Search

Observational studies have reported many beneficial effects of vitamin and mineral supplements on cardiovascular and other diseases, but randomized controlled trials have failed to confirm these. This could be due to the failure of statistical adjustment to eliminate residual and unmeasured confounding by known risk factors. A Mendelian randomization study now suggests a similar problem for the observed beneficial effects of moderate alcohol intake. When 500,000 Chinese people were ranked by self-reported alcohol intake, stroke risk showed a U-shaped curve, risk being lowest at 1-2 units per day. However, when subjects were ranked by genetically conditioned intake, risk was lowest in abstainers and went up linearly with intake. Mendelian randomization may be more suitable for elucidating the effects of diet on health than conventional epidemiology.

Doctors can play a major role in reducing obesity in the community, but that requires an unconventional approach. Treatment of individual patients with diet or drugs is largely ineffective. In contrast, comprehensive community interventions such as one pioneered by EPODE in France have successfully reduced the prevalence of corpulence in children. Such a community approach requires simultaneously engagement by town governments, retailers, associations, restaurants, caterers, media, schools and kindergartens to cooperate in improving diets, reducing caloric intake and increasing activity. Physicians are by far the most highly trusted source of information when it comes to health matters. Therefore, a few words from a doctor at the right time and in the right place, e.g. at a city council meeting, could tip the scales. Individual doctors cannot cure patients' obesity by themselves in their offices, but a few hours per year spent on persuading key stakeholders might help to turn the tide on obesity in the community.

Taking fish oil supplements in the third trimester of pregnancy was associated with significantly less wheezing or asthma in the child at the age of 3-5 years, according to a randomized clinical trial by Bisgaard et al., NEJM 2017. However, the results of this study should be interpreted with caution. The primary end points were modified at a late stage in the study, and two primary end points, eczema in the first 3 years of life and allergic sensitization at 18 months of age, were demoted to secondary end points, and showed no significant effect of treatment. Furthermore, the age range for the published primary end point, persistent wheeze, differed from that in the protocol. Additional concerns include the emphasis on outcomes by omega-3 fatty acid levels in the blood, a post hoc subgroup analysis not included in the protocol. In our opinion, this study does not justify advising routine fish oil supplements in pregnancy.

Background: Substituting sugar-free for sugar-sweetened beverages reduces weight gain. This effect may be more pronounced in children with a high body mass index (BMI) because their sensing of kilocalories might be compromised. We investigated the impact of sugar-free versus sugary drinks separately in children with a higher and a lower initial BMI z score, and predicted caloric intakes and degree of compensation in the two groups., Methods and Findings: This is a secondary, explorative analysis of our double-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) which showed that replacement of one 250-mL sugary drink per day by a sugar-free drink for 18 months significantly reduced weight gain. In the 477 children who completed the trial, mean initial weights were close to the Dutch average. Only 16% were overweight and 3% obese. Weight changes were expressed as BMI z-score, i.e. as standard deviations of the BMI distribution per age and sex group. We designated the 239 children with an initial BMI z-score below the median as 'lower BMI' and the 238 children above the median as 'higher BMI'. The difference in caloric intake from experimental beverages between treatments was 86 kcal/day both in the lower and in the higher BMI group. We used a multiple linear regression and the coefficient of the interaction term (initial BMI group times treatment), indicated whether children with a lower BMI responded differently from children with a higher BMI. Statistical significance was defined as p ≤ 0.05. Relative to the sugar sweetened beverage, consumption of the sugar-free beverage for 18 months reduced the BMI z-score by 0.05 SD units within the lower BMI group and by 0.21 SD within the higher BMI group. Body weight gain was reduced by 0.62 kg in the lower BMI group and by 1.53 kg in the higher BMI group. Thus the treatment reduced the BMI z-score by 0.16 SD units more in the higher BMI group than in the lower BMI group (p = 0.04; 95% CI -0.31 to -0.01). The impact of the intervention on body weight gain differed by 0.90 kg between BMI groups (p = 0.09; 95% CI -1.95 to 0.14). In addition, we used a physiologically-based model of growth and energy balance to estimate the degree to which children had compensated for the covertly removed sugar kilocalories by increasing their intake of other foods. The model predicts that children with a lower BMI had compensated 65% (95% CI 28 to 102) of the covertly removed sugar kilocalories, whereas children with a higher BMI compensated only 13% (95% CI -37 to 63)., Conclusions: The children with a BMI above the median might have a reduced tendency to compensate for changes in caloric intake. Differences in these subconscious compensatory mechanisms may be an important cause of differences in the tendency to gain weight. If further research bears this out, cutting down on the intake of sugar-sweetened drinks may benefit a large proportion of children, especially those who show a tendency to become overweight., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00893529.

The latest dietary guidelines recommend increased consumption of vegetables, fruits and nuts; weekly consumption of beans and fish; zero intake of alcohol; reduced meat and salt consumption; water, milk or yoghurt, filtered coffee, and 3-5 daily cups of tea rather than soft drinks and fruit juice; and replacing butter with vegetable oils and soft margarine. The glycemic index is considered not useful. The totality of the guidelines can lower blood pressure substantially. Effects on LDL cholesterol may be limited because the guidelines ignore the saturated fat content of foods, and treat all dairy products as equal. Interpretation of the effects of foods in terms of their constituent parts is mostly dismissed; this is a worrisome development in an otherwise valuable report.

Background: Replacement of sugar-sweetened by non-nutritively sweetened beverages or water may reduce excess weight gain in children. However, it is unclear whether children like non-nutritively sweetened beverages as much as sugar-sweetened beverages. We examined whether children could taste a difference between non-nutritively sweetened beverages and matching sugar-sweetened beverages, and which of the two types of beverage they liked best., Methods: 89 children aged 5 to 12 tasted seven non-nutritively sweetened beverages and matching sugar-sweetened beverages, for a total of 14 beverages. We used Triangle tests to check their ability to discriminate between the matched versions, and a 5-point scale to measure how much the children liked each individual beverage., Results: Overall, 24% of children appeared to be genuinely capable of distinguishing between non-nutritively sweetened and sugar-sweetened beverages. The mean ± SD score for how much the children liked the non-nutritively sweetened beverages was 3.39 ± 0.7 and that for the sugar-sweetened beverages 3.39 ± 0.6 (P = 0.9) on a scale running from 1 (disgusting) to 5 (delicious). The children preferred some beverages to others irrespective of whether they were sugar-sweetened or non-nutritively sweetened (P = 0.000). Children who correctly identified which of three drinks contained the same sweetener and which one was different also showed no preference for either type., Conclusion: We found that about one in four children were able to discriminate between non-nutritively sweetened and sugar-sweetened beverages but children liked both varieties equally. Non-nutritively sweetened beverages may therefore be an acceptable alternative to sugar-sweetened beverages although water remains the healthiest beverage for children.