Search

Aim: Our aim was to use epidemiological data to determine the incidence of soccer‐related head injuries in children aged 5–14 years who presented at emergency departments (EDs) or were admitted in hospitals in Victoria, Australia. Methods: ED presentation and hospital admission de‐identified aggregate data were from the Victorian Injury Surveillance Unit. Soccer participation data were compared with the soccer‐related head injury data to determine the incidence of this injury among these children. Results: The incidence of ED presentations was 0.17% of children participating in soccer during the study period (financial years 2011–2012 to 2015–2016). The 10–14‐years age group presented with more head injuries than the 5–9‐years age group. For the admissions data, soccer had a significantly lower (P = 0.0379) incidence of head injury when compared with 'sport as a whole'. Conclusions: The low incidence of soccer‐related head injuries presenting to an ED or admission to hospital is consistent with international findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: There is limited data on the duration of consults resulting in the prescription of antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) in general practice.Objective: To explore how demographic factors influence consult duration where antibiotics have been prescribed for URTI in Australian general practice.Methods: 2985 URTI-specific presentations were identified from a national study of patients who were prescribed an antibiotic after presenting to general practice between June and September 2017. Consult duration was analysed to assess for any variation in visit length based on demographic factors.Results: The overall median consult duration was 11.42 minutes [interquartile range (IQR) 7.95]. Longer consult duration was associated with areas of highest socio-economic advantage where patients living in postcodes of Index of Relative Socio-economic Advantage and Disadvantage (IRSAD) Quintile 5 (highest 20% on the IRSAD) had significantly longer consults [median 13.12 (IQR 8.01)] than all other quintiles (P < 0.001). Females [11.75 (IQR 8.13)] had significantly longer consults than males [10.87 (IQR 7.57); P < 0.001]. Clinics based in State C and State F had significantly shorter consults when compared with all other included states and territories (P < 0.001) and shorter consult duration was associated with visits on Sundays [median 8.18 (IQR 5.04)].Conclusion: There is evidence for the association of demographic and temporal factors with the duration of consultations for URTIs where an antibiotic has been prescribed. These factors warrant further research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Since 1991, the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners' (RACGP) Standards for General Practices (the Standards) have provided a framework for quality care, risk management and best practice in the operation of Australian general practices. The Standards are also linked to incentives for general practice remuneration. These Standards were revised in 2017.Objective: The objective of this study is to describe the process undertaken to develop the fifth edition Standards published in 2017 to inform future standards development both nationally and internationally.Method: A modified Delphi process was deployed to develop the fifth edition Standards. Development was directed by the RACGP and led by an expert panel of GPs and representatives of stakeholder groups who were assisted and facilitated by a team from RACGP. Each draft was released for stakeholder feedback and tested twice before the final version was submitted for approval by the RACGP board.Results: Four rounds of consultation and two rounds of piloting were carried out over 32 months. The Standards were redrafted after each round. One hundred and fifty-two individuals and 225 stakeholder groups participated in the development of the Standards. Twenty-three new indicators were recommended and grouped into three sections in a new modular structure that was different from the previous edition.Conclusion: The Standards represent the consensus view of national stakeholders on the indicators of quality and safety in Australian general practice and primary care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]