Search

Current dogma suggests increased dietary roughage may improve calf health at the expense of performance during receiving. In experiment 1, the effects of increasing dietary roughage on performance and clinical health of high-risk heifers was evaluated over a 56-d receiving period. Heifers (n  = 589; initial body weight; BW  = 230 ± 33 kg) were sourced from Oklahoma livestock auctions from April through October of 2019. Heifers were randomly assigned to pens, which were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 experimental dietary treatments in a randomized complete block design. Diets contained either: 1) 15% roughage (R15), 2) 30% roughage (R30), or 3) 45% roughage (R45) in the form of prairie hay. Orthogonal contrasts were used to test for linear and quadratic responses among experimental treatments. There was a linear decrease in overall average daily gain (ADG ; P  ≤ 0.0001) with increasing roughage inclusion which resulted in a linear decrease (P  ≤ 0.0001) in heifer final BW. A linear increase (P  ≤ 0.01) was observed for overall dry matter intake (DMI), and overall gain:feed (G:F) decreased linearly (P  ≤ 0.0001) as dietary roughage concentration increased. A quadratic response to decreasing roughage was observed (P  = 0.02) for the percent of calves treated three times for bovine respiratory disease (BRD). No other responses (P  ≥ 0.11) were detected in animal health variables. In experiment 2, Angus steers (n  = 12) and heifers (n  = 6; BW = 272 ± 28 kg) were acquired from a single ranch in Oklahoma to evaluate the same experimental dietary treatments on serum metabolite concentrations. Animals were randomly assigned to experimental treatments, with animal serving as the experimental unit in experiment 2. Statistical models for serum metabolites in experiment 2 were analyzed using repeated measures with the effects of treatment, time, and treatment × time. In experiment 2, there were tendencies for treatment × time interactions for blood urea nitrogen (BUN ; P  = 0.07) and nonesterified fatty acid (NEFA ; P  = 0.06) concentrations. No metabolites were affected by treatment (P  ≥ 0.11), while all metabolites were impacted by time (P  ≤ 0.02). In summary, growth performance was improved in calves as dietary roughage concentration decreased with minimal impacts on health and serum metabolites. These results suggest that diets containing as little as 15% roughage can be used during receiving to improve calf performance without compromising calf health when fibrous byproducts are included in the diet. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In recent years, substantial progress has been made in understanding the sources of biological variation and genetic components of feed efficiency in growing animals consuming energy-dense mixed diets during the post-weaning phase. Much less is known about within-animal variation of feed efficiency for beef cows consuming moderate to low-quality forage diets common to most cow/calf production systems. Considerable evidence indicates the existence of a genetic by environment interaction for feed efficiency. Phenotype for feed intake and feed efficiency are most practically and cost effectively determined during the post-weaning growing stage. However, due to the additional nutrient sinks associated with gestation and lactation, and the cost, labor and technology required to measure economically relevant traits in mature cows, little is known about forage utilization efficiency in beef cows. The beef cow/calf segment of the industry represents, by far, the greatest opportunity to reduce beef production input costs and reduce the industry's carbon footprint. We reason that selection tools for feed intake and feed efficiency developed over the last 20 years are effective for the post-weaning growing and finishing phases, although only marginally effective for beef cows consuming unprocessed, moderate to low-quality forage. In this session, we will discuss challenges, opportunities, and experiences associated with measuring forage intake and recovered energy in beef cows. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Our objectives were to 1) determine diet selection of goats and cattle grazing woody plant-encroached tallgrass prairie, and, 2) determine the effect of the presence of goats on cattle diet selection. In 2019, pastures (n = 6) were allocated to 1 of 2 experimental grazing treatments. Pastures (n = 3) grazed by cattle only (crossbred Angus yearling heifers) were moderately grazed year-round at 4.2 ha per heifer. Pastures (n = 3) grazed by cattle (similar heifers) and goats (Boer x Spanish crossbred mature does) were moderately grazed year-round at 4.7 ha per heifer and 2.3 ha per goat simultaneously. Each pasture was burned in 6 patches (2 patches per year) to facilitate range management objectives. Every 35 d from May 2022 until June 2023, fecal samples were collected from all animals and stored frozen and later composited into 2 composites per animal species per pasture. Composites were then analyzed by a commercial lab with DNA barcoding and high-throughput sequencing. For statistical analysis, the top 50 Exact Sequence Variants (ESVs), representing species of forage, across all treatments were used for analysis. Each ESV was georeferenced to eliminate plants that did not grow in the study area, and assigned to a representative functional group: graminoid, forb, legume, and woody plant. Analysis of variance and Tukey's post-hoc separation of estimated marginal means were performed to assess the effects of season, grazer species, and the interaction. The interaction of season and grazer species was significant (P < 0.01) for the percentage of diet selected from each functional group of plants. As expected, goats selected a greater percentage of their diet as woody plants in summer (57%) and winter (74%) compared with cattle (27%). Cattle selected more grass in winter (34%) than goats (11%). Goats selected more forbs in spring (33%) than cattle (10%). However, goats selected a lesser percentage of their diet as legumes in summer (16%) than cattle (58%), which was unexpected. Overall, these results indicate that both species of grazers select a diverse diet from these diverse pastures, and selection is dynamic over time. Goat presence in a pasture does not seem to drastically alter cattle selection, actually complementing cattle in these pastures where goats can be used to target species cattle do not prefer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objective was to compare whole cottonseed (WCS) with a more traditional supplement (20% breeder cube; BC) to determine the impacts on animal performance, metabolites, and methane emissions in beef cows. Cows (n = 24) were assigned to 1 of 2 experimental treatments (BC vs. WCS) based on age and body weight (BW). Supplements were fed individually at 0.9, 1.8, or 2.7 kg per day, resulting in 12 animals per supplement treatment and 4 animals per supplementation level within treatment. Two additional cows served as negative controls. Cows were fed 4 days per week, with supplementation levels being prorated at 1.6, 3.2, and 4.8 kg per feeding. Data collection occurred in 28-day intervals through d 84, with a final collection on d 99 after all cows finished calving. An amount fed per d × d interaction for BW change (P = 0.001) was detected. Cattle that were not supplemented (control) or received 0.9 kg per day lost more BW than cows that received 1.8 or 2.7 kg of supplement per day. There was a body condition score (BCS) change interaction for amount fed per d × d (P = 0.009). There was an amount fed per d × d interaction for back fat thickness (BFT; P = 0.02), and a tendency for an effect of amount fed per day on BFT (P = 0.07). There was a tendency for an amount fed per d × d interaction for fecal score (FS; P = 0.09) indicating that cattle receiving different amounts of supplement had varying trends in FS over time. A day effect was also observed for fecal score (P = 0.00003). There were no interactions (P = 0.55), effect of treatment (P = 0.85), or effect of amount fed per d (P = 0.45) for fecal pH. A treatment × amount fed per d × d interaction for plasma glucose concentrations (P = 0.04) was detected. An amount fed per d × d interaction was detected for plasma lactate concentrations (P = 0.01) indicating that cattle receiving different amounts of supplement had different trends in lactate concentrations over time. An effect of amount fed per d on plasma lactate concentrations (P = 0.05) was also observed. A tendency for an amount fed per d × d interaction for plasma urea nitrogen (PUN; P = 0.06) was observed indicating that cattle receiving different amounts of supplement had varying trends in PUN over time. No treatment effect on methane emissions was observed between cows consuming BC and WCS (P = 0.68). This experiment suggests that the supplementation of BC or WCS had minimal impacts on performance, metabolites, or methane emissions, but some interactions existed between supplementation source or level and day. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Four years of feedlot performance and carcass characteristics were pooled on spring-(SPRING) and fall-(FALL) born steers (n=460) into a mixed model to evaluate the effects of calving season, sire breed (Angus [AN], Charolais [CHAR] or Hereford [HER]) and their interaction on feedlot performance and carcass traits. Initial and final BW, DOF, ADG, DMI, and G:F were evaluated as performance measures and HCW, YG, FT, REA, and MS were collected at harvest. There was no season by breed interaction for entry or final BW (P >0.05). SPRING steers (400.2 kg, 686.4 kg) weighed more than FALL (350.9 kg, 668.3 kg) upon entering and leaving the feedyard (P< 0.001). CHAR weighed 14.3 kg less than AN upon feedlot entry (P=0.01) although final BW did not differ by breed (P >0.05). SPRING steers (21.8 kg/d) consumed more feed than FALL steers (18.8 kg/d; P=0.002), but there was no difference in gain:feed due to calving season nor sire breed (P=0.575). A calving season by sire breed interaction was present for ADG and DOF (P=0.014). FALL AN (1.70 kg/d) and FALL HER (1.80 kg/d) gained more than FALL CHAR (1.55 kg/d;P< 0.001) and FALL AN were fed over a shorter period than FALL CHAR and FALL HER (P=0.006). However, average daily gain of SPRING calves did not differ by breed (P >0.05). There was a tendency for FALL (400.9 kg) steers to have lighter carcasses than SPRING steers (407.9 kg; P=0.068). HER carcasses were 18.0 kg heavier than AN carcasses (P< 0.001), but did not differ from CHAR (P=0.13). CHAR had larger REA (93.5 cm2) than both AN (87.7 cm2) and HER steers (88.5 cm2;P=0.001). Fall-born steers had less YG than spring-born steers (P< 0.042). Feedlot performance was generally less for fall-born steers finished during the winter months. Under these conditions, numerous performance and carcass traits were influenced by the interaction of breed and season. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Two experiments (EXP1 and EXP2) evaluated the effects of NutraGen (NG) on calf health following exposure to bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) on d -3 and Mannheimia haemolytica (Mh) infection on d 0. For each EXP, steers (BW = 251 ± 38.2 kg) were randomly allocated to 1 of 3 treatments (TRT). Treatments included a placebo (CON; EXP1 n = 5; EXP2 n = 5), a placebo fed from d -18 to d -3 followed by NG fed from d -3 to d 28 (CHLG; EXP1 n = 5; EXP2 n = 6), and NG fed from d -18 to d 28 (PREC; EXP1 n = 6; EXP2 n = 5). There was no treatment by time interaction (TRT×TME) or TRT effect for rectal temperatures (RT) or clinical scores (CS) in EXP1 or CS in EXP2 (P = 0.26). There was a TRT×TME for respiration rates (RR) during the first 24 h following Mh infection (P = 0.04), and a tendency for a TRT effect from d -3 to d 14, and overall in EXP1 (P ≥ 0.10). There was a tendency for a TRT×TME for RT from d -3 to d 14 in EXP2 (P = 0.04). There was a TRT effect for RR from d -3 to d 14 and overall in EXP2 (P ≥ 0.05). There was a TRT×TME for leukocytes during the first 24 h following Mh infection in EXP1 (P = 0.03) and overall in both EXP (P ≥ 0.001). There was no TRT×TME or TRT effect for neutrophils (NEU), lymphocytes (LYM), or NEU:LYM in EXP1 (P = 0.19); however, there were multiple TRT×TME and TRT effects for NEU, LYM, and NEU:LYM in EXP2 (P ≥ 0.05). These experiments suggest that NG has the potential to alter clinical and cellular responses during a bovine respiratory disease challenge. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objective of this study was to determine the relative effects of stocker-phase implant strategies on growth and carcass characteristics of beef steers. In each of 2 locations (OK and MS), steers were grazed on cool-season annual pastures in fall 2018 through spring 2019. Steers (n = 300 in MS, n = 240 in OK) were randomly assigned to one of three implant treatments, 1) a single Synovex® One Grass implant at d 0, 2) a single Component® TE-G with Tylan implant at d 0, or 3) a reimplant treatment receiving Component® TE-G with Tylan at d 0 and again at d 82 (OK) or 85 (MS). Steers from each treatment were commingled in 2 (OK) or 3 (MS) pastures for 159 (OK) or 161 d (MS). Following grazing, steers were shipped to a commercial feedyard for finishing, sorted into 3 pens based on BW with each treatment equally represented in each pen, and were managed according to that site's BMPs. Steers from all treatments were implanted identically in the feedyard. Steers were slaughtered when the pen was visually estimated to be at 1 cm backfat. Carcass data of individuals were collected by camera grading equipment in the packing plant. Data were analyzed as a completely random design with animal as the experimental unit, treatment as a fixed effect, and pasture within location as a random effect. Marbling score tended to be greater in the single Component® TE-G with Tylan (treatment 2) vs. the other 2 treatments (425 vs 408 and 410, P = 0.07). No other production variables, including stocker-phase ADG, approached a significant difference (P > 0.39). No evidence was found to recommend stocker-phase reimplanting even in relatively long stocker phases with high ADG, and producers should consider selecting the most cost-effective implant at grazing initiation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Two experiments were conducted to evaluate the effects of virtual fencing on stress in beef cattle. In both experiments, cattle were contained by either physical, 2-strand electric fencing or by use of a proprietary, GPS-based virtual fencing collar, with no physical interior fencing. In both studies, hair from the tail switch was collected at the end of the experiment, and analyzed for cortisol concentration to measure the accumulated stress experienced by the cattle. Additionally, a subset of cattle were fitted with pedometers to measure behavior responses. In the initial pilot experiment, 55 heifers were grazed for 28 d in either 1 physically-fenced pasture or 1 virtually-fenced pasture. In the second experiment, 59 mature cows and heifers were grazed for 56 d in 1 of 2 physically-fenced or 1 of 2 virtually-fenced pastures (4 pastures total). In the second experiment, blood samples were also collected and NEFA and lactate were quantified in plasma. Only descriptive statistics were summarized for the pilot experiment, which indicated that hair cortisol concentrations were within published ranges for both fence types (0.39 ± 0.32 and 0.37 ± 0.15 pg/mg for physically- or virtually-fenced animals, respectively), and step count and motion index appeared elevated in the first few days of adaptation to virtual fence. The second experiment was analyzed with analysis of variance as a completely random design with pasture as the experimental unit. No effect of fence type was found for behavior (number of steps, standing time, lying bouts, or motion index; P > 0.16). Further, no difference was observed in cortisol, lactate nor NEFA (P > 0.14) concentrations due to fence type. None of this data suggests that virtual fencing is different from physical fencing in the effects on cattle stress and behavior, indicating further research and development of virtual fencing technology are warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

New technologies have enabled autonomous measurement of intake and feeding behavior of pen-fed animals and this has piqued interest in utilizing similar technologies in grazing experiments. Various feeding systems are currently available, but individual supplementation and feeding experiments have been conducted for years using individual feeding stanchions, which are the lowest level of technology for measuring supplement intake. These experiments are laborious as they require animals to be trained and acclimated, gathered at each feeding, and sorted into individual stalls for supplementation--thereby disrupting the animals grazing activities. In the mid-1980s Calan Gate systems (American Calan; Northwood, NH) became popular in pasture supplementation experiments, but still have many of the same disadvantages. Newer, more automated systems, reduce labor and possibly have less disruption of the animal's grazing behavior, but are reliant on the animal's willingness to use the system and ability to access it when more dominant peers are present. Individuals also do not always follow the "averages"-based rules we often hold true and behave differently in groups. Recent research with automatic feeders show steers consumed average of 60% of the potential supplement with supplement intake CVs of 50 to 100%. These technologies lead many to question the paradigm of experimental units in experimental designs. The experimental unit is defined as the smallest independently assigned unit to which the treatment is applied. This definition of experimental unit is somewhat limiting when taken to the extreme, but still applies well for experiments utilizing individual animal feeding, regardless of the level of technology involved. In many cases where the aforementioned technologies are used, the individual animal can be both the observational and experimental unit. This symposia presentation will discuss attributes of different feeding options and the implications on study design, experimental power, and the designated experimental unit. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]