Search

Introduction: Whilst rarely researched, the authenticity with which Objective Structured Clinical Exams (OSCEs) simulate practice is arguably critical to making valid judgements about candidates' preparedness to progress in their training. We studied how and why an OSCE gave rise to different experiences of authenticity for different participants under different circumstances. Methods: We used Realist evaluation, collecting data through interviews/focus groups from participants across four UK medical schools who participated in an OSCE which aimed to enhance authenticity. Results: Several features of OSCE stations (realistic, complex, complete cases, sufficient time, autonomy, props, guidelines, limited examiner interaction etc) combined to enable students to project into their future roles, judge and integrate information, consider their actions and act naturally. When this occurred, their performances felt like an authentic representation of their clinical practice. This didn't work all the time: focusing on unavoidable differences with practice, incongruous features, anxiety and preoccupation with examiners' expectations sometimes disrupted immersion, producing inauthenticity. Conclusions: The perception of authenticity in OSCEs appears to originate from an interaction of station design with individual preferences and contextual expectations. Whilst tentatively suggesting ways to promote authenticity, more understanding is needed of candidates' interaction with simulation and scenario immersion in summative assessment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The psychiatric interview serves as the cornerstone of psychiatric practice. It is therefore essential that we find effective ways of teaching students how to conduct a psychiatric interview. The present paper arises from two faculty members at Memorial University of Newfoundland and Labrador considering how to improve the quality of teaching of the psychiatric interview to preclerkship undergraduate medical students, before they begin the clinical portion of their training. The interview is taught in discrete pieces initially (e.g., discussing confidentiality, screening for suicidal ideation, taking a history for depressive disorders, etc.) before being assembled into a whole interview. The sessions are led by psychiatrists and residents who play the role of the patient. They use prewritten cases but can improvise to challenge or direct the students. Students receive real time feedback. The flexibility allows for students to repeat and vary their approach in response to feedback. Anonymous course evaluations showed improvement in student satisfaction with the new psychiatry clinical skills teaching. Prior to implementing the new approach student satisfaction was at 3.9/5. With the new method scores improved to 4.7/5 and 4.5/5 in the following two years. Clinical skills OSCE scores remained stable with modest improvement following implementation. The class average was 8.5 in the year prior to implementation and were 9.1, 8.6 and 8.8 in the years following. As a side benefit, the approach lent itself well to being delivered remotely so it continued to function well during the disruption resulting from COVID-19. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Effective clinical communication skills are essential for dietitians as it impacts patient outcomes and satisfaction across diverse clinical and public healthcare settings. Despite its importance as a core competency, many dietetics programs, including those in Taiwan, need to provide sufficient training in this area. This study aimed to develop and assess a scenario-based simulation course to improve communication skills in dietetic students. Methods: A non-randomized control group pretest–posttest design was used. The intervention consisted of a 12-week scenario-based simulation communication course divided into three units employing diverse teaching methods. One hundred nineteen third-year dietetic students from two universities were enrolled through convenience sampling, with 59 students in the experimental group and 60 in the control group. The experimental group participated in the course intervention, whereas the control group received no clinical communication skills training. Effectiveness was assessed by comparing participants' self-assessment of communication skills and Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) scores before and after the intervention and collecting feedback on learning satisfaction. Data were analyzed using paired t-tests and ANCOVA. Results: The results showed that the post-test scores of the experimental group were significantly higher than those of the control group in terms of self-assessed clinical communication confidence, self-efficacy, and competence after controlling for pre-test scores. In the experimental group, the post-test OSCE scores were significantly higher than the pre-test scores, except for one item related to the nutrition assessment of diabetes. The intervention course's average learning satisfaction score was above 4.4 (out of 5 points). Conclusions: This course effectively enhanced dietetic students' clinical communication confidence, self-efficacy, and communication skills. These results can provide a reference for integrating clinical communication courses into undergraduate dietetics curricula. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The technical development of ultrasound devices based on silicon chips has revolutionized ultrasound examinations, leading to the implementation of these portable handheld devices (PUD) in different medical fields. However, training on these devices is necessary to assure appropriate use and ensure valid results. While training programs for the use of conventional standard ultrasound devices (SUD) have been described, no training program for these handheld devices has been developed thus far. Methods: A training program for obstetric ultrasound examination was modified through the addition of an extra module focusing on the use of these PUDs. After the module the students had to attend an OSCE in which their skills of using the PUD and the SUD were tested and analyzed by applying the agreement rate, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland–Altman plots. Furthermore, the students' ultrasound results were compared with those of trained physicians by employing the one-sample Student's t-test. After the OSCE, the students answered a survey regarding their experience and their expected use of these devices. Result: An agreement of one hundred percent was reached for basic parameters such as fetal position, placental position, fetal heartbeat and for the classification of the amniotic fluid. The ICC showed a good to moderate agreement between the results of fetal biometry achieved by SUD and PUD. The T-test results confirmed a high reliability between the physicians' results and the students' results, independent of the used device. The students remarked a good handling of the ultrasound devices and supported the use in their future specialties. Discussion: The reliability between the examinations using the SUD and PUD were high but lower than the results observed for trained physicians. Therefore, the implementation of an additional module for portable ultrasound teaches the students to reliably examine basic obstetric parameters and provides a solid basis for further training and improvement of ultrasound skills in use of PUD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVES: This study investigates the differences between in-person versus virtual format of an advanced communication skills OSCE through thematic analyses of post-OSCE debrief transcripts. METHODS: Two cohorts of senior medical students participated in either a 2019 in-person or 2021 virtual advanced communication skills OSCE. Students were grouped in triads and rotated through three of five possible cases. Afterwards, students participated in a faculty-led debrief (in-person in 2019, virtual in 2021). Inductive thematic analysis was used to compare the themes and the ratio of comments related to the themes were compared between the virtual and in-person OSCEs. RESULTS: Thematic analyses for both in-person and virtual OSCEs identified the same four major themes (Case Review, Emotional Response, Feedback, and Reflection) and 11 subthemes. However, the ratio of comments related to Case Review was lower in the virtual OSCE compared to in-person (P <.0001). Analysis of subthemes within Case Review revealed the percentage of comments was higher for Content and lower for Challenges in the virtual OSCE compared to in-person (both P <.0001). There were no differences in the ratios of comments related to Emotional Response, Feedback, and Reflection, or their subthemes. CONCLUSION: A virtual advanced communications skills OSCE for medical students showed identical qualitative themes to that from a prior in-person OSCE. However, students in the virtual OSCE focused more on matter-of-fact discussions about case content and less about the challenges they experienced. The findings suggest that some medical students may struggle with experiential learning in the virtual format, and have difficulty accessing or practicing their reflective observation skills based on Kolb's learning theory. Differences may be attributable to the additional cognitive load in the virtual setting, inadequate structural safeguards, and/or other limitations of virtual communication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AbstractPurposeMaterials and methodsResultsConclusionsTrial RegistrationObjective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is a stressful exam assessing medical competencies. Stress coping strategies are expected to enhance students’ performance during OSCE. The objective was to determine the effect of short preventive coping interventions on performance of medical students.Double-blinded, randomized controlled trial with multiple arms and a superiority hypothesis. Enrolment was proposed to each fourth-year undergraduate medical student convened to the Lyon Est University OSCE in 2022. There was no exclusion criterion. Students were randomized to one of four groups: standardized breathing with cardiac biofeedback (BFB), mindfulness-based intervention (MBI), positive psychology intervention (PPI), or control (CTRL). Each intervention was video-guided, lasted six minutes, and occurred just before starting the OSCE. The primary outcome was the academic OSCE score, assessed through specific grids by university examiners blinded to the interventions. Secondary outcomes included specific performance scores, and student perception of the influence of the intervention on their performance.A total of 482 students were included. No difference was found between BFB (−0.17 [95%CI, −1.20 to 0.86], p = .749), MBI (0.32 [95%CI, −0.71 to 1.36], p = .540), or PPI groups (−0.25 [95%CI, −1.29 to 0.79], p = .637) on the academic OSCE score compared to the control group, nor regarding the specific performance scores. Compared to the control group, the students perceived that the intervention influenced more positively their performance (BFB +3 [95%CI, 0–8]), p < .001; MBI +4 [95%CI, 1–9], p = .040; PPI +1 [95%CI, 0–4], p = .040]).A single six-minute cardiac biofeedback, mindfulness, or positive psychology intervention performed by fourth-year medical students just before an OSCE did not improve their following academic performance. Still, students reported that the interventions helped them to enhance their performance. Future research should aim to further explore the perception of intervention on performance and potential long-term effects for students.The study protocol was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05393219. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Workplace violence disproportionately affects healthcare workers and verbal aggression from patients frequently occurs. While verbal de-escalation is the first-line approach to defusing anger, there is a lack of consistent curricula or robust evaluation in undergraduate medical education. Aim: To develop a medical school curriculum focused on de-escalation skills for adult patients and evaluate effectiveness with surveys and an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Setting: We implemented this curriculum in the "Get Ready for Residency Bootcamp" of a single large academic institution in 2023. Participants: Forty-four fourth-year medical students Program Description: The curriculum consisted of an interactive didactic focused on our novel CALMER framework that prioritized six evidence-based de-escalation skills and a separate standardized patient practice session. Program Evaluation: The post-curriculum survey (82% response rate) found a significant increase from 2.79 to 4.11 out of 5 (p ≤ 0.001) in confidence using verbal de-escalation. Preparedness improved with every skill and curriculum satisfaction averaged 4.79 out of 5. The OSCE found no differences in skill level between students who received the curriculum and those who did not. Discussion: This evidence-based and replicable de-escalation skill curriculum improves medical student confidence and preparedness in managing agitated patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article is devoted to the analysis of the understanding of the police (police functions) in the standards of the Council of Europe. Particular attention is paid to the fact that the police (police functions) are understood taking into account the dynamic changes that occur in the globalized world and are associated with new manifestations of crime. It is noted that the understanding of the place of the police in the system of bodies of the modern state is affected by new trends in the management sphere, which demonstrate the requirements of transparency, efficiency and depoliticization for police structures established by law. The understanding of «police activity as a public service» is defined in the following way: «The main duties of the police are to maintain public peace and order; protect the fundamental rights and freedoms of the individual, especially life; prevent and detect crimes; reduce the level of fear; and provide assistance and services to the public.» Progress towards a democratic basis for policing is achieved when there is a shift "from a control-oriented to a service-oriented approach", where the main focus of law enforcement agencies is on active crime prevention. The OSCE Strategic Concept on the elimination of threats posed by criminal activities names the following types of such activities, organized crime, in particular, the OSCE promotes specialized training in the field of criminal prosecution for law enforcement agencies and other elements of the criminal justice system, including with a view to expanding the range of methods that have proven effective in cases related to organized crime, in particular, promoting policing strategies aimed at the early detection of radicalism and violent extremism, as well as at the deradicalization and reintegration of militant extremists into society, illicit drugs and chemical precursors (development of effective and comprehensive strategies to combat drug smuggling and diversion of chemical precursors, trafficking in human beings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract The psychiatric interview serves as the cornerstone of psychiatric practice. It is therefore essential that we find effective ways of teaching students how to conduct a psychiatric interview. The present paper arises from two faculty members at Memorial University of Newfoundland and Labrador considering how to improve the quality of teaching of the psychiatric interview to preclerkship undergraduate medical students, before they begin the clinical portion of their training. The interview is taught in discrete pieces initially (e.g., discussing confidentiality, screening for suicidal ideation, taking a history for depressive disorders, etc.) before being assembled into a whole interview. The sessions are led by psychiatrists and residents who play the role of the patient. They use prewritten cases but can improvise to challenge or direct the students. Students receive real time feedback. The flexibility allows for students to repeat and vary their approach in response to feedback. Anonymous course evaluations showed improvement in student satisfaction with the new psychiatry clinical skills teaching. Prior to implementing the new approach student satisfaction was at 3.9/5. With the new method scores improved to 4.7/5 and 4.5/5 in the following two years. Clinical skills OSCE scores remained stable with modest improvement following implementation. The class average was 8.5 in the year prior to implementation and were 9.1, 8.6 and 8.8 in the years following. As a side benefit, the approach lent itself well to being delivered remotely so it continued to function well during the disruption resulting from COVID-19.

Abstract Background Effective clinical communication skills are essential for dietitians as it impacts patient outcomes and satisfaction across diverse clinical and public healthcare settings. Despite its importance as a core competency, many dietetics programs, including those in Taiwan, need to provide sufficient training in this area. This study aimed to develop and assess a scenario-based simulation course to improve communication skills in dietetic students. Methods A non-randomized control group pretest–posttest design was used. The intervention consisted of a 12-week scenario-based simulation communication course divided into three units employing diverse teaching methods. One hundred nineteen third-year dietetic students from two universities were enrolled through convenience sampling, with 59 students in the experimental group and 60 in the control group. The experimental group participated in the course intervention, whereas the control group received no clinical communication skills training. Effectiveness was assessed by comparing participants' self-assessment of communication skills and Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) scores before and after the intervention and collecting feedback on learning satisfaction. Data were analyzed using paired t-tests and ANCOVA. Results The results showed that the post-test scores of the experimental group were significantly higher than those of the control group in terms of self-assessed clinical communication confidence, self-efficacy, and competence after controlling for pre-test scores. In the experimental group, the post-test OSCE scores were significantly higher than the pre-test scores, except for one item related to the nutrition assessment of diabetes. The intervention course's average learning satisfaction score was above 4.4 (out of 5 points). Conclusions This course effectively enhanced dietetic students’ clinical communication confidence, self-efficacy, and communication skills. These results can provide a reference for integrating clinical communication courses into undergraduate dietetics curricula.

Background: The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is a commonly used method for assessing clinical skills among nursing students. However, it often induces anxiety, which can impact student performance. This study aims to examine the effect of a simulated OSCE (MOCK OSCE) on reducing test anxiety and improving performance in nursing students during the OSCE.Method: This quasi-experimental study was conducted on 65 first-year nursing students at Aligudarz Nursing School during the 2023-2024 academic years. Using a census sampling method, students were randomly assigned to two groups: an intervention group, which participated in a MOCK OSCE program (including test scenarios, feedback, and practical exercises), and a control group, which continued with the regular curriculum. Test anxiety was measured before and after the intervention using the Sarason Test Anxiety Scale, and OSCE performance scores were evaluated with standardized checklists. Data were analyzed with paired t-tests, independent t-tests, and ANOVA using SPSS version 23.Results: The results showed a significant decrease in test anxiety scores within the intervention group before and after the simulated OSCE (p

Abstract Background Clinical education is a significant part of medical education, and paying attention to clinical evaluation is important. One of the challenges in the teaching-learning process is evaluating students’ performance. Learners, as the main stakeholders of the educational system, may have different experiences of evaluation quality. Awareness of these experiences is effective in improving the quality of clinical evaluation. Therefore, this study was conducted to “explore the experiences of nursing students for evaluation of professional competence by using the objective structured clinical examination (OSCE)”. Method This study was conducted with a qualitative descriptive research approach and conventional content analysis method in 2022–2024. The participants included 12 undergraduate nursing students at Maragheh University of Medical Sciences, who were selected by purposeful sampling, and their experiences were collected using semi-structured and in-depth interviews until reaching data saturation. Results The data analysis of the interviews led to the extraction of 268 primary codes, 7 subcategories, 2 categories, and 1 theme: “Credibility and stability”. The category “Exam’s accuracy in measuring competence " included 3 sub-categories: “Challenges in objective adaptation “, " Communication and organizational challenges for exam preparation " and " Inadequate simulation of stations and exam environment “, and the category " Exam power for repeatability” included 4 sub-categories: " Characteristics of the students “, " Lack of evaluators’ skills and mastery “, " Inefficiency of the evaluation tool " and " Disturbance in executive affairs”. Conclusions OSCE can be used in self-evaluation, creating motivation and strengthening different dimensions of students’ learning, as well as discovering weaknesses and strengths for planning by managers and faculties. According to the results of this study, many factors such as management before and during the exam, characteristics of the evaluators, prevailing educational conditions in the faculty, and the method of clinical training are effective in achieving the “reliability and sustainability” required in the OSCE.

Abstract Background Casper, an online open-response situational judgement test that assesses social intelligence and professionalism [1], is used in admissions to health professions programs. Method This study (1) explored the incremental validity of Casper over grade point average (GPA) for predicting student performance on objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) and fieldwork placements within an occupational therapy program, (2) examined optimal weighting of Casper in GPA in admissions decisions using non-linear optimization and regression tree analysis to find the weights associated with the highest average competency scores, and (3) investigated whether Casper could be used to impact the diversity of a cohort selected for admission to the program. Results Multiple regression analysis results indicate that Casper improves the prediction of OSCE and fieldwork performance over and above GPA (change in Adj. R2 = 3.2%). Non-linear optimization and regression tree analysis indicate the optimal weights of GPA and Casper for predicting performance across fieldwork placements are 0.16 and 0.84, respectively. Furthermore, the findings suggest that students with a slightly lower GPA (e.g., 3.5–3.6) could be successful in the program as assessed by fieldwork, which is considered to be the strongest indicator of success as an entry-level clinician. In terms of diversity, no statistically significant differences were found between those actually admitted and those who would have been admitted using Casper. Conclusion These results constitute preliminary validity evidence supporting the integration of Casper into applicant selection in an occupational therapy graduate program.

Abstract Background Screen-based simulation is a cost-effective educational modality that allows nursing students to comfortably acquire new skills as they become accustomed to digital environments. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a screen-based simulation tool in enhancing knowledge and skills related to medication administration and dosage calculation in nursing students. Methods This multicenter, single-blind, stratified, randomized controlled trial initially enrolled 480 nursing students. The 351 students eligibles were randomly allocated to two groups. Using a screen-based simulation tool (SIMDOSE®), the intervention group was trained in drug administration and dosage calculation through four perfusion clinical cases. The control group underwent the same training content using the paper-and-pencil method. knowledge and skills acquisition, Students’ satisfaction, self-confidence and anxiety were analyzed using Jamovi software (version 2.3.18). Results 4 out of 5 main variables examined were significantly different, specifically in dosage calculation, where the simulation group excelled both in the knowledge post-test (post – pre = 1.00 (20%); p = 0.004) and in the objective structured clinical examination (p = 0.013). The intervention group reported higher levels of satisfaction and self-confidence than the control group (p

Introduction: The Competency-Based Medical Education (CBME) curriculum, implemented in August 2019, emphasizes a comprehensive approach to learning, integrating cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains. To address the limitations of traditional assessment methods, the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) was introduced to reduce the bias. OSCE is now widely adopted as a gold standard for evaluating clinical skills due to its structured, objective approach and ability to minimize bias. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the perceptions of MBBS fourth-year students regarding the OSCE in General Surgery at Al-Ameen Medical College. Materials and Methods: Conducted over six months, this cross-sectional study involved 144 out of 149 MBBS fourth-year students who participated in an OSCE consisting of six stations: two history-taking, two clinical examination, one with a simulated patient, one with a mannequin, one skill station, and one communication station. Students completed a questionnaire via Google Forms following the OSCE. Responses were recorded on a 5-point Likert scale and analysed using Microsoft Excel, with quantitative data expressed as means and standard deviations, and qualitative data as frequencies and percentages. Statistical significance was assessed using t-tests, with p

Abstract Background The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is a crucial assessment tool for evaluating learners’ ability to apply theoretical knowledge in practical clinical situations. It is widely accepted by both students and educators, and the costs associated with conducting OSCE assessments vary depending on the field of study, how it is implemented, staffing needs, standardized patients, and duration of the examination. This study examines the expenses related to administering OSCEs in medical universities. Method Conducted from June to September 2023; this mixed-method study elucidated the cost intricacies of executing a two-day OSCE with 14 eight-minute stations for 100 nursing students. This process unfolds in two phases: a qualitative segment comprising text reviews and 45-minute in-depth interviews with faculty members and OSCE experts, leading to the development of a validated checklist, followed by a quantitative phase in which the tool was distributed to 25 faculty members and 5 specialists for completion. Result The examination costs were delineated into three primary components: time, human resources, equipment, consumables, and necessary supplies. In 2023, the total implementation cost of the OSCE for 100 students across 14 clinical stations was $1028.07, with an estimated per-learner cost of $37.50. Human resources incurred the highest expenditure ($1649.37); while supply costs were relatively lower ($1072.17). Educational infrastructure expenses were excluded because the study focused on the Nursing and Midwifery Faculty’s Clinical Skills Center. Conclusion Various factors influence OSCE costs, including national production capabilities of medical supplies, institutional credibility, governance status, examination frequency, student demographics, assessor composition, station count, course content, and examinee volume. The insights derived from this comprehensive examination are significant as entry benchmarks for healthcare systems and higher-level academic evaluations. Understanding OSCE cost dynamics facilitates resource optimization and assessment strategy refinement, thereby improving medical education efficacy.

Background & Objective: Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is a crucial component in medical school examinations to assess students' competency, particularly in clinical skills incorporating cognitive and affective domains. OSCE results are subjected to standard-setting methods, which yield different findings. Hence, in this study, five different standard-setting methods, namely norm reference, Angoff method, borderline group method (BGM), borderline regression method (BRM), and modified Cohen's method, were compared to determine the cut-off scores and failure rates determined by each method. Material & Methods: Data of 170 second-year medical students who attended OSCE with eight stations for their First Professional Examination at the end of year 2 MBBS was taken for the study following ethical approval. Total scores for each station were standardized to 20 marks, and cut-off scores were determined using each of the five standard-setting methods. Results: As a comparison of 5 methods, the Norm reference method yielded the highest number of stations with high cut-off scores, followed by BRM. This is reflected in the number of failures, too. On the contrary, using the Angoff method yielded the lowest cut-off scores in maximum stations, resulting in the least number of failed students. The Cochrane's Q test of the results yielded a p < 0.001, which signifies that the proportion of students who failed a particular OSCE station was significantly different when different methods were used to determine the cut score. Conclusion: The study, which compared 5 common standard-setting methods employed in medical education assessments, found that norm-referenced and BRM had high cut-off scores and failures, with the opposite determined by the Modified Angoff method. The study concluded that the cut-off score and failure rate differed with different standard-setting methods, and the choice of the method is contextual depending on the available resources. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The OSCE plays a key role in promoting global peace and stability, especially in Europe, but also in other regions. Initially founded as a Conference in 1975, the OSCE adopted a comprehensive approach to security based on three dimensions: political and military security, economic and environmental cooperation, and human rights and humanitarian affairs. This structure seeks to address security problems from multiple perspectives, recognizing that peace depends not only on military strength, but also on economic, social and environmental factors. The OSCE has been successful in several mediation and observation missions, promoting dialogue and cooperation in conflict-ridden areas such as the Balkans, the Caucasus and Central Asia. However, its capacity to intervene is limited by a lack of resources, a consensus-based decision-making structure, and rivalry among its most influential members, especially in the context of increasing geopolitical polarization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

During the examination of professionals, the simulated patient (SP) can be the right person to assess the professionalism of examinees. This research analysed the efficiency of SP assessments of students' professionalism. Students' professionalism was assessed during an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) by two independent assessors (the examiner and the SP). Professionalism was assessed using the previously validated Medical Students' Professionalism Assessment Scale. The scores provided by two assessors were subject to descriptive analysis, with mean, standard deviation, median, interquartile range, and minimum and maximum values derived. Since the rating was based on the ordinal scale, the agreement between the two assessors was analysed using quadratic weighted kappa statistics. Both SPs and examiners provided similar mean scores in their assessments. The highest difference was observed in relation to one statement on "student causing pain to the SP", in which the SP assessment mean score was 0.10, while the examiner assessment mean score was 0.48. In terms of agreement, the item "the student gave clear instructions before examining me" achieved moderate concordance (agreement). Although most of the items achieved fair concordance between the assessors, we recommend periodic training of SPs to improve their abilities as assessors for rating the professionalism shown by medical students. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCE) is an objective assessment approach that enables the evaluation of students' practical skills by simulating real clinical scenarios. This scale is specifically designed to evaluate the attributes and characteristics of the OSCE from the perspective of health sciences students, thereby filling a crucial gap in the existing assessment methods. This research conducted a methodological design involving 220 students from the faculties of medicine and nursing between 2022 and 2023. Data were gathered using a "Descriptive Form" and "OSCEPS." Factor analyses were performed for research and validation to ascertain the scale's factorial structure. The factorial analysis was used to test the structural validity of the scale. A structure consisting of 19 items was developed. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.943. Fit indices resulting from the study were RMSEA = 0.084; GFI = 0.839; CFI = 0.902; IFI = 0.902; RFI = 0.824; NFI = 0.843; TLI = 0.889. This study proves that the OSCEPS is a highly reliable and valid scale with strong psychometric properties. It effectively assesses health sciences students' perceptions of OSCE, thereby enhancing the credibility and usefulness of this assessment tool. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The Japanese medical educational model core curriculum requires an understanding of the characteristics of Kampo medicine. However, there are few reports on the methods of evaluating the skill levels of Kampo medicine practitioners. Objective: This study investigated the utility of objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) for evaluating the skills of Kampo medicine practitioners, exploring its relationship with other medical skills. Methods: The 2022 post‐clinical clerkship OSCE assessed the accuracy of Kampo‐related tasks, specifically abdominal examinations. In addition, correlation coefficients and factor analysis were used to analyze the relationship of Kampo tasks with other tasks (three clinical‐reasoning tasks, electrocardiogram attachment task, joint examination task). Results: Medical students showed significant variation in their ability to accurately assess different abdominal regions. The epigastric region had the highest accuracy (92.0%), while the para‐umbilical region had the lowest (45.1%). Correlation analysis between Kampo tasks and other clinical tasks (clinical reasoning, electrocardiogram attachment, joint examination) yielded coefficients ranging from 0.10 to 0.19, suggesting a low relationship. Factor analysis confirmed the independence of Kampo skills from other assessed medical skills across four distinct factors. Conclusions: Since Kampo diagnostic skills are highly unique, it is possible that Western medicine OSCE tasks alone may not sufficiently assess competency in Kampo medicine. Therefore, it is necessary to consider incorporating Kampo tasks into the OSCE. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is a commonly used method for assessing clinical skills among nursing students. However, it often induces anxiety, which can affect student performance. This study aims to examine the effect of a simulated OSCE (MOCK OSCE) on reducing test anxiety and improving performance in nursing students during the OSCE. Method: This quasi-experimental study was conducted on 65 firstyear nursing students at Aligudarz Nursing School during the 2023-2024 academic years. Using a census sampling method, students were randomly assigned to two groups: an intervention group, which participated in a MOCK OSCE program (including test scenarios, feedback, and practical exercises), and a control group, which continued with the regular curriculum. Test anxiety was measured before and after the intervention using the Sarason Test Anxiety Scale, and OSCE performance scores were evaluated with standardized checklists. Data were analyzed with paired t-tests, independent t-tests, and ANOVA using SPSS version 23. Results: The results showed a significant decrease in test anxiety scores within the intervention group before and after the simulated OSCE (p<0.001, R=-0.91). Additionally, performance scores in the final OSCE were higher for the intervention group than the control group (R=0.59, p<0.05). However, test anxiety did not have a substantial impact on performance within this study (p<0.05, R=-0.23). Conclusion: Implementing simulated OSCEs may help reduce test anxiety and enhance nursing students' performance in the final OSCE. Incorporating this approach is recommended as part of the assessment program for nursing students. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

While objective clinical structured examination (OSCE) is a worldwide recognized and effective method to assess clinical skills of undergraduate medical students, the latest Ottawa conference on the assessment of competences raised vigorous debates regarding the future and innovations of OSCE. This study aimed to provide a comprehensive view of the global research activity on OSCE over the past decades and to identify clues for its improvement. We performed a bibliometric and scientometric analysis of OSCE papers published until March 2024. We included a description of the overall scientific productivity, as well as an unsupervised analysis of the main topics and the international scientific collaborations. A total of 3,224 items were identified from the Scopus database. There was a sudden spike in publications, especially related to virtual/remote OSCE, from 2020 to 2024. We identified leading journals and countries in terms of number of publications and citations. A co-occurrence term network identified three main clusters corresponding to different topics of research in OSCE. Two connected clusters related to OSCE performance and reliability, and a third cluster on student's experience, mental health (anxiety), and perception with few connections to the two previous clusters. Finally, the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada were identified as leading countries in terms of scientific publications and collaborations in an international scientific network involving other European countries (the Netherlands, Belgium, Italy) as well as Saudi Arabia and Australia, and revealed the lack of important collaboration with Asian countries. Various avenues for improving OSCE research have been identified: i) developing remote OSCE with comparative studies between live and remote OSCE and issuing international recommendations for sharing remote OSCE between universities and countries; ii) fostering international collaborative studies with the support of key collaborating countries; iii) investigating the relationships between student performance and anxiety. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To offset grade inflation, many clerkships combine faculty evaluations with objective assessments including the Medical Examiners Subject Examination (NBME-SE) or Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE), however, standardized methods are not established. Following a curriculum transition removing faculty clinical evaluations from summative grading, final clerkship designations of fail (F), pass (P), and pass-with-distinction (PD) were determined by combined NBME-SE and OSCE performance, with overall PD for the clerkship requiring meeting this threshold in both. At the time, 90% of students achieved PD on the Internal Medicine (IM) OSCE resulting in overall clerkship grades primarily determined by the NBME-SE. The clerkship sought to enhance the OSCE to provide a more thorough objective clinical skills assessment, offset grade inflation, and reduce the NBME-SE primary determination of the final clerkship grade. The single-station 43-point OSCE was enhanced to a three-station 75-point OSCE using the Reporter-Interpreter-Manager-Educator (RIME) framework to align patient encounters with targeted assessments of progressive skills and competencies related to the clerkship rotation. Student performances were evaluated pre- and post-OSCE enhancement. Student surveys provided feedback about the clinical realism of the OSCE and the difficulty. Pre-intervention OSCE scores were more tightly clustered (SD = 5.65%) around a high average performance with scores being highly negatively skewed. Post-intervention OSCE scores were more dispersed (SD = 6.88%) around a lower average with scores being far less skewed resulting in an approximately normal distribution. This lowered the total number of students achieving PD on the OSCE and PD in the clerkship, thus reducing the relative weight of the NMBE-SE in the overall clerkship grade. Student response was positive, indicating the examination was fair and reflective of their clinical experiences. Through structured development, OSCE assessment can provide a realistic and objective measurement of clinical performance as part of the summative evaluation of students. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper aims to examine the position of Kosovo in international relations. Explains differences between de facto states, quasi-states, unrecognized states, pseudo states and states with limited recognition, arguing that Kosovo should be considered as the latter. The author also points out consequences of international recognition (including the case of Kosovo) and shows the main goals of its foreign policy. A separate place was devoted to relations between Kosovo and international governmental organizations, which conduct "engagement without recognition policy" and selected countries, which recognized Kosovo as a sovereign state. The article is based on examination of primary and secondary sources, critical analysis of sources and data analysis. The author argues that limited recognition of Kosovo has a direct influence on foreign policy of this state. This foreign policy is strictly connected with security issues. However, limited recognition reduced foreign policy of Kosovo and made that this country cannot be a party of military pacts, which is crucial in maintaining peace and security in this country. The article is partially based on sources available at the Slavic, East European and Eurasian Collections and Services at International and Area Studies Library of the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, collected by the author during the 2021 Virtual Summer Research Laboratory organized by the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Russia, East European, and Eurasian Center, University of Illinois Urbana – Champaign (Champaign, IL). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AbstractBackgroundMethodsResultsConclusionsThe Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is a cornerstone of medical education that uses a structured approach to assess clinical skills and competency. A well-designed checklist is essential to enhance the validity of OSCE exams. This study aimed to determine whether a clinically discriminatory checklist (CDC) improves the validity of the OSCE compared with an assessment using the thoroughness checklist (TC), with a particular focus on clinical reasoning.Fourteen OSCE case scenarios with both TC and CDC were developed. Each case was administered to 350–1170 fourth-year medical students in nine medical schools within the Seoul-Gyeonggi-area (Korea) during their OSCEs in 2019 and 2020. We also conducted interstation examinations after standardized patient encounters to assess clinical reasoning ability. The validities of OSCE scores based on the TCs and CDCs were compared.The OSCE using a CDC (rather than a TC) enabled better item discrimination but provided a lower internal consistency coefficient and worse standard measurement error. Clinical reasoning scores derived using patient notes were significantly correlated with OSCE scores but varied according to the characteristics of each case, indicating that OSCE scores derived using CDCs did not assess clinical reasoning ability more accurately than OSCE scores obtained using TCs.This study found that using a CDC to limit checklist items did not improve OSCE validity and did not reflect clinical reasoning ability. Further development of robust assessment strategies that support and evaluate clinical reasoning abilities is needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Clinical education is a significant part of medical education, and paying attention to clinical evaluation is important. One of the challenges in the teaching-learning process is evaluating students' performance. Learners, as the main stakeholders of the educational system, may have different experiences of evaluation quality. Awareness of these experiences is effective in improving the quality of clinical evaluation. Therefore, this study was conducted to "explore the experiences of nursing students for evaluation of professional competence by using the objective structured clinical examination (OSCE)". Method: This study was conducted with a qualitative descriptive research approach and conventional content analysis method in 2022–2024. The participants included 12 undergraduate nursing students at Maragheh University of Medical Sciences, who were selected by purposeful sampling, and their experiences were collected using semi-structured and in-depth interviews until reaching data saturation. Results: The data analysis of the interviews led to the extraction of 268 primary codes, 7 subcategories, 2 categories, and 1 theme: "Credibility and stability". The category "Exam's accuracy in measuring competence " included 3 sub-categories: "Challenges in objective adaptation ", " Communication and organizational challenges for exam preparation " and " Inadequate simulation of stations and exam environment ", and the category " Exam power for repeatability" included 4 sub-categories: " Characteristics of the students ", " Lack of evaluators' skills and mastery ", " Inefficiency of the evaluation tool " and " Disturbance in executive affairs". Conclusions: OSCE can be used in self-evaluation, creating motivation and strengthening different dimensions of students' learning, as well as discovering weaknesses and strengths for planning by managers and faculties. According to the results of this study, many factors such as management before and during the exam, characteristics of the evaluators, prevailing educational conditions in the faculty, and the method of clinical training are effective in achieving the "reliability and sustainability" required in the OSCE. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Objective structured clinical examinations have long been used in dietetics education. This observational study aims to describe the development, deployment, feasibility and validity of assessment using an oral interview in place of traditional objective structured clinical examinations, and to determine the ability of this assessment to identify students who are either not ready for placement or may require early support and/or remediation. Methods: Student assessment data were collected over a two‐and‐a‐half‐year period and used to test the predictive ability of an oral interview to determine dietetic placement outcomes and highlight a need for early remediation. Descriptive statistics as well as a between‐group one‐way ANOVA was used to describe results. Results: A total of 169 students participated in the oral interview and subsequent medical nutrition therapy placement over the study period. Significant differences in oral interview score were seen between students who passed placement and students who passed with remediation or those who failed. Oral interview performance was able to predict placement outcome, yet required less resources than traditional objective structured clinical examinations. Conclusion: An oral interview may provide the same utility as the objective structured clinical examination in dietetics education. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To assess student reactions to the skill-based training program on IMNCI. To assess student learning in the skill-based training program on IMNCI by OSCE and retro-pre feedback. To assess the reaction of students to OSCE as an assessment tool. Material and Methods: It was a mixed method interventional educational research. Students were assessed by using OSCE stations, retro pre feedback, and open ended questions about the training program and OSCE. Results: Retro-pre feedback of self-assessment of the 75 students shows that, after the training program, there is a significant increase in the self perceived post-test scores of Knowledge of Importance of IMNCI (2-4), Chart booklet (1.5-3.9), Skills of assessing the child for danger signs (1.7-3.9), cough (1.9-3.9), diarrhoea (2.1-4.2), anemia (2.2 -4.1), malnutrition (2.2 -4.2), counseling the care giver of the child (2-4.2). The students liked the skills taught interactively through videos, case scenarios, and role plays. Student liked the OSCE because of the clinical scenarios, photos, diverse cases were evaluated. Conclusions: Overall, the training program was taken well by the students and their IMNCI skills were improved. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is a crucial assessment tool for evaluating learners’ ability to apply theoretical knowledge in practical clinical situations. It is widely accepted by both students and educators, and the costs associated with conducting OSCE assessments vary depending on the field of study, how it is implemented, staffing needs, standardized patients, and duration of the examination. This study examines the expenses related to administering OSCEs in medical universities. Method: Conducted from June to September 2023; this mixed-method study elucidated the cost intricacies of executing a two-day OSCE with 14 eight-minute stations for 100 nursing students. This process unfolds in two phases: a qualitative segment comprising text reviews and 45-minute in-depth interviews with faculty members and OSCE experts, leading to the development of a validated checklist, followed by a quantitative phase in which the tool was distributed to 25 faculty members and 5 specialists for completion. Result: The examination costs were delineated into three primary components: time, human resources, equipment, consumables, and necessary supplies. In 2023, the total implementation cost of the OSCE for 100 students across 14 clinical stations was $1028.07, with an estimated per-learner cost of $37.50. Human resources incurred the highest expenditure ($1649.37); while supply costs were relatively lower ($1072.17). Educational infrastructure expenses were excluded because the study focused on the Nursing and Midwifery Faculty’s Clinical Skills Center. Conclusion: Various factors influence OSCE costs, including national production capabilities of medical supplies, institutional credibility, governance status, examination frequency, student demographics, assessor composition, station count, course content, and examinee volume. The insights derived from this comprehensive examination are significant as entry benchmarks for healthcare systems and higher-level academic evaluations. Understanding OSCE cost dynamics facilitates resource optimization and assessment strategy refinement, thereby improving medical education efficacy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Screen-based simulation is a cost-effective educational modality that allows nursing students to comfortably acquire new skills as they become accustomed to digital environments. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a screen-based simulation tool in enhancing knowledge and skills related to medication administration and dosage calculation in nursing students. Methods: This multicenter, single-blind, stratified, randomized controlled trial initially enrolled 480 nursing students. The 351 students eligibles were randomly allocated to two groups. Using a screen-based simulation tool (SIMDOSE®), the intervention group was trained in drug administration and dosage calculation through four perfusion clinical cases. The control group underwent the same training content using the paper-and-pencil method. knowledge and skills acquisition, Students' satisfaction, self-confidence and anxiety were analyzed using Jamovi software (version 2.3.18). Results: 4 out of 5 main variables examined were significantly different, specifically in dosage calculation, where the simulation group excelled both in the knowledge post-test (post – pre = 1.00 (20%); p = 0.004) and in the objective structured clinical examination (p = 0.013). The intervention group reported higher levels of satisfaction and self-confidence than the control group (p < 0.001). Their moderate anxiety levels didn't differ significantly (0.161). Conclusion: The SIMDOSE® platform can be used as a supplementary teaching method of dosage calculation for nursing students. Screen-based simulation has benefits that nurse educators should be aware of, such as being a key to more satisfied and confident students. Trial registration: This Moroccan clinical trial was prospectively registered (16/05/2023) in the Pan African Clinical Trial Registry (pactr.samrc.ac.za) with trial registration number PACTR202305505743210. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The objective of the study is to describe the implementation of a medication therapy management course into the PharmD curriculum with an objective standardized clinical examination, and to assess the impact on students' knowledge, skills, and satisfaction. Methods: A new medication therapy management course was started for undergraduate pharmacy students. It was then altered to incorporate more active learning and skill-assessment measures; one such alteration was the addition of an objective standardized clinical examination to assess medication therapy management skills. A cross-sectional survey was used to assess the students' perceptions and satisfaction with the medication therapy management course and the evaluation method. Results: Most students agreed that the weekly medication therapy management simulation activities helped them achieve the course learning outcomes (83%). When asked about the objective standardized clinical examination, most of them also agreed that they were well-oriented and prepared (78%). Students reported few drawbacks like lack of time (41%) and having different assessors at objective standardized clinical examination stations (56%). Conclusion: Implementation of medication therapy management course within the undergraduate pharmacy curriculum help shape the students' clinical skills and introduce them to this emerging field. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This study aims to evaluate how student performance and perspectives changed when the Objective Structured Clinical Exam (OSCE) assessment system was changed from a composite score to discipline‐specific grading at the Harvard School of Dental Medicine. Methods: The retrospective study population consisted of all students (n = 349) who completed three OSCEs (OSCE 1, 2, and 3) as part of the predoctoral program during the years 2014–2023. Data on the students' OSCE scores were obtained from the Office of Dental Education, and data on students' race/ethnicity and gender were obtained from their admissions data. Results: The likelihood of a student failing the OSCE after the assessment system change significantly increased with an adjusted odds ratio of 20.12. After the change, the number of failed subjects per student decreased with an adjusted mean ratio of 0.48. Students perceived the OSCE as being less useful after the change. Independent of the grading change, OSCEs 1 and 2 were seen as more useful compared to OSCE 3, which is administered in the last year of the Doctor of Dental Medicine program. Conclusion: The discipline‐specific nature of the new assessment system helps focus on specific areas of remediation, rather than blanket remediation used previously, in order to isolate the actual areas of deficiency and to focus remediation efforts so that students can align their learning needs appropriately. Therefore, although the actual number of fails identified increased for the course, the assessment change has allowed for more directed, actionable information to be gained from the OSCE to prepare students to work toward competency standards. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Near-peer teaching is a popular pedagogical teaching tool however many existing models fail to demonstrate benefits in summative OSCE performance. The 3-step deconstructed (3-D)skills near-peer model was recently piloted in undergraduate medicine showing short term improvement in formative OSCE performance utilising social constructivist educational principles. This study aims to assess if 3-D skills model teaching affects summative OSCE grades. Methods Seventy-nine third year medical students attended a formative OSCE event at the University of Glasgow receiving an additional 3-minutes per station of either 3-D skills teaching or time-equivalent unguided practice. Students’ summative OSCE results were compared against the year cohort to establish whether there was any difference in time delayed summative OSCE performance. Results 3-D skills and unguided practice cohorts had comparable demographical data and baseline formative OSCE performance. Both the 3-D skill cohort and unguided practice cohort achieved significantly higher median station pass rates at summative OSCEs than the rest of the year. This correlated to one additional station pass in the 3-D skills cohort, which would increase median grade banding from B to A. The improvement in the unguided practice cohort did not achieve educational significance. Conclusion Incorporating the 3-D skills model into a formative OSCE is associated with significantly improved performance at summative OSCEs. This expands on the conflicting literature for formative OSCE sessions which have shown mixed translation to summative performance and suggests merit in institutional investment to improve clinical examination skills.

Abstract Background Dermatological conditions are a common reason for patients to seek healthcare advice. However, they are often under-represented in Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs). Given the visual nature of skin conditions, simulation is suited to recreate such skin conditions in assessments such as OSCEs. One such technique often used in simulation is moulage—the art and science of using special effects make-up techniques to replicate a wide range of conditions on Simulated Participants or manikins. However, the contextual nature of OSCEs places additional challenges compared to using moulage in more general forms of simulated-based education. Main body OSCEs are high-stakes assessments and require standardisation across multiple OSCE circuits. In addition, OSCEs tend to have large numbers of candidates, so moulage needs to be durable in this context. Given the need to expand the use of moulage in OSCE stations and the unique challenges that occur in OSCEs, there is a requirement to have guiding principles to inform their use and development. Conclusion Informed by evidence, and grounded in experience, this article aims to provide practical tips for health profession education faculty on how best to optimise the use of moulage in OSCEs. We will describe the process of designing an OSCE station, with a focus on including moulage. Secondly, we will provide a series of important practice points to use moulage in OSCEs—and encourage readers to integrate them into their day-to-day practice.

Abstract Background Clinical practitioners think of frequent causes of diseases first rather than expending resources searching for rare conditions. However, it is important to continue investigating when all common illnesses have been discarded. Undergraduate medical students must acquire skills to listen and ask relevant questions when seeking a potential diagnosis. Methodology Our objective was to determine whether team-based learning (TBL) focused on clinical reasoning in the context of rare diseases combined with video vignettes (intervention) improved the clinical and generic skills of students compared with TBL alone (comparator). We followed a single-center quasi-experimental posttest-only design involving fifth-year medical students. Results The intervention group (n = 178) had a significantly higher mean overall score on the objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) (12.04 ± 2.54 vs. 11.27 ± 3.16; P = 0.021) and a higher mean percentage score in clinical skills (47.63% vs. 44.63%; P = 0.025) and generic skills (42.99% vs. 40.33%; P = 0.027) than the comparator group (n = 118). Success on the OSCE examination was significantly associated with the intervention (P = 0.002). Conclusions The TBL with video vignettes curriculum was associated with better performance of medical students on the OSCE. The concept presented here may be beneficial to other teaching institutions.

Abstract Background The administration of performance assessments during the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic posed many challenges, especially for examinations employed as part of certification and licensure. The National Assessment Collaboration (NAC) Examination, an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE), was modified during the pandemic. The purpose of this study was to gather evidence to support the reliability and validity of the modified NAC Examination. Methods The modified NAC Examination was delivered to 2,433 candidates in 2020 and 2021. Cronbach’s alpha, decision consistency, and accuracy values were calculated. Validity evidence includes comparisons of scores and sub-scores for demographic groups: gender (male vs. female), type of International Medical Graduate (IMG) (Canadians Studying Abroad (CSA) vs. non-CSA), postgraduate training (PGT) (no PGT vs. PGT), and language of examination (English vs. French). Criterion relationships were summarized using correlations within and between the NAC Examination and the Medical Council of Canada Qualifying Examination (MCCQE) Part I scores. Results Reliability estimates were consistent with other OSCEs similar in length and previous NAC Examination administrations. Both total score and sub-score differences for gender were statistically significant. Total score differences by type of IMG and PGT were not statistically significant, but sub-score differences were statistically significant. Administration language was not statistically significant for either the total scores or sub-scores. Correlations were all statistically significant with some relationships being small or moderate (0.20 to 0.40) or large (> 0.40). Conclusions The NAC Examination yields reliable total scores and pass/fail decisions. Expected differences in total scores and sub-scores for defined groups were consistent with previous literature, and internal relationships amongst NAC Examination sub-scores and their external relationships with the MCCQE Part I supported both discriminant and criterion-related validity arguments. Modifications to OSCEs to address health restrictions can be implemented without compromising the overall quality of the assessment. This study outlines some of the validity and reliability analyses for OSCEs that required modifications due to COVID.

Abstract Context Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) are an increasingly popular evaluation modality for medical students. While the face-to-face interaction allows for more in-depth assessment, it may cause standardization problems. Methods to quantify, limit or adjust for examiner effects are needed. Methods Data originated from 3 OSCEs undergone by 900-student classes of 5th- and 6th-year medical students at Université Paris Cité in the 2022-2023 academic year. Sessions had five stations each, and one of the three sessions was scored by consensus by two raters (rather than one). We report OSCEs' longitudinal consistency for one of the classes and staff-related and student variability by session. We also propose a statistical method to adjust for inter-rater variability by deriving a statistical random student effect that accounts for staff-related and station random effects. Results From the four sessions, a total of 16,910 station scores were collected from 2615 student sessions, with two of the sessions undergone by the same students, and 36, 36, 35 and 20 distinct staff teams in each station for each session. Scores had staff-related heterogeneity (p

Background: Medical schools use different evaluation methods after students undergo a period of instruction for certification of acquisition of requisite skills and competencies required for registration. Despite a global trend towards adoption of OSCE format to test competencies, its adoption in medical schools in Nigeria has been relatively slow and local experiences with its use are limited. We describe the development and administration of OSCE for the formative assessment of undergraduate medical students of Kaduna state university at the end of paediatrics clinical rotation. Methodology: OSCE was developed and conducted to assess clinical skills of 20 undergraduate medical students at the end of clinical posting in paediatrics. Students rotated through a series of clinical encounters arranged in ten stations in a circuit, each for a short duration of five minutes. Clinical tasks were carefully chosen to reflect learning objectives of the posting using standardized patients while scoring was done using task-specific and validated checklists by the same assessors. Results: A range of clinical competencies in different clinical scenarios, including history taking, physical examination and basic clinical skills was examined using this format. The conduct was resource intensive with much time spent during the selection of the competencies and appropriate standardized patients to be tested, standardization of checklists, briefing assessors and choosing appropriate venue as well as preparation of stations. Unfamiliarity with OSCE by both some students and assessors was a major challenge. Conclusions: OSCE is a feasible way of assessing a wide range of clinical competencies of medical students during paediatric rotation in our setting.

Objective Methods Results Conclusion The purpose of the present study was to assess the benefits of simulation for advancing knowledge and assisting healthcare staff in optimization of procedures when managing severe pre‐eclampsia/eclampsia (sPE/E).A randomized educational trial was conducted with two groups: Group I received theoretical training, while group II received the same training along with simulation scenarios based on the management of sPE/E. The study involved 199 healthcare providers, including physicians, midwives, skilled birth attendants, and nurses. The study analyzed the percentage of correct answers on both the multiple‐choice questions (MCQ) and the objective structured clinical examinations (OSCE) to evaluate theoretical knowledge and clinical skills objectively.Statistically significant differences were found immediately after training between groups I and II, whose mean percentages were 65.0% (±11.2) versus 71.0% (±9.8) (P < 0.001). A statistically significant reduction in the percentage of correct answers was found in both groups and demonstrated a discrepancy between immediate post‐training test and post‐training test at 3 months scores of 11.6% (±1.3) in group I versus 7.2% (±0.6) in group II. OSCE1 and OSCE2 scores were significantly higher in group II than in group I (P < 0.001).Simulation combined with theoretical training would appear to be an interesting method of training for advancing knowledge and improving skills of healthcare providers in their management of sPE/E. Our goal is for this method to be used to reduce real‐life maternal mortality in the South Kivu region of the Democratic Republic of Congo. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To assess the Consultation And Relational Empathy (CARE) measure as a tool for examiners to assess medical students' empathy during Objective and Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs), as the best tool for assessing empathy during OSCEs remains unknown. Methods: We first assessed the psychometric properties of the CARE measure, completed simultaneously by examiners and standardized patients (SP, either teachers - SPteacher - or civil society members - SPcivil society), for each student, at the end of an OSCE station. We then assessed the qualitative/quantitative agreement between examiners and SP. Results: We included 129 students, distributed in eight groups, four groups for each SP type. The CARE measure showed satisfactory psychometric properties in the context of the study but moderate, and even poor inter-rater reliability for some items. Considering paired observations, examiners scored lower than SPs (p < 0.001) regardless of the SP type. However, the difference in score was greater when the SP was a SPteacher rather than a SPcivil society (p < 0.01). Conclusion: Despite acceptable psychometric properties, inter-rater reliability of the CARE measure between examiners and SP was unsatisfactory. The choice of examiner as well as the type of SP seems critical to ensure a fair measure of empathy during OSCEs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim/background: To investigate the effect of a stress and anxiety coping programme on anxiety and objective structured clinical exam (OSCE) performance in medical students. Material and methods: First-year medical students about to sit their first OSCE were randomised into experimental (n = 75) and control (n = 78) groups at the Ondokuz Mayıs University Medical Faculty in 2009–2010. Before the study, the state-trait anxiety inventory (STAI) was applied to both groups (pre-tests). The volunteer medical students in the experimental group received nine sessions (one 30 min session per week for 9 weeks) of an anxiety- and stress-coping programme. At the end of the programme (post-test) and 3 months later, following an overview session with the experimental group, the STAI was readministered to both groups (1st follow-up test). One month later, the experimental group performed deep diaphragmatic breathing and listened to gentle classical music in the test room while waiting to sit the OSCE, while the control group waited in a silent room. Both groups retook the STAI (2nd follow-up) just before sitting the OSCE. The groups' pre-, post-, 1st and 2nd follow-up STAI scores and the relations with OSCE performance and anxiety were investigated within the groups. Results: Although there was no difference in the pre-test STAI results between the experimental and control groups (state p =.213, trait p =.122), the experimental group had lower post-test, 1st and 2nd follow-up STAI scores (p <.001, respectively). The OSCE results of the experimental group were higher than those of the control group (p <.001). In a linear regression model, post-test, 1st and 2nd follow-up trait anxiety (p =.023, p =.014 and p <.0001, respectively) and state anxiety (p =.032, p =.026 and p <.001, respectively) were identified as independent factors for higher OSCE scores. Conclusion: Our results indicate that the participants in the experimental group achieved lower scores on post-STAI and improved OSCE performance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]