Search

Diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN) can be classified based on fiber diameter into three subtypes: small fiber neuropathy (SFN), large fiber neuropathy (LFN), and mixed fiber neuropathy (MFN). We examined the effect of different diagnostic models on the frequency of polyneuropathy subtypes in type 2 diabetes patients with DPN. This study was based on patients from the Danish Center for Strategic Research in Type 2 Diabetes cohort. We defined DPN as probable or definite DPN according to the Toronto Consensus Criteria. DPN was then subtyped according to four distinct diagnostic models. A total of 277 diabetes patients (214 with DPN and 63 with no DPN) were included in the study. We found a considerable variation in polyneuropathy subtypes by applying different diagnostic models independent of the degree of certainty of DPN diagnosis. For probable and definite DPN, the frequency of subtypes across diagnostic models varied from: 1.4% to 13.1% for SFN, 9.3% to 21.5% for LFN, 51.4% to 83.2% for MFN, and 0.5% to 14.5% for non-classifiable neuropathy (NCN). For the definite DPN group, the frequency of subtypes varied from: 1.6% to 13.5% for SFN, 5.6% to 20.6% for LFN, 61.9% to 89.7% for MFN, and 0.0% to 6.3% for NCN. The frequency of polyneuropathy subtypes depends on the type and number of criteria applied in a diagnostic model. Future consensus criteria should clearly define sensory functions to be tested, methods of testing, and how findings should be interpreted for both clinical practice and research purpose., (© 2020 Peripheral Nerve Society.)

Objectives: Chronic inflammatory axonal polyneuropathy (CIAP) is defined on the basis of the clinical, electrophysiological and nerve biopsy findings and therapeutic responses of 'immunotherapy responding chronic axonal polyneuropathy (IR-CAP)'., Methods: The diagnosis of IR-CAP was made when all of three of the following mandatory criterion were met: (1) acquired, chronic progressive or relapsing symmetrical or asymmetrical polyneuropathy with duration of progression >2 months; (2) electrophysiological evidence of axonal neuropathy in at least two nerves without any evidence of 'strict criteria of demyelination'; and (3) definite responsiveness to immunotherapy., Results: Thirty-three patients with IR-CAP showed similar clinical features of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) except 'motor neuropathy subtype'. High spinal fluid protein was found in 27/32 (78%) cases. 'Inflammatory axonal neuropathy' was proven in 14 (45%) of 31 sural nerve biopsies., Discussions: IR-CAP could well be 'axonal CIDP' in view of clinical similarity, but not proven as yet. Thus, IR-CAP is best described as CIAP, a distinct entity that deserves its recognition in view of responsiveness to immunotherapy., Conclusion: Diagnosis of CIAP can be made by additional documentation of 'inflammation' by high spinal fluid protein or nerve biopsy in addition to the first two diagnostic criteria of IR-CAP., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

ICU-acquired weakness (ICUAW), including critical illness polyneuropathy, critical illness myopathy, and critical illness polyneuropathy and myopathy, is a frequent disabling disorder in ICU subjects. Research has predominantly been performed by intensivists, whose efforts have permitted the diagnosis of ICUAW early during an ICU stay and understanding of several of the pathophysiological and clinical aspects of this disorder. Despite important progress, the therapeutic strategies are unsatisfactory and issues such as functional outcomes and long-term recovery remain unclear. Studies involving multiple specialists should be planned to better differentiate the ICUAW types and provide proper functional outcome measures and follow-up. A more strict collaboration among specialists interested in ICUAW, in particular physiatrists, is desirable to plan proper care pathways after ICU discharge and to better meet the health needs of subjects with ICUAW.

The aim of this paper was to define an unexplained non-classified polyneuropathy condition as a new neurological disease. This new diagnosis of occupation related polyneuropathy has been named as "WORKING HAND SYNDROME (WHS)."This study collected and compared clinic and electrophysiological analyze data from healthy controls, WHS patients, carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) patients and polyneuropathy patients. The WHS patients presented to the clinic with pain, numbness, tingling, and burning sensations in their hands that increased significantly during rest and nighttime. However, there was no weakness in the muscles, and the deep tendon reflexes were normal in this disease. The patients had all been working in physically demanding jobs requiring the use of their hands/arms for at least 1 year, but no vibrating tools were used by the patients. All of the cases were men. I supposed that overload caused by an action repeated chronically by the hand/arm may impair the sensory nerves in mentioned hand/arm. In patients with these complaints, for a definitive diagnosis, similar diseases must be excluded. Nonetheless, the specific electrophysiological finding that the sural nerves are normal on the lower sides, as well as the occurrence of sensory axonal polyneuropathy in the sensory nerves without a significant effect on velocity and latency in the work-ups of the upper extremity are enough to make a diagnosis.In conclusion, WHS has been defined as a polyneuropathy and occupational disease. Patients with WHS present with pain, numbness, tingling, and burning sensations in their hands that increases significantly during rest and nighttime. They also use their arms/hands for jobs that require heavy labor. The neurological examinations of patients with WHS are normal. Only the sensory nerves in the upper extremities are affected. This article is suggested to serve as a resource for patients, health care professionals, and members of the neurology community at large.

Introduction: The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic usefulness of skin punch biopsies with emphasis on visualization and quantification of T-cells and macrophages in patients with polyneuropathies., Methods: We quantified inflammatory cells in skin samples (lower leg, upper thigh) in 187 patients and compared data with counts in their sural nerve biopsies and with skin biopsies from 32 healthy volunteers., Results: Vessel-bound T-cells and macrophages were increased in proximal and distal skin samples of neuropathy patients compared with controls (P < 0.001 in both). Patients with vasculitic neuropathy had increased T-cell and macrophage counts in distal skin compared with controls (P < 0.01; for scattered macrophages/mm 2 diagnostic sensitivity 71% and specificity 79%). In patients with vasculitic neuropathy, distal skin perivascular inflammatory cell counts also correlated with those in sural nerve biopsies (P < 0.001)., Conclusion: Neuropathy per se may lead to skin inflammation. In cases of possible vasculitic neuropathy, skin biopsy may be an additional tool to support the diagnosis. Muscle Nerve 55: 884-893, 2017., (© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Nonsystemic vasculitic neuropathy (NSVN) is an under-recognized single-organ vasculitis of peripheral nerves that can only be diagnosed with a nerve biopsy. A Peripheral Nerve Society guideline group published consensus recommendations on the classification, diagnosis and treatment of NSVN in 2010, and new diagnostic criteria for vasculitic neuropathy were developed by the Brighton Collaboration in 2015. In this Review, we provide an update on the classification, diagnosis and treatment of NSVN. NSVN subtypes include Wartenberg migratory sensory neuropathy and postsurgical inflammatory neuropathy. Variants include diabetic radiculoplexus neuropathy and - arguably - neuralgic amyotrophy. NSVN with proximal involvement is sometimes termed nondiabetic lumbosacral radiculoplexus neuropathy. Cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa and other skin-nerve vasculitides overlap with NSVN clinically. Three patterns of involvement in NSVN have been identified: multifocal neuropathy, distal symmetric polyneuropathy, and overlapping multifocal neuropathy (asymmetric polyneuropathy). These patterns lack standard definitions, resulting in inconsistencies between studies. We propose definitions and provide an up-to-date differential diagnosis of multifocal neuropathy. Available evidence suggests that NSVN and neuropathy-predominant systemic vasculitis might be controlled better by treatment with corticosteroids and an immunosuppressive agent than with corticosteroids alone. Treated NSVN rarely spreads to other organs, but 30% of patients experience a relapse. Long-term neurological outcome is favourable, but chronic pain is common.

Objective: Ultrasound differentiation of neuropathies is a great challenge. We, therefore, suggest a standardized score to operationalize differentiation between several acute and subacute onset neuropathies., Method: We retrospectively analyzed the ultrasound data of 61 patients with acute or subacute neuropathies, e.g. chronic immune-mediated neuropathies, Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), and axonal/vasculitic neuropathies. We compared these data to 28 healthy controls. Based on these results an ultrasound pattern sum score (UPSS) with three sub-scores (UPS-A for the sensorimotor nerves, UPS-B for the cervical roots and the vagal nerve and UPS-C for the sural nerve) was developed. Afterwards, the applicability of the score was prospectively validated in 10 patients with chronic neuropathies and in 14 patients with unknown acute and subacute PNP before performing additional tests., Results: UPS-A and UPSS were significantly higher in CIDP than in other neuropathies and controls (p<0.001). UPS-B was significantly more often pathologic in GBS than in CIDP and other neuropathies (p<0.001). Using receiver operation characteristics curve analysis boundary values for each score were defined. Positive predictive value (PPV) of these scores for CIDP and GBS was >85%. Vasculitic neuropathies showed an intermediate type of UPSS compared to other axonal neuropathies (p<0.001). In the prospective application the pattern score could be used with good accuracy in several types of neuropathy., Conclusion: UPS-A and UPSS operationalize to diagnose acute and subacute-onset CIDP and its variants with high sensitivity, specificity, and PPV. An increased UPS-B with normal UPSS and other sub scores may point to the diagnosis of GBS with high PPV and enables the differentiation from CIDP., Significance: Using the UPSS and its sub-scores gives a new diagnostic power to the method of the peripheral nerve ultrasound., (Copyright © 2015 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)