Search

After tooth extraction, a modeling and remodeling phase of bone and soft tissues occurs. It has been fully demonstrated that bone resorption as high as 50% can take place regarding ridge width and a variable amount concerning ridge height, making it difficult to perform implant surgery.Active members of the Italian Academy of Osseointegration (IAO) participated in this Consensus Conference, and three systematic reviews were conducted before the meeting to provide guidelines on alveolar ridge preservation procedures. The systematic reviews covered the following topics: (1) What material best preserves the dimensions of the ridge horizontally and vertically?; (2) what material favors the formation of the highest quantity of new bone?; (3) which technique would best seal the socket?; and (4) what effect does alveolar ridge preservation have on soft tissues?The main conclusions reached by the assembly were that alveolar ridge preservation is advisable after dental extraction, particularly in esthetic areas, in proximity of anatomical structures (ie, maxillary sinus, inferior alveolar nerve, and mental foramen), whenever the treatment plan requires delayed placement, and whenever patients ask to postpone implant insertion for various reasons. Socket debridement is advised before the use of a "regenerative material," and xenograft is considered the gold standard material to maintain ridge dimensions. Another indication is antibiotic therapy, which is recommended in the case of alveolar ridge preservation (amoxicillin 2 g 1 hour before the intervention and 1 g every 12 hours for 6 days). A membrane or autologous soft tissue should be used to seal the socket and protect the regenerative material, and the indicated reentry time (implant insertion) is 4 to 6 months.This Consensus Conference agreed that the adoption of alveolar ridge preservation can effectively prevent physiologic bone loss, especially in esthetic areas. It is recommended to cover the xenograft material with a membrane or autologous soft tissue, and antibiotic therapy is advisable.

The scientific community has definitely demonstrated the importance of the use of mouthwash in daily oral hygiene. In our pilot study, we tested the effectiveness of a novel mouth rinse containing sea salt, xylitol, and lysozyme. Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) growth, and plaque index in adolescent patients aged 14&ndash, 17 years, were observed. The bacterial load was investigated by in vitro microbiological analysis, the plaque index was assessed through the O&rsquo, Leary&rsquo, s Plaque Control Record (PCR). The study has shown that the use of a sea salt-based mouthwash in daily oral hygiene reduces the bacterial levels of S. mutans (p &lt, 0.01) linked to the combined action of xylitol and lysozyme, together with the action of sea salt. Our preliminary data confirm and improve the main results reported in the scientific literature on the importance of the use of xylitol, lysozyme, and sea salt in oral health.

Background: The discovery of the vaccination technique was revealed by Edward Jenner in 1796, which represented the first scientific attempt to control an infectious disease by vaccines, followed by other important studies carried out by Pasteur and Koch, and Sabin, who developed the first technique to attenuate the virus. In recent decades, numerous scholars have begun to create dangerous theories against the effectiveness of vaccines through scientifically invalid or fraudulent studies. Aim: This critical review of the literature aims to analyze the main factors that have undermined the credibility of vaccines in the general population, disproved false information and emphasized the benefits of vaccines over the last 200 years. Discussions: Unfortunately, several studies have been carried out without the proper scientific attention. The most impacting example is the study published by Andrew Wakefield in the Lancet journal who tried to correlate vaccines with the development of autism: this publication was withdrawn from the journal a few years after its publication, but the impact of incorrect scientific studies, fake news, and ambiguous healthcare policies have led to a general adverse opinion about the effectiveness of vaccines. Conclusion: The excess of uncontrolled information is a serious concern during the Coronavirus pandemic. Modern science must tackle this problem with a better willingness to communicate the clinical studies to those who cannot understand medical information. Nevertheless, a reliable science must also limit the distribution of studies that do not meet the basic criteria of methodological rigor and certainty of results in order not to incur confusion in the scientific community.

BACKGROUND: Probiotics are living microorganisms that confer a health benefit when administered in adequate amounts. There is evidence in the current literature about the importance of probiotic use in pregnancy. The early supplementation of probiotics in the perinatal and postnatal periods seems to have a positive impact on the overall mother’s health and future health of infants. AIM: Our pilot study aimed to test the ability of specific probiotics strains in combination with the kiwi-unique enzyme actinidin to improve the availability of folic acid in 20 pregnant women. METHODS: We investigate 20 pregnant women in early (4–10 weeks) (6 patients), intermedium (11–20 weeks) (6 patients), and late (21–30 weeks) (8 patients) pregnancy. RESULTS: Our findings show that the tested formula promotes increased concentration of serum folate in women’s blood and contributes to the control of blood sugar and body weight, regardless of the gestational period (early, intermediate or late). CONCLUSIONS: Our data support the main results reported in the scientific literature about the importance of probiotics intake in pregnancy.

Background: Dysbiosis is related to changes in the composition and behaviour of intestinal microbiota, which may contribute to an age-related decline in metabolic and immune system functioning (immune-senescence). Objective: The microbiota-targeted dietary and probiotic interventions have been shown to favorably affect the host health by an enhancement of antioxidant activity, improving immune homeostasis, suppression of chronic inflammation, regulation of metabolism and prevention of insulin resistance. Results: In our study, the use of specific probiotics strains improved the serum concentration of glycemic markers, thereby promoting better overall health. Conclusion: Probiotics may help correct defects in the gut microbial environment improving metabolic parameters, such as blood sugar levels, glycosylated hemoglobin and a decrease in body weight.

Statement of problem Few investigations concerning the use of pterygoid implants have reported reproducible and consistent data, making survival data controversial. Purpose The purpose of this clinical study was to investigate the 1-year survival and success rates of pterygoid implants and prostheses in participants affected by severe atrophy of the posterior maxilla requiring a complete-arch immediate fixed prosthesis. Material and methods Fifteen participants, either completely edentulous or with failing dentition in the maxillary arch and with severe atrophy of the posterior maxilla, were enrolled in the study. All participants underwent prosthodontic rehabilitation after implant placement in both the anterior maxilla areas and the pterygoid regions. The survival data of the implants were evaluated at the time of abutment connection by means of a mobility test for each implant. After placement of the prostheses, survival was assessed by means of marginal bone maintenance as assessed by panoramic radiographs and the absence of pain or symptoms of infection. The t test was used for evaluating the difference in age between men and women (α=.05). Correlations between categorical variables (Fisher exact test) were used to evaluate the possible association between the number of implants and both the age and presence of comorbidities (α=.05). Results During the 1-year follow-up, high prosthesis stability and no implant loss were observed for all participants. In addition, participants did not report any pain or paresthesia. No peri-implant radiolucency was detected in the panoramic radiographs. Survival and success rates in the follow-up period were 100%. Conclusions The present study supports the conclusion that pterygoid implants have a high success rate with minimal or no complications.

Systematic reviews showed possible esthetic complications with the use of traditional flap designs after guided bone regeneration (GBR) procedures in the esthetic zone and the aim of this case series was to analyze hard and soft tissue changes over 18 months after these procedures. Healthy subjects requiring tooth extraction and single-implant placement in the anterior maxilla were enrolled in the study. Three months after tooth extraction and ridge preservation, a prosthetic-driven implant was placed. The horizontal bone deficiency was treated with a resorbable bone graft substitute (beta tricalcium phosphate [β-TCP]) and a bioresorbable polylactic acid (PLA) membrane. Primary closure was obtained by a novel coronally advanced flap adapted from mucogingival techniques. Final metal-free implant restorations were delivered 4 months after placement. Clinical measurements, pictures, and radiographs were acquired after delivery of the final restoration (T1) and at the 18-month follow-up (T2). Digital impressions were taken at the time of tooth extraction (T-1) and implant insertion (baseline; T0) and at T2. Marginal bone level changes were assessed by radiographic analysis, while soft tissue changes were evaluated with ExoCad software. Student t test for paired data was used to detect differences between the different time points. Twelve subjects (7 men and 5 women; mean age: 63.7 ± 14 years) completed the study and received 15 implants. All implants healed uneventfully and were clinically osseointegrated and stable, showing no sign of infection. No GBR complications were noted. Statistically significant ridge-width changes were observed after extraction (T-1 vs T0 = -1.72 ± 0.30 mm; P = .00001) and after horizontal GBR (T0 vs T2 = 1.41 ± 0.64 mm; P = .00001). Radiographic bone levels after implant placement remained stable T0 to T2 (0.09 ± 0.08 mm). Periodontal parameters never exceeded physiologic levels. It can be concluded that GBR using a bioresorbable PLA membrane and resorbable β-TCP bone graft in conjunction with a coronally advanced flap is a predictable procedure for horizontal bone augmentation with simultaneous implant placement in the esthetic area.