associations between PIK3CA/PIK3R1 mutations and response to chemotherapy were studied in mBC cases. We found 141 patients (11.8%) with a PIK3CA and/or PIK3R1 mutation across 20 different cancer types. The main cancer subtype was mBC (45.4%). Eighty-four mutations (62.2%) occurred in the three described hotspots; 51 mutations occurred outside of these hotspots. In total, 78.4% were considered activating or probably activating. Among PIK3R1 mutations, 20% were loss of function mutations, leading to a constitutional activation of the pathway. Phospho-AKT quantification in tumor samples was in favor of activation of the PI3K pathway in the majority of mutated tumors, regardless of mutation type. In ER+/HER2- mBC, first line chemotherapy efficacy was similar for PIK3CA-mutated and PIK3CA-WT tumors, whereas in triple negative mBC, chemotherapy appeared to be more effective in PIK3CA-WT tumors. In this large, real-life pan-cancer patient cohort, our results indicate that PIK3CA/PIK3R1 mutations are widely spread, and plead in favour of evaluating the efficacy of PI3K inhibitors outside of ER+/HER2- mBC and outside of hotspot mutations., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

The study of the tumor microenvironment (TME) and its interactions with cancer cells is an important issue in cancer research. Here, we present a protocol to sort three important cell populations from murine triple negative breast cancer 4T1 model TME, including CD45 + tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, cancer-associated fibroblasts, and tumor cells. The protocol includes four steps: generation of 4T1 tumors, tumor collection and digestion, magnetic sorting of the different populations, and phenotypic validation of sorted cells. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Limagne et al. (2022). 1 ., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests The authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Introduction: Bone metastases (BM) in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are associated with a poor prognosis based on retrospective studies evaluating antiangiogenic agents. Few data are available regarding immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in patients with bone metastatic RCC. NIVOREN is a multicentre prospective study in which patients were treated with nivolumab after the failure of antiangiogenic agents. We aim to assess the impact of BM on prognosis, and the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in patients enrolled in the NIVOREN trial., Materials and Methods: All patients with BM at inclusion were included in our study. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), safety, and skeletal-related events (SRE)., Results: Among 720 patients treated with nivolumab, 194 presented BM at inclusion. The median follow-up was 23.9 months. Median OS was 17.9 months in patients with BM versus 26.1 months in patients without BM (p = 0.0023). The difference was not statistically significant after adjustment (p = 0.0707). The median PFS was shorter in patients with BM even after adjustment (2.8 versus 4.6 months, p = 0.0045), as well as the ORR (14.8% versus 23.3%). SRE occurred for 36% of patients with BM. A post-hoc analysis evaluating the impact of bone-targeting agents (BTA) on SRE incidence showed a significant benefit of BTA on the incidence of SRE (OR = 0.367, CI95% [0.151-0.895])., Conclusion: Nivolumab is associated with shorter PFS, and lower ORR in RCC patients with BM. Our study suggests that BTA in association with immunotherapy decreases the incidence of SRE., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: MaudVELEV, Cecile Dalban, Florence Joly, Mathieu Laramas, Berangère Narciso, Jean-François BERDAH, Victoria FERRARI, Quentin Dominique THOMAS, Cecile Mione, Florence Tantot and Sylvie Chabaud have nothing to disclose. Christine Chevreau: consulting or advisory role – BMS; Ipsen; Novartis; Pfizer. Travel, accommodations, and expenses – AstraZeneca, BMS, Pfysez-Ipsen. Gwenaelle Gravis: AstraZeneca (Inst); Bayer (Inst); BMS (Inst); IPSEN (Inst); Janssen (Inst); MSD Oncology (Inst); Pfizer (Inst); Sanofi/Aventis (Inst). Speaker's: Amgen (Inst); Astellas Pharma (Inst); BMS (Inst); Ipsen (Inst); Janssen Oncology (Inst); MSD Oncology (Inst); Sanofi/Aventis (Inst), Research Funding: BMS. Sylvie Negrier: Honoraria: Bristol-Myers Squibb; Ipsen; MSD Oncology; Novartis; Pfizer. Consulting or advisory role – Bristol-Myers Squibb; Ipsen; MSD Oncology; Novartis; Pfizer. Research Funding: IPSEN (Inst); Pfizer (Inst). Travel, accommodations, and expenses – Bristol-Myers Squibb; IPSEN; Novartis; Pfizer. Brigitte Laguerre: Honoraria: Astellas Pharma; AstraZeneca; Ipsen; Ipsen; Ipsen; Janssen-Cilag; MSD Oncology. Travel, accommodations, and expenses – Astellas Pharma; Janssen; Janssen Oncology; Novartis; Pfizer. Marine Gross-Goupil: consulting or advisory role – Amgen; Astellas Medivation; AstraZeneca; Bayer/Onyx; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Ipsen; Janssen-Cilag; MSD Oncology; Pfizer; Roche; Sanofi. Research Funding – AstraZeneca (Inst); AstraZeneca (Inst); BMS (Inst); Ipsen (Inst); Janssen-Cilag (Inst); Merck (Inst); MSD Oncology (Inst); Pfizer (Inst); Roche (Inst). Sylvain Ladoire: Expert testimony – Astellas Pharma; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Ipsen; Janssen Oncology; Lilly; Novartis; Pfizer; Roche; Sanofi. Travel, accommodations, and expenses – Astellas Pharma; AstraZeneca; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Ipsen; Janssen Oncology; Novartis; Pfizer; Sanofi. Delphine Borchiellini has received consulting and advisory fees from Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Ipsen, Janssen-Cilag, MSD Oncology, Novartis, Pfizer, and Sanofi; research funding from Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Exelixis, Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, MSD, and Roche; and travel and accommodations expenses from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen, Pfizer, and Roche. Lionnel Geoffrois: Honoraria: BMS; Ipsen; Merck serono; Pfizer. Consulting or advisory role – Ipsen. Frank Priou: consulting or advisory role – AstraZeneca. Philippe Barthélémy: Honoraria Astellas Pharma; BMS; IPSEN; Janssen-Cilag; Merck KGaA; MSD; Novartis; Pfizer. Consulting or advisory role – Amgen; AstraZeneca; BMS; Eisai; Ipsen; Janssen-Cilag; Merck KGaA; MSD Oncology; Pfizer. Travel, accommodations, and expenses – Astellas Pharma; BMS; IPSEN; Janssen-Cilag; MSD; Pfizer. Antoine Thiery-Vuillemin has received honoraria from Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Ipsen, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche/Genentech, and Sanofi; consulting and advisory fees from Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Ipsen, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi; research funding from Pfizer; and travel and accommodations expenses from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen, MSD, Pfizer, and Roche. Hubert Curcio: Honoraria or consultation fees: Bristol Myers Squibb. Stephane Oudard has received honoraria from Astellas Pharma, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eisai, Ipsen, Janssen, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche/Genentech, and Sanofi; consulting and advisory fees from Astellas Pharma, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eisai, Ipsen, Janssen, Merck, MSD Oncology, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Roche, and Sanofi; research funding from Ipsen and Sanofi; and travel and accommodation expenses from Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eisai, Merck, MSD Oncology, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche. Bernard Escudier: Honoraria Bristol-Myers Squibb; Ipsen; Oncorena; Pfizer. Consulting or Advisory Role – AVEO; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Ipsen; Oncorena; Pfizer. Research Funding - BMS France (Inst). Travel, accommodations, and expenses - Bristol-Myers Squibb; Ipsen; MSD. Laurence Albiges: consulting or advisory role – Amgen (Inst); Astellas Pharma (Inst); AstraZeneca (Inst); Bristol-Myers Squibb (Inst); Corvus Pharmaceuticals (Inst); Exelixis (Inst); Ipsen (Inst); Janssen (Inst); Merck (Inst); MSD (Inst); Novartis (Inst); Peloton therapeutics (Inst); Pfizer (Inst); Roche (Inst). Research Funding – Bristol-Myers Squibb (Inst). Travel, accommodations, and expenses – Bristol-Myers Squibb; MSD. Constance Thibault: consulting or advisory role – Astellas/Agensys; AstraZeneca; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Ipsen; Janssen; Merck; MSD; Pfizer; Sanofi. Travel, accommodations, and expenses - Astellas/Agensys; Janssen; Sanofi., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Breast cancer is the most frequently occurring cancer worldwide. With its increasing incidence, it is a major public health problem, with many therapeutic challenges such as precision medicine for personalized treatment. Thanks to next-generation sequencing (NGS), progress in biomedical technologies, and the use of bioinformatics, it is now possible to identify specific molecular alterations in tumor cells-such as homologous recombination deficiencies (HRD)-enabling us to consider using DNA-damaging agents such as platinum salts or PARP inhibitors. Different approaches currently exist to analyze impairment of the homologous recombination pathway, e.g., the search for specific mutations in homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes, such as BRCA1 / 2 ; the use of genomic scars or mutational signatures; or the development of functional tests. Nevertheless, the role and value of these different tests in breast cancer treatment decisions remains to be clarified. In this review, we summarize current knowledge on the clinical utility of genomic tests, evaluating HRR deficiency for treatment decisions in early and metastatic breast cancer., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Purpose: The prognosis of local invasive recurrence (LIR) after prior carcinoma in situ (CIS) of the breast has not been widely studied and existing data are conflicting, especially considering the specific prognosis of this entity, compared to de novo invasive breast cancer (de novo IBC) and with LIR after primary IBC., Methods: We designed a retrospective study using data from the specialized Côte d'Or Breast and Gynecological cancer registry, between 1998 and 2015, to compare outcomes between 3 matched groups of patients with localized IBC: patients with LIR following CIS (CIS-LIR), patients with de novo IBC (de novo IBC), and patients with LIR following a first IBC (IBC-LIR). Distant relapse-free (D-RFS), overall survival (OS), clinical, and treatment features between the 3 groups were studied., Results: Among 8186 women initially diagnosed with IBC during our study period, we retrieved and matched 49 CIS-LIR to 49 IBC, and 46 IBC-LIR patients. At diagnosis, IBC/LIR in the 3 groups were mainly stage I, grade II, estrogen receptor-positive, and HER2 negative. Metastatic diseases at diagnosis were higher in CIS-LIR group. A majority of patients received adjuvant systemic treatment, with no statistically significant differences between the 3 groups. There was no significant difference between the 3 groups in terms of OS or D-RFS., Conclusion: LIR after CIS does not appear to impact per se on survival of IBC., (© 2022. The Author(s).)