Search

ObjectiveThe objective of this study is to devise an indicator system to assess the quality of nursing care in the context of interventional therapy for intracranial aneurysms (IA) in China. This will furnish a standardized and quantitative framework for the monitoring and assessment of nursing quality within the IA interventional therapeutic field.MethodsThe indicators and their associated weights within the evaluation system for nursing quality in interventional therapy for IA were determined based on the theoretical framework of the three-dimensional quality model, specifically the “structure-process-outcome” paradigm. This was achieved by using several methodological approaches, such as literature analysis, semi-structured interviews, expert consultations, the Delphi method, and the analytic hierarchy process.ResultsExpert consultations were conducted over two rounds, with questionnaires distributed via email and WeChat. Both rounds yielded a questionnaire return rate of 100%. Across these consultations, pertinent statistical measures were obtained, such as the expert authority coefficient (Cr), the coefficient of variation (CV), and Kendall’s harmony coefficient, which exhibited values of 0.886 and 0.952, 0–0.193 and 0–0.185, and 0.138 and 0.149, respectively. These findings indicated statistically significant differences (p

Piles were regarded as elastic materials in the traditional numerical simulation. The elastic pile would not reflect the damage of the pile in engineering, which would misjudge the reinforcement effect of piles on slopes. The specific objective of this study was to propose a damage constitutive model to replace the traditional elastic constitutive model in the numerical analysis of pile–slope stability. In this study, the pile was simulated by a damage constitutive model, which can reflect the plastic deformation of the pile. The factors of pile position and reinforcement ratio on a slope’s factor of safety (FOS) are investigated by the finite difference method using FLAC3D. The lateral displacement, bending moment, shear force, and soil pressure of balance-reinforced piles are used to study the difference between damage and elastic constitutive models. The results showed that the FOS considering the damage constitutive model could be smaller, approximately 15% less than that considering an elastic constitutive model under specific conditions. Furthermore, the difference between the two evaluation results of the internal force of the same pile can reach about 30%. It was observed that the elastic constitutive model would overestimate the reinforcement effect of the pile on the slope, which will cause potential safety hazards in engineering. This study provides a realistic damage constitutive model for the design and evaluation of slope-stabilizing piles.