Search

Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is an opportunistic infection in HIV patients with higher relapse and mortality rate. The number of HIV-VL patients is comparatively higher in areas where both infections are endemic. However, the conventional chemotherapeutic agents have limited success due to drug toxicity, efficacy variance and overall cost of treatment. Therefore, it is crucial to discover and develop newer potent antileishmanial agents for successful eradication of the disease. Our previous report, for the first time showed the leishminicidal effect of amprenavir (APV) mediated by inhibition of L.donovani Topoisomerase I (LdTopILS). So, we intended to demonstrate the effect of APV in combination with ritonavir (RTV). The present study revealed that the complete catalytic inhibition of LdTopILS by APV (10 μM) in combination with RTV (5 μM), compare to APV (20 μM) as previously reported (Roy et al., 2021). Moreover, APV (5 μM) in combination with RTV (4 μM) exhibited promastigote inhibition with IC 50 values of 2.4 ± 0.6 μM at 12 h and 1.6 ± 0.7 μM at 24 h, respectively. The study was extended in animal model where the in vivo antileishmanial efficacy of APV-RTV in BALB/c mice demonstrated that treatment of APV in combination with RTV led to significant splenic and hepatic protection as compared to single dose of APV. Moreover, the antileishmanial activity of APV in combination with RTV was exerted via inhibition of LdTopILS at much lower concentration of APV and this inhibition of the enzyme induced programmed cell death in Leishmania parasites by generating oxidative stress within the cells. From the in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo studies, it was indicated that lower dose of APV in combination with RTV elevated the effective killing of the parasites as compared to the single higher dose of APV. Thus, the current study highlights repurposing of available protease inhibitors in combination, which might be exploited further for the therapeutic development against VL as well as HIV-VL co-infection., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. The authors also declare that there is no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2025. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Azvudine and nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (Paxlovid) were widely used to treat patients with COVID-19 in China during the Omicron wave. However, the efficacy and safety of azvudine versus Paxlovid are poorly established. This study included 40,876 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 from eleven hospitals in Henan and Xinjiang Provinces, China. Clinical outcomes were compared between the two drugs via Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression models. Additionally, in vitro and in vivo experiments were used to evaluate the antitumor effects and safety of both drugs. Single-cell RNA sequencing was performed to elucidate the tumor immune landscape after azvudine treatment. After propensity score matching, 2404 azvudine and 1202 Paxlovid recipients from Henan Province were included. Cox regression revealed that azvudine was related to an 18% lower risk of all-cause death than Paxlovid (95% CI: 0.676-0.987), was not obviously different in composite disease progression. The robustness of the findings was verified by the Xinjiang cohort and three sensitivity analyses. Fewer adverse events were observed in the azvudine group. Subgroup analysis revealed that azvudine provided greater benefits for patients with malignant tumors, significantly reducing both all-cause death (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.20-0.54) and composite disease progression (HR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.33-0.88). Furthermore, azvudine can suppress the growth of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by regulating CD4 + T and CD8 + T cells in vivo. These findings suggest that azvudine therapy is not inferior to Paxlovid in hospitalized COVID-19 patients and has fewer adverse effects. Notably, azvudine may offer greater clinical benefit for patients with HCC., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2025. The Author(s).)

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate pharmacist prescribing of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir to ensure this method of increasing access to treatment is safe and effective., Methods: This multicenter, retrospective observational study included patients receiving a prescription for nirmatrelvir/ritonavir by a physician, nurse practitioner (NP), physician assistant (PA), or pharmacist at an Indiana University (IU) Health West Central Region site over a 3-month period. Patients were divided into two groups: those who received nirmatrelvir/ritonavir prescribed by a pharmacist (the pharmacist prescribed group) and those who received nirmatrelvir/ritonavir prescribed by other providers (the physician/NP/PA prescribed group). Electronic health record (EHR) reviews were performed to assess the appropriateness of prescriptions based on the presence of risk factors and symptoms, day of symptom onset, and dosing. The primary endpoint was the overall appropriateness of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir prescriptions in the two study groups based on emergency use authorization inclusion and exclusion requirements. Secondary endpoints included appropriateness of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir dosing and medically attended visits or mortality within 30 days. Statistical analysis of the endpoints occurred post hoc utilizing the Fisher's exact test., Results: A total of 259 patients were included in the pharmacist prescribed group and 265 patients in the physician/NP/PA prescribed group. Overall appropriate nirmatrelvir/ritonavir prescribing occurred in 258 patients (99.6%) and 232 patients (87.5%) in the pharmacist and physician/NP/PA prescribed groups, respectively (P < 0.0001). Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir dosing was appropriate in 256 patients (98.8%) and 240 patients (90.6%) in the pharmacist and physician/NP/PA prescribed groups, respectively (P < 0.0001). The 30-day rates of medically attended visits were similar between groups. No patients died within 30 days of treatment in either group., Conclusion: Pharmacist prescribing of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir may result in a higher likelihood of prescriptions meeting overall appropriateness criteria. Pharmacists represent an important healthcare professional resource to improve nirmatrelvir/ritonavir prescribing and utilization., (© American Society of Health-System Pharmacists 2024. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (NR) has demonstrated effectiveness in halting the progression to severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) among solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) infected with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2. However, it has a wide range of interactions, especially with immunosuppressants. The study aimed to comprehensively evaluate the Inappropriate prescribing of NR and immunosuppressants in SOTRs with COVID-19, while also highlighting the essential aspects., Methods: We included hospitalized SOTRs who received NR at five tertiary hospitals between December 2022 and June 2023, and evaluated their prescription., Results: A total of 211 patients were enrolled, of which 205 did not meet all criteria for appropriate prescribing (97.16%). Inappropriateness primarily stemmed from starting treatment more than 5 days after symptom onset (87.68%), followed by application in severe-to-critical cases of COVID-19 (52.13%), the inappropriate dosages based on renal function (47.87%). Contraindications encompassed 17.06% of patients with severe renal impairment and 5.69% with contraindicated drug interactions. Inappropriate resumption of immunosuppressants accounted for a larger proportion than inappropriate discontinuation or dose adjustment (30.16% vs 8.99%). More than one-third of patients neglected to monitor concentrations. About 8% experienced abnormal high concentrations., Conclusion: Inappropriate prescribing of NR is widespread among hospitalized SOTRs. Adjusting doses based on patients' renal function and paying attention to concurrent use of immunosuppressive drugs are crucial, and therapeutic drug monitoring is necessary. Clinical practitioners should enhance their vigilance and attention., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this article., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

A fraction of individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 experienced rebounds when treated with effective antivirals such as Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir (Paxlovid). Although this phenomenon has been studied from biological and statistical perspectives, the underlying dynamical mechanism is not yet fully understood. In this work, we characterize the dynamic behavior of a target-cell model to explain post-treatment rebounds from the perspective of set-theoretic stability analysis. Without relying on the effects of the adaptive immune system or the resistance through viral mutations, we develop mathematical conditions for antiviral treatments to avoid viral rebound. Simulation results illustrate the critical role of dosage (i.e., the doses and timing of administration) in taking advantage of highly effective drugs and tailoring therapies., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: In the filed of antiviral therapy, effective therapeutic concentration is beneficial to shorten the recovery time of patients and reduce the transmission rate.The aim of this study is to retrospectively analyze the factors that lead to the drug concentration of Nirmatrelvir /Ritonavir (NMV/RTV) not reaching the standard., Methods: In this study, the NMV/RTV drug concentration(Cnmv/rtv) data (n = 114) of COVID-19 patients over 18 years old were collected from May 2022 to July 2022, and the results of the patients were retrospectively compared. According to the analysis of the early study of NMV/RTV, combined with the research results at home and abroad, according to whether the measured drug concentration > 987 ng/ml, the patients were divided into target group and non-target group,The non-target group was defined as not reaching the trough concentration level., Results: Serum NMV/RTV concentration in adult patients was correlated with prognostic nutritional index [PNI, (P < 0.05)], height (P < 0.05), weight (P < 0.05) and creatinine clearance [Crcl, (P < 0.05)]. Multivariate analysis showed that height, weight, PNI, lymphocyte (LYM) and CrCl were independent influencing factors of NMV/RTV trough concentration. However, after the correction of BMI calculation, there was no correlation between NMV/RTV and BMI, so in the clinical medication plan, the drug was not adjusted according to the height and weight., Conclusions: The serum NMV/RTV concentration of adult patients gradually decreased with the increase of CrCl. For patients with high and low CrCl, the trough concentration of NMV/RTV should be continuously monitored and the dosing regimen should be adjusted to achieve the target trough concentration in these patients to reduce the effect of CrCl. PNI is also a key factor affecting drug concentration. For poor nutritional status, drug concentration should be closely monitored and the dose should be adjusted., Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This study is a retrospective cohort study, but not a clinical trial, thus the clinical trial number is not applicable. Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee ofShanghai Public Health Clinical Center on July 26, 2022 (Granted number: 2021-S070-02), all procedures were in accordance with ethical standards, and informed consent was waived for this retrospective review. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

This study aimed to develop and optimize formulations containinga BCS Class IV drug by improving its solubility and permeability. Herein development of self-emulsifying solid lipid matrices was investigated as carrier systems for a BCS Class IV model drug. Self-emulsifying drug delivery systems (SEDDS) have been extensively investigated for formulating drugs with poor water solubility. However, manufacturing SEDDS is challenging. These systems usually have low drug-loading capacities, and the incorporated drugs tend to recrystallize during storage, which severely impacts the storage stability in vitro and performance in vivo . Moreover, they require greater amounts (>80%) of lipid carriers, cosolvents, surfactants, and other excipients to keep them from recrystallizing. This in turn is again challenging for high-dose drugs as it affects the size of the final drug product (tablets and capsules). Also, the final liquid nature of the formulation affects the handling and processability of the formulation, which poses challenges during the manufacturing and packaging steps. In this work, we have studied the feasibility of a single-step extrusion process to formulate and optimize solid self-emulsifying granules with a relatively higher drug loading of Ritonavir (RTV), a BCS Class IV drug. Further, we have compared the performance of using these granules as the feedstock for direct powder extrusion-based 3D printing as opposed to the use of physical blends. The stability and solubility-permeability advantage of these granules was also evaluated where SEDDS showed about 27 and 20 fold increase in apparent solublity and permeability compared to bulk drug, respectively. Combining the capabilities of HME to form drug-loaded homogeneous granules as a continuous process along with application of direct printing extruiosn (DPE) 3D printing improves the drug delivery prospects for such candidates.

Purpose: Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (N/R) is the first drug to receive emergency authorization for the treatment of COVID-19 infection. We aimed to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model to evaluate the effects of potential covariates and explore dosing regimen., Patients and Methods: Sparse data of serum concentrations of N/R were obtained from 129 patients with COVID-19 infection receiving oral 300/100 mg N/R twice daily for 5 days. Plasma samples were assayed using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The PopPK model was developed using a nonlinear mixed effects approach utilizing the NONMEM 7.4 software. Monte Carlo simulation was conducted to optimize the dosage regimen., Results: A one-compartment model with first-order absorption and first-order elimination provided the best fit for the data. Allometric scaling of parameters on creatinine clearance (CrCl) and body weight were identified as covariates that significantly influenced exposure-efficacy after oral administration of nirmatrelvir. Monte Carlo simulation using the final model generated concentration-time profiles for virtual patients (1,000 per group) with varying renal functions and body weight. Furthermore, we developed a web-based dashboard to visualize the dynamic changes in nirmatrelvir concentration and provide individualized dosage regimens., Conclusion: This study showed that dosing regimen optimization of nirmatrelvir should be based on CrCl and body weight. Moreover, a web-based dashboard has been developed to facilitate individualized pharmacotherapy., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (© 2024 Zhang et al.)

Objectives: Effectiveness of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NR) in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) infected COVID-19 for more than 5 days has not been evaluated., Methods: In this multicenter retrospective study, 85 KTRs with COVID-19 were enrolled, including 50 moderate, 21 severe, and 14 critical patients., Results: The median time from onset to starting NR treatment was 14 (IQR, 11-19) days. Before NR treatment, 96.5% patients reduced use of antimetabolites. They also stopped using calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) 12-24 hours before NR treatment, with CNI concentrations well-controlled during NR treatment. The use of intravenous corticosteroids increased with COVID-19 severity. The median time to reach viral negative conversion was 5 (IQR, 4-8) days for all patients. For moderate and severe COVID-19 patients, they had a low rate of ICU admission (1.4%), exacerbation requiring upgraded oxygen therapy (5.6%), and dialysis (2.8%); no intubation and mechanical ventilation, and no deaths were observed. Patients with critical COVID-19 had a low mortality rate (7.1%)., Conclusions: A regimen including NR for clearing SARS-CoV-2 along with reducing immunosuppressants and using intravenous corticosteroids is associated with lower rates of exacerbation and mortality in KTRs who have moderate to critical SARS-CoV-2 infection and the virus still present after 5 days.

While previous research examined coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) antiviral-vaccine interactions through exploratory subgroup analysis, none specifically designed for examining this interaction or its impact on post-acute outcomes. This study examined the interaction between nirmatrelvir-ritonavir and complete COVID-19 vaccination on reducing the risk of post-acute outcomes among COVID-19 patients. We followed COVID-19 patients hospitalized between 11 March 2022 and 10 October 2023, until 31 October 2023 in Hong Kong. Exposure groups were based on nirmatrelvir-ritonavir usage and vaccination status (fully or not fully vaccinated). Post-acute death and all-cause rehospitalization were the study outcomes. Propensity score weighting was applied to balance covariates among exposure groups, including age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and concomitant treatments. Multiplicative and additive interactions between nirmatrelvir-ritonavir and vaccination status were assessed. A total of 50,438 COVID-19 patients were included in this study and arranged into four exposure groups. Significant additive interaction on post-acute rehospitalization was observed (relative excess risk, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.02-0.19; p -value, 0.018; attributable proportion, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.01-0.12; p -value, 0.017; synergy index, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.02-1.55; p -value, 0.032). The interaction on post-acute mortality was marginally significant. In the subgroup analysis, the interaction effect is more pronounced in older adults, female, and CoronaVac recipients. In conclusion, our study demonstrated an additive interaction between nirmatrelvir-ritonavir and complete vaccination on post-acute outcomes, suggesting greater long-term benefits of the antiviral for fully vaccinated individuals compared to not fully vaccinated patients.

Background : Several studies have examined INR fluctuations using pharmacokinetic (PK) models or post-hoc INR values after completing nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, but further study of the effects of the drug interaction with warfarin during treatment is necessary. Case Summary : Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir is largely utilized in the outpatient setting so data regarding INR trends in hospitalized patients on warfarin is limited. However, many who receive nirmatrelvir/ritonavir outpatient experience difficulty with presenting to clinic for INR checks due to feeling acutely ill along with isolation precautions. We present the case of a patient receiving warfarin and utilizing home INR testing for monitoring. After diagnosis of coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19), she was started on nirmatrelvir/ritonavir on day five after testing positive. Most recent INR prior to the start of therapy was 2.7 and had been stable on the same dose for months prior to infection. On day two of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, her INR rose to 4.0 on home point of care INR testing. Despite reducing her dose of warfarin by 15%, her INR remained supratherapeutic the day after completing nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (4.0) and for several checks after. One month after completion of therapy, her INR returned to therapeutic levels. Practice Implications : While PK models and case series have hypothesized both potential increases or decreases in INR with the nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and warfarin interaction, COVID-19 infection itself can cause several pharmacodynamic changes which can increase INR, including decreased appetite and, in severe cases, organ dysfunction. This case provides real-world insight into the drug interaction between nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and the drug-disease state interaction between warfarin and COVID-19., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of oral antiviral agents - nirmatrelvir - ritonavir or molnupiravir in non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients aged < 60 years., Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed data of patients aged 18-60 years diagnosed with COVID-19 between 1 January 2022, and 30 June 2023. Propensity score matching was used to balance the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients receiving oral antivirals (nirmatrelvir - ritonavir or molnupiravir) and untreated controls. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause emergency department visits, hospitalizations, or mortality within 30 days. The secondary outcomes included each individual component of the primary composite outcome., Results: Two matched cohorts (antiviral group and control group) comprising 52,585 patients with balanced baseline characteristics were created using propensity score-matching. During follow-up period, the antiviral group demonstrated a lower risk of the primary outcome than the control group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.772, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.736-0.808, p  < 0.001). The antiviral group also exhibited a reduced risk of individual secondary outcomes, including emergency department visits (HR 0.780, 95% CI, 0.738-0.825), hospitalization (HR 0.755, 95% CI, 0.715-0.840), and mortality (HR 0.297, 95% CI, 0.147-0.600)., Conclusion: Oral antiviral agents were associated with lower risks of all-cause emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and mortality in non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients aged < 60 years.

Introduction: Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (Paxlovid) is an effective antiviral drug for treating coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in adults. However, Paxlovid treatment of children, especially those who are under 12 years and with severe underlying diseases, is rare., Case Report: A three-year-old COVID-19 patient (weighing 14.5 kg) was infected by the Omicron variant (BA.5.2) after undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The patient had severe bilateral pneumonia along with recurrent fever. The patient was administered 150 mg of nirmatrelvir plus 50 mg of ritonavir twice daily for 5 days, starting 27 days after the initial severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) positive test. Clinical manifestations and chest computed tomography improved considerably after the treatment. The real time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) cycle threshold values increased from 23.92 to 38.40 in the case of ORF 1-ab gene, and from 22.22 to 36.28 in the case of N gene. Only a mild increase in serum urea nitrogen (10.10 mmol/L), alanine transaminase (ALT, 65 IU/L), and aspartate transaminase (AST, 68.5 IU/L) was observed., Conclusions: Paxlovid can effectively inhibit the replication of SARS-CoV-2 and help in improving the clinical manifestations in pediatric COVID-19 patients. Our study provided novel information on Paxlovid treatment in very young children., Competing Interests: No Conflict of Interest is declared, (Copyright (c) 2024 Xia Wang, Shuyan Quan, Zhifeng Wu, Yuping Zhang, Enyi Wen, Jingbin Huang, Wang Yang.)

Background: Darunavir is a potent HIV protease inhibitor with a high barrier to resistance. We conducted a nested pharmacokinetic sub-study within CHAPAS-4 to evaluate darunavir exposure in African children with HIV, taking once-daily darunavir/ritonavir for second-line treatment., Methods: We used data from the CHAPAS-4 pharmacokinetic sub-study treating children with once-daily darunavir/ritonavir (600/100 mg if 14-24.9 kg and 800/100 mg if ≥25 kg) with either tenofovir alafenamide fumarate (TAF)/emtricitabine (FTC), abacavir/lamivudine or zidovudine/lamivudine. Steady-state pharmacokinetic sampling was done at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24 hours after observed darunavir/ritonavir intake. Non-compartmental and population pharmacokinetic analyses were used to describe the data and identify significant covariates. Reference adult pharmacokinetic data were used for comparison. We simulated the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended 600/100 mg darunavir/ritonavir dose for the 25-34.9 kg weight band., Results: Data from 59 children with median age and weight 10.9 (range 3.8-14.7) years and 26.0 (14.5-47.0) kg, respectively, were available. A two-compartment disposition model with transit absorption compartments and weight-based allometric scaling of clearance and volume best described darunavir data. Our population achieved geometric mean (%CV) darunavir AUC0-24h, 94.3(50) mg·h/L and Cmax, 9.1(35) mg/L, above adult reference values and Ctrough, 1.5(111) mg/L, like adult values. The nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor backbone was not found to affect darunavir concentrations. Simulated WHO-recommended darunavir/ritonavir doses showed exposures equivalent to adults. Higher alpha-1-acid glycoprotein increased binding to darunavir and decreased apparent clearance of darunavir., Conclusions: Darunavir exposures achieved in our trial are within safe range. Darunavir/ritonavir can safely be co-administered with TAF/FTC. Both WHO-recommended 600/100 mg and CHAPAS-4 800/100 mg darunavir/ritonavir doses for the 25-34.9 kg weight band offer favourable exposures. The choice between them can depend on tablet availability., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.)

Background: The clinical effectiveness of early therapies for mild-to-moderate COVID-19, comparing antivirals and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) during the Omicron era, has not been conclusively assessed through a post-approval comparative trial. We present a pooled analysis of two randomized clinical trials conducted during Omicron waves., Methods: The MANTICO2/MONET trial is a pooled analysis of two multicentric, independent, phase-4, three-arm, superiority, randomized, open-label trials. Nonhospitalized patients with early mild-to-moderate COVID-19 (≤5 days after symptoms' onset) and at least one risk factor for disease progression were randomized 1:1:1 to receive 500 mg of intravenous sotrovimab (SOT) or 600 mg of intramuscular tixagevimab/cilgavimab (TGM/CGM) or oral 5-days course of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NMV/r) 300/100 mg BID. Primary outcome was COVID-19-related hospitalization or death within 29 days after randomization. Fisher's exact test for pooled data and incidence of failure was reported as overall and by arm with respective 95% CI. Pairwise comparisons across the arms were conducted using unadjusted exact logistic regression. An analysis by means of a doubly robust marginal model using augmented inverse probability weighting (AIPW) was also conducted to estimate the potential outcomes (Pom) in each treatment group and their difference by the average treatment effect (ATE). Analysis of symptom persistence within 30 days after randomization was performed using a 2-level hierarchical mixed-effects logistic model with a random intercept at the patient's level. Point estimates and 95% confidence intervals were adjusted for age and sex and calculated using ANOVA-like methods for the mixed effects logistic model. These trials are registered with the European Clinical Trials Database, EudraCT2021-002612-31 (MANTICO2) and EudraCT2021-004188-28 (MONET) and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05321394 (MANTICO2)., Findings: Between March 2022 and February 2023, 991 patients (SOT = 332, TGM/CGM = 327, NMV/r = 332) were enrolled in 15 Italian centers. The overall mean age was 66 years; 482 participants (48.80%) were male, and 856 were vaccinated with at least a primary course (86%). Among the 8/991 hospitalizations observed, one resulted in death. The overall estimate of failure was 0.81% (95%CI; 0.35-1.58%). The odds ratio (OR) for the primary outcome in the NMV/r arm compared to the TGM/CGM and SOT arms was 8.41 (95% CI 1.21 to infinity; p = 0.015) and 2.42 (95% CI 0.19 to infinity; p = 0.499), respectively. No significant difference was observed between SOT and TGM/CGM (OR 0.32; 95% CI 0.032-1.83; p = 0.174). Results were similar when we applied the marginal weighted model accounting for potential residual confounding bias. There was no evidence for a difference in the prevalence of symptoms between treatment groups, except for cough, which was higher in the SOT group compared to the other two groups at the 21-day follow-up (P = 0.039) and a higher prevalence of nausea at the 7-day follow-up in the NMV/r group compared to the mAbs group (p = 0.036)., Interpretation: NMV/r was superior to TGM/CGM in reducing hospital admission or death in clinically vulnerable patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection treated within 5 days of symptoms' onset. No significant difference in symptom prevalence over time across the arms was found., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest, (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: This study assessed the effectiveness of the oral antiviral agents nirmatrelvir - ritonavir (NMV-r) and molnupiravir (MOV) for treating mild-to-moderate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients with COPD., Methods: This retrospective cohort study extracted data from the TriNetX platform and examined 94,984 COVID-19 patients with preexisting COPD from 1 January 2022, to 1 October 2023. Patients receiving NMV-r or MOV (study group) were compared with those not receiving oral antiviral agents (control group) after propensity score matching (PSM)., Results: After PSM, 7,944 patients were classified into the study and control groups. The primary composite outcome of all-cause hospitalization, or death in 30 days was reported in 458 (5.7%) patients in the study group and 566 (7.1%) patients in the control cohort, yielding a hazard ratio [HR] of 0.79 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.70-0.89; Table 2). Compared with the control group, the study group had a significantly lower risk of all-cause hospitalization (HR, 0.87; 95% CI: 0.76-0.99) and death (HR: 0.21, 95% CI: 0.13-0.35)., Conclusions: This study revealed that oral antivirals - NMV-r or MOV might improve clinical outcomes in patients with preexisting COPD and COVID-19. However, only a small proportion of preexisting COPD patients with COVID-19 received oral antiviral treatment.

Background: Digoxin is a commonly used cardiac glycoside drug in clinical practice, primarily transported by P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and susceptible to the influence of P-gp inhibitors/inducers. Concurrent administration of ritonavir and digoxin may significantly increase the plasma concentration of digoxin. Due to the narrow therapeutic window of digoxin, combined use may lead to severe toxic effects., Purpose: Utilize a Physiology-Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model to simulate and predict the impact of the interaction between ritonavir and digoxin on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of digoxin, and provide recommendations for the combined medication regimen., Methods: Using PK-Sim ® , develop individual PBPK models for ritonavir and digoxin. Simulate the exposure in a drug-drug interaction (DDI) scenario by implementing ritonavir's inhibition of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) on digoxin. Evaluate the performance of the models by comparing the predicted and observed plasma concentration-time curves and predicted versus observed PK parameter values. Finally, adjust the dosing regimen for the combined therapy based on the changes in exposure., Results: According to the model simulations, the steady-state exposure of digoxin increased by 86.5% and 90.2% for oral administration, and 80.2% and 90.2% for intravenous administration, respectively, when 0.25 mg or 0.5 mg of digoxin was administered concurrently with ritonavir. By reducing the dose of digoxin by 45% or doubling the oral administration interval, similar steady-state concentrations can be achieved compared to when the drugs are not co-administered., Conclusions: In clinical practice, the influence of drug interactions on the plasma concentration changes of digoxin within the body should be considered to ensure the safety and effectiveness of treatment., Competing Interests: Declarations. Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

This research study investigates the intricate relationship among COVID-19, maternal and infant health, and breastfeeding practices, with a specific focus on assessing the transfer of nirmatrelvir and ritonavir into human milk. Our aim is to provide critical insights to those managing COVID-19 treatment in lactating individuals. The InfantRisk Center Human Milk Biorepository contained human milk and corresponding health information for eight mother-infant dyads exposed to standard doses of maternal nirmatrelvir with ritonavir (300 mg nirmatrelvir and 100 mg ritonavir taken orally twice daily for 5 days). The primary outcomes measured were drug levels in milk using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and reporting the tolerance of the breastfed infant. Nirmatrelvir with ritonavir was measurable in all participants at a mean concentration of 33.48 ng/mL (ritonavir) and 729 ng/mL (nirmatrelvir). The estimated infant dose via milk was 0.0024 mg/kg/12 h (ritonavir) and 0.054 mg/kg/12 h (nirmatrelvir). The estimated relative infant dose was 0.19% (ritonavir) and 1.43% (nirmatrelvir) well under the standard 10% safety threshold. Among the eight infants exposed in this study, there were no reported adverse events. Nirmatrelvir with ritonavir is the recommended treatment for ambulatory COVID-19 patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 infection at high risk for progression to severe disease. Although its use is recommended in lactating women, there are no previous studies on the transfer of nirmatrelvir into human milk. The study findings endorse the current approach of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir use in lactating women and encourage healthcare providers to consider prescribing this treatment irrespective of lactation status when indicated., (© 2024 The Author(s). Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics © 2024 American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

Background: This study aimed to establish population pharmacokinetics (PPK) models of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir in critically ill Chinese patients with the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection, explore factors affecting the pharmacokinetics (PK) of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir., Methods: A total of 285 serum samples and clinical data were collected from 152 patients. The PPK models of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir were analyzed using nonlinear mixed-effect modeling (NONMEM) approach. The optimal dosing regimen for patients with different renal function was determined using Monte Carlo simulations., Results: The population typical values of apparent clearance (CL/F) and apparent volume of distribution (V/F) of nirmatrelvir were 2.26 L/h and 15.3 L, respectively. Notably, creatinine clearance (CrCL) significantly influenced the PK variation of nirmatrelvir. Monte Carlo simulations suggested that patients with mild-to-moderate renal impairment experienced a 22.0-59.9% increase in the area under the curve (AUC) when they were administered a standard dose of nirmatrelvir compared to those with normal renal function. The AUC in patients with severe renal impairment after administration of 150 mg q12h nirmatrelvir was similar to that in patients with normal renal function after administration of 300 mg q12h nirmatrelvir., Conclusions: PPK modeling and simulation provided a reference for the rational clinical application of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir in critically ill Chinese patients.

Ritonavir-boosted atazanavir (ATV/r) and rifampicin are mainstays of second-line antiretroviral and multiple anti-TB regimens, respectively. Rifampicin induces CYP3A4, a major enzyme involved in atazanavir metabolism, causing a drug-drug interaction (DDI) which might be exaggerated in pregnancy. Having demonstrated that increasing the dose of ATV/r from once daily (OD) to twice daily (BD) in non-pregnant adults can safely overcome this DDI, we developed a pregnancy physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model to explore the impact of pregnancy. Predicted pharmacokinetic parameters were validated with separate clinical datasets of ATV/r alone (NCT03923231) and rifampicin alone in pregnant women. The pregnancy model was considered validated when the absolute average fold error (AAFE) for C trough and AUC 0-24 of both drugs were <2 when comparing predicted vs. observed data. Thereafter, predicted atazanavir C trough was compared against its protein-adjusted IC 90 (14 ng/mL) when simulating the co-administration of ATV/r 300/100 mg OD and rifampicin 600 mg OD. Pregnancy was predicted to increase the rifampicin DDI effect on atazanavir. For the dosing regimens of ATV/r 300/100 mg OD, ATV/r 300/200 mg OD, and ATV/r 300/100 mg BD (all with rifampicin 600 mg OD), predicted atazanavir C trough was above 14 ng/mL in 29%, 71%, and 100%; and 32%, 73% and 100% of the population in second and third trimesters, respectively. Thus, PBPK modeling suggests ATV/r 300/100 mg BD could maintain antiviral efficacy when co-administered with rifampicin 600 mg OD in pregnancy. Clinical studies are warranted to confirm safety and efficacy in pregnancy., (© 2024 The Author(s). CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

The study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of azvudine versus nirmatrelvir-ritonavir against omicron strains of coronavirus disease 2019 infections and determine their comparative effectiveness. This retrospective study included 716 patients who received nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (NR group) or azvudine (FNC group) at Peking Union Medical College Hospital between 1 November 2022 and 27 February 2023. Patients in the FNC group (n = 304) were younger, exhibited less severe symptoms, started antiviral therapy later, received corticosteroids more frequently, and used tocilizumab less frequently than patients in the NR group (n = 412). Within 28 d of therapy, 40 (9.7%) and 20 (6.6%) deaths were in the NR and FNC groups, respectively. No differences were observed between drugs and mortality rates (odds ratio [OR] 0.78, 95% CI 0.40-1.5, P = 0.45), clinical improvement (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.79-1.3, P = 0.38), and clinical progression (OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.58-1.8, P = 0.96). More patients in the NR group experienced platelet decline than those in the FNC group (17.6% vs. 8.9%, P = 0.034). This study indicated that the effectiveness and safety of azvudine were comparable to those of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objectives: This study assessed the clinical effectiveness of the combination of nirmatrelvir and ritonavir (NMV-r) in treating nonhospitalized patients with COVID-19 who have preexisting psychiatric disorders., Methods: Patients diagnosed with COVID-19 and psychiatric disorders between 1 March 2020, and 1 December 2022, were included using the TriNetX network. The primary outcome was the composite outcome of all-cause emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalization, or death within 30 days., Results: Propensity score matching yielded two cohorts of 20,633 patients each. The composite outcome of all-cause ED visits, hospitalization, or death within 30 days was 3.57% (737 patients) in the NMV-r cohort and 5.69% (1176) in the control cohort, resulting in a reduced risk in the NMV-r cohort (HR: 0.657; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.599-0.720). The NMV-r cohort exhibited a lower risk of all-cause hospitalization (HR: 0.385; 95% CI: 0.328-0.451) and all-cause death (HR: 0.110; 95% CI: 0.053-0.228) compared with the control group., Conclusion: NMV-r could mitigate the risk of adverse outcomes in nonhospitalized patients with COVID-19 and preexisting psychiatric disorders. However, only a limited number of patients in this population received adequate treatment, thus emphasizing the importance of promoting its appropriate use.

Background: Tenofovir-containing antiretroviral therapy regimens may have long-term toxicity-related side effects. This study aimed to compare the virological efficacy of co-formulated darunavir/ritonavir plus lamivudine with darunavir/ritonavir plus tenofovir and emtricitabine or lamivudine., Methods: The ANDES study was a 48-week, phase 4, randomized, open-label, non-inferiority trial in treatment-naïve adults living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Patients were randomized on a 1:1 basis to receive a daily oral regimen of either dual therapy based on a generic co-formulation of darunavir/ritonavir (800/100 mg) plus a generic lamivudine 300 mg pill, or triple therapy with darunavir/ritonavir plus tenofovir/emtricitabine (300/200 mg) or tenofovir/lamivudine (300/300 mg). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a viral load of <50 copies/mL at week 48 in the intention-to-treat population. The US Food and Drug Administration snapshot algorithm and a non-inferiority margin of -12% were used. The secondary objective was to analyse safety in the per-protocol population. This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02770508)., Results: Between November 2015 and 31 October 2020, 336 participants were assigned at random to the triple therapy arm (n=165) or the dual therapy arm (n=171). After 48 weeks, 153 patients in the triple therapy group (93%) and 155 patients in the dual therapy group (91%) achieved virological suppression (difference -2.1%, 95% confidence interval -7.0 to 2.9). Drug-related adverse events were more common in the triple therapy group (P=0.04). Two toxicity-related events led to discontinuation in each group., Interpretation: Co-formulated darunavir/ritonavir plus lamivudine showed non-inferiority and a safer toxicity profile compared with the standard-of-care triple therapy regimen including tenofovir in treatment-naïve patients., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd and International Society of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Clinicians consider polypharmacy, comorbidities, and other factors including the potential for drug-drug interactions (DDIs) when evaluating therapeutic options for specific clinical diagnoses. Contemporary treatment for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) includes direct-acting antivirals (DAAs). We sought to characterize patients' characteristics, comorbidities, and medications received during their hospitalization for COVID-19 and quantify potential DDIs that clinicians consider in selecting appropriate DAAs., Methods: Patients hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of COVID-19 between May 2020 and December 2022 from the PINC AI Healthcare Database were identified. Medications administered during the hospitalization with the potential to cause DDIs with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, remdesivir, or molnupiravir (per the Emergency Use Authorization factsheet or package insert) were assessed. For DDIs with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, medications are categorized as "Contraindicated," "Avoid Concomitant Use," or "Other DDIs" (includes recommendation for dose modification or clinical and laboratory monitoring). For remdesivir, coadministration with chloroquine phosphate and hydroxychloroquine sulfate was not recommended. For molnupiravir, no drugs are listed as having potential DDIs. In a subset of patients, a multivariable logistic regression model was used to examine the association between documented patient/hospital characteristics and the likelihood of being "Contraindicated" to receive nirmatrelvir/ritonavir., Findings: Of the 788,238 patients hospitalized for COVID-19 in 920 hospitals, 53% were ≥ 65 years old, and 31% had Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) ≥ 3. During the study period, about half of the patients received medications categorized as "Contraindicated" (11%) and/or "Avoid Concomitant Use" (41%) with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. The frequency of administered drugs was higher in those aged ≥ 65 years (68%), CCI ≥ 3 (78%), with high-risk underlying conditions (55%). About 1% of patients received medications that were not recommended to be coadmistered with remdesivir. Among a subset of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 in 2022, those who were older, had higher CCI, high-risk underlying conditions, severe hepatic impairment, Medicare insurance, and hospitalized in larger hospitals were significantly more likely to be categorized as "Contraindicated" when considering nirmatrelvir/ritonavir as a therapeutic option to manage COVID-19., Implications: A significant proportion of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 receive medications for other conditions that have the potential to result in DDIs with DAAs; most predominantly with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, a strong CYP3A enzyme inhibitor, fewer with remdesivir, and none with molnupiravir. Higher age and comorbidity burden were significantly associated with a higher likelihood of receiving medications that are "Contraindicated" with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. In the evolving COVID-19 era, these findings provide insights into patients hospitalized for COVID-19, and the polypharmacy evaluations that clinicians may encounter when selecting among DAAs to manage COVID-19., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Summary of ICMJE forms: Essy Mozaffari is an employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. and holds stock or stock options. Aastha Chandak is an employee of Certara and declares support provided by Gilead Sciences, Inc. to her institution. Andrew Ustianowski declares consulting fees provided by Generate Biomedicines, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Merck/MSD, and Pfizer Inc. and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events, and/or participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board from Astra Zeneca, Gilead Sciences, Inc., and GSK. Christina G. Rivera declares the receipt of grant or contracts from Gilead Science, Inc. as payment to PI colleague, consulting fees and participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board from Gilead Science, Inc., and payment of honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Jobson Health, Continuing Education Network, CE Impact, Insmed, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Annenberg Center for Health Science, American College of Clinical Pharmacy, and PharmCon Healthcare Education. Neera Ahuja declares payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Gilead Sciences, Inc. Heng Jiang is an employee of Certara and declares support provided by Gilead Sciences, Inc. to his institution. Mark Berry is an employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. and holds stock or stock options. Jason F. Okulicz is an employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. and holds stock or stock options. Alpesh N. Amin is a PI or co-PI of clinical trials sponsored by NIH/NIAID, NeuroRx Pharma, Pulmotect, Blade Therapeutics, Novartis, Takeda, Humanigen, Eli Lilly, PTC Therapeutics, OctaPharma, Fulcrum Therapeutics, Alexion unrelated to this manuscript; speaker and/or consultant fees for Pfizer, Salix, Alexion, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Ferring, Seres, Spero, Eli Lilly, Nova Nordisk, Gilead, Renibus, GSK, Dexcom, Reprieve, HeartRite, and Aseptiscope; and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events for Pfizer, Salix, Alexion, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Ferring, Seres, Spero, Eli Lilly, Nova Nordisk, Gilead, Renibus, GSK, Dexcom, Reprieve, HeartRite, and Aseptiscope., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

APV20002 was a multicenter, international, open-label study that began in 2003 investigating the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of ritonavir-boosted fosamprenavir (FPV/r) oral solution (OS) in combination with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) in participants living with HIV-1 aged 4 weeks to <2 years with a primary endpoint at Week 48 (48W). Participants in APV20002 could continue in the study post-48W until FPV OS was locally available in their countries. Children were required to discontinue after reaching >39 kg or if FPV OS had no clinical benefit. Fifty-nine participants were enrolled; 5/59 received a single FPV OS visit for pharmacokinetic determinations. Most (38/54; 70%) were antiretroviral experienced; 39/59 participants had >48 weeks on treatment, 4/39 of whom discontinued after 48 weeks due to an adverse event (AE). At 48W, 88% of participants had HIV-1 RNA <400 copies/mL by Observed analysis; the proportion with HIV-1 RNA <400 copies/mL remained high (84%-100%) through Week 684. The median CD4 + cell count was 1,235 cells/mm 3 [ n = 51] at baseline, 1,690 cells/mm 3 ( n = 41) at Week 48, and 1,280 cells/mm 3 ( n = 21) at Week 180. From baseline to Week 684, 54/59 (92%) participants had ≥1 treatment-emergent AE regardless of causality; 42/59 (71%) had a treatment-emergent grade 2-4 AE, predominantly maximum toxicity: grade 2; 21/59 (36%) and 21/59 (36%) had severe or grade 3/4 AEs. From baseline to Week 684, 14/54 (26%) participants met virologic failure (VF) criteria, 9/14 before 48W. HIV from 1/9 VFs through 48W developed treatment-emergent reduced susceptibility to FPV and 1/9 to lamivudine/emtricitabine. Post-48W, 4/5 participants with VF had phenotype results; all were still susceptible to all study drugs at VF. In conclusion, FPV OS-based ART was efficacious and generally well tolerated in this long-running pediatric study through 684 weeks of treatment, with a safety profile consistent with experience in adults and older children.

Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. E. L. reports support for attending meetings and/or travel from Gilead, ViiV Healthcare, Shionogi, Correvio, Exafield, and Menarini. D. B. reports honoraria paid to author for presentations unrelated to this work from Gilead Sciences. G. P. reports consulting fees from Gilead Sciences, Merck, ViiV Healthcare, and Takeda; payment to author for lectures, presentations, speaker’s bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Gilead Sciences, Merck, ViiV Healthcare, and Takeda; and support for attending meetings and/or travel from Gilead Sciences. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.

Objectives: To describe the management of haematological patients experiencing prolonged SARS-CoV-2 viral shedding, as the optimal management strategy for this condition remains undetermined., Methods: We conducted a retrospective evaluation of our prospectively followed cohort of haematological patients treated with remdesivir for more than 10 days. Starting January 2023, upon COVID-19 diagnosis, the treatment strategy was based on symptoms and PCR cycle threshold (Ct) as follows: (i) when Ct was 25 or less or if the patient had symptoms, a course of remdesivir for at least 10 days, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir for 5 days (whenever possible) and convalescent plasma was administered; and (ii) when the patient was asymptomatic and had a PCR Ct of more than 25, when possible, a course of 5 days of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir was administered. The patient was considered to have achieved viral clearance and, thus, remdesivir was stopped, in either of these cases: (i) PCR negativity, or (ii) subgenomic RNA negativity., Results: From January to November 2023, 18 patients benefited from a safe extended remdesivir administration, resulting in detection of SARS-CoV-2 viral clearance in a median time of 3.5 weeks (IQR 2.6-3.9) (min-max 1.6-8.0). No clinical or biological side effects were detected. No patient died or needed further treatment for their COVID-19 episode., Conclusions: The extended course of remdesivir, combined with other active therapies for COVID-19 infection, was well tolerated. Cure and virus negativity were obtained in all these high-risk patients., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Ritonavir (RTV), which is used in combination with nilmatrelvir (NMV) to treat coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), inhibits cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A, thereby increasing blood tacrolimus (TAC) levels through a drug-drug interaction (DDI). We experienced a case in which a DDI between the two drugs led to markedly increased blood TAC levels, resulting in vasospastic angina (VSA) and acute kidney injury (AKI). Rifampicin (RFP) was administered to induce CYP3A and promote TAC metabolism. A 60-year-old man with dermatomyositis who was taking 3 mg/day TAC contracted COVID-19. The patient started oral NMV/RTV therapy, and he was admitted to the hospital after 4 days because of chest pain and AKI. On day 5, his blood TAC level increased markedly to 119.8 ng/mL. RFP 600 mg was administered once daily for 3 days, and his blood TAC level decreased to the therapeutic range of 9.6 ng/mL on day 9, leading to AKI improvement. Transient complete atrioventricular block and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia were present during chest pain. In the coronary spasm provocation test, complete occlusion was observed in the right coronary artery, leading to a diagnosis of VSA. VSA and AKI are possible side effects of high blood TAC levels caused by DDI, and attention should be paid to cardiovascular side effects such as VSA and AKI associated with increased blood levels of TAC when it is used together with NMV/RTV. When blood levels of TAC increase, oral RFP can rapidly decrease TAC blood levels and potentially reduce its toxicity., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Japanese Society of Chemotherapy, Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases, and Japanese Society for Infection Prevention and Control. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) has been an important tool to project safety and efficacy of novel or repurposed therapies for the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Here, we present a QSP modeling framework to predict response to antiviral therapeutics with three mechanisms of action (MoA): cell entry inhibitors, anti-replicatives, and neutralizing biologics. We parameterized three distinct model structures describing virus-host interaction by fitting to published viral kinetics data of untreated COVID-19 patients. The models were used to test theoretical behaviors and map therapeutic design criteria of the different MoAs, identifying the most rapid and robust antiviral activity from neutralizing biologic and anti-replicative MoAs. We found good agreement between model predictions and clinical viral load reduction observed with anti-replicative nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (Paxlovid®) and neutralizing biologics bamlanivimab and casirivimab/imdevimab (REGEN-COV®), building confidence in the modeling framework to inform a dose selection. Finally, the model was applied to predict antiviral response with ensovibep, a novel DARPin therapeutic designed as a neutralizing biologic. We developed a new in silico measure of antiviral activity, area under the curve (AUC) of free spike protein concentration, as a metric with larger dynamic range than viral load reduction. By benchmarking to bamlanivimab predictions, we justified dose levels of 75, 225, and 600 mg ensovibep to be administered intravenously in a Phase 2 clinical investigation. Upon trial completion, we found model predictions to be in good agreement with the observed patient data. These results demonstrate the utility of this modeling framework to guide the development of novel antiviral therapeutics., (© 2024 Biomedical Research, Novartis. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

GLS4 is a first-in-class hepatitis B virus (HBV) capsid assembly modulator (class I) that is co-administered with ritonavir to maintain the anticipated concentration required for the effective antiviral activity of GLS4. In this study, the first physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for GLS4/ritonavir was successfully developed. The predictive performance of the PBPK model was verified using data from 39 clinical studies, including single-dose, multiple-dose, food effects, and drug-drug interactions (DDI). The PBPK model accurately described the PK profiles of GLS4 and ritonavir, with predicted values closely aligning with observed data. Based on the verified GLS4/ritonavir model, it prospectively predicts the effect of hepatic impairment (HI) and DDI on its pharmacokinetics (PK). Notably, CYP3A4 inducers significantly influenced GLS4 exposure when co-administered with ritonavir; co-administered GLS4 and ritonavir significantly influenced the exposure of CYP3A4 substrates. Additionally, with the severity of HI increased, there was a corresponding increase in the exposure to GLS4 when co-administered with ritonavir. The GLS4/ritonavir PBPK model can potentially be used as an alternative to clinical studies or guide the design of clinical trial protocols., (© 2024 The Author(s). CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

Importance: There is an urgent need to identify treatments for postacute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC)., Objective: To assess the efficacy of a 15-day course of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir in reducing the severity of select PASC symptoms., Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a 15-week blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial conducted from November 2022 to September 2023 at Stanford University (California). The participants were adults with moderate to severe PASC symptoms of 3 months or longer duration., Interventions: Participants were randomized 2:1 to treatment with oral nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (NMV/r, 300 mg and 100 mg) or with placebo-ritonavir (PBO/r) twice daily for 15 days., Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcome was a pooled severity of 6 PASC symptoms (fatigue, brain fog, shortness of breath, body aches, gastrointestinal symptoms, and cardiovascular symptoms) based on a Likert scale score at 10 weeks. Secondary outcomes included symptom severity at different time points, symptom burden and relief, patient global measures, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures, orthostatic vital signs, and sit-to-stand test change from baseline., Results: Of the 155 participants (median [IQR] age, 43 [34-54] years; 92 [59%] females), 102 were randomized to the NMV/r group and 53 to the PBO/r group. Nearly all participants (n = 153) had received the primary series for COVID-19 vaccination. Mean (SD) time between index SARS-CoV-2 infection and randomization was 17.5 (9.1) months. There was no statistically significant difference in the model-derived severity outcome pooled across the 6 core symptoms at 10 weeks between the NMV/r and PBO/r groups. No statistically significant between-group differences were found at 10 weeks in the Patient Global Impression of Severity or Patient Global Impression of Change scores, summative symptom scores, and change from baseline to 10 weeks in PROMIS fatigue, dyspnea, cognitive function, and physical function measures. Adverse event rates were similar in NMV/r and PBO/r groups and mostly of low grade., Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this randomized clinical trial showed that a 15-day course of NMV/r in a population of patients with PASC was generally safe but did not demonstrate a significant benefit for improving select PASC symptoms in a mostly vaccinated cohort with protracted symptom duration. Further studies are needed to determine the role of antivirals in the treatment of PASC., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05576662.

Objectives: This study investigated the association between nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir (NMV-r) or molnupiravir and the outcomes of non-hospitalized high-risk patients with COVID-19 during Omicron XBB subvariants., Methods: The retrospective cohort study used the TriNetX US collaborative network to identify non-hospitalized high-risk adult patients with COVID-19 between 1 February 2023, and 31 August 2023. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to match patients receiving NMV-r or MOV (the study group) with those not receiving antivirals (the control group)., Results: Using PSM, two cohorts of 17,654 patients each with balanced baseline characteristics were identified. During the follow-up period, the study group had a lower risk of all-cause hospitalization, or death (3.2% [ n  = 564] versus 3.8% [ n  = 669]; HR, 0.796; 95% confidence interval [CI], 95% CI, 0.712-0.891). Compared with the control group, the study group had a significantly lower risk of all-cause hospitalization (3.1% vs. 3.4%; HR, 0.847; 95% CI, 0.754-0.950) and mortality (0.1% vs. 0.4%; HR, 0.295; 95% CI, 0.183-0.476)., Conclusion: The use of novel oral antiviral including NMV-r or MOV can be associated with a lower risk of all-cause hospitalization, or death in non-hospitalized high-risk patients with COVID-19 during Omicron XBB wave.

Background: In the UK, a regional vertical system for the delivery of COVID-19 medicines has been in place. This enabled centralization of expertise in risk stratification of patients, and in understanding and mitigating drug-drug interactions., Research Design and Methods: We analyzed real-world drug-drug interactions in adult patients referred for nirmatrelvir/ritonavir therapy across one such geographic area covering 2.2 million London citizens., Results: Among 208 who received NMV/r therapy, we identified 184 potential DDIs, 8% precluded nirmatrelvir/ritonavir use, 53% required management, but 56% of these did not have documented advice to hold therapy., Conclusions: This highlights the need to maintain and develop pathways for clinical pharmacology expertise in COVID-19 management.

Background: Molnupiravir and nirmatrelvir-ritonavir are orally administered pharmacotherapies for mild to moderate COVID-19. However, the effectiveness of these drugs among very old (≥80 years), hospitalised patients remains unclear, limiting the risk-benefit assessment of these antivirals in this specific group. This study investigates the effectiveness of these antivirals in reducing mortality among this group of hospitalised patients with COVID-19., Methods: Using a territory-wide public healthcare database in Hong Kong, a target trial emulation study was conducted with data from 13 642 eligible participants for the molnupiravir trial and 9553 for the nirmatrelvir-ritonavir trial. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Immortal time and confounding bias was minimised using cloning-censoring-weighting approach. Mortality odds ratios were estimated by pooled logistic regression after adjusting confounding biases by stabilised inverse probability weights., Results: Both molnupiravir (HR: 0.895, 95% CI: 0.826-0.970) and nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (HR: 0.804, 95% CI: 0.678-0.955) demonstrated moderate mortality risk reduction among oldest-old hospitalised patients. No significant interaction was observed between oral antiviral treatment and vaccination status. The 28-day risk of mortality was lower in initiators than non-initiators for both molnupiravir (risk difference: -1.09%, 95% CI: -2.29, 0.11) and nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (risk difference: -1.71%, 95% CI: -3.30, -0.16) trials. The effectiveness of these medications was observed regardless of the patients' prior vaccination status., Conclusions: Molnupiravir and nirmatrelvir-ritonavir are moderately effective in reducing mortality risk among hospitalised oldest-old patients with COVID-19, regardless of their vaccination status., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objective: To describe characteristics and acute clinical outcomes for patients with COVID-19 treated with sotrovimab, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir or molnupiravir, or untreated patients at highest risk per National Health Service (NHS) criteria., Methods: Retrospective study of non-hospitalized patients between 1 December 2021 and 31 May 2022, using data from the Discover-NOW dataset (North-West London). Included patients were aged ≥12 years and treated with sotrovimab, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir or molnupiravir, or untreated but expected to be eligible for early treatment per NHS highest-risk criteria. COVID-19-related and all-cause hospitalizations were reported for 28 days from COVID-19 diagnosis (index). Subgroup analyses were conducted in patients with advanced renal disease, those aged 18-64 and ≥65 years, and by period of Omicron BA.1, BA.2 and BA.5 (post-hoc exploratory) predominance., Results: Overall, 1503 treated and 4044 eligible high-risk untreated patients were included. A high proportion of patients on sotrovimab had advanced renal disease (29.3%), ≥3 high-risk comorbidities (47.6%) and were aged ≥65 years (36.9%). Five of 696 (0.7%) patients on sotrovimab, <5/337 (0.3-1.2%) on nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, 10/470 (2.1%) on molnupiravir and 114/4044 (2.8%) untreated patients were hospitalized with COVID-19. Similar results were observed across all subgroups. The proportion of patients dying within 28 days of the index period was similarly low across all cohorts (<2%)., Conclusion: Patients receiving sotrovimab appeared to show evidence of multiple high-risk comorbidities. Low hospitalization rates were observed for all treated cohorts across subgroups and periods of predominant variants of concern. These results require confirmation with comparative effectiveness analyses adjusting for differences in underlying patient characteristics.

Objectives: This study aimed to determine the association of early use of oral antiviral drugs (including nirmatrelvir-ritonavir and molnupiravir) with the risk of post COVID-19 condition (PCC) and compare the possible efficacy of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir and molnupiravir., Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane, MedRxiv, and Psycinfo were searched from inception until November 1, 2023. We included studies that assessed the effect of oral antiviral drugs on the incidence of PCC. Pairwise and network meta-analyses were conducted using a random-effects model. Risk ratios (RRs) for oral antiviral drugs were calculated with a confidence interval (CI)., Results: Nine observational studies containing 866,066 patients were included. Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir and molnupiravir were evaluated in eight and two studies respectively, with both drugs evaluated in one study. Pair-wise meta-analysis showed that early oral antiviral drugs reduced PCC risk (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.68-0.88). Network meta-analysis showed that nirmatrelvir-ritonavir may perform better than molnupiravir (surface under the cumulative ranking curve: 95.5% vs. 31.6%) at reducing PCC risk., Conclusions: Early use of oral antiviral drugs may potentially protect against developing PCC in non-hospitalized patients with COVID-19. These findings support the standardized administration of oral antiviral drugs in patients during the acute phase of COVID-19 according to the guidelines., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Backgrounds: The effectiveness of oral antiviral therapy including nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir and molnupiravir in managing COVID-19 among individuals with pre-existing lung cancer was unclear. Therefore, this study was conducted to evaluate the usefulness of antiviral agents in the management of COVID-19 among patients with lung cancer., Methods: Utilizing data from the TriNetX - a global health research network, a retrospective cohort study was conducted involving 2484 patients diagnosed with both lung cancer and COVID-19. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to create well-balanced cohorts. The study assessed the primary outcome of all-cause hospitalization or mortality within a 30-day follow-up., Results: After PSM, the oral antiviral group exhibited a significantly lower risk of the primary composite outcome compared to the control group (6.1 % vs. 9.9 %; HR: 0.60; 95 % CI: 0.45-0.80). This association was consistent across various subgroups according to age, sex, vaccine status, type of oral antiviral agent, and lung cancer characteristics. Additionally, the oral antiviral group showed a lower risk of all-cause hospitalization (HR: 0.73; 95 % CI: 0.54-0.99) and a significantly lower risk of mortality (HR: 0.16; 95 % CI: 0.06-0.41)., Conclusion: The study suggests a favorable impact of oral antiviral therapy on the outcomes of COVID-19 in individuals with lung cancer and support the potential utility of oral antiviral agents in improving outcomes in this vulnerable population., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: This study examined the effectiveness of nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir (NMV-r) and molnupiravir (MOV) in treating COVID-19 among chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients., Methods: This retrospective cohort study, using the TriNetX research network, identified stage 3-5 CKD and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients with non-hospitalized COVID-19 between 1 January 2022, and 31 May 2023. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to compare patients on NMV-r or MOV (antiviral group) against those not receiving these treatments (control group). The primary composite outcome was the cumulative hazard ratio (HR) for all-cause hospitalization or death within the 30-day follow-up., Results: After PSM, two balanced cohorts of 6,275 patients each were established. The antiviral group exhibited a lower incidence of all-cause hospitalization or mortality (5.93% vs. 9.53%; HR: 0.626; 95% CI: 0.550-0.713) than controls. Additionally, antiviral recipients were associated with a lower risk of all-cause hospitalization (HR: 0.679; 95% CI: 0.594-0.777) and mortality (HR: 0.338; 95% CI: 0.227-0.504). The beneficial effects of antiviral agents were consistent across sex, age, vaccination status, antiviral type, and CKD stage., Conclusion: Oral antiviral agents could be associated with lower rates of all-cause hospitalization or death among non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients with CKD.

Background: The pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) characteristics of nirmatrelvir (NMV) are unknown in Chinese patients with COVID-19., Objectives: To understand the PK, as well as PK-PD characteristics of NMV for optimizing the dose in Chinese patients with COVID-19., Methods: We enrolled 141 participants who received NMV 300 mg/ritonavir (RTV) 100 mg b.i.d. for 5 days. The NMV concentrations were analyzed using 251 blood samples. PK/PD of NMV was investigated in these COVID-19 patients using a nonlinear mixed-effects model., Results: The patients had a mean age of 82 years (range, 34-97). The absorption rate constant and apparent clearance of NMV in this Chinese cohort were 0.253 h -1 and 6.83 L/h, respectively, similar to Caucasian patients. No covariates affected NMV clearance. Predicted peak (C max ) and trough concentration (C min ) under 300 mg NMV/100 mg RTV b.i.d. were 4004 and 1498 ng/mL, respectively. Although higher AUC and C min were weakly associated with a slight increase in the number of cycle threshold (CT) of viral genes, no significant correlation was found, indicating a weak relationship between drug exposure and efficacy (CT)., Conclusions: In all, our findings suggest no ethnic PK differences, a weak and clinically insignificant relationship between drug exposure and efficacy, suitable dosage for Chinese patients (including the elderly) based on PK parameters, and the need for further studies to determine optimal regimens for high-risk patients due to inter-individual variability., (© 2024 Société Française de Pharmacologie et de Thérapeutique. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Among adults at risk for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the lowest hospitalization rate was among those who received nirmatrelvir-ritonavir after 3 or more messenger RNA vaccine doses (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.22; 95% confidence interval, .19-.24). Eligible adults, including those previously vaccinated, should be considered for COVID-19 antiviral treatment., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest . B. J., S. S., E. B., M. P., J. D., D. S., and J. L. G. report being employed by Epic Systems Corporation. J. D. reports stock or stock options from Epic Systems. D. S. reports stock or stock options, privately held, part of employer compensation, from Epic Systems Corporation. All remaining authors: No reported conflicts of interest. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America 2024.)

Background: Clinical trials of treatments for coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) have not shown a significant benefit of postexposure prophylaxis., Methods: We conducted a phase 2-3 double-blind trial to assess the efficacy and safety of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir in asymptomatic, rapid antigen test-negative adults who had been exposed to a household contact with Covid-19 within 96 hours before randomization. The participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (300 mg of nirmatrelvir and 100 mg of ritonavir) every 12 hours for 5 days or for 10 days or matching placebo for 5 or 10 days. The primary end point was the development of symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) infection, confirmed on reverse-transcriptase-polymerase-chain-reaction (RT-PCR) or rapid antigen testing, through 14 days in participants who had a negative RT-PCR test at baseline., Results: A total of 2736 participants were randomly assigned to a trial group - 921 to the 5-day nirmatrelvir-ritonavir group, 917 to the 10-day nirmatrelvir-ritonavir group, and 898 to the placebo group. Symptomatic, confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection developed by day 14 in 2.6% of the participants in the 5-day nirmatrelvir-ritonavir group, 2.4% of those in the 10-day nirmatrelvir-ritonavir group, and 3.9% of those in the placebo group. In each nirmatrelvir-ritonavir group, the percentage of participants in whom symptomatic, confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection developed did not differ significantly from that in the placebo group, with risk reductions relative to placebo of 29.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], -16.7 to 57.8; P = 0.17) in the 5-day nirmatrelvir-ritonavir group and 35.5% (95% CI, -11.5 to 62.7; P = 0.12) in the 10-day nirmatrelvir-ritonavir group. The incidence of adverse events was similar across the trial groups, with dysgeusia being the most frequently reported adverse event (in 5.9% and 6.8% of the participants in the 5-day and 10-day nirmatrelvir-ritonavir groups, respectively, and in 0.7% of those in the placebo group)., Conclusions: In this placebo-controlled trial, postexposure prophylaxis with nirmatrelvir-ritonavir for 5 or 10 days did not significantly reduce the risk of symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. (Funded by Pfizer; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05047601.)., (Copyright © 2024 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Purpose: Immunocompromised individuals, such as those diagnosed with cancer, are at a significantly higher risk for severe illness and mortality when infected with SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) than the general population. Two oral antiviral treatments are approved for COVID-19: Paxlovid® (nirmatrelvir/ritonavir) and Lagevrio® (molnupiravir). There is a paucity of data regarding the benefit from these antivirals among immunocompromised patients with cancer, and recent studies have questioned their efficacy among vaccinated patients, even those with risk factors for severe COVID-19., Methods: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir in preventing severe illness and death using our database of 457 patients with cancer and COVID-19 from Brown University-affiliated hospitals., Results: Sixty-seven patients received nirmatrelvir/ritonavir or molnupiravir and were compared to 45 concurrent controls who received no antiviral treatment despite being eligible to receive it. Administration of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir or molnupiravir was associated with improved survival and lower 90-day all-cause and COVID-19-attributed mortality (p < 0.05) and with lower peak O 2 requirements (ordinal odds ratio [OR] 1.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92-2.56)., Conclusion: Acknowledging the small size of our sample as a limitation, we concluded that early antiviral treatment might be beneficial to immunocompromised individuals, particularly those with cancer, when infected with SARS-CoV-2. Larger-scale, well-stratified studies are needed in this patient population., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Immunocompromised patients with hematologic malignancies, particularly those treated with anti-CD20 antibodies such as rituximab and obinutuzumab, are known to be at risk of prolonged infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Prolonged administration or combination therapy with antiviral medications reportedly yields favorable outcomes in these patients. However, knowledge regarding the adverse events associated with such therapeutic approaches is limited. Herein, we report a case of acute acalculous cholecystitis (AAC) following extended administration of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NMV/r) in a 68-year-old Japanese man with persistent SARS-CoV-2 infection. The patient had received obinutuzumab and bendamustine for follicular lymphoma and was diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) approximately one year after treatment initiation with these drugs. Subsequently, he was admitted to a different hospital, where he received antiviral drugs, monoclonal antibodies, and steroids. Despite these interventions, the patient relapsed and was subsequently transferred to our hospital due to persistent SARS-CoV-2 infection. Remdesivir administration was ineffective, leading to the initiation of extended NMV/r therapy. One week later, he exhibited elevated gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) levels, and one month later, he developed AAC. Cholecystitis was successfully resolved via percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage and administration of antibiotics. We speculate that extended NMV/r administration, in addition to COVID-19, may have contributed to the elevated GGT and AAC. During treatment of persistent SARS-CoV-2 infection with extended NMV/r therapy, patients should be carefully monitored for the appearance of findings suggestive of biliary stasis and the development of AAC., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None., (Copyright © 2024 Japanese Society of Chemotherapy, Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases, and Japanese Society for Infection Prevention and Control. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: This study aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (Paxlovid) and sotrovimab for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)., Methods: A search was conducted on PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science to explore relevant studies from January 2021 to November 2023. The risk of bias in the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool. Data analysis was conducted using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software (version 3.0)., Results: Fifteen retrospective studies involving 13, 306 patients were included. The meta-analysis revealed no significant difference between the nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and sotrovimab groups in terms of mortality rate (odds ratio [OR] = 0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.28 to 1.38), hospitalization rate (OR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.48 to 1.22), death or hospitalization rate (OR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.51 to 1.10), and intensive unit care admission (OR = 1.97, 95% CI: 0.38 to 10.07). In terms of safety, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir was associated with a higher incidence of adverse events (OR = 3.44, 95% CI: 1.29 to 9.17)., Conclusions: The meta-analysis showed that nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and sotrovimab have similar effectiveness in treating COVID-19 patients. However, the certainty of evidence supporting these findings is low. High-quality research is needed to better compare these interventions in COVID-19.

Background: Randomised comparative data on efficacy and safety of second-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) after failure of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) across diverse geographical settings are scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate optimal second-line ART for people with HIV., Methods: D 2 EFT is a completed international, randomised, open-label, phase 3b/4 trial evaluating three second-line ART strategies in adults (aged ≥18 years) with HIV-1 for whom first-line NNRTI therapy has failed. The study was done at 28 sites across 14 countries in Asia, Africa, and Latin America. It was originally designed to compare recommended standard of care (ritonavir-boosted darunavir [800 mg darunavir plus 100 mg ritonavir once daily] plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors [NRTIs; dosed once or twice daily]) with a novel nucleoside sparing regimen of dolutegravir (50 mg once daily) with ritonavir-boosted darunavir. The study was adapted during the first year to add a third arm of dolutegravir (50 mg once daily) with fixed tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (300 mg once daily) plus either lamivudine (300 mg once daily) or emtricitabine (200 mg once daily). Participants were randomly assigned with a computer-generated, blocked randomisation scheme (block size of two) stratified by site, previous tenofovir disoproxil fumarate use, and HIV viral load. The trial was designed to evaluate non-inferiority of either interventional arm against standard of care for the primary outcome of virological suppression, as determined by HIV RNA load of less than 50 copies per mL at 48 weeks. The prespecified non-inferiority margin was 12%. Comparisons were made with a modified intention-to-treat population, including all participants randomly assigned but excluding administrative withdrawals. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03017872., Findings: 1190 individuals were screened; 828 participants were enrolled between Nov 1, 2017, and Dec 31, 2021. Two participants were unable to receive their assigned regimen for administrative reasons; and 826 participants were included in analyses. Median age was 39 years (IQR 33-46), and 450 (54%) participants were female. Baseline median CD4 count was 206 cells per μL (23-354) and median HIV RNA was 15 400 copies per mL (3600-65 986). The proportion of participants with HIV RNA of less than 50 copies per mL at 48 weeks was 194 (75%) of 257 in the ritonavir-boosted darunavir plus two NRTIs group, 222 (84%) of 264 in the ritonavir-boosted darunavir plus dolutegravir group, and 227 (78%) of 291 in the dolutegravir with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate plus either lamivudine or emtricitabine group. Compared with ritonavir-boosted darunavir plus two NRTIs, the difference in virological suppression was 8·6% (95% CI 1·7 to 15·5; p=0·016) for dolutegravir plus ritonavir-boosted darunavir and 6·7% (-1·2 to 14·4; p=0·093) for dolutegravir with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate plus either lamivudine or emtricitabine. Six deaths occurred, none of which were related to treatment. 19 pregnancies (11 livebirths) occurred with no congenital defects., Interpretation: In individuals experiencing failure of an NNRTI-based first-line ART, a switch to either dolutegravir plus ritonavir-boosted darunavir or dolutegravir with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate plus either lamivudine or emtricitabine, without universal access to genotyping, was non-inferior in achieving viral suppression compared with ritonavir-boosted darunavir plus two NRTIs. These global data support the most recent WHO treatment guidelines., Funding: UNITAID; National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, USA; National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia; ViiV Healthcare; and Janssen., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests GVM, AK, SE, MNP, and MHL received support for the present manuscript from Janssen and ViiV Healthcare, paid to their institution. GVM, AK, and SE received support for the present manuscript from Unitaid, paid to their institution. GVM received support for the present manuscript from the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), paid to their institution. MHL received support for the present manuscript from Gilead, paid to their institution. AK received grants or contracts from the Medical Research Future Fund, NHMRC, NIH, and Biotron, paid to their institution; consulting fees from Merck, paid to their institution; support for attending meetings or travel from the HIV Netherlands Australia Thailand Research Collaboration, Keystone conferences, the New South Wales (NSW) Government, and NSW Office for Health and Medical Research, paid to their institution; patent planned issues or pending (PCT/AU2023/050918), with no renumeration; has acted as Chair of the ASCOT data and safety monitoring board, with no renumeration; and is the Director and Chair of Scientia Clinical Research Phase I Unit Board, with no renumeration. ML received fees from Certa Therapeutics for participation on a data safety monitoring board. GVM and MHL have participated on an advisory board for ViiV Healthcare and Gilead. NK received research grants from NIH, WHO, Indian Council of Medical Research, University of New South Wales, Unitaid, Massachusetts General Hospital—Harvard University, and TREAT Asia–The Foundation for AIDS Research for the conduct of research. DB is an employee of ViiV Healthcare and holds GSK stock options. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Purpose: An oral docetaxel formulation boosted by the Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3 A inhibitor ritonavir, ModraDoc006/r, is currently under clinical investigation. Based on clinical data, the incidence of grade 1-2 diarrhea is increased with this oral docetaxel formulation compared to the conventional intravenous administration. Loperamide, a frequently used diarrhea inhibitor, could be added to the regimen as symptomatic treatment. However, loperamide is also a substrate of the CYP3A enzyme, which could result in competition between ritonavir and loperamide for this protein. Therefore, we were interested in the impact of coadministered loperamide on the pharmacokinetics of ritonavir-boosted oral docetaxel., Methods: We administered loperamide simultaneously or with an 8-hour delay to humanized CYP3A4 mice (with expression in liver and intestine) receiving oral ritonavir and docetaxel. Concentrations of docetaxel, ritonavir, loperamide and two of its active metabolites were measured., Results: The plasma exposure (AUC and C max ) of docetaxel was not altered during loperamide treatment, nor were the ritonavir plasma pharmacokinetics. However, the hepatic and intestinal dispositions of ritonavir were somewhat changed in the simultaneous, but not 8-hour loperamide treatment groups, possibly due to loperamide-induced delayed drug absorption. The pharmacokinetics of loperamide itself did not seem to be influenced by ritonavir., Conclusion: These results suggest that delayed loperamide administration can be added to ritonavir-boosted oral docetaxel treatment, without affecting the overall systemic exposure of docetaxel., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)