Search

Psychology ranks fourth on the list of most common undergraduate majors and is increasing in popularity (McFarland, 2018). The most recent American Psychological Association (APA) guidelines for the undergraduate psychology major list scientific inquiry among its most important goals. In order to demonstrate literacy in psychological science, the APA recommends that students learn to interpret and communicate statistical findings as well as interpret, design, and conduct basic psychological research (American Psychological Association, 2016). To that end, statistics for behavioural sciences is often a required course in undergraduate psychology curricula. Teaching statistics to an undergraduate population of non-math majors, such as those studying psychology, poses challenges, including negative beliefs and attitudes about statistics (Freeman et al., 2008 Gal et al., 1997; Holmes, 2012). Undergraduate statistics is often the only quantitative course required of many psychology majors, and, in light of negative perceptions and anxieties, it may be the only such course they complete throughout their undergraduate education. Accordingly, course objectives should be carefully considered to maximise student benefit and reduce negative experiences (Garfield, 1995). Primary aims of a statics course for psychological sciences could include: (1) preparing students to competently engage with the statistical concepts and applications that they are likely to see in other classes; (2) familiarising students with the key research and statistical methods used in the discipline; and (3) teaching students how to be responsible consumers of quantitative information they are likely to encounter outside of school. In this article, the authors propose that utilising best practices drawn from the Writing Across the Curriculum (WAC) tradition can address the the primary aims, reduce negative classroom experiences, and lead to improved learning outcomes in introductory statistics courses for psychology majors.

Objective: Cognitive, mood, and behavioral changes are common among persons with epilepsy (PWE), resulting in a complex neuropsychological presentation. Women with epilepsy (WWE) represent a distinct cohort within the broader epilepsy population due to sex and gender-specific factors impacting epilepsy semiology and treatment. However, unique neuropsychological profiles among WWE have not been established. This narrative review aims to further define neuropsychological correlates in WWE and promote meaningful discussion related to enhancing the provision of neuropsychological care within this clinical population. Method: Current literature in PWE examining differences in cognitive function, mental health, and quality of life (QoL) between women and men was critically reviewed, emphasizing considerations for neuropsychological practice. Results: WWE demonstrate a preservation of verbal learning and memory compared to men both pre- and post-surgically, with sex-based, neurobiological mechanisms likely contributing to this association. WWE also have elevated risk for affective disorder psychopathology, suicidality, and traumatic experiences. Epidemiology related to psychotic and bipolar spectrum disorders is less clear, and findings are mixed regarding sex-specific behavioral side effects of antiseizure and psychotropic medication. Finally, hormonal and obstetric factors are highlighted as important contributors to neuropsychological symptoms in WWE, with elevated risk for low QoL and increased stigma associated with greater medical and psychiatric comorbidities compared to men. Conclusions: While emerging literature has begun to characterize the neuropsychological presentation of WWE, future research is needed to define sex and gender differences in neuropsychological sequalae among PWE to ensure consistency and quality of care for WWE. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Stroke represents a primary cause of morbidity and mortality in pregnant and postpartum people. While pregnancy-related stroke has drawn increased attention in certain domains of health research (e.g. obstetrics, neurology), neuropsychology has yet to contribute to this literature. Given neuropsychologists' crucial role in stroke evaluation and rehabilitation efforts, our field is poised to offer insights into this important topic. Method: This review presents facts about pregnancy-related stroke most relevant for neuropsychologists, including epidemiology, risk factors, and mechanisms, alongside clinical considerations and open areas of inquiry. Structured in the format of a traditional neuropsychological evaluation, we walk readers through factors to consider in record review, the clinical interview, and providing feedback and recommendations. Conclusions: Pregnancy-related stroke can be associated with marked functional disability and decreased quality of life, and it is notable that prevalence rates are increasing. Presenting at a time when people are experiencing adjustment to a new phase of life, and most commonly affecting women of color and other vulnerable populations, pregnancy-related stroke is a unique condition warranting special attention within the broader stroke discourse. This review aims to serve as a starting point for neuropsychologists to better understand the unique attributes of pregnancy-related stroke through a neuropsychology lens. Beyond that, it aims to promote broader meaningful discussion of neuropsychology's role in women's health. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Episodic memory disruptions in epilepsy stem from shared neurocircuitry. While prior research has focused on retrospective memory (RM), prospective memory (PM; i.e. remembering to remember) also deserves consideration given its critical role in the management of daily activities. The current investigation assessed whether PM is associated with disability and quality of life in people with epilepsy. This cross-sectional, correlational study included a consecutive series of 50 people with epilepsy presenting for neuropsychological evaluation who completed the Royal Prince Alfred Prospective Memory Test (RPA) and Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire (PRMQ) and 63 demographically comparable healthy adults. The participants with epilepsy also completed clinical measures of neuropsychological ability and questionnaires assessing disability and quality of life. People with epilepsy had significantly more frequent memory symptoms as compared to healthy adults at a very large effect size. Worse mood was associated with lower PM ability at a medium effect size and more frequent PM symptoms at a large effect size. A hierarchical linear regression indicated that PM explained 52% of the variance in disability and 43% of the variance in quality of life after accounting for RM ability. PM is associated with poorer everyday functioning among people with epilepsy and shows evidence of incremental value beyond RM ability in that regard. Future studies are needed to understand the complex pathways from PM to functional limitations to inform clinical intervention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Performance validity tests (PVTs) and symptom validity tests (SVTs) detect inaccuracies in examinee-completed measures, though methods for assessing the accuracy of informant reports—which may be inaccurate due to examinee deception, motivation for external incentives (e.g., disability payments), or attempts to validate examinee experiences—remain underexplored. We used a sample of 72 veteran-informant dyads undergoing evaluation of possible epilepsy-related neurocognitive disorder to assess the association between examinee response invalidity (i.e., performance and/or symptom invalidity) and informant report measures. Examinees completed PVTs, SVTs, cognitive, and self-report measures. Informants completed measures on examinee functioning and their own caregiver burden. Performance invalidity was defined as failure on two or more PVTs. Symptom invalidity for psychopathology symptom reports (SVT-P) and cognitive/somatic symptom reports (SVT-CS) were separately defined via above-threshold scores on two or more SVT criterion. Independent samples t tests demonstrated the associations of the PVT, SVT-CS, and SVT-P groups with informant-report measures. Informants for examinees with performance invalidity reported worse functioning in the examinee than informants for examinees in the valid performance group (medium-large effect sizes). Symptom validity status (for both SVT-CS and SVT-P) was meaningfully but less strongly related to informant-reported examinee functioning (small–medium effect sizes). Neither performance nor symptom invalidity was meaningfully related to informant-reported caregiver burden (negligible effect sizes). Informant reports for examinees with response invalidity should be interpreted with caution. Public Significance Statement: To ensure the public competent neuropsychological services, informant report measures should also be interpreted cautiously when examinees exhibit inaccurate test scores. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The pulvinar nucleus of the thalamus has extensive cortical connections with the temporal, parietal, and occipital lobes. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) targeting the pulvinar nucleus, therefore, carries the potential for therapeutic benefit in patients with drug-resistant posterior quadrant epilepsy (PQE) and neocortical temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). Here, we present a single-center experience of patients managed via bilateral DBS of the pulvinar nucleus., Methods: A single-institution retrospective review of five patients who underwent bilateral pulvinar DBS for drug-resistant TLE or PQE was performed. Stimulation parameters were adjusted monthly as needed, and side effects were monitored. The primary outcome was the percentage reduction in patient-reported seizure frequency in comparison to the preimplant baseline. The location of the active electrode contacts in relation to pulvinar thalami that produced the best seizure outcome was identified. Chronic sensing of the pulvinar local field potentials (LFPs) and circadian pattern of modulation of the LFP amplitudes were analyzed., Results: Four patients (80%) experienced a >70% reduction in seizure frequency, whereas one patient had >50% reduction in seizure. Mean seizure reduction was 79% at a median follow-up of 13 months (range = 9-21 months). No significant side effects were noted. Of all the pulvinar subnuclei, stimulation of the medial pulvinar nucleus (MPN) produced the best seizure outcome in all patients except for two, in whom active contacts in the MPN but also in more lateral and inferior locations resulted in the most significant reduction in seizures. Chronic timeline data identified changes in LFP amplitude associated with stimulation and seizure occurrences., Significance: In this first ever report on a series of patients undergoing bilateral pulvinar DBS for drug-resistant epilepsy, we demonstrate that stimulation of the pulvinar and in particular the MPN is a safe and viable option for patients with nonlesional PQE or TLE. The optimal target for stimulation and relative merits of open versus closed loop stimulation should be delineated in future studies., (© 2025 International League Against Epilepsy.)