Search

Background Ganaplacide, also known as KAF156, is among the new antimalarial drug candidates that have successfully reached Phase III clinical trials, and is proposed in combination with lumefantrine. This combination could replace the current front-line artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) in case of Plasmodium falciparum resistance to both artemisinins and partner drugs. Indeed, the African continent, where the malaria burden is the highest, is currently experiencing worrying multiple emergences and spread of artemisinin resistance, which urges for the exploration of the antiparasitic properties of KAF156 in this context. Objectives and methods The objectives of this work were firstly to evaluate the risk of cross-resistance between artemisinins and KAF156 alone, and in combination with lumefantrine, using a panel of artemisinin-resistant strains carrying different pfk13 mutations and markers of other antiplasmodial drug resistances; secondly to explore in vitro the relevance of combining KAF156 and lumefantrine with artemisinins, based on the model of triple ACTs. Results Our results highlighted that KAF156 activity was not impaired by mutations in pfk13 , pfcrt , pfmdr1 , pfmdr2 , pfdhps and pfdhfr genes or by pfmdr1 amplification. Moreover, we demonstrated that KAF156 alone and in combination with lumefantrine was active against artemisinin-resistant parasites, including when they are quiescent. Conclusions All these in vitro results evidence that multi-drug resistant parasites currently in circulation in the field might not affect KAF156 efficacy, and are encouraging signs for KAF156 use in a triple ACT to preserve the use of artemisinins for as long as possible. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The use of artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs), which combine an artemisinin derivative with a partner drug, in the treatment of uncomplicated malaria has largely been responsible for the significant reduction in malaria-related mortality in tropical and subtropical regions. ACTs have also played a significant role in the 18% decline in the incidence of malaria cases from 2010 to 2016. However, this progress is seriously threatened by the reduced clinical efficacy of artemisinins, which is characterised by delayed parasitic clearance and a high rate of recrudescence, as reported in 2008 in Western Cambodia. Resistance to artemisinins has already spread to several countries in Southeast Asia. Furthermore, resistance to partner drugs has been shown in some instances to be facilitated by pre-existing decreased susceptibility to the artemisinin component of the ACT. A major concern is not only the spread of these multidrug-resistant parasites to the rest of Asia but also their possible appearance in Sub-Saharan Africa, the continent most affected by malaria, as has been the case in the past with parasite resistance to other antimalarial treatments. It is therefore essential to understand the acquisition of resistance to artemisinins by Plasmodium falciparum to adapt malaria treatment policies and to propose new therapeutic solutions.

Background: Owing to the emergence of multiresistant Plasmodium falciparum parasites in Southeast Asia, along with the impressive decrease in the efficacy of the endoperoxide compound artemisinin and of artemisinin-based combination therapies, the development of novel antimalarial drugs or combinations is required. Although several antiplasmodial molecules, such as endoperoxide-based compounds, are in advanced research or development, we do not know whether resistance to artemisinin derivatives might impact the efficacy of these new compounds.Objectives: To address this issue, the antiplasmodial efficacy of trioxaquines, hybrid endoperoxide-based molecules, was explored, along with their ability to select in vitro resistant parasites under discontinuous and dose-escalating drug pressure.Methods: The in vitro susceptibilities of artemisinin- and trioxaquine-resistant laboratory strains and recent Cambodian field isolates were evaluated by different phenotypic and genotypic assays.Results: Trioxaquines tested presented strong cross-resistance with artemisinin both in the artemisinin-resistant laboratory F32-ART5 line and in Cambodian field isolates. Trioxaquine drug pressure over 4 years led to the in vitro selection of the F32-DU line, which is resistant to trioxaquine and artemisinin, similar to the F32-ART lineage. F32-DU whole genome sequencing (WGS) revealed that resistance to trioxaquine was associated with the same non-synonymous mutation in the propeller domain of the K13 protein (M476I) that was found in the F32-ART lineage.Conclusions: These worrisome results indicate the risk of cross-resistance between artemisinins and endoperoxide-based antiplasmodial drugs in the development of the K13 mutant parasites and question the usefulness of these molecules in the future therapeutic arsenal. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]