Search

Dimitrios Varrias,1,2,* Michail Spanos,3,* Damianos G Kokkinidis,4 Panagiotis Zoumpourlis,1,2 Dimitrios Rafail Kalaitzopoulos5 1Department of Medicine, Jacobi Medical Center, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA; 2Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA; 3Cardiovascular Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; 4Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT, USA; 5Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Cantonal Hospital Schaffhausen, Schaffhausen, Switzerland*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Dimitrios Varrias, Jacobi NYCHHC, 1400 Pelham Parkway South, 3N1, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA, Tel +1 7189185000, Email varriasd@nychhc.orgAbstract: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a serious medical condition that can lead to severe morbidity and mortality, making it a significant public health concern. VTE is a multifactorial condition that results from the interaction of genetic, acquired, and environmental factors. Physiological changes during pregnancy increase the risk of VTE as they express Virchow’s triad (increased coagulation factors, decreased fibrinolysis, trauma, and venous stasis). Moreover, pregnancy-related risk factors, such as advanced maternal age, obesity, multiple gestations, and cesarean delivery, further increase the risk of VTE. Managing VTE in pregnancy is challenging due to the complexity of balancing the risks and benefits of anticoagulant therapy for both the mother and the fetus. A multidisciplinary approach involving obstetricians, hematologists, and neonatologists, is necessary to ensure optimal outcomes for both the mother and baby. This review aims to discuss the current challenges associated with VTE in pregnancy and identify potential solutions for improving outcomes for pregnant women at risk for VTE.Keywords: venous embolism, thrombosis, pregnancy, VTE, anticoagulation

STUDY QUESTION: Does double vitrification and thawing of an embryo compromise the chance of live birth after a single blastocyst transfer? SUMMARY ANSWER: The live birth rate (LBR) obtained after double vitrification was comparable to that obtained after single vitrification. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Double vitrification-warming (DVW) is commonly practiced to accommodate surplus viable embryos suitable for transfer, to allow retesting of inconclusively diagnosed blastocysts in preimplantation genetic testing (PGT), and to circumvent limitations associated with national policies on embryo culture in certain countries. Despite its popularity, the evidence concerning the impact of DVW practice on ART outcomes is limited and lacking credibility. This is the first thorough investigation of clinical pregnancy and LBR following DVW in the case where the first round of vitrification occurred at the zygote stage and the second round occurred at the blastocyst stage in the absence of biopsy. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This is a retrospective observational analysis of n = 407 single blastocyst transfers whereby embryos created by IVF/ICSI were vitrified-warmed once (single vitrification-warming (SVW) n = 310) or twice (DVW, n = 97) between January 2017 and December 2021. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: In the SVW group, blastocysts were vitrified on Day 5/6 and warmed on the day of embryo transfer (ET). In the DVW group, two pronuclear (2PN) zygotes were first vitrified-warmed and then re-vitrified on Day 5/6 and warmed on the day of ET. Exclusion criteria were ETs from PGT and vitrified-warmed oocyte cycles. All of the ETs were single blastocyst transfers performed at the University Hospital Zurich in Switzerland following natural or artificial endometrial preparation. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The biochemical pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), and LBR were all comparable between the DVW and SVW groups. The CPR for DVW was 44.3% and for SVW i

Background: Sexuality has a key impact on quality of life and on reproductive health. Infertility often results in sexual dysfunction. Despite this close association, addressing sexuality is not a standard component of infertility counselling, especially since in most countries sexual medicine is not a core element of specialist training. Even today, many doctors and patients consider discussing sexuality to be more challenging than other aspects of reproductive medicine. The present review addresses the complex consequences of infertility on sexuality. Objective and rationale: Our goals were: (i) to identify the prevalence of sexual problems resulting from infertility, (ii) to evaluate characteristics of sexual difficulties and disorders resulting from infertility and (iii) to analyse factors involved in the complex association between sexual problems and infertility. Search methods: A systematic search for publications containing keywords related to sexual disorders and infertility was performed via PubMed, Web of Science and Psyndex. A total of 170 manuscripts published between January 1966 and April 2021 were identified after verification of inclusion and exclusion criteria. The reference lists in these manuscripts were searched for further relevant literature. Studies were reviewed for quality-related methodological details. Outcomes: Couples diagnosed with infertility have an increased risk of sexual disorders. Loss of sexual desire and erectile dysfunction are among the most frequent sexual disorders resulting from infertility. Currently available literature reflects only fragmentarily the complexity of the diverse interactions. Sexuality plays out against the backdrop of interactions among personal, cultural, infertility-related and sexuality-related factors. Considering this complexity, it is crucial to evaluate individual profiles as well as partnership interactions to avoid a negative impact of infertility on a couple's sexual life. Wider implications: Id

Superficial papilloma of the ovary is a rare benign ovarian finding, which was first described back in 1895. Here, we present the intraoperative and histological findings of a superficial papilloma of the ovary in a 59-year-old patient. Keywords: finding; laparoscopy; ovary; papilloma

Background: Endosalpingiosis is assumed to be the second most common benign peritoneal pathology after endometriosis in women. Although recent studies indicate a significant association with gynecologic malignancies, many underlying principles remain unclear. This work aimed to systematically describe the intraoperative appearance of endosalpingiosis. Methods: Data and intraoperative videos of patients with histologically verified endosalpingiosis were retrospectively reviewed. The main outcome measures were macroscopic phenotype and anatomical distribution. Additionally, a systematic review searching PubMed (Medline) and Embase was conducted. Results: In the study population (n = 77, mean age 40.2 years (SD 16.4)), the mean size of lesions was 3.6 mm and the main visual pattern was vesicular (62%). The most frequent localization was the sacrouterine ligaments (24.7%). In the systematic review population (n = 1174 (210 included studies overall), mean age 45.7 years (SD 14.4)), there were 99 patients in 90 different studies with adequate data to assess the appearance of the lesions. The mean size of the lesions was 48.5 mm, mainly with a cystic visual pattern (49.5%). The majority of the lesions affected the ovaries (23.2%), fallopian tubes (20.4%), or lymph nodes (18.5%). Comparing this study to the literature population, the main differences concerned the size (p < 0.001) and main visual patterns (p < 0.001) of lesions. Conclusions: The usual intraoperative findings of endosalpingiosis appeared less impressive than described in the literature. In our study population, lesions of a few millimeters in size with a vesicular appearance were mostly seen, most frequently in the sacrouterine ligament area. Intraoperative recognition by the gynecologic surgeon and histologic diagnosis should play an important role in further understanding this entity, scientifically and clinically. Keywords: endosalpingiosis; endosalpingiosis distribution; endosalpingiosis morphology

Background: Social media platforms, such as Facebook and Instagram, are increasingly being used to share health-related information by "influencers," regular users, and institutions alike. While patients may benefit in various ways from these interactions, little is known about the types of endometriosis-related information published on social media. As digital opinion leaders influence the perceptions of their followers, physicians need to be aware about ideas and beliefs that are available online, in order to address possible misconceptions and provide optimal patient care. Objective: The aim of this study was to identify and analyze frequent endometriosis-related discussion topics on social media in order to offer caregivers insight into commonly discussed subject matter and aspects. Methods: We performed a systematic search using predefined parameters. Using the term "endometriosis" in Facebook's search function and a social media search engine, a list of Facebook pages was generated. A list of Instagram accounts was generated using the terms "endometriosis" and "endo" in Instagram's search function. Pages and accounts in English with 5000 or more followers or likes were included. Nonpublic, unrelated, or inactive pages and accounts were excluded. For each account, the most recent 10 posts were identified and categorized by two independent examiners using qualitative content analysis. User engagement was calculated using the numbers of interactions (ie, shares, likes, and comments) for each post, stratified by the number of followers. Results: A total of 39 Facebook pages and 43 Instagram accounts with approximately 1.4 million followers were identified. Hospitals and medical centers made up 15% (6/39) of the Facebook pages and 5% (2/43) of the Instagram accounts. Top accounts had up to 111,600 (Facebook) and 41,400 (Instagram) followers. A total of 820 posts were analyzed. On Facebook, most posts were categorized as "awareness" (101/390, 25.9% of posts), "educa

Objective: To describe the anatomical distribution and intraoperative morphology of endosalpingiosis. Design: Retrospective observational video study. Setting: Data and intraoperative videos were reviewed by two independent reviewers at one referral center. The study was approved by the local ethics committee. Patient(s): A total of 77 patients with histologically proven endosalpingiosis from 2007-2020. Intervention(s): None. Main outcome measure(s): The primary endpoints were anatomical distribution and macroscopic phenotype. The secondary endpoints were demographic and clinical characteristics as well as associated diseases. Result(s): Of the 77 patients with endosalpingiosis, the mean age was 40.2 years (standard deviation, 16.4 years), mean body mass index 24.1 kg/m2 (standard deviation, 5.7 kg/m2), 59.7% (n = 46) were nulligravide, 70.1% (n = 54) nulliparous, 22.1% (n = 17) suffered of infertility, and 53.2% (n = 41) had at least one previous abdominal or vaginal surgery. Endometriosis was associated in 53.2 % (n = 41) and malignancies in 28.6% (n = 22, 7 endometrial cancers, 1 uterine carcinosarcoma, 8 borderline ovarian tumors, 5 epithelial ovarian cancers, and 1 yolk sac tumor of the ovary). Anatomic distribution and varying intraoperative phenotypes were demonstrated in the video presentation. Conclusion(s): In the majority of this population, endosalpingiosis was located in the pelvis. The higher prevalence of specific gynecologic tumors is consistent with previous results. In phenotype, most lesions appear to be less spectacular than prominent in the literature. For further studies on the relevance as a risk factor for malignancy and consequently clinical recommendations, sound knowledge about endosalpingiosis of laparoscopists as initial diagnosticians is crucial. Keywords: Endosalpingiosis; borderline ovarian tumor; endometrial cancer; endoscopy; epithelial ovarian cancer; laparoscopy; müllerianosis.

A patients’ increasing interest in dietary modifications as a possible complementary or alternative treatment of endometriosis is observed. Unfortunately, the therapeutic potential of dietary interventions is unclear and to date no guidelines to assist physicians on this topic exist. The aim of this study, therefore, was to systematically review the existing studies on the effect of dietary interventions on endometriosis. An electronic-based search was performed in MEDLINE and COCHRANE. We included human and animal studies that evaluated a dietary intervention on endometriosis-associated symptoms or other health outcomes. Studies were identified and coded using standard criteria, and the risk of bias was assessed with established tools relevant to the study design. We identified nine human and 12 animal studies. Out of the nine human studies, two were randomized controlled trials, two controlled studies, four uncontrolled before-after studies, and one qualitative study. All of them assessed a different dietary intervention, which could be classified in one of the following principle models: supplementation with selected dietary components, exclusion of selected dietary components, and complete diet modification. Most of the studies reported a positive effect on endometriosis; they were however characterized by moderate or high-risk bias possibly due to the challenges of conducting dietary intervention trials. According to the available level of evidence, we suggest an evidence-based clinical approach for physicians to use during consultations with their patients. Further well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed to accurately determine the short-term and long-term effectiveness and safety of different dietary interventions.