Search

Background: Standardized reporting leads to high-quality data and can reduce administration time. The aim of this study was to (1) get an insight into the variability of what is considered important to report in the surgical report following shoulder instability surgery and (2) determine which elements should be included in the surgical report following shoulder instability surgery according to Dutch surgeons using a Delphi method. Methods: Dutch orthopedic shoulder surgeons were included in a panel for a Delphi study consisting of 3 rounds. Importance of the elements was rated on a 9-point Likert scale. High variability was defined as an element that received at least 1 score between 1 and 3 and 1 score between 7 and 9 in round 3. Consensus was defined as ≥80% of the panel giving a score of 7 or more. Results: Seventeen shoulder specialists completed all 3 rounds and identified a total of 82 elements for the arthroscopic Bankart repair and 60 for the open Latarjet. High variability was observed in 57 (70%) and 52 (87%) of the elements, respectively. After round 3, the panel reached consensus on 27 and 11 elements that should be mentioned in the surgical report following arthroscopic Bankart repair and open Latarjet. Conclusion: There is high variability in what shoulder specialists regard essential to report. Consensus was reached on 27 and 11 elements to be reported following arthroscopic Bankart repair and open Latarjet, respectively. Future studies on an international scale can further improve data collection and communication between specialists.

Abbreviations: MUA, manipulation under anesthesia ; FS, frozen shoulder ; SPADI, Shoulder Pain and Disability Score ; OSS, Oxford Shoulder Score ; NPRS, Numeric Paind Rating Scale. Manipulation under anesthesia is a well-established, but controversial, treatment for frozen shoulders. We will evaluate our results of manipulation and physiotherapy in stage two frozen shoulders. Questionnaires were sent to 65 patients with stage 2 frozen shoulders, treated with manipulation under anaesthesia between January 2012 and January 2014. Outcome parameters consisted of SPADI, OSS, EQ-5D, pain and satisfaction. A response rate of 75% was obtained. Mean follow up was 21 months (range 11-36). The median SPADI score was 11.2 (IQR 0.8-25.2) and median OSS was 39.0 (IQR 30-43). Only 72% of patients reported that they reached their pre injury level of functioning. A satisfaction rate of 92% was reported. Manipulation is a relatively easy intervention with a high satisfaction rate. We assume that manipulation could shorten the duration of symptoms. However, this needs to be confirmed in a randomized trial with a control group.