Search

No studies evaluating the rapidity of response to biological therapies are available for Crohn's disease (CD). The aim of this study was to evaluate rapidity of onset of clinical response and impact on quality of life (QoL) of adalimumab therapy in adult anti-TNF-naïve patients with moderately-to-severely active CD.RAPIDA was an open-label, single-arm, prospective, multicenter clinical trial. Adult patients with moderately-to-severely active luminal CD, anti-TNF-naïve, and unresponsive to conventional therapy were treated with adalimumab. Clinical disease activity, QoL and inflammatory biomarkers were measured at day 4, and weeks 1, 2, 4, and 12 after treatment initiation.Eighty-six patients were included in the intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses. Clinical disease activity was reduced from a median of 9.0 points to 6.0 points at day 4. Clinical response (≥ 3-point reduction in the Harvey-Bradshaw Index, HBI) was achieved by 61.6% (d4) and 75.6% (w1) of patients in the ITT population (median 2.5 days) and with non-responder imputation (NRI), by 55.8% and 53.4%, respectively. The proportion of patients in clinical remission (HBI5) at weeks 2 and 4 in the ITT population was 54.7% and 62.8%, respectively (median 7.0 days), and 38.4% and 45.3% in the NRI population. All QoL scores significantly improved and inflammatory biomarkers significantly decreased from day 4 onwards (p0.0001).Rapid clinical response and remission, improvement in QoL and fatigue, and a reduction of inflammatory biomarkers were achieved with adalimumab as early as day 4 in adult anti-TNF-naïve patients with moderately-to-severely active CD.

Background Methotrexate is widely used to treat some inflammatory chronic disorders, though it is hampered by the risk of liver fibrosis. Many recommendations have been made to assess methotrexate-related hepatotoxicity, including liver biopsy. However, other noninvasive methods to assess liver fibrosis have been developed and could be implemented for patients treated with methotrexate. Aim The aim of the study was to compare the prevalence of liver fibrosis by means of noninvasive methods [aspartate transaminase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) Forns index, and transient elastography] in patients with Crohn's disease exposed or not to methotrexate, and to identify risk factors for liver fibrosis. Methods Prospective, cross-sectional study. All patients with Crohn's disease exposed to methotrexate were included and compared to an unselected cohort of outpatients with Crohn's disease never exposed to methotrexate. Results A total of 84 patients with Crohn's disease, 56 exposed to methotrexate, and 28 controls, were included. Significant liver fibrosis was found in 7% of methotrexate-exposed patients with Crohn's disease and 10% of controls as measured by transient elastography, and in 7% of controls as measured by the Forns index. No cases of liver fibrosis were detected by APRI. Only alcohol consumption, diabetes mellitus, and age were associated with significant liver fibrosis. Conclusions Significant liver fibrosis is uncommon among patients with Crohn's disease, even among those exposed to methotrexate. The risk of liver fibrosis in Crohn's disease seems to depend on common risk factors for liver disease.

COVID-19; Immunosuppression; Inflammatory bowel disease COVID-19; Immunosupressió; Malaltia inflamatòria intestinal COVID-19; Inmunosupresión; Enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal (1) Scant information is available concerning the characteristics that may favour the acquisition of COVID-19 in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess these differences between infected and noninfected patients with IBD. (2) This nationwide case−control study evaluated patients with inflammatory bowel disease with COVID-19 (cases) and without COVID-19 (controls) during the period March−July 2020 included in the ENEIDA of GETECCU. (3) A total of 496 cases and 964 controls from 73 Spanish centres were included. No differences were found in the basal characteristics between cases and controls. Cases had higher comorbidity Charlson scores (24% vs. 19%; p = 0.02) and occupational risk (28% vs. 10.5%; p < 0.0001) more frequently than did controls. Lockdown was the only protective measure against COVID-19 (50% vs. 70%; p < 0.0001). No differences were found in the use of systemic steroids, immunosuppressants or biologics between cases and controls. Cases were more often treated with 5-aminosalicylates (42% vs. 34%; p = 0.003). Having a moderate Charlson score (OR: 2.7; 95%CI: 1.3−5.9), occupational risk (OR: 2.9; 95%CI: 1.8−4.4) and the use of 5-aminosalicylates (OR: 1.7; 95%CI: 1.2−2.5) were factors for COVID-19. The strict lockdown was the only protective factor (OR: 0.1; 95%CI: 0.09−0.2). (4) Comorbidities and occupational exposure are the most relevant factors for COVID-19 in patients with IBD. The risk of COVID-19 seems not to be increased by immunosuppressants or biologics, with a potential effect of 5-aminosalicylates, which should be investigated further and interpreted with caution.

Aim To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib in ulcerative colitis [UC] in real life. Methods Patients from the prospectively maintained ENEIDA registry and treated with tofacitinib due to active UC were included. Clinical activity and effectiveness were defined based on Partial Mayo Score [PMS]. Short-term response/remission was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, and 16. Results A total of 113 patients were included. They were exposed to tofacitinib for a median time of 44 weeks. Response and remission at Week 8 were 60% and 31%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, higher PMS at Week 4 (odds ratio [OR] = 0].2; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0].1–0.4) was the only variable associated with lower likelihood of achieving remission at Week 8. Higher PMS at Week 4 [OR = 0.5; 95% CI = 0.3–0.7] and higher PMS at Week 8 [OR = 0.2; 95% CI = 0.1–0.5] were associated with lower probability of achieving remission at Week 16. A total of 45 patients [40%] discontinued tofacitinib over time. Higher PMS at Week 8 was the only factor associated with higher tofacitinib discontinuation [hazard ratio = 1.5; 95% CI = 1.3–1.6]. A total of 34 patients had remission at Week 8; of these, 65% had relapsed 52 weeks after achieving remission; the dose was increased to 10 mg/12 h in nine patients, and five of them reached remission again. Seventeen patients had adverse events. Conclusions Tofacitinib is effective and safe in UC patients in real practice, even in a highly refractory cohort. A relevant proportion of patients discontinue the drug over time, mainly due to primary failure.

Objectives: To assess the rates and severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with autoimmune and immune-mediated inflammatory disease (AI/IMID) treated with anticytokine biologics (AB) or Janus Kinase inhibitors (JAKi), and to compare the types of confinement observed by AI/IMID patients and the general population. Methodology: A case-control study nested within a retrospective observational study. Subjects: AI/IMID patients followed by rheumatology, dermatology and digestology specialists and who were receiving treatment with AB/JAKi. Controls were selected from our Primary Care Centers. The main outcome was SARS-CoV-2 infection and severity. The secondary outcome was the type of confinement (strict, standard, lax, and no confinement). Results: Three hundred and sixty-seven patients (54·8% men, mean age 52 years) and 193 controls (53·4% men, mean age 52 years). In patients’ group, 95·6% were receiving AB treatment, and 43·3% had at least one risk factor for COVID compared to 37·8% of controls. Cumulative rates of COVID infection were 10·1% in the AI/IMID group and 13·5% in controls (p=0·228). Strict confinement was the most frequent form in both groups; lax confinement was more common in the control group (p=0·013, OR=0·62). There were no differences in the incidence of COVID-19 according to type of confinement. Conclusions: The incidence of COVID-19 infection in our cohort is similar to that reported in other series. None of our patients developed severe COVID-19 infection. We observed that strict confinement was predominant in both groups and was higher in the AI/IMID patients. Lax confinement was more frequent in the control group. Funding: This project has obtained a research grant from the Catalan Society of Rheumatology which has allowed the project to be carried out. Declaration of Interest: None to declare. Ethical Approval: The protocol was approved by an independent Clinical Research Ethics Committee (Comite d'Etica d'Investigacio Clinica de la Fundacio Unio Catalana d'Hospitals, protocol number CEIC 20/45).

Background Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib in ulcerative colitis (UC) in real life. Methods Patients from the prospectively maintained ENEIDA registry treated with tofacitinib due to active UC were included. Clinical activity and effectiveness were defined based on Partial Mayo Score (PMS). The short-term response was assessed at week 4, 8 and 16. The last-observation-carried-forward method was used in patients that stopped tofacitinib before the time-points for clinical assessment. Variables associated with short-term remission at week 8 were identified by logistic regression analysis. The cumulative retention rate and the cumulative incidence of relapse over time were assessed by survival curves. Cox-regression analysis was performed to identify predictive factors of tofacitinib discontinuation or relapse over time. Data quality was assessed by remote monitoring. Results 113 patients were included (Table 1 and Figure 1) and exposed to tofacitinib a median of 44 (interquartile range = 30–66) weeks. Response and remission at week 8 were 60% and 31%, respectively (Figure 2). In multivariate analysis, higher PMS at week 4 [odds ratio (OR)=0.2; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.1–0.4] was the only variable associated with the likeliness of achieving remission at week 8. Higher PMS at week 4 (OR = 0.5; 95% CI = 0.3–0.7) and higher PMS at week 8 (OR = 0.2; 95% CI = 0.1–0.5) were associated with lower probability of achieving remission at week 16. Twenty per cent of those without remission at week 4, and 12% of those without remission at week 8, achieved remission at week 16. A total of 45 patients (40%) discontinued tofacitinib over time (Figure 3); the discontinuation rate was 34% and 46% at 24 and 52 weeks, respectively. PMS at week 8 was the only factor associated with tofacitinib discontinuation [Hazard ratio (HR) = 1.5; 95% CI = 1.3–1.6)]. A total of 33 patients had remission at week 8; from them, 65% relapsed 52 weeks after achieving remission; 9 patients increased the dose to 10 mg /12 h and 5 reached remission again. No factors associated with relapse over time were identified. Eighteen patients had adverse events (4 hypercholesterolaemia, 2 herpes zoster, 3 infections, 2 dyspnoea, 1 neoplasia, 1 lymphopenia, 1 headache, 1 hypertriglyceridaemia and 4 others). No thromboembolic events were reported. Conclusion Tofacitinib is relatively effective in UC patients in real practice even in a highly refractory cohort. Only 10% of the patients without remission at week 8 reached remission at week 16. A relevant proportion of patients discontinue the drug over time, mainly due to primary failure. Over 60% of patients that achieve remission, relapse over time. Safety was consistent with the known profile of tofacitinib

Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) have an increased risk of colorectal cancer. Scarce data regarding the development of adenomas in these patients are available both for normal and colitic mucosa.The objective of this article is to evaluate the prevalence of adenomatous polyps and associated risk factors in patients with UC.Patients with UC were identified from the databases of two tertiary referral centers. Medical, endoscopic and histologic reports were reviewed.A total of 403 patients were included (53% male; 33% extensive colitis) and 1065 colonoscopies (median per patient, 2) were recorded and analyzed. Seventy-four adenomas in 47 patients (11.7%) and three cases of colorectal cancer were found during a median follow-up of 6.3 years. The cumulative risk of colorectal adenoma was 4.7%, 16.7%, 23.6% and 34.4% at 10, 20, 30 and 40 years from UC diagnosis, respectively. The cumulative risk of developing metachronous colorectal adenoma was 66.7%, 87.9%, and 90.9% at 5, 10, and 15 years from first adenoma detection. Older age at UC diagnosis and longer disease duration were independent risk factors for colorectal adenoma development.The prevalence of colorectal adenomas among UC patients seems to be higher than previously reported, although lower than in the background population.

Background The exhaustive registry of COVID-19 cases in patients with IBD is a unique opportunity to learn how to deal with this infection, especially in reference to the management of immunosuppressive treatment, isolation measures or if the disease is more severe in IBD patients due to immunosuppression. With these premises, the aims of this study were to know the incidence and characteristics of COVID-19 in the ENEIDA cohort during the first wave of the pandemic; the outcomes among those under immunosuppressants/biologics for IBD; the risk factors for contracting the infection and poor outcomes; and the impact of the infection after three-month follow-up. Methods Prospective observational cohort study of all IBD patients with COVID-19 included in the ENEIDA registry (with 60.512 patients in that period) between March and July 2020, with at least 3 months of follow-up. Any patient with a confirmed (by PCR or SARS-CoV-2 serology) or probable (suggestive clinical picture) infection was considered as a case. Results A total of 484 patients with COVID-19 from 63 centres were included: 247 Crohn’s disease, 223 ulcerative colitis and 14 unclassified colitis; median age 52 years (IQR: 42–61), 48% women and 44% ≥1 comorbidity. Diagnosis was made by PCR: 63% and serology: 35%. The most frequent symptoms: fever (69%), followed by cough (63%) and asthenia (38%). During lockdown 78% followed strict isolation. 35% required hospital admission (ICU: 2.7%) and 12% fulfilled criteria for SIRS upon admission. 16 patients died from COVID-19 (mortality:3.3%). 12% stop IBD medication during COVID-19. At 3 months, taken into account all included cases, 76% were in remission of IBD. Male gender (OR 1.56; 95%CI:1–2.4, p=0.05), ≥40 years of age (OR 2.55; 95% CI:1.4–4.8; p=0.004), Charlson score ≥1 (OR 2.1; 95% CI:1.3–3.5; p=0.004), and systemic steroids Conclusion IBD does not seem to worsen the prognosis of COVID-19, even when immunosuppressants and biological drugs are used. Age and comorbidity are the most important prognostic factors for more severe COVID-19 in IBD patients. The use of aminosalicylates and the risk of a worse outcome deserves a deeper analysis. Funded by the Carlos III Health Institute (COV20 / 00227).

Background The effectiveness of the switch to another anti–tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agent is not known. The aim of this study was to analyze the effectiveness and safety of treatment with a second and third anti-TNF drug after intolerance to or failure of a previous anti-TNF agent in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. Methods We included patients diagnosed with IBD from the ENEIDA registry who received another anti-TNF after intolerance to or failure of a prior anti-TNF agent. Results A total of 1122 patients were included. In the short term, remission was achieved in 55% of the patients with the second anti-TNF. The incidence of loss of response was 19% per patient-year with the second anti-TNF. Combination therapy (hazard ratio [HR], 2.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8–3; P < 0.0001) and ulcerative colitis vs Crohn’s disease (HR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1–2.1; P = 0.005) were associated with a higher probability of loss of response. Fifteen percent of the patients had adverse events, and 10% had to discontinue the second anti-TNF. Of the 71 patients who received a third anti-TNF, 55% achieved remission. The incidence of loss of response was 22% per patient-year with a third anti-TNF. Adverse events occurred in 7 patients (11%), but only 1 stopped the drug. Conclusions Approximately half of the patients who received a second anti-TNF achieved remission; nevertheless, a significant proportion of them subsequently lost response. Combination therapy and type of IBD were associated with loss of response. Remission was achieved in almost 50% of patients who received a third anti-TNF; nevertheless, a significant proportion of them subsequently lost response.

Objectives: (a) To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of anti-TNF trough levels to predict mucosal healing in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD); (b) to determine the best cut-off point to predict mucosal healing in IBD patients treated with anti-TNF. Methods: This is a multicenter, prospective study. IBD patients under anti-TNF treatment for at least 6 months that had to undergo an endoscopy were included. Mucosal healing was defined as: Simple endoscopic score for Crohn’s Disease < 3 for Crohn’s disease (CD), Rutgeerts score < i2 for CD in postoperative setting, or Mayo endoscopic score = 1 for ulcerative colitis (UC). Anti-TNF concentrations were measured using SMART ELISAs at trough. Results: A total of 182 patients were included. Anti-TNF trough levels were significantly higher among patients that had mucosal healing than among those who did not. The area under the curve of infliximab for mucosal healing was 0.63 (best cutoff value 3.4 µg/mL), and for adalimumab 0.60 (best cutoff value 7.2 µg/mL). In the multivariate analysis, having anti-TNF drug levels above the cutoff values [odds ratio (OR) 3.1]) and having UC instead of CD (OR 4) were associated with a higher probability of having mucosal healing. Additionally, the need for an escalated dosage (OR 0.2) and current smoking habit (OR 0.2) were also associated with a lower probability of mucosal healing. Conclusions: There was an association between anti-TNF trough levels and mucosal healing in IBD patients; however, the accuracy of the determination of infliximab and adalimumab concentrations able to predict mucosal healing was suboptimal.

Resumen Introduccion Infliximab ha demostrado su eficacia en evitar la colectomia a corto y medio plazo en los pacientes con colitis ulcerosa corticorrefractarios (CUCR). No obstante, existen pocos datos acerca del tratamiento de mantenimiento mas adecuado en los pacientes con CUCR que han respondido al tratamiento de induccion a infliximab. El objetivo del estudio es comparar la evolucion a largo plazo de los pacientes corticorrefractarios que han respondido al tratamiento de induccion a infliximab segun hayan seguido tratamiento de mantenimiento con azatioprina en monoterapia o infliximab. Pacientes y metodos Se seleccionaron los pacientes ingresados en 3 centros entre enero de 2005 y diciembre de 2011 por un brote moderado-grave de CUCR que habian respondido a las 3 dosis de induccion de infliximab sin necesidad de colectomia antes de la semana 22 despues de la primera infusion. Resultados Se incluyeron 22 pacientes, 9 (37%) siguieron tratamiento con azatioprina y 15 (63%) con infliximab. Despues de una mediana de 18 meses de seguimiento, los corticoides se pudieron retirar en todos. De los que siguieron tratamiento con azatioprina, infliximab tuvo que ser reintroducido en 4 (44%). No hubo ninguna colectomia. De los 15 pacientes que siguieron tratamiento con infliximab, este requirio ser intensificado en el 53%, aunque en 9 (65%) pudo retirarse por remision clinica. Cuatro pacientes (16%) requirieron colectomia. Conclusiones Segun los resultados del estudio parece recomendable seguir tratamiento con infliximab, incluso en los pacientes no expuestos previamente a tiopurinas, dada la necesidad de reintroduccion de infliximab si se sigue tratamiento con azatioprina en monoterapia.

Background INFEII registry (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02904590) is a prospective study promoted by GETECCU to determine the incidence and risk factors of infection in an inception cohort of IBD patients. Despite preventive measures and recommendations of scientific societies, TB remains a problem in patients with IBD treated with immunosuppressants (IMM) and biologics. AIMS To asses: (1) the screening of TB performed at the time of inclusion of a patient in the INFEII registry, (2) the incidence of latent TB; and (3) compliance with national and European recommendations. Methods A longitudinal prospective study of incident cases with IBD, initiated in October 2016 and with a planned follow-up of 5 years. In September 2019, INFEII registry had 1241 patients from 28 centres throughout Spain. The study protocol determines the mandatory fulfilment of TB screening in every patient, leaving to the centre the freedom of decision on what procedures to perform. Guidelines recommend a mandatory study before starting immunosuppression, especially with biological treatment, using the combination of tuberculin skin test (TST) and interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) or at least one TST with a booster test1,2. Results Of the 1241 patients 233 (19%) had no screening, 494 (40%) had one [TST 158, IGRA 299, thorax-X-ray 37], 288 (23%) two [TST + IGRA 87, IGRA + thorax-X-ray 130, TST + thorax-X-ray 30, TST + booster 41], 128 (10%) three [TST + IGRA + thorax-X-ray 65, TST + booster + IGRA 23, TST + booster + thorax-X-ray 40] and 98 (7.9%) the four tests [TST + booster + IGRA + thorax-X-ray]. 486 patients (48%) receive pharmacological immunosuppression (172 IMMS, 195 biologics, 119 COMBO) and from them 198 (41%) followed the guidelines recommendation (131 TST and IGRA and 118 TST-booster), 245 (50%) had some method for TB screening [TST 43, IGRA 112, thorax-X-ray 15, IGRA + thorax-X-ray 57, TST + thorax-X-ray 18] and 43 patients (8.8%) had no screening. With the baseline screening, latent TB was detected in 134 patients (13%), 63 (47%) receiving anti-TB chemotherapy. In patients initiating immunosuppression, latent TB was detected in 35 cases [of which 28 received prophylaxis but 7 under IMM did not]. Active TB was detected in 4 cases: 2 during baseline screening, one without screening and one with negative screening (negative TST and IGRA, without booster receiving biological treatment). Conclusion Despite TB in IBD is a relevant problem, there is ample room for improvement for the implementation of mandatory minimum screening recommendations, even in prospective protocolised projects. References

Background Three anti-TNFs (one intravenous and two subcutaneous) are licensed for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). However, it is not known if the efficacy of a second anti-TNF changes on whether it is intravenous or subcutaneous; this could justify the indication of biological agents with a different mechanism of action in second line. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of a second subcutaneous or intravenous anti-TNF in UC. Methods Patients from the prospectively maintained ENEIDA registry treated with consecutively intravenous and subcutaneous anti-TNF, who were naïve to biological agents, were identified. Patients were classified according to the administration route of the first anti-TNF in: IVi (intravenous initially) or SCi (subcutaneous initially). Patients treated for extraintestinal manifestations or pouchitis were excluded. Clinical activity and effectiveness were defined based on Partial Mayo Score (PMS) at baseline, 14 and 52 weeks. Loss of response, dose-escalation and treatment discontinuation were also assessed. Results 372 UC patients were included (270 IVi and 102 SCi). Both cohorts were similar in clinical-epidemiological characteristics, except for a higher proportion of patients with moderate-to-severe clinical activity at the beginning of the first anti-TNF in the IVi group (82% vs. 71%; p = 0.017) and at the beginning of the second anti-TNF (62% vs. 74%; p = 0.04). Clinical response and remission rates at week 14 for the second anti-TNF were 41% and 29% in IVi vs. 47% and 25% in SCi, respectively (p = ns). At week 52, clinical response/remission rates of the second anti-TNF were 37%/32% in IVi vs. 40%/29% in SCi (p = ns). A higher response rate at 14 weeks with the second anti-TNF was detected in the SCi group (40% vs. 68%; p = 0.012) when the reason for withdrawal of the first anti-TNF was secondary loss of response. The cumulative persistence of the second anti-TNF treatment in IVi and SCi were 55% and 54% after 1 year, and 41% and 40% after 2 years, respectively (p = ns). The SCi group had lower rates of dose-escalation with the second anti-TNF than IVi (34% and 29% in SCi vs. 57% and 49% in EVi, at 12 and 24 months, respectively -p = 0.004-). Dose-escalation of the first anti-TNF and moderate-to-severe clinical activity at the beginning of the second anti-TNF were associated with a lower probability of remission with the second anti-TNF in the short- and long-term. Conclusion The efficacy of infliximab after failure/intolerance of a subcutaneous anti-TNF is similar to that of subcutaneous anti-TNFs after infliximab failure/intolerance.

Background Approximately one half of the patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) develop intestinal strictures during their lifetime. The effectiveness of currently approved drugs in fibrosis-predominant lesions is very limited. Our aim was to determine the effectiveness of anti-TNF therapy in CD complicated by symptomatic intestinal strictures in a real-world setting. Methods We included adult patients with symptomatic stricturing CD receiving their first-line anti-TNF therapy. Strictures were defined as constant luminal narrowing with pre-stenotic dilatation. We excluded those patients with previous anti-TNF exposure, surgery or endoscopic therapy of the stenosis. The effectiveness of the anti-TNF was defined as a composite outcome combining the persistence of the treatment and without dose or frequency intensification, with no new immunomodulators, surgery or endoscopic therapy during follow-up. A multivariate Cox regression was performed and the final multivariate model was determined using a backward procedure. Results A total of 262 patients from 32 sites were included (141 received infliximab and 121 adalimumab). The median number of stenosis per patient was 1 (range 1–9). The treatment was effective in 81% and 59% of patients after 6 and 12 months, respectively, while this outcome was fulfilled by 21% after a median of 40 months (IQR, 19–85). During follow-up, anti-TNF therapy required a dose or frequency adjustment in 39% of patients, 12% required a new immunomodulator or endoscopic therapy in 4%. The proportion of subjects requiring surgery was 15% and 21% after 1 and 2 years, respectively, with an overall rate of surgery of 32%. Infliximab was associated with a higher rate of surgery as compared with adalimumab (OR 1.78; 95% CI, 1,025-3,09). A shorter time since the diagnosis of CD or the stricture and the initiation of anti-TNF therapy was associated with a greater effectiveness at 6 and 12 months (HR 0.99 95% CI 0.99–1, p = 0.045; HR 0.99 95% CI 0.99–0.99, p = 0.015; HR 0.98 95% CI 0.96–0.99, p = 0.024; HR 0.99 95% CI 0.98–1.0, p = 0.046; respectively). In the survival analysis, younger age, lower albumin levels at baseline, strictures being located in the descending colon, concomitant use of mesalamine and the presence of ulcers or lymphadenopathy at the stricture were associated with lower effectiveness. The anti-TNF agent was discontinued in 131 patients (50%), and 88 subjects (34%) required a switch to a new biologic. Conclusion Anti-TNF agents are effective in approximately 20% of patients with CD complicated with symptomatic strictures. Early introduction of anti-TNF therapy improves the effectiveness in the short term in these patients. Some clinical and radiological predictors can identify patients with a lower probability of response.

Background Colonic cytomegalovirus [CMV] reactivation has been involved in steroid refractoriness in patients with active ulcerative colitis [UC]. The benefits of antiviral therapy in this clinical setting are still under debate, but the burden of viral reactivation has been associated with a poorer outcome in some studies. Our aim was to assess whether the burden of CMV reactivation measured by the number of viral inclusions by immunohistochemistry [IHC-CMV] is associated with a risk of colectomy. Methods Biopsy sets of UC patients with positive IHC-CMV were identified from the Pathology departments of three university hospitals. All biopsies were reviewed by expert pathologists, and the maximum number of IHC-CMV-positive cells in each biopsy set was re-assessed. Epidemiological and clinical features and clinical outcomes were recorded. Results Forty-six positive IHC-CMV cases with UC were included. At the time of CMV reactivation, 70% were receiving corticosteroids, 33% azathioprine, and 24% anti-tumour necrosis factor [TNF] agents. Thirty-two patients [70%] were treated with antiviral therapy. The median number of IHC-CMV-positive cells was 2 cells/biopsy [IQR 1-4]. Fourteen patients [30%] underwent colectomy, and 4 of them [29%] showed persistence of CMV in the surgical specimen. In the multivariate analysis, colectomy was only associated with >2 positive cells/biopsy [p = 0.048] and younger age [p = 0.023]. Conclusions The burden of CMV colonic reactivation in patients with active UC, as measured by IHC, seems to be related to the risk of colectomy, and more data is needed to understand whether antiviral therapy guided by CMV burden will alter the clinical outcome.

T1 colorectal polyps with at least 1 risk factor for metastasis to lymph node should be treated surgically and are considered endoscopically unresectable. Optical analysis, based on the Narrow-Band Imaging International Colorectal Endoscopic (NICE) classification system, is used to identify neoplasias with invasion of the submucosa that require endoscopic treatment. We assessed the accuracy of the NICE classification, along with other morphologic characteristics, in identifying invasive polyps that are endoscopically unresectable (have at least 1 risk factor for metastasis to lymph node).We performed a multicenter, prospective study of data collected by 58 endoscopists, from 1634 consecutive patients (examining 2123 lesions) at 17 university and community hospitals in Spain from July 2014 through June 2016. All consecutive lesions10 mm assessed with narrow-band imaging were included. The primary end point was the accuracy of the NICE classification for identifying lesions with deep invasion, using findings from histology analysis as the reference standard. Conditional inference trees were fitted for the analysis of diagnostic accuracy.Of the 2123 lesions analyzed, 89 (4.2%) had features of deep invasion and 91 (4.3%) were endoscopically unresectable. The NICE classification system identified lesions with deep invasion with 58.4% sensitivity (95% CI, 47.5-68.8), 96.4% specificity (95% CI, 95.5-97.2), a positive-predictive value of 41.6% (95% CI, 32.9-50.8), and a negative-predictive value of 98.1% (95% CI, 97.5-98.7). A conditional inference tree that included all variables found the NICE classification to most accurately identify lesions with deep invasion (P.001). However, pedunculated morphology (P.007), ulceration (P = .026), depressed areas (P.001), or nodular mixed type (P.001) affected accuracy of identification. Results were comparable for identifying lesions that were endoscopically unresectable.In an analysis of 2123 colon lesions10 mm, we found the NICE classification and morphologic features identify those with deep lesions with96% specificity-even in non-expert hands and without magnification. ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT02328066.

Background & Aims Relative adrenal insufficiency (RAI) is common in critical illness and in cirrhosis, and is related with worse outcomes. The prevalence of RAI may be different in variceal and non-variceal bleeding and whether it may influence outcomes in these settings is unclear. This study assesses RAI and its prognostic implications in cirrhosis with variceal bleeding and in peptic ulcer bleeding. Methods Patients with severe bleeding (systolic pressure

Background and aim: Intravenous corticosteroids remain the first line therapy for severe attacks of ulcerative colitis although up to 30-40% of patients do not respond to treatment. The availability of alternative therapies to colectomy and the knowledge of early predictors of response to corticosteroids should have improved the clinical outcomes of patients with severe refractory ulcerative colitis. The aim of the study is to describe the current need, way of use, and efficacy of rescue therapies, as well as colectomy rates in patients with severe ulcerative colitis flares. Methods: Between January 2005 and December 2011, all patients admitted in three referral centres for a severe ulcerative colitis flare who received intravenous corticosteroids were identified and clinical and biological data were accurately collected. Patients were followed-up until colectomy, death, or date of data collection. Results: Sixty-two flares were included. Initial efficacy of intravenous corticosteroids (mild activity or inactive disease without rescue treatment, at day 7 after starting intravenous corticosteroids) was achieved in 50% of flares, and rescue therapies were used in 27 episodes (43%). After a median follow-up of 18 months, the colectomy rate was 6.5%. Failed oral corticosteroids for the index flare were the only baseline feature that predicted the need for rescue therapy and colectomy. Conclusions: There is a marked reduction in the colectomy rate and an increased use of medical rescue therapies as compared to historical series. Patients worsening while on oral corticosteroids for a moderate flare are at high risk of rescue therapy and colectomy and, therefore, should be directly treated with rescue therapies instead of attempting intravenous corticosteroids. (C) 2016 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.