Search

A 69-year-old woman, who complained of appetite loss, was diagnosed with Type 3 gastric cancer, and a biopsy resulted in the diagnosis of adenocarcinoma(tub2-por), Group 5. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) revealed bulky metastatic lymph nodes around the stomach and the aorta. The diagnosis was cT4a, cN2, cM1(LYM), cStage ⅣB, and SP therapy(a combination of S-1 and cisplatin) was immediately administered. On the completion of 3 courses of SP therapy, both the primary tumor and lymph nodes markedly decreased in size. Based on this finding, D2 total gastrectomy, No. 16 lymph node dissection, splenectomy, and right adrenal tumor resection were performed. Histopathology showed no residual tumor cells in the stomach or lymph nodes. Postoperatively, she received S-1 therapy, which was discontinued on completion of the first course due to its side effects. She survived for over 7 years postoperatively without receiving chemotherapy and showed no recurrence.

Background/aim: A meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate and compare the short- and long-term outcomes of robot-assisted (RAS) and conventional laparoscopic surgery (LAS) for rectal cancer., Materials and Methods: We searched MEDLINE for relevant papers published between 2010 and December 2017 by using specific search terms. We analyzed outcomes over short- and long-term periods., Results: We identified 23 papers reporting results that compared RAS for rectal cancer with LAS. Our meta-analysis included 4,348 patients with rectal cancer; 2,068 had undergone RAS, and 2,280 had undergone LAS. In the short- and long-term period, 27 and 7 outcome variables were examined, respectively. RAS for rectal cancer was significantly associated with a greater operative time and a lower conversion rate to open surgery in the short-term, and results in almost similar outcomes in the long-term, compared to LAS., Conclusion: RAS may be an acceptable surgical treatment option compared to LAS for rectal cancer., (Copyright© 2018, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

A morphological change resembling liver cirrhosis called pseudocirrhosis may be observed following chemotherapy for liver metastasis of breast cancer. Pseudocirrhosis is hypothesized to be caused by retraction of the hepatic capsule along with tumor shrinkage and subsequent scar formation around the metastatic lesion, as a response to the infiltrating tumor or chemotherapy-induced hepatic injury. The progression of cirrhotic changes may result in portal hypertension and esophageal varices. We managed two cases of esophageal variceal rupture during chemotherapy for breast cancer with liver metastasis. Hemostasis was successfully achieved by the endoscopic variceal ligation technique in both cases. We conclude that clinicians should be aware of the risk of pseudocirrhosis during chemotherapy for liver metastasis, and a periodic endoscopic follow-up is recommended along with appropriate management of esophageal varices.