Search

Peripheral nerve injuries lead to severe functional impairments, with rodent models essential for studying regeneration. This review examines key factors affecting outcomes. Age-related declines, like reduced nerve fiber density and impaired axonal transport of vesicles, hinder recovery. Hormonal differences influence regeneration, with BDNF/trkB critical for testosterone and nerve growth factor for estrogen signaling pathways. Species and strain selection impact outcomes, with C57BL/6 mice and Sprague-Dawley rats exhibiting varying regenerative capacities. Injury models - crush for early regeneration, chronic constriction for neuropathic pain, stretch for traumatic elongation and transection for severe lacerations - provide insights into clinically relevant scenarios. Repair techniques, such as nerve grafts and conduits, show that autografts are the gold standard for gaps over 3 cm, with success influenced by graft type and diameter. Time course analysis highlights crucial early degeneration and regeneration phases within the first month, with functional recovery stabilizing by three to six months. Early intervention optimizes regeneration by reducing scar tissue formation, while later interventions focus on remyelination. Understanding these factors is vital for designing robust preclinical studies and translating research into effective clinical treatments for peripheral nerve injuries.

Purpose: The use of ultrasound (US) guidance for central vascular access in children has been advocated as a safer approach compared to traditional landmark techniques. We therefore collected data on the current use of US for central vascular access in children and infants in the Nordic countries., Methods: A cross-sectional survey using an online questionnaire was distributed to one anaesthesiologist at every hospital in the Nordic countries; a total of 177 anaesthesiologists were contacted from July till August 2012., Results: The use of US for placing central venous catheters (CVCs) seems widespread across the Nordic countries. Close to 80% of respondents were using it "almost always" or "frequently" across all paediatric age groups for internal jugular vein cannulation. US was least frequently used when catheterizing the subclavian vein. The two most common reasons given when not using US were lack of training followed by lack of equipment. We found no difference in the use of US between high-volume centres and low-volume centres. (High-volume centres placed paediatric CVCs at least weekly.)., Conclusions: US was commonly used for cannulation of the internal jugular vein but infrequently for the subclavian vein. A lack of training seems to be a barrier for further increasing the use of US. Establishing standardized training programmes based on current evidence should alleviate this.