Search

Gliomas represent 80% of all primary malignant brain tumors in adults. In view of this public health problem, the early detection through sensitive and specific molecular tumor markers analysis can help to improve gliomas diagnosis and prognosis as well as their staging, assessment of therapeutic response and detection of recurrence. Therefore, this review focuses in current gliomas tumor markers, IDH-1/2, 1p/19q, MGMT, ATRX, TERT, H3, EGFR, BRAF and Ki67 used in clinic worldwide and their importance to early detection, glioma histological and molecular classification as well as in predicting patient's therapeutic response. In addition, we present what are the steps in the requesting process for this type of examination in the Brazilian Public Health System (SUS) scope, which attends most of the Brazilian population. Thereby, this article is useful in demonstrating which markers are used in the clinical practice for glioma patients and can be performed in the SUS through partnerships/agreements between specialized health centers and clinical analysis laboratories. It is hoped that this work clarifies, the necessary subsidies to carry out the research of tumor markers in all institutions that serve SUS users, providing a service with equal conditions.

Genome-wide analysis using microarrays has revolutionized breast cancer (BC) research. A substantial body of evidence supports the clinical utility of the 21-gene assay (Oncotype DX) and 70-gene assay (MammaPrint) to predict BC recurrence and the magnitude of benefit from chemotherapy. However, there is currently no genetic tool able to predict chemosensitivity and chemoresistance to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) during BC treatment. In this study, we explored the predictive value of DNA repair gene expression in the neoadjuvant setting. We selected 98 patients with BC treated with NACT. We assessed DNA repair expression in 98 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded core biopsy fragments used at diagnosis and in 32 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded post-NACT residual tumors using quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. The following genes were selected: BRCA1, PALB2, RAD51C, BRCA2, ATM, FANCA, MSH2, XPA, ERCC1, PARP1, and SNM1. Of 98 patients, 33 (33.7%) achieved pathologic complete response (pCR). The DNA expression of 2 genes assessed in pre-NACT biopsies (PALB2 and ERCC1) was lower in pCR than in non-pCR patients (P=0.005 and P=0.009, respectively). There was no correlation between molecular subtype and expression of DNA repair genes. The genes BRCA2 (P=0.009), ATM (P=0.004), FANCA (P=0.001), and PARP1 (P=0.011) showed a lower expression in post-NACT residual tumor samples (n=32) than in pre-NACT biopsy samples (n=98). The expression of 2 genes (PALB2 and ERCC1) was lower in pCR patients. These alterations in DNA repair could be considered suitable targets for cancer therapy.