Search

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the NeVaTM stent retriever as first- and second-line device for mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke. Methods: In this retrospective single-center study, all consecutive patients that underwent mechanical thrombectomy with NeVaTM stent retriever as first- or second-line device due to intracranial vessel occlusion with acute ischemic stroke between March and November 2022 were included. Results: Thirty-nine patients (m=18, f=21) with a mean age of 69.9 ± 13.3 years were treated with the NeVaTM stent retriever. NeVaTM stent retriever was used as first-line device in 24 (61.5%) of patients and in 15 (38.5%) as second-line device. First-pass rate (≥mTICI 2c) of NeVaTM stent retriever was both 66.7% when used as first- or second-line device. Final recanalization rate including rescue strategies was 92.3% for ≥mTICI2c and 94.9% for ≥mTICI2b. No device-related minor or major adverse events were observed. A hemorrhage was detected in 33.3% of patients at 24h post-thrombectomy dual-energy CT, of which none was classified as symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. NIHSS and mRS improved significantly at discharge compared to admission (p<0.05). Conclusion: The NeVaTM stent retriever has a high effectivity and good safety profile as first- and second-line device for mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Different imaging characteristics such as clot burden score, collaterals, and pre- interventional thrombus migration are associated with functional outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Moreover, histological thrombus composition is associated with pre- interventional thrombus migration. We hypothesized that smaller clots may more likely migrate and that collateral status in ischemic stroke patients may mediate this tendency of the clot to migrate. Methods In this prospective cohort of consecutive ischemic stroke patients, clot burden scores and collateral scores were rated and the retrieved thrombi were histologically analyzed. We then investigated the relationship between clot burden score, probability for thrombus migration, and collateral scores using mediation analysis. Results 163 patients are included of which 36 (22.1%) had a clot migration. Probability of thrombus migration was significantly associated with lower collateral scores (P<0.01), higher clot burden scores (P<0.01), shorter thrombi (P<0.01), and higher RBC count (P<0.01). In the mediator pathway, higher collateral scores were significantly associated with higher clot burden scores (P<0.01) and younger age (P=0.029). The total effect of an increase in clot burden score by one grade on thrombus migration is composed of the direct effect (+18%, P<0.01) and the collateral score- mediated indirect effect (--5%, P<0.01). Conclusions Smaller, erythrocyte- rich thrombi tend to migrate more often. Good collaterals seem to have a considerable effect on limiting migration. This supports the hypothesis that larger clots have stronger adherence with the vessel wall and that good collaterals increase the counter pressure distal of the clot. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background:  Splenic lesions are rare and mostly incidental findings on cross-sectional imaging. Most lesions are of benign nature and can be correctly identified based on imaging characteristics. Further, invasive evaluation is only necessary in cases of splenic lesions with uncertain or potentially malignant etiology., Method:  While in most cases a correct diagnosis can be made from computed tomography (CT), (additional) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can aid in the identification of lesions. As these lesions are rare, only a few of the differential diagnoses are regularly diagnosed in the clinical routine., Result and Conclusion:  This review presents the differential diagnoses of splenic lesions, including imaging characteristics and a flowchart to determine the right diagnosis. In conjunction with laboratory results and clinical symptoms, histological workup is necessary only in a few cases, especially in incidental findings. In these cases, image-guided biopsies should be preferred over splenectomy, if possible., Key Points:   · Splenic lesions are rare and are usually incidental findings on abdominal imaging. · CT imaging and MRI imaging are the diagnostic tools of choice for the further workup of splenic lesions. · Based on their image morphological characteristics, a large number of splenic lesions can be assigned to one entity and do not need histological analysis., Citation Format: · Krähling H, Seidensticker M, Heindel WL et al. Diagnostic approach to splenic lesions. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2024; 196: 573 - 581., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)