Search

Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum‐graecum) is a widely grown dietary herb in Asia, and its seeds are traditionally used for several diseases, including diabetes. The seeds and leaves possess a variety of compounds that play an important role in regulating their hypoglycemic effect. However, so far, no extensive systematic review exists on its antidiabetic effect, highlighting the molecular mechanisms and isolated compounds. The purpose of this review is to summarize the preclinical and clinical antidiabetic properties of fenugreek and its isolated compounds by focusing on underlying mechanisms. PubMed, Google Scholar, Science Direct, and Scopus databases were searched to retrieve articles until June, 2024. Preclinical studies demonstrated that the antidiabetic effect of fenugreek was mostly associated with enhanced glucose transporter type‐4 (GLUT4) translocation and hexokinase activity, decreased glucose‐6‐phosphatase and fructose‐1,6‐bisphosphatase activities, inhibited α‐amylase and maltase activities, protected β cells, and increased insulin release. Furthermore, few studies have reported its role as a glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) modulator, 5′‐AMP‐activated kinase (AMPK) activator, and dipeptidyl peptidase‐IV (DPP‐IV) inhibitor. Further clinical trials showed that fenugreek seeds improved blood glucose levels, insulin resistance, insulin sensitivity, and lipid profiles. This study highlights significant evidence of the antidiabetic effect of fenugreek and its isolated compounds; therefore, it could be a potential therapy for diabetes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Globally, the prevalence of breast cancer (BC) is increasing at an alarming level, despite early detection and technological improvements. Alkaloids are diverse chemical groups, and many within this class have been reported as potential anticancer compounds. Chabamide F (F) and chabamide G (G) are two dimeric amide alkaloids found in a traditional medicinal plant, Piper chaba, and possess significant cytotoxic effects. However, their scientific rationalization in BC remains unknown. Here, we aimed to investigate their potential and molecular mechanisms for BC through in silico approaches. From network pharmacology, we identified 64 BC-related genes as targets. GO and KEGG studies showed that they were involved in various biological processes and mostly expressed in BC-related pathways such as RAS, PI3K-AKT, estrogen, MAPK, and FoxO pathways. However, PPI analysis revealed SRC and AKT1 as hub genes, which play key roles in BC tumorigenesis and metastasis. Molecular docking revealed the strong binding affinity of F (− 10.7 kcal/mol) and G (− 9.4 and − 11.7 kcal/mol) for SRC and AKT1, respectively, as well as the acquisition of vital residues to inhibit them. Their long-term stability was evaluated using 200 ns molecular dynamics simulation. The RMSD, RMSF, Rg, and SASA analyses showed that the G-SRC and G-AKT1 complexes were excellently stable compared to the control, dasatinib, and capivasertib, respectively. Additionally, the PCA and DCCM analyses revealed a significant reduction in the residual correlation and motions. By contrast, the stability of the F-SRC complex was greater than that of the control, whereas it was moderately stable in complex with AKT1. The MMPBSA analysis demonstrated higher binding energies for both compounds than the controls. In particular, the binding energy of G for SRC and AKT1 was − 120.671 ± 16.997 and − 130.437 ± 19.111 kJ/mol, respectively, which was approximately twice as high as the control molecules. Van der Waal and polar solvation energies significantly contributed to this energy. Furthermore, both of them exhibited significant interactions with the binding site residues of both proteins. In summary, this study indicates that these two molecules could be a potential ATP-competitive inhibitor of SRC and an allosteric inhibitor of AKT1. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]