Search

Background— Although best practices have been developed for achieving door-to-needle (DTN) times ≤60 minutes for stroke thrombolysis, critical DTN process failures persist. We sought to compare these failures in the Emergency Department at an academic medical center and a community hospital. Methods and Results— Failure modes effects and criticality analysis was used to identify system and process failures. Multidisciplinary teams involved in DTN care participated in moderated sessions at each site. As a result, DTN process maps were created and potential failures and their causes, frequency, severity, and existing safeguards were identified. For each failure, a risk priority number and criticality score were calculated; failures were then ranked, with the highest scores representing the most critical failures and targets for intervention. We detected a total of 70 failures in 50 process steps and 76 failures in 42 process steps at the community hospital and academic medical center, respectively. At the community hospital, critical failures included (1) delay in registration because of Emergency Department overcrowding, (2) incorrect triage diagnosis among walk-in patients, and (3) delay in obtaining consent for thrombolytic treatment. At the academic medical center, critical failures included (1) incorrect triage diagnosis among walk-in patients, (2) delay in stroke team activation, and (3) delay in obtaining computed tomographic imaging. Conclusions— Although the identification of common critical failures suggests opportunities for a generalizable process redesign, differences in the criticality and nature of failures must be addressed at the individual hospital level, to develop robust and sustainable solutions to reduce DTN time.

An unintended consequence of rapid thrombolysis may be more frequent treatment of stroke mimics, nonvascular conditions that simulate stroke. We explored the relationship between door-to-needle (DTN) times and thrombolysis of stroke mimics at a single academic center by analyzing consecutive quartiles of patients who were treated with IV tissue plasminogen activator for suspected stroke from January 1, 2010 to February 28, 2014. An increase in the proportion of stroke mimic patients (6.7% in each of the 1st and 2nd, 12.9% in the 3rd, and 30% in the last consecutive case quartile; p = 0.03) and a decrease in median DTN time from 89 to 56 minutes (p < 0.01) was found. As more centers reduce DTN times, the rates of stroke mimic treatment should be carefully monitored.

Introduction: National guidelines endorse that eligible acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients should be treated with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV tPA) within 60 minutes of arrival to an emergency department (ED). We participated in the American Heart Association’s Target: Stroke program which successfully reduced door to needle (DTN) times through 10 best practices, but academic hospitals face a unique challenge as junior residents evaluate and manage AIS patients. We hypothesized that a “stroke boot camp” could improve resident efficiency during stroke codes and shorten DTN times through faster stroke code to tPA times. Methods: A neurology resident educational protocol was developed and implemented in April 2013 using a Socratic case-based discussion to emphasize focused history and exam, medication history, and tPA exclusion criteria. We distributed cards with IV tPA risks/benefits and a checklist for tPA exclusion criteria. We compared pre-intervention (January 2010-April 2013) to post-intervention (April 2013-April 2014) patient demographics, comorbidities, resident level, relevant times, and outcomes using appropriate tests. Results: We analyzed 122 consecutive AIS patients treated with IV tPA in our ED during the study period. Pre and post intervention groups did not differ by demographics except gender (p = 0.005). There were no difference in comorbidities, baseline NIHSS, or resident post graduate year (PGY). After the intervention, stroke-code-to-tPA was significantly reduced (75 min vs. 45 min; p < 0.001), whereas door-to-stroke-code (7 min vs. 6 min, p = 0.56) and door-to-CT (18 min vs. 19 min, p = 0.44) did not change. The proportion of patients treated within 60 minutes increased (16.4% vs. 51.4%, P < 0.001) and median DTN time decreased (81 min vs. 60 min P < 0.001) significantly after the intervention. Time reductions were consistent across PGY levels without increased adverse outcomes. Conclusion: Reduction in stroke code-to-tPA times after implementation of a “stroke boot camp” led to a significant reduction in DTN time. Focused neurology resident acute stroke education should be implemented at academic institutions to improve rapid IV tPA administration