Search

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a heterogeneous group of hyperinflammatory statuses that are difficult to diagnose and can be life‐threatening. Bone marrow (BM) hemophagocytosis is one of the diagnostic criteria according to HLH 2004 diagnostic criteria and HS score. Limited studies have focused on the prognostic factors of BM hemophagocytosis and its association with hematologic malignancies. We aimed to analyze the clinical significance of BM hemophagocytosis. Patients with BM hemophagocytosis, either by cytology or pathology, were enrolled at Taipei Veterans General Hospital from January 2002 to July 2021. Relevant clinical and laboratory data were extracted from medical records. Of 119 patients with BM hemophagocytosis, 57 were diagnosed with hematologic malignancies. The median age of the patients was 58, ranging from 21 to 90. Splenomegaly (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.96; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13–7.79) was a risk factor for hematologic malignancies, while autoimmune disease (aOR 0.07; 95% CI 0.01–0.39) and increased D‐dimer (aOR 0.25; 95% CI 0.07–0.92) were protective factors. Risk factors for mortality in patients with BM hemophagocytosis were hematologic malignancies (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.34; 95% CI 1.24–4.44), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score ≥3 (aHR 2.42; 95% CI 1.20–4.89) and thrombocytopenia (aHR 3.09; 95% CI 1.04–9.16). In conclusion, among patients with BM hemophagocytosis, splenomegaly was a predictor of hematologic malignancies. Patients with hematologic malignancies, poor performance status, or thrombocytopenia had a higher mortality risk. Further validation studies are warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) is known for its immune disturbance and patients suffering from MM are thus vulnerable to opportunistic infections, including herpes zoster (HZ). As HZ infection remarkably affects patients' quality of life and poses huge economic burdens on the health system, we aim to identify the risk factors of HZ infection and evaluate the effects of different dosages, types, and durations of anti‐HZ prophylaxis drugs to prevent HZ infection. Methods: 551 MM patients at Taipei Veterans General Hospital in Taiwan between January 1, 2009 and August 31, 2021 were restrospectively analyzed. The patients' baseline characteristics were recorded. The primary endpoint of the study was the incidence of HZ infection among the studied patient population. Due to the lack of cost coverage from Taiwanese public health insurance on HZ prophylaxis drugs, the use of anti‐HZ drugs mainly depends on physicians' preferences and patients' choices. Results: In our study, prophylaxis was given to 283 of the patients. In the multivariate analysis, we included non‐prophylaxis, age ≥ 60, corrected serum calcium ≥12 mg/dl, serum creatinine ≥2 mg/dl, serum β2‐microglobulin ≥5500 mg/L, autologous stem cell transplant (SCT), and allogeneic SCT for analysis. Our results demonstrated that the non‐prophylaxis group (HR: 2.37, 95% CI 1.57–3.57) and patients receiving autologous SCT (HR: 2.22, 95% CI 1.28–3.86) and allogeneic SCT (HR: 5.12, 95% CI 1.13–23.22) had higher risk of HZ infection. The difference in dosage and types of anti‐HZ drugs showed similar protective effects. In patients who stopped anti‐HZ prophylaxis before active cancer‐related treatment, a higher risk of getting HZ infection compared to the corresponding group was also observed (adjusted HR 3.09, 95% CI 1.35–7.07, p = 0.008). Conclusions: We concluded that MM patients should receive HZ prophylaxis drugs while receiving active cancer‐related treatment. Patients receiving SCT are also at high risk of getting HZ infection, even under prophylaxis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a well-established treatment for patients with multiple myeloma (MM), and adequate stem cell collection must be assured before ASCT. However, prediction of poor mobilizers (PMs) is still difficult despite several risk factors for mobilization failure having been identified. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed MM patients at Taipei Veterans General Hospital in Taiwan who underwent stem cell collection between October 2006 and August 2020. A CD34+ cell collection of <1 × 106 cells/kg was defined as a mobilization failure. The primary endpoint was mobilization failure. The secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for mobilization failure were calculated using a logistic regression model. The cumulative incidence of mortality was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: In the multivariate analysis, absolute monocyte count <500/µL (adjusted OR 10.75, 95% CI: 1.82–63.57, p = 0.009), platelet count <150,000/µL (adjusted OR 12.49, 95% CI: 2.65–58.89, p = 0.001) before mobilization, and time interval from diagnosis to stem cell harvest ≥180 days (adjusted OR 7.69, 95% CI: 1.61–36.87, p = 0.011) were risk factors for PMs. PM patients had poorer OS compared to patients with successful stem cell collection in the univariate analysis (log-rank test p = 0.027). The predicted probability of PMs was estimated by the multiple logistic regression model with a sensitivity of 84.6% and a specificity of 84.0%. Conclusion: Absolute monocyte count <500/µL, platelet count <150,000/µL, and treatment duration more than 180 days before stem cell mobilization are risk factors for unsuccessful stem cell collection. Our prediction models have high sensitivity and specificity for mobilization failure prediction and allow for early interventions for possible PMs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Survival benefit from chemotherapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was limited till now. New chemoregimens with cytotoxicity modulators were explored to improve efficacy. Chemotherapy modulated with valproic acid (VA) as a deacetylation inhibitor of histone and DNA damage response proteins, and hydralazine (HZ) as a DNA hypomethylating agent, hypothetically suppressing DNA repair, were used in phase II trial here for advanced HCC. Methods: Between July 2008 and March 2016, patients with chemo‐naive advanced HCC, regardless of previous sorafenib treatment, not amenable to local therapy and with Child Pugh score ≤7, were treated with VA (200 mg thrice per day) and HZ (12.5 mg twice per day) in conjunction with gemcitabine and cisplatin (GCGG): gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2, D1; 800 mg/m2 D8, 15) and cisplatin (70 mg/m2, D1) every 28 days till disease progression and then with Dox‐DTIC: doxorubicin (45 mg/m2) and dacarbazine (450 mg/m2) every 28 days. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); the secondary endpoints were safety, progression‐free survival (PFS) and response rate (RR). Results: Thirty‐seven patients with 16 sorafenib‐experienced, underwent GCGG treatment, and 30 of them underwent the following Dox‐DTIC treatment. The median OS was 14.6 months (95% confidence interval: 6.0–23.1). The median PFSs for patients treated with VA‐ and HZ‐combined GCGG and Dox‐DTIC were 3.7 and 4.2 months, respectively; the RRs were 10/37 (27.0%) and 7/30 (23.3%); and grade 3/4 neutropenia were 54% and 51%. However, there were no chemotherapy‐related deaths. Conclusion: VA‐ and HZ‐combined sequential chemotherapy was effective in advanced HCC with manageable toxicities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]